7d07192ddeaad28a26e3c4a54757a4f27f2a08ff Add src/qt/android/.gitignore (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes `git` ignore files created by `make apk`.
ACKs for top commit:
icota:
ACK 7d07192dde
Tree-SHA512: 4be20bd84830217a10d8ea7634799e71ed50be73f4f60c91c56311a2c95b22ff1f28d3b7bc077f1417318bb75e446e3fc3bdbf9dbc037b4cbc8428f0875f2c77
7e2a9890e50969cdfdd08d735fa8f3c611a663a7 depends: latest config.sub (2021-04-30) (fanquake)
f16d4cd8c5412890ee0b73f4ef142b59d130e5d5 depends: latest config.guess (2021-05-24) (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is split out of #21851. Updating these files should be mechanical, and shouldn't have to wait for that PR. Also, having support in depends for the new `arm-apple-darwin` target (added in [2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80](https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/config.git/commit/?id=2593751ef276497e312d7c4ce7fd049614c7bf80)) is useful when debugging. i.e #22070.
If you try and compile depends for a `arm-apple-darwin` target using master, on a x86_64 darwin machine, currently you'll get:
```bash
gmake -C depends -j9 HOST=arm64-apple-darwin
Invalid configuration `arm64-apple-darwin': machine `arm64-apple' not recognized
shasum: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
<omitted>
Makefile:111: hosts/.mk: No such file or directory
gmake: *** No rule to make target 'hosts/.mk'. Stop.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7e2a9890e50969cdfdd08d735fa8f3c611a663a7
Tree-SHA512: 8ed99b5d486c6cbca8929a752460338b6ee17f6bf93013c76589605678853c3a01ebd631b4d3f5d6aaeb6e5c21b7bbe39afc4454d3a697fafb27678f6d2c021e
13650fe2e527bf0cf5d977bf5f3f1563b853ecdc [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b44f99f4bce54077788d0ad4d81f7cd [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7ee23ef6e0ec82c5d5b9dfa9cadd5bed [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f20378e86c5289ebd20dd394a5915123 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709ff3d52b8e9918e09cacb64f83ae379 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f17c8b98632b7796ffa8f8788b5a83c [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916cc036488783bb4bdcfdd3665aecf711 [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96c01e200d0086b2f011f4a614f5a705 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941db439c5b3e529f08b6ab153ff061fc5 [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded62828a9820398165c41670f4dbb523d [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5e7bef5305a668d15031351c0548b4d [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc52b0ffdf2c47aad95ba9d195f6a45e [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f5987eadd8559981a973c045c471b3ad8 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df07c45562b7210e0e15c3fd5edb2c11 [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e527bf0cf5d977bf5f3f1563b853ecdc
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e527bf0cf5d977bf5f3f1563b853ecdc
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
167fb1fc72e309587a8ef1d7844cb51a5483f54f Update Windows code signing certificate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Updates the Windows code signing certificate to a new one issued by Digicert. This certificate has been issued to Bitcoin Core Code Signing LLC registered in Delaware, US. Note that this is different from the previous Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association registered in Zurich, Switzerland as it was unable to meet the validation requirements in time.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 167fb1f
laanwj:
ACK 167fb1fc72e309587a8ef1d7844cb51a5483f54f
Tree-SHA512: 8d5308c710ef94330417955b9bc82c5894d282798cebece82b84b425e3354e566aa6a68693ec359391ea40ddd7e2032d35ce28d104683d75ec3010ddf00be209
Pass in chainman instead of prev_block so that we can enforce the
block.hashPrevBlock refers to prev_block invariant in the function
itself.
We should probably rethink BlockAssembler's API and somehow include
commitment regeneration functionality in there. Something like a variant
of CreateNewBlock that takes in a std::vector<TxRef> and return a CBlock
instead of CBlockTemplate. That could avoid reaching for
LookupBlockIndex at all.
This is not the cleanest change but:
1. It fixes the erroneous use of RPC's Ensure*() in rest.cpp, which
cause crashes in REST contexts.
RPC code wraps all calls in a try/except, REST code does not.
Ensure*(), being part of RPC, expects that its throw's will get
caught by a try/except. But if you use Ensure*() in REST code, since
it doesn't have a try/except wrap, a crash will happen.
2. It is consistent with other functions like GetMemPool.
Someone can probably make this a bit prettier.
8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab move-only: Group and re-order CAddrMan members by access type (Hennadii Stepanov)
5cd7f8abe3996d303774b6cddeb419337d605d02 refactor: Do not expose CAddrMan members as protected without need (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is split from #19238 as all of its commits are trivial to review.
The last commit is easy to review with `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`.
Addressed the following comments from #19238:
- 130b82ff35 (r550865131)
> Can you consolidate all the private members and protected members to be next to each other? Multiple private and protected access specifiers make this harder to read than is necessary.
- 130b82ff35 (r557271783)
> Yeah, class declaration is easier to read if there is just one instance of `public:`, `protected:` and `private:` (in that order).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
jarolrod:
ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
vasild:
ACK 8caf60dbbe16afa3c52574a7f6710d74c0bfd4ab
Tree-SHA512: e6127fc658da7876e36f22e2fae162dc19502ed7f8e931fdebc827dabd627e5346c6fbe6f6d0cd27fd3e5c96690ff35022ff6b48f2747b748ebd66a45c851c2b
df4c81fda490e556775f6006f3d4f7d54f61073b English translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
bfb53ddda9a31bbeb8697e65ff9987e61dac136f scripted-diff: Fix ellipsis after pr20773 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Update for Transifex.
After changing translator comments in #332 this update will show if Transifex triggers strings to be re-translated.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK df4c81fda490e556775f6006f3d4f7d54f61073b
jarolrod:
ACK df4c81fda490e556775f6006f3d4f7d54f61073b
Tree-SHA512: 1e54812bc04db6ae39e0b4d735b220ed8730a9941b17a0a2d09e21bcdd08e829adba86c35cf43c9be5e492ccb13e53a90149fcd7d6c0f5fdd022b978a1ff785c
cb7eba2a570e7830d53a21b7d534087c00b4cbd7 build: Use Qt archive of the same version as the compiled binaries (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes broken Android APK build when the `depends/sources` directory contains Qt source archives of different versions (e.g., Qt version update [pull request](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22054) in CI with the cached `depends/sources` directory).
This is an alternative to #22058.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK cb7eba2a570e7830d53a21b7d534087c00b4cbd7
laanwj:
Code review ACK cb7eba2a570e7830d53a21b7d534087c00b4cbd7
Tree-SHA512: cf63a9809fba5cb13719d7e7bb5afc718a2cff5233b0670d30d30a0018d91278fcfc2a1b9ae8b84e8e3a52c95157bc465603cc754bb8a9d1a3d62415f01ad70f
8b7713365134022475e7e5d24d3ca73149bd10e1 qt: Replace disambiguation strings with translator comments (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694 is merged, translator comments is the right way to pass context to translators.
This PR fixes changes were made:
- in #220 before https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694
- in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21694 on testing purpose
- in #125Closes#288.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 8b7713365134022475e7e5d24d3ca73149bd10e1
Tree-SHA512: 466ade35f4969a41fbf3196780b1ae9fa810bab5d2f09077f8631604636cc63b24a901c719f6b5797366d2aa307993d0aa419ce35200c8d0a741a3d81cad3e6b
6fe05168587ee818e6ae4483a5984a5893131e44 contrib: add torv3 seed nodes for testnet, drop v2 ones (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Replace the ancient (2015) Tor V2 hardcoded seeds with new Tor V3 ones. This needs to be done before 0.22 to make sure onion-only testnet nodes can still connect to the network. Continues #21560.
Ways to test:
- Re-generate ` src/chainparamsseeds.h` with `cd contrib/seeds && python3 generate-seeds.py . > ../../src/chainparamsseeds.h`, check if git tree stays the same.
- Create a new testnet node with `bitcoind -testnet -onlynet=onion -proxy=127.0.0.1:9050` (or delete `~/.bitcoin/testnet3/peers.dat`), check if it is able to connect to the network and get blocks.
- Check if the addresses are connectable for ex.:
```python3
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import subprocess
with open('contrib/seeds/nodes_test.txt') as f:
for line in (line for line in (line.rstrip().split('#', 1)[0] for line in f) if line):
subprocess.call(["nc", "-v", "-x", "127.0.0.1:9050", "-z"] + line.split(':'))
```
Thanks to jonatack for providing the list.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 6fe05168587ee818e6ae4483a5984a5893131e44
Tree-SHA512: 61bfdb44dfab9d02b75e5cb06c089a3b1a1fe7134875e1d09166c4116e961d809aa25422fe03f068876e9423b571ecc4a0c7a7eeacba4aac3b2768717f3ee6d6
