Historically, the headers have been bumped some time after a file has
been touched. Do it now to avoid having to touch them again in the
future for that reason.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i --regexp-extended 's;( 20[0-2][0-9])(-20[0-2][0-9])? The Bitcoin Core developers;\1-present The Bitcoin Core developers;g' $( git show --pretty="" --name-only HEAD~0 )
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This can be reproduced according to the developer notes with something
like
( cd ./src/ && ../contrib/devtools/run-clang-tidy.py -p ../bld-cmake -fix -j $(nproc) )
Also, the header related changes were done manually.
fab1e02086 refactor: Pass verification_progress into block tip notifications (MarcoFalke)
fa76b378e4 rpc: Round verificationprogress to exactly 1 for a recent tip (MarcoFalke)
faf6304bdf test: Use mockable time in GuessVerificationProgress (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Some users really seem to care about this. While it shouldn't matter much, the diff is so trivial that it is probably worth doing.
Fixes#31127
One could also consider to split the field into two dedicated ones (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28847#issuecomment-1807115357), but this is left for a more involved follow-up and may also be controversial.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fab1e02086
pinheadmz:
ACK fab1e02086
sipa:
utACK fab1e02086
Tree-SHA512: a3c24e3c446d38fbad9399c1e7f1ffa7904490a3a7d12623b44e583b435cc8b5f1ba83b84d29c7ffaf22028bc909c7cec07202b825480449c6419d2a190938f5
09ee8b7f27 node: avoid recomputing block hash in `ReadBlock` (Lőrinc)
2bf173210f test: exercise `ReadBlock` hash‑mismatch path (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Eliminate one block header hash calculation per block-read by reusing the hash for:
* proof‑of‑work verification;
* (optional) integrity check against the supplied hash.
This part of the code wasn't covered by tests either, so the first commit exercises this part first, before pushing the validation to the delegate method.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 09ee8b7f27
achow101:
ACK 09ee8b7f27
jonatack:
ACK 09ee8b7f27
pinheadmz:
ACK 09ee8b7f27
Tree-SHA512: 43fe51b478ea574b6d4c952684b13ca54fb8cbd67c3b6c136f460122d9ee953cc70b88778537117eecea71ccb8d88311faeac21b866e11d117f1145973204ed4
Eliminate one SHA‑256 double‑hash computation of the header per block read by reusing the hash for:
* proof‑of‑work verification;
* (optional) integrity check against the supplied hash.
ee045b61ef rpc, psbt: Require sighashes match for descriptorprocesspsbt (Ava Chow)
2b7682c372 psbt: use sighash type field to determine whether to remove non-witness utxos (Ava Chow)
28781b5f06 psbt: Add sighash types to PSBT when not DEFAULT or ALL (Ava Chow)
15ce1bd73f psbt: Enforce sighash type of signatures matches psbt (Ava Chow)
1f71cd337a wallet: Remove sighash type enforcement from FillPSBT (Ava Chow)
4c7d767e49 psbt: Check sighash types in SignPSBTInput and take sighash as optional (Ava Chow)
a118256948 script: Add IsPayToTaproot() (Ava Chow)
d6001dcd4a wallet: change FillPSBT to take sighash as optional (Ava Chow)
e58b680923 psbt: Return PSBTError from SignPSBTInput (Ava Chow)
2adfd81532 tests: Test PSBT sighash type mismatch (Ava Chow)
5a5d26d612 psbt: Require ECDSA signatures to be validly encoded (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, we do not add the sighash field to PSBTs at all, even when we have signed with a non-default sighash. This PR changes the behavior such that when we (attempt to) sign with a sighash other than DEFAULT or ALL, the sighash type field will be added to the PSBT to inform the later signers that a different sighash type was used by a signer. Notably, this is necessary for MuSig2 support as all signers must sign using the same sighash type, but the sighash is not provided in partial signatures.
Furthermore, because the sighash type can also be provided on the command line, we require that if both a command line sighash type and the sighash field is present, they must specify the same sighash type. However, this was being checked by the wallet, rather than the signing code, so the `descriptorprocesspsbt` RPC was not enforcing this restriction at all, and in fact ignored the sighash field entirely. This PR refactors the checking code so that the underlying PSBT signing function `SignPSBTInput` does the check.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK ee045b61ef
rkrux:
re-ACK ee045b61ef
fjahr:
Code review ACK ee045b61ef
Tree-SHA512: 4ead5be1ef6756251b827f594beba868a145d75bf7f4ef6f15ad21f0ae4b8d71b38c83494e5a6b75f37fadd097178cddd93d614b962a2c72fc134f00ba2f74ae
32-bit architecture is limited to 4GiB, so it doesn't make sense to set a too
high value. Since this setting is performance critical, pick an arbitrary value
higher than for -maxmempool but still reasonable.
32-bit architecture is limited to 4GiB, so it doesn't make sense to set a too high value. 500 MB is
chosen as an arbitrary maximum value that seems reasonable.
SignPSBTInput will need to report the specific things that caused an
error to callers, so change it to return a PSBTError. Additionally some
callers will now check the return value and report an error to the user.
Currently, this should not change any behavior as the things that
SignPBSTInput will error on are all first checked by its callers.
62fc42d475 interfaces: refactor: move `waitTipChanged` implementation to miner (ismaelsadeeq)
c39ca9d4f7 interfaces: move getTip implementation to miner (Sjors Provoost)
720f201e65 interfaces: refactor: move `waitNext` implementation to miner (ismaelsadeeq)
e6c2f4ce7a interfaces: refactor: move `submitSolution` implementation to miner (ismaelsadeeq)
02d4bc776b interfaces: remove redundant coinbase fee check in `waitNext` (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
#### Motivation
In [Internal interface guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#internal-interface-guidelines)
It's stated that
> Interface method definitions should wrap existing functionality instead of implementing new functionality. Any substantial new node or wallet functionality should be implemented in [src/node/](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/node) or [src/wallet/](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet) and just exposed in [src/interfaces/](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/interfaces) instead of being implemented there, so it can be more modular and accessible to unit tests.
However the some methods in the newly added `BlockTemplateImpl` and `MinerImpl` classes partially enforces this guideline, as the implementations of the `submitSolution`, `waitNext`, and `waitTipChanged` methods reside within the class itself.
#### What the PR Does
This PR introduces a simple refactor by moving certain method implementations from `BlockTemplateImpl` into the miner module. It introduces three new functions:
1. Remove rundundant coinbase fee check in `waitNext`
2. **`AddMerkleRootAndCoinbase`**: Computes the block's Merkle root, inserts the coinbase transaction, and sets the Merkle root in the block. This function is called by `submitSolution` before the block is submitted for processing.
3. **`WaitAndCreateNewBlock`**: Returns a new block template either when transaction fees reach a certain threshold or when a new tip is detected. If a timeout is reached, it returns `nullptr`. The `waitNext` method in `BlockTemplateImpl` now simply wraps this function.
4. Move `GetTip` implementation to miner.
5. **`WaitTipChanged`**: Returns the tip when the chain it changes, or `nullopt` if a timeout or interrupt occurs. The `waitTipChanged` method in `MinerImpl` now calls `GetTip` after invoking `ChainTipChanged`, and returns the tip.
#### Behavior Change
- We now only `Assert` for a valid chainman and notifications pointer once.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 62fc42d475
Sjors:
ACK 62fc42d475
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 62fc42d475. Lots of suggest suggest changes made since last review, altering function names and signatures and also adding new commit to drop negative fee handling. I like the idea of making the wait function return a BlockRef, that is clearer than what I suggested. Left some comments below but they are not important and this looks good as-is
Tree-SHA512: 502632f94ced81f576b2c43cf015f1527e2c259e6ca253f670f5a6889171e2246372b4e709575701afa3f01d488d6633557fef54f48fe83bbaf1836ac5326c4f
- This commit creates a function `WaitTipChanged` that waits for the connected
tip to change until timeout elapsed.
- This function is now used by `waitTipChanged`
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
- Create a new function `AddMerkleRootAndCoinbase` that compute the
block's merkle root, insert the coinbase transaction and the merkle
root into the block.
a58cb3b1c1 qa: sanity check mined block have their coinbase timelocked to height (Antoine Poinsot)
8f2078af6a miner: timelock coinbase transactions (Antoine Poinsot)
788aeebf34 qa: use prev height as nLockTime for coinbase txs created in unit tests (Antoine Poinsot)
c76dbe9b8b qa: timelock coinbase transactions created in fuzz targets (Antoine Poinsot)
9c94069d8b contrib: timelock coinbase transactions in signet miner (Antoine Poinsot)
a5f52cfcc4 qa: timelock coinbase transactions created in functional tests (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
The Consensus Cleanup soft fork proposal includes enforcing that coinbase transactions set their
nLockTime field to the block height minus 1, as well as their nSequence such as to not disable the
timelock. If such a fork were to be activated by Bitcoin users, miners need to be ready to produce
compliant blocks at the risk of losing substantial amounts mining would-be invalid blocks. As miners
are unfamously slow to upgrade, it's good to make this change as early as possible.
Although Bitcoin Core's GBT implementation does not provide the `coinbasetxn` field, and mining
pool software crafts the coinbase on its own, updating the Bitcoin Core mining code is a first step
toward convincing pools to update their (often closed source) code. A possible followup is also to
introduce new fields to GBT. In addition, this first step also makes it possible to test future
Consensus Cleanup changes.
The commit making the change also updates a bunch of seemingly-unrelated tests. This is because those tests were asserting error messages based on the txid of transactions involved, and changing the coinbase transaction structure necessarily changes the txid of all tests' transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Code review ACK a58cb3b1c1
achow101:
ACK a58cb3b1c1
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK a58cb3b1c1
Tree-SHA512: a2aae009a187eb760d34435f518a895ee76c6b02a667eb030ddf6bd584da6e8eae2737d974dbf81a928d60c07bcb4820f055adc067e18d8819640db0240bb513
No warning is currently emitted because our reverse_lock does not enforce our
thread-safety annotations. Once it is fixed, the unlock would cause a warning.
524f981bb8 Bugfix: Miner: Don't reuse block_reserved_weight for "block is full enough to give up" weight delta (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
PR #30356 incorrectly changed a constant of `4000` to `m_options.coinbase_max_additional_weight` in the check for when to give up finding another transaction to fill the block:
```diff
if (nConsecutiveFailed > MAX_CONSECUTIVE_FAILURES && nBlockWeight >
- m_options.nBlockMaxWeight - 4000) {
+ m_options.nBlockMaxWeight - m_options.block_reserved_weight) {
// Give up if we're close to full and haven't succeeded in a while
break;
}
```
But this constant did not deal with the reserved weight at all. It was in fact simply checking if the block was close to full, and if so, giving up finding another transaction to pad it with after `MAX_CONSECUTIVE_FAILURES` failed attempts.
It doesn't seem very logical to reuse the reserve weight for this purpose, and it would be overcomplicated to add yet another setting, so this PR changes it to a new constexpr.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 524f981bb8
darosior:
utACK 524f981bb8
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK 524f981bb8
Tree-SHA512: c066debc34a021380424bd21b40444071b736325e41779a41590c2c8a6822ceeaf910fe067817c1dba108210b24c574977b0350b29520502e7af79d3b405928b
PR #30356 incorrectly changed a constant of `4000` to `m_options.coinbase_max_additional_weight` in the check for when to give up finding another transaction to fill the block:
```diff
if (nConsecutiveFailed > MAX_CONSECUTIVE_FAILURES && nBlockWeight >
- m_options.nBlockMaxWeight - 4000) {
+ m_options.nBlockMaxWeight - m_options.block_reserved_weight) {
// Give up if we're close to full and haven't succeeded in a while
break;
}
```
But this constant did not deal with the reserved weight at all. It was in fact simply checking if the block was close to full, and if so, giving up finding another transaction to pad it with after `MAX_CONSECUTIVE_FAILURES` failed attempts.
It doesn't seem very logical to reuse the reserve weight for this purpose, and it would be overcomplicated to add yet another setting, so this PR changes it to a new constexpr.
The Consensus Cleanup soft fork proposal includes enforcing that coinbase transactions set their
locktime field to the block height, minus 1 (as well as their nSequence such as to not disable the
timelock). If such a fork were to be activated by Bitcoin users, miners need to be ready to produce
compliant blocks at the risk of losing substantial amounts mining would-be invalid blocks. As miners
are unfamously slow to upgrade, it's good to make this change as early as possible.
Although Bitcoin Core's GBT implementation does not provide the "coinbasetxn" field, and mining
pool software crafts the coinbase on its own, updating the Bitcoin Core mining code is a first step
toward convincing pools to update their (often closed source) code. A possible followup is also to
introduce new fields to GBT. In addition, this first step also makes it possible to test future
Consensus Cleanup changes.
The changes to the seemingly-unrelated RBF tests is because these tests assert an error message
which may vary depending on the txid of the transactions used in the test. This commit changes the
coinbase transaction structure and therefore impact the txid of transactions in all tests.
The change to the "Bad snapshot" error message in the assumeutxo functional test is because this
specific test case reads into the txid of the next transaction in the snapshot and asserts the error
message based it gets on deserializing this txid as a coin for the previous transaction. As this
commit changes this txid it impacts the deserialization error raised.
05117e6e17 rpc: clarify longpoll behavior (Sjors Provoost)
5315278e7c Have createNewBlock() wait for a tip (Sjors Provoost)
64a2795fd4 rpc: handle shutdown during long poll and wait methods (Sjors Provoost)
a3bf43343f rpc: drop unneeded IsRPCRunning() guards (Sjors Provoost)
f9cf8bd0ab Handle negative timeout for waitTipChanged() (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
This PR prevents Mining interface methods from sometimes crashing when called during startup before a tip is connected. It also makes other improvements like making more RPC methods usable from the GUI. Specifically this PR:
- Adds an `Assume` check to disallow passing negative timeout values to `Mining::waitTipChanged`
- Makes `waitfornewblock`, `waitforblock` and `waitforblockheight` RPC methods usable from the GUI when `-server=1` is not set.
- Changes `Mining::waitTipChanged` to return `optional<BlockRef>` instead of `BlockRef` and return `nullopt` instead of crashing if there is a timeout or if the node is shut down before a tip is connected.
- Changes `Mining::waitTipChanged` to not time out before a tip is connected, so it is convenient and safe to call during startup, and only returns `nullopt` on early shutdowns.
- Changes `Mining::createNewBlock` to block and wait for a tip to be connected if it is called on startup instead of crashing. Also documents that it will return null on early shutdowns.
This allows `waitNext()` (added in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31283) to safely assume `TipBlock()` isn't `null`, not even during a scenario of early shutdown.
Finally this PR clarifies long poll behaviour, mostly by adding code comments, but also through an early `break`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 05117e6e17
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 05117e6e17, just updated a commit message since last review
TheCharlatan:
ACK 05117e6e17
vasild:
ACK 05117e6e17
Tree-SHA512: 277c285a6e73dfff88fd379298190b264254996f98b93c91c062986ab35c2aa5e1fbfec4cd71d7b29dc2d68e33f252b5cfc501345f54939d6bd78599b71fec04
The obfuscation (XOR) operations are currently done byte-by-byte during serialization. Buffering the reads will enable batching the obfuscation operations later.
Different operating systems handle file caching differently, so reading larger batches (and processing them from memory) is measurably faster, likely because of fewer native fread calls and reduced lock contention.
Note that `ReadRawBlock` doesn't need buffering since it already reads the whole block directly.
Unlike `ReadBlockUndo`, the new `ReadBlock` implementation delegates to `ReadRawBlock`, which uses more memory than a buffered alternative but results in slightly simpler code and a small performance increase (~0.4%). This approach also clearly documents that `ReadRawBlock` is a logical subset of `ReadBlock` functionality.
The current implementation, which iterates over a fixed-size buffer, provides a more general alternative to Cory Fields' solution of reading the entire block size in advance.
Buffer sizes were selected based on benchmarking to ensure the buffered reader produces performance similar to reading the whole block into memory. Smaller buffers were slower, while larger ones showed diminishing returns.
------
> macOS Sequoia 15.3.1
> C++ compiler .......................... Clang 19.1.7
> cmake -B build -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ && cmake --build build -j$(nproc) && build/bin/bench_bitcoin -filter='ReadBlockBench' -min-time=10000
Before:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 2,271,441.67 | 440.25 | 0.1% | 11.00 | `ReadBlockBench`
After:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 1,738,971.29 | 575.05 | 0.2% | 10.97 | `ReadBlockBench`
------
> Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
> C++ compiler .......................... GNU 13.3.0
> cmake -B build -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++ && cmake --build build -j$(nproc) && build/bin/bench_bitcoin -filter='ReadBlockBench' -min-time=20000
Before:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 6,895,987.11 | 145.01 | 0.0% | 71,055,269.86 | 23,977,374.37 | 2.963 | 5,074,828.78 | 0.4% | 22.00 | `ReadBlockBench`
After:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | ins/op | cyc/op | IPC | bra/op | miss% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 5,771,882.71 | 173.25 | 0.0% | 65,741,889.82 | 20,453,232.33 | 3.214 | 3,971,321.75 | 0.3% | 22.01 | `ReadBlockBench`
Co-authored-by: maflcko <6399679+maflcko@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Co-authored-by: Martin Leitner-Ankerl <martin.ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Cory Fields <cory-nospam-@coryfields.com>
Made every OpenBlockFile#fReadOnly value explicit.
Replaced hard-coded values in ReadRawBlock with STORAGE_HEADER_BYTES.
Changed `STORAGE_HEADER_BYTES` and `UNDO_DATA_DISK_OVERHEAD` to `uint32_t` to avoid casts.
Also added `LIFETIMEBOUND` to the `AutoFile` parameter of `BufferedFile`, which stores a reference to the underlying `AutoFile`, allowing Clang to emit warnings if the referenced `AutoFile` might be destroyed while `BufferedFile` still exists.
Without this attribute, code with lifetime violations wouldn't trigger compiler warnings.
Co-authored-by: maflcko <6399679+maflcko@users.noreply.github.com>
Renames the constant to be less verbose and better reflect its purpose:
it represents the size of the storage header that precedes serialized block data on disk,
not to be confused with a block's own header.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -q "STORAGE_HEADER_BYTES" $(git ls-files) && echo "Error: Target name STORAGE_HEADER_BYTES already exists in the codebase" && exit 1
sed -i 's/BLOCK_SERIALIZATION_HEADER_SIZE/STORAGE_HEADER_BYTES/g' $(git grep -l 'BLOCK_SERIALIZATION_HEADER_SIZE')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Reorganized error handling in block-related operations by grouping related operations together within the same scope.
In `ReadBlockUndo()` and `ReadBlock()`, moved all deserialization operations, comments and checksum verification inside a single try/catch block for cleaner error handling.
In `WriteBlockUndo()`, consolidated hash calculation and data writing operations within a common block to better express their logical relationship.
0000fb3fd9 doc: Remove outdated and stale todo comment (MarcoFalke)
fa2b529f92 refactor: Remove redundant call to IsArgSet (MarcoFalke)
fa29842c1f refactor: Remove IsArgSet guard when fallback value is provided (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`IsArgSet` is problematic:
* It returns whether an arg has been set, even if it has been negated. `IsArgSet` is sometimes used to check for a truthy value, which is wrong, but usually harmless. Cleanup of those cases may or may not be done in a follow-up.
* In most other cases, calling it is redundant, because the immediately following `Get*Arg` calls can already return an `std::optional` nullopt value to indicate an unset arg.
So relieve both issues by removing all `IsArgSet` that are redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK 0000fb3fd9
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0000fb3fd9. No changes since last review other than rebase.
Tree-SHA512: d142d71d136b2dbd5fd005667875099777704176f5e08fdeb38f05d6afce40b435a257c5bb6a1f545459fe4f81f967cee3083ab666cb0befdef3f6234f1e3d32
226d81f8b7 mining: drop unused -nFees and sigops from CBlockTemplate (Sjors Provoost)
53ad845fb9 test: check fees and sigops in getblocktemplate (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
For the coinbase `vTxFees` used a dummy value of -nFees.
Similarly the first `vTxSigOpsCost` entry was calculated from
the dummy coinbase transaction.
This was introduced in #2115, but the values were never returned by the RPC or used in a test.
Drop 'm and add code comments to prevent confusion.
This PR also adds test coverage for the `fees` and `sigops` fields in `getblocktemplate`, so it closes#32053.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK 226d81f8b7
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 226d81f8b7. New test was added since last review, which seems very cleanly written and fixes some missing coverage.
glozow:
ACK 226d81f8b7
Tree-SHA512: 79c534e6bc4810d29114b04dd6db798877732cb473e773bf3cc28f83d14ee3982392587bd0baa39857bd53a79eae3b730d7a7029b08a9b6c3b5c51f86657ca5d
Checking for IsArgSet before calling GetArg while providing an arbitrary
default value as fallback is both confusing and fragile.
It is confusing, because the provided fallback is dead code. So it would
be better to just call GetArg without a fallback.
Even better would be to provide the true fallback value and sanitize it
as if it were user-input, but this can be done in a follow-up.
Removing the redundant call to IsArgSet will have to be done either way,
so do it now.
- return null on shutdown instead of the last tip
- ignore timeout value node initialization
This allows consumers of BlockTemplate to safely
assume that a tip is connected, instead of having
to account for startup and early shutdown scenarios.
The waitTipChanged() now returns nullopt if the node is shutting down.
Previously it would return the last known tip during shutdown, but
this creates an ambiguous circumstance in the scenario where the
node is started and quickly shutdown, before notifications().TipBlock()
is set.
The getblocktemplate, waitfornewblock and waitforblockheight RPC
are updated to handle this. Existing behavior is preserved.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
For the coinbase vTxFees used a dummy value of -nFees. This
value was never returned by the RPC or used in a test.
Similarly the fist vTxSigOpsCost entry was calculated from
the dummy coinbase transaction.
Drop both and add code comments to prevent confusion.
70398ae05b mapport: make ProcessPCP void (Antoine Poinsot)
9e6cba2988 mapport: remove unnecessary 'g_mapport_enabled' (Antoine Poinsot)
8fb45fcda0 mapport: remove unnecessary 'g_mapport_current' variable (Antoine Poinsot)
1b223cb19b mapport: merge DispatchMapPort into StartMapPort (Antoine Poinsot)
9bd936fa34 mapport: drop unnecessary function (Antoine Poinsot)
2a6536ceda mapport: rename 'use_pcp' to 'enable' (Antoine Poinsot)
c4e82b854c mapport: make 'enabled' and 'current' bool (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Followup to #31130, this does a couple cleanups to `src/mapport.*` to clarify the logic now that there is a single protocol option for port mapping.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 70398ae05b
TheCharlatan:
ACK 70398ae05b
Tree-SHA512: d9a3ab4fcd59a7cf4872415c40cc7ac3a98dfc5aa25e195d4df880bb588bac286c30c3471e9d9499de379a75f45dcd0a82019eba3cb9f342004ae1482d0ba075
386eecff5f doc: add release notes (ismaelsadeeq)
3eaa0a3b66 miner: init: add `-blockreservedweight` startup option (ismaelsadeeq)
777434a2cd doc: rpc: improve `getmininginfo` help text (ismaelsadeeq)
c8acd4032d init: fail to start when `-blockmaxweight` exceeds `MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT` (ismaelsadeeq)
5bb31633cc test: add `-blockmaxweight` startup option functional test (ismaelsadeeq)
2c7d90a6d6 miner: bugfix: fix duplicate weight reservation in block assembler (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
* This PR attempts to fix the duplicate coinbase weight reservation issue we currently have.
* Fixes#21950
We reserve 4000 weight units for coinbase transaction in `DEFAULT_BLOCK_MAX_WEIGHT`
7590e93bc7/src/policy/policy.h (L23)
And also reserve additional `4000` weight units in the default `BlockCreationOptions` struct.
7590e93bc7/src/node/types.h (L36-L40)
**Motivation**
- This issue was first noticed during a review here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11100#discussion_r136157411)
- It was later reported in issue #21950.
- I also came across the bug while writing a test for building the block template. I could not create a block template above `3,992,000` in the block assembler, and this was not documented anywhere. It took me a while to realize that we were reserving space for the coinbase transaction weight twice.
---
This PR fixes this by consolidating the reservation to be in a single location in the codebase.
This PR then adds a new startup option `-blockreservedweight` whose default is `8000` that can be used to lower or increase the block reserved weight for block header, txs count, coinbase tx.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 386eecff5f
fjahr:
Code review ACK 386eecff5f
glozow:
utACK 386eecff5f, nonblocking nits. I do think the release notes should be clarified more
pinheadmz:
ACK 386eecff5f
Tree-SHA512: f27efa1da57947b7f4d42b9322b83d13afe73dd749dd9cac49360002824dd41c99a876a610554ac2d67bad7485020b9dcc423a8e6748fc79d6a10de6d4357d4c
- The reserved weight of the coinbase transaction is an estimate and
may not reflect the exact value; it can be lower.
- It should be clear that `currentblockweight` includes the reserved coinbase transaction weight.
whereas `currentblocktx` does not account for the coinbase transaction count.
- Also clarify `m_last_block_num_txs` and `m_last_block_weight`
