70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4 psbt: Avoid unsigned int overflow in PSBT_IN_TAP_BIP32_DERIVATION (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25749
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4
darosior:
re-utACK 70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4
jonatack:
Review ACK 70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4, this should avoid the issue reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25749
Tree-SHA512: 6bb58e1cda9a5baa50fcd24f818b5b27ed94f0d33da3f71f6e457618176611bf2a84e1864e9a48d9303c301252bc4c1dee8b19a67dd713e849fb9442851ca341
b4a5ab96b42957a0e2110525b9e2e450deda09c1 test: refactor: deduplicate `DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT` constants (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0fda1c7df6165a60f63ced139ed10169f5df55f8 scripted-diff: test: rename `MAX_{ANCESTORS,DESCENDANTS}` to `DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR renames the default in-mempool max ancestors/descendants constants `MAX_ANCESTORS`/`MAX_DESCENDANTS` in the functional tests to match the ones in the codebase:
c012875b9d/src/policy/policy.h (L58-L59)c012875b9d/src/policy/policy.h (L62-L63)
The custom limit constants `MAX_ANCESTORS_CUSTOM`/`MAX_DESCENDANTS_CUSTOM` are also renamed accordingly to better fit to this naming style. In the second commit, the default constants are deduplicated by moving them into the `messages.py` module. (Not sure if this module is really appropriate, as it doesn't have a connection to messages. If someone has a good suggestion, would be glad to hear it.)
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK b4a5ab96b4
glozow:
utACK b4a5ab96b42957a0e2110525b9e2e450deda09c1
fanquake:
ACK b4a5ab96b42957a0e2110525b9e2e450deda09c1
Tree-SHA512: a15c8256170afce3e383fceddcb562f588a02be97ce4202c84a2ebf22d73ab843f5e5a7d7c98e9ea044d8bcb7a4aeae0081d0e84c53e8fc0edffbcca00460139
4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c doc: test: suggest multi-line imports in functional test style guide (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As long as I remember contributing to functional tests (~2-3 years), it was always kind of an unwritten rule that multi-line imports are preferred over single-line imports in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts -- at least if more than one symbol from a module is imported. This PR adds this rule to the style guide and adapts the example test accordingly. (Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25792#discussion_r941180819).
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
ACK 4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c
1440000bytes:
ACK 4edc689382
w0xlt:
ACK 4edc689382
fanquake:
ACK 4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c
Tree-SHA512: c7b6ff62f601f4e57cc8334d291662987d6737ebca8d81c063280409f4412302172f1404ec16afc9a13007bcdba55bdab66b9b80363287e287888929cb386584
0532aa7444e7b40027b9b67876077f2a042ae329 test: don't rely on usdt block_conn event order (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Relying on block_connected event order in the USDT interface tests turned out to be brittle.
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25793
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25764
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 40b5012ac80a8eac9d2f374cd39304488009c29adb474dc5e8c03b96c354be358298d2ddee8de480afecc187e1bf42ee119b7aa6216b086a8bf77b7e1310213c
155344960b16d4b27dec3197dc273b03e6aed57d test: negative/unknown `rpcserialversion` should throw an init error (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following init errors:
41205bf442/src/init.cpp (L1025-L1030)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4456949e9a13908a5a59b13ed57bc3002b7ffd626e8dfb0346aa2600937ba1ef1b69cbae45cdb6bbc1c019dbcd64844e736a2ddd671a4704e53804355b6ea9f9
544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb Add wallet tests for spending rawtr() (Pieter Wuille)
e1e3081200a71b6c9b0dcf236bc2a37ed1aa7552 If P2TR tweaked key is available, sign with it (Pieter Wuille)
8d9670ccb756592bddb2a269bf5078d62658537b Add rawtr() descriptor for P2TR with unknown tweak (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It may be useful to be able to represent P2TR outputs in descriptors whose script tree and/or internal key aren't known. This PR does that, by adding a `rawtr(KEY)` descriptor, where the KEY represents the output key directly. If the private key corresponding to that output key is known, it also permits signing with it.
I'm not convinced this is desirable, but presumably "tr(KEY)" sounds more intended for direct use than "rawtr(KEY)".
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb
sanket1729:
code review ACK 544b4332f0e122167bdb94dc963405422faa30cb
w0xlt:
reACK 544b4332f0
Tree-SHA512: 0de08de517468bc22ab0c00db471ce33144f5dc211ebc2974c6ea95709f44e830532ec5cdb0128c572513d352120bd651c4559516d4500b5b0a3d257c4b45aca
68006c10abbfec0f16b90efa69b7880a5e17f186 test: check that `verifymessage` RPC fails for non-P2PKH addresses (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `verifymessage` RPC, for the case that a non-P2PKH (but otherwise valid) address is passed:
e09ad284c7/src/util/message.cpp (L38-L40)e09ad284c7/src/rpc/signmessage.cpp (L48-L49)
The passed addresses to trigger the error are of the types nested segwit (P2SH-P2WPKH) and native segwit (P2WPKH) and are created with a helper function `addresses_from_privkey` using descriptors and the `deriveaddresses` RPC. At some point in the future, if we have BIP322 support, all those will likely succeed and can then be moved from error-throwing to the succedding assert loop.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 68006c10abbfec0f16b90efa69b7880a5e17f186
w0xlt:
ACK 68006c10ab
Tree-SHA512: fec4ed97460787c2ef3d04e3fce89c9365c87207c8358b59c41890f3738355c002e64f289ab4aef794ef4dfd5c867be8b67d736fb620489204f2c6bfb8d3363c
db10cf8ae36693cb4d3ed1b47b84709cf9c0d849 rpc/wallet: add simulaterawtransaction RPC (Karl-Johan Alm)
701a64f548662e01821765b2934b6e4b321fda6d test: add support for Decimal to assert_approx (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
(note: this was originally titled "add analyzerawtransaction RPC")
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
I originally proposed this to Elements (https://github.com/ElementsProject/elements/pull/1016) and it was suggested that I propose this upstream.
There is an alternative #22776 to instead add this info to `getbalances` when providing an optional transaction as argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK db10cf8ae36693cb4d3ed1b47b84709cf9c0d849
achow101:
re-ACK db10cf8ae36693cb4d3ed1b47b84709cf9c0d849
Tree-SHA512: adf222ec7dcdc068d007ae6f465dbc35b692dc7bb2db337be25340ad0c2f9c64cfab4124df23400995c700f41c83c29a2c34812121782c26063b100c7969b89d
This command iterates over the inputs and outputs of the given transactions, and tallies up the balance change for the given wallet. This can be useful e.g. when verifying that a coin join like transaction doesn't contain unexpected inputs that the wallet will then sign for unintentionally.
f2f6068b69b1b532db92b276f024c89b56f38294 test: MiniWallet: add `send_self_transfer_chain` to create chain of txns (Andreas Kouloumos)
1d6b438ef0ccd05e1522ac38b44f847c1d93e72f test: use MiniWallet to simplify mempool_package_limits.py tests (Andreas Kouloumos)
Pull request description:
While `wallet.py` includes the MiniWallet class and some helper methods, it also includes some methods that have been moved there without having any direct relation with the MiniWallet class. Specifically `make_chain`, `create_child_with_parents` and `create_raw_chain` methods that were extracted from `rpc_packages.py` at f8253d69d6f02850995a11eeb71fedc22e6f6575 in order to be used on both `mempool_package_limits.py` and `rpc_packages.py`.
Since that change, due to the introduction of additional methods in MiniWallet, the functionality of those methods can now be replicated with the existing MiniWallet methods and simultaneously simplify those tests by using the MiniWallet.
This PR's goals are
- to simplify the `mempool_package_limits.py` functional tests with usage of the MiniWallet.
- to make progress towards the removal of the `make_chain`, `create_child_with_parents` and `create_raw_chain` methods of `wallet.py`.
For the purpose of the aforementioned goals, a helper method `MiniWallet.send_self_transfer_chain` is introduced and method `bulk_transaction` has been integrated in `create_self_transfer*` methods using an optional `target_weight` option.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK f2f6068b69b1b532db92b276f024c89b56f38294 👜
Tree-SHA512: 3ddfa0046168cbf7904ec6b1ca233b3fdd4f30db6aefae108b6d7fb69f34ef6fb2cf4fa7cef9473ce1434a0cc8149d236441a685352fef35359a2b7ba0d951eb
Moved `bulk_transaction` into MiniWallet class as `_bulk_tx` private
helper method to be used when the newly added `target_weight` option is
passed to `create_self_transfer*`
395767e9f15b7a1b5203da68f1fbe3df281ae906 Add test case mimicking issue 24765 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a functional test for the concern brought up in #24765. It turned out to be a non-issue, but since I wrote it anyway, it can't hurt to add it.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: fc8d57129d8c68f6d9a41b94b5ff676c87b31f53bc958195d4fe312530ec3e038ebd0bc5e8b9d56be77b7b63fd94574685901901404a4ab8726a5e09d89e86c8
cc7335edc87c6ef34429b4df94f53973db520aac ci: run USDT interface test in a VM (0xb10c)
dba6f8234217565957e37516a0ea655f1180d99c test: adopt USDT utxocache interface tests (0xb10c)
220a5a2841172a07d6d7849596316f0e0933e272 test: hook into PID in tracing tests (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
Changes a CI task that runs test the previously not run `test/functional/interface_usdt_*.py` functional tests (added in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24358).
This task is run as CirussCI `compute_engine_instance` VM as hooking into the tracepoints is not possible in CirrusCI docker containers (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23296#issuecomment-1024920845). We use an unoffical PPA and untrusted `bpfcc-tools` package in the CI as the Ubuntu jammy and Debian bullseye packages are outdated. We hope use an official package when new Ubuntu/Debian releases are available for the use with Google Compute Engine.
We make sure to hook into `bitcoind` binaries in USDT interface tests via their PID, instead of their path. This makes sure multiple functional tests running in parallel don't interfere with each other.
The utxocache USDT interface tests is adopted to a change of the functional test framework that wasn't detected as the tests weren't run in the CI. As the tracepoints expose internals, it can happen that we need to adopt the interface test when internals change. This is a bit awkward, and if it happens to frequently, we should consider generalizing the tests a bit more. For now it's fine, I think.
See the individual commit messages for more details on the changes.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24782
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23296
I'd like to hear from reviewers:
- Are we OK with using the [`hadret/bpfcc`](https://launchpad.net/~hadret/+archive/ubuntu/bpfcc) PPA for now? There is a clear plan when to drop it and as is currently, it could only impact the newly added VM task.
- ~~Adding a new task increases CI runtime and costs. Should an existing `container` CI task be ported to a VM and reused instead?~~ Yes, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25528#issuecomment-1179509525
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK cc7335edc87c6ef34429b4df94f53973db520aac
Tree-SHA512: b7fddccc0a77d82371229d048abe0bf2c4ccaa45906497ef3040cf99e7f05561890aef4c253c40e4afc96bb838c9787fae81c8454c6fd9db583276e005a4ccb3
ab3c06db1aed979847158505f3df1dcea9fd6c2b doc: Release notes for default RBF (Andrew Chow)
61d9149e7804e2cec8fecf4150837344322eb301 rpc: Default rbf enabled (Andrew Chow)
e3c33637bac7db8ae56ab497df10911fad773981 wallet: Enable -walletrbf by default (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The GUI currently opts in to RBF by default, but RPCs do not, and `-walletrbf` is default disabled. This PR makes the default in those two places to also opt in.
The last time this was proposed (#9527), the primary objections were the novelty at the time, the inability to bump transactions, and the gui not having the option to disable rbf. In the 5 years since, RBF usage has steadily grown, with ~27% of txs opting in. The GUI has the option to enable/disable RBF, and is also defaulted to having it enabled. And we have the ability to bump RBF'd transactions in both the RPC and the GUI. So I think it makes sense to finally change the default to always opt in to RBF.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
reACK ab3c06db1aed979847158505f3df1dcea9fd6c2b
aureleoules:
ACK ab3c06db1aed979847158505f3df1dcea9fd6c2b.
glozow:
utACK ab3c06db1a
Tree-SHA512: 81b012c5033e270f86a87a6a196ccc549eb54b158eebf88e917cc6621d40d7bdcd1566b602688907dd5d364b95a557b29f97dce869cea512e339588262c027b6
71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4 test: add unit test for AvailableCoins (josibake)
da03cb41a4ce15ebceee7fa4a4fdd2d3602fe284 test: functional test for new coin selection logic (josibake)
438e04845bf3302b7f459a50e88a1b772527f1e6 wallet: run coin selection by `OutputType` (josibake)
77b07072061c59f50c69be29fbcddf0d433e1077 refactor: use CoinsResult struct in SelectCoins (josibake)
2e67291ca3ab2d8f498fa910738ca655fde11c5e refactor: store by OutputType in CoinsResult (josibake)
Pull request description:
# Concept
Following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23789, Bitcoin Core wallet will now generate a change address that matches the payment address type. This improves privacy by not revealing which of the outputs is the change at the time of the transaction in scenarios where the input address types differ from the payment address type. However, information about the change can be leaked in a later transaction. This proposal attempts to address that concern.
## Leaking information in a later transaction
Consider the following scenario:
1. Alice has a wallet with bech32 type UTXOs and pays Bob, who gives her a P2SH address
2. Alice's wallet generates a P2SH change output, preserving her privacy in `txid: a`
3. Alice then pays Carol, who gives her a bech32 address
4. Alice's wallet combines the P2SH UTXO with a bech32 UTXO and `txid: b` has two bech32 outputs
From a chain analysis perspective, it is reasonable to infer that the P2SH input in `txid: b` was the change from `txid: a`. To avoid leaking information in this scenario, Alice's wallet should avoid picking the P2SH output and instead fund the transaction with only bech32 Outputs. If the payment to Carol can be funded with just the P2SH output, it should be preferred over the bech32 outputs as this will convert the P2SH UTXO to bech32 UTXOs via the payment and change outputs of the new transaction.
**TLDR;** Avoid mixing output types, spend non-default `OutputTypes` when it is economical to do so.
# Approach
`AvailableCoins` now populates a struct, which makes it easier to access coins by `OutputType`. Coin selection tries to find a funding solution by each output type and chooses the most economical by waste metric. If a solution can't be found without mixing, coin selection runs over the entire wallet, allowing mixing, which is the same as the current behavior.
I've also added a functional test (`test/functional/wallet_avoid_mixing_output_types.py`) and unit test (`src/wallet/test/availablecoins_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4
aureleoules:
ACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4.
Xekyo:
reACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4 via `git range-diff master 6530d19 71d1d13`
LarryRuane:
ACK 71d1d13627ccd27319f347e2d8167c8fe8a433f4
Tree-SHA512: 2e0716efdae5adf5479446fabc731ae81d595131d3b8bade98b64ba323d0e0c6d964a67f8c14c89c428998bda47993fa924f3cfca1529e2bd49eaa4e31b7e426
4e616d20c9e92b5118a07d4a4b8562fffc66e767 test: check that combining PSBTs with different txs fails (Sebastian Falbesoner)
2a428c79897761579efc990aaf810b0eb3e572b6 test: support passing PSBTMaps directly to PSBT ctor (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `combinepsbt` RPC, in the case of combining two PSBTs with different transactions:
b8067cd435/src/psbt.cpp (L24-L27)
The calling function `CombinePSBTs` checks for the false return value and then returns the transaction error string `PSBT_MISMATCH`:
b8067cd435/src/psbt.cpp (L433-L435)b8067cd435/src/util/error.cpp (L30-L31)
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 4e616d20c9
achow101:
ACK 4e616d20c9e92b5118a07d4a4b8562fffc66e767
Tree-SHA512: 45b2b224b13b44ad69ae62e4bc20f74cab32770cf8127b026ec47a7520f7253148fdbf1fad612afece59e45a6738bef9a351ae87ea98dc83d095cc78f6db0318
71a751f6c3e8912e1b1cfe388e593309d210e576 test: add test for decoding PSBT with per-input preimage types (Sebastian Falbesoner)
faf43378e223c563b0741c28a4b5406f471c1332 refactor: move helper `random_bytes` to util library (Sebastian Falbesoner)
fdc1ca389646a55c4d9cb2a79feaa69f90b18c67 test: add constants for PSBT key types (BIP 174) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
1b035c03f9fbbdf7a13663a35d75fb2428f44743 refactor: move PSBT(Map) helpers from signet miner to test framework (Sebastian Falbesoner)
7c0dfec2dd9998932d13dd183c3ce4b22bd5851b refactor: move `from_binary` helper from signet miner to test framework (Sebastian Falbesoner)
597a4b35f6e11d0ec5181e0d4d2d8f9bbf59898a scripted-diff: rename `FromBinary` helper to `from_binary` (signet miner) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the `decodepsbt` RPC in the case that a PSBT with on of the per-input preimage types (`PSBT_IN_RIPEMD160`, `PSBT_IN_SHA256`, `PSBT_IN_HASH160`, `PSBT_IN_HASH256`; see [BIP 174](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki#Specification)) is passed. As preparation, the first four commits move the already existing helpers for (de)serialization of PSBTs and PSBTMaps from the signet miner to the test framework (in a new module `psbt.py`), which should be quite useful for further tests to easily create PSBTs.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 71a751f6c3e8912e1b1cfe388e593309d210e576
Tree-SHA512: 04f2671612d94029da2ac8dc15ff93c4c8fcb73fe0b8cf5970509208564df1f5e32319b53ae998dd6e544d37637a9b75609f27a3685da51f603f6ed0555635fb
facc2fa7b8a218a0df6a19772e1641ea68dda2e3 Use AutoFile where possible (MacroFake)
6666803c897e4ad27b45cb74e3a9aa74a335f1bf streams: Add AutoFile without ser-type and ser-version (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This was done in the context of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25284 , but I think it also makes sense standalone.
The basic idea is that serialization type should not be initialized when it is not needed. Same for the serialization version.
So do this here for `AutoFile`. `CAutoFile` remains in places where it is not yet possible.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK facc2fa7b8a218a0df6a19772e1641ea68dda2e3
fanquake:
ACK facc2fa7b8a218a0df6a19772e1641ea68dda2e3
Tree-SHA512: d82d024d55af57565ac53d9d1517afafc12b46964effba0332de62a6c77869356fa77f89e6d4834438fff44c45b64fccdf5a1358bfea03e28dfe55013b3c099d
Create a wallet with mixed OutputTypes and send a volley of payments,
ensuring that there are no mixed OutputTypes in the txs. Finally,
verify that OutputTypes are mixed only when necessary.
fae5ce8795080018875227aee8613677f92e99ce univalue: Return more detailed type check error messages (MacroFake)
fafab147e7ff41ab1b961349f20a364f6bf847d2 move-only: Move UniValue::getInt definition to keep class with definitions only (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Print the current type and the expected type
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fae5ce8795080018875227aee8613677f92e99ce.
Tree-SHA512: 4ae720a012ff8245baf5cd7f844f93b946c58feebe62de6dfd84ebc5c8afb988295a94de7c01aef98aaf4c6228f7184ed622f37079c738924617e0f336ac5b6e
d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d wallet: Precompute Txdata after setting PSBT inputs' UTXOs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
If we are given a PSBT that is missing one or more input UTXOs, our
PrecomputedTransactionData will be incorrect and missing information
that it should otherwise have, and therefore we may not produce a
signature when we should. To avoid this problem, we can do the
precomputation after we have set the UTXOs the wallet is able to set for
the PSBT.
Also adds a test for this behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK d2ed97656b
Sjors:
ACK d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d
aureleoules:
ACK d2ed97656bba050051cfc677f1fa7eb3fc633f7d.
Tree-SHA512: 71beb6c7946096e82cfca83f36277302aa9e69d27b4f6d73d7d8f2f9f0ea1c0d653e846fa6aebee5e4763f56f950b4481240e953f6a2412caa84908d519171e1
1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106 test, wallet: Add mempool rescan test for import RPCs (Fabian Jahr)
833ce76df712932c19e99737e87b5569e2bca34b rpc, wallet: Document mempool rescan after importdescriptor, importwallet (Fabian Jahr)
0e396d1ba701c9ac6280a98bf37f53352167e724 rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importmulti (Fabian Jahr)
e6d3ef85867545a5a66a211e35e818e8a1b166fa rpc, wallet: Document mempool scan after importpubkey (Fabian Jahr)
6d3db52e667474b6c0c2e4eeb9fb5b3ba4063205 rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importprivkey (João Barbosa)
3abdbbb90a4a8f2041fec37506268e66a0b3eb31 rpc, wallet: Document and test mempool scan after importaddress (João Barbosa)
236239bd40ae1175537fc932df5af27902326329 wallet: Rescan mempool for transactions as well (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
This PR picks up the work from #18964 and closes#18954.
It should incorporate all the unaddressed feedback from the PR:
- Mempool rescan now expanded to all relevant import* RPCs
- Added documentation in the help of each RPC
- More tests
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106 (only a test change)
achow101:
ACK 1be796418934ae7370cb0ed501877db59e738106
w0xlt:
reACK 1be7964189
Tree-SHA512: b62fed5f97c6c242b2af417b41c9696a1f18878483d9e1c9429791f9c05257f57a00540a9a84df23c49faf6a61c3109c22972de81540083f38b506217804fcc5
cb3e9a1e3f8d72daaa361fc45dd853775e754b9d Move {Load,Dump}Mempool to kernel namespace (Carl Dong)
aa306765419f7dbea12b12e15553039835ba0e4d Move DEFAULT_PERSIST_MEMPOOL out of libbitcoinkernel (Carl Dong)
06b88ffb8ae7f2b2a93a32908cd80e77fafd270c LoadMempool: Pass in load_path, stop using gArgs (Carl Dong)
b857ac60d9a0433036519c26675378bbf56a1de1 test/fuzz: Invoke LoadMempool via CChainState (Carl Dong)
b3267258b052557fc136b9a4dcb754afb9219470 Move FopenFn to fsbridge namespace (Carl Dong)
ae1e8e37567fa603a5977d7d05105c682dd3f7db mempool: Use NodeClock+friends for LoadMempool (Carl Dong)
f9e8e5719f28d84f68f7d75e26c8e7fccac8e7d3 mempool: Improve comments for [GS]etLoadTried (Carl Dong)
813962da0b17b918941c6849996845e35d84a451 scripted-diff: Rename m_is_loaded -> m_load_tried (Carl Dong)
413f4bb52b72e082ad8716664ede48352b8e7e5a DumpMempool: Pass in dump_path, stop using gArgs (Carl Dong)
bd4407817e523e3c5b347bc6be25ed007cb27034 DumpMempool: Use std::chrono instead of weird int64_t arthmetics (Carl Dong)
c84390b741ab7b61c9f702d8b447c8cadc1257c8 test/mempool_persist: Test manual savemempool when -persistmempool=0 (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project: #24303, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18
-----
This PR moves `{Dump,Load}Mempool` into its own `kernel/mempool_persist` module and introduces `ArgsManager` `node::` helpers in `node/mempool_persist_args`to remove the scattered calls to `GetBoolArg("-persistmempool", DEFAULT_PERSIST_MEMPOOL)`.
More context can be gleaned from the commit messages.
-----
One thing I was reflecting on as I wrote this was that in the long run, I think we should probably invert the validation <-> mempool relationship. Instead of mempool not depending on validation, it might make more sense to have validation not depend on mempool. Not super urgent since `libbitcoinkernel` will include both validation and mempool, but perhaps something for the future.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
re ACK cb3e9a1e3f8d72daaa361fc45dd853775e754b9d via `git range-diff 7ae032e...cb3e9a1`
MarcoFalke:
ACK cb3e9a1e3f 🔒
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK cb3e9a1e3f8d72daaa361fc45dd853775e754b9d
Tree-SHA512: 979d7237c3abb5a1dd9b5ad3dbf3b954f906a6d8320ed7b923557f41a4472deccae3e8a6bca0018c8e7a3c4a93afecc502acd1e26756f2054f157f1c0edd939d
ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04 qa: functional test Miniscript watchonly support (Antoine Poinsot)
bfb036756ad6e187fd6d3abfefe5804bb54a5c71 Miniscript support in output descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
4a082887bee76a96deada5dbd7f991c23b301c54 qa: better error reporting on descriptor parsing error (Antoine Poinsot)
d25d58bf5f301d3bb8683bd67c8847a4957d8e97 miniscript: add a helper to find the first insane sub with no child (Antoine Poinsot)
c38c7c5817b7e73cf0f788855c4aba59c287b0ad miniscript: don't check for top level validity at parsing time (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This adds Miniscript support for Output Descriptors without any signing logic (yet). See the OP of #24147 for a description of Miniscript and a rationale of having it in Bitcoin Core.
On its own, this PR adds "watchonly" support for Miniscript descriptors in the descriptor wallet. A follow-up adds signing support.
A minified corpus of Miniscript Descriptors for the `descriptor_parse` fuzz target is available at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets/pull/92.
The Miniscript descriptors used in the unit tests here and in #24149 were cross-tested against the Rust implementation at https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-miniscript.
This PR contains code and insights from Pieter Wuille.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04
achow101:
ACK ffc79b8e492c6dd1352e528fd82e45d8d25eaa04
w0xlt:
reACK ffc79b8e49
Tree-SHA512: 02d919d38bb626d3c557eca3680ce71117739fa161b7a92cfdb6c9c432ed88870b1ed127ba24248574c40c7428217d7e9bdd986fd8cd7c51fae8c776e1271fb9
613e2211493ae2c78b71d1f4ea62661438d2cb73 test: remove unnecessary parens (Suhas Daftuar)
e939cf2b7645c2b20a68cb6129f3aebfdf287d61 Remove atomic for m_last_getheaders_timestamp (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Eliminate the unnecessary atomic guarding `m_last_getheaders_timestamp`, which is only accessed in a single thread (thanks to MarcoFalke for pointing this out).
Also address a nit that came up in #25454.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 613e2211493ae2c78b71d1f4ea62661438d2cb73
vasild:
ACK 613e2211493ae2c78b71d1f4ea62661438d2cb73
Tree-SHA512: 6d6c473735b450b8ad43aae5cf16ed419154d72f4a05c0a6ce6f26caecab9db2361041398b70bf9395611c107d50897f501fa5fdbabb2891144bbc2b479dfdad
