Previously we used deployments that would timeout prior to Bitcoin's
invention, which allowed the deployment to still be activated in unit
tests. This switches those deployments to be truly never active.
Github-Pull: #21377
Rebased-From: 55ac5f568a
2d5793c016 Bugfix: chainparams: Add missing (disabled) Taproot deployment for Signet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Is there a way we can trigger compiler warnings if a deployment is undefined?
ACKs for top commit:
decryp2kanon:
utACK 2d5793c016
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 2d5793c016
Tree-SHA512: 135cefae0f8dc552b0f682c2b87cabca7a4716290a36410a55968850e803a5049234e3cc597c8ef8d7917ae5d5ea3fb851e160df171b6793114c6bc01c5ea3e7
01e283068b [net] Remove unnecessary default args on CNode constructor (Amiti Uttarwar)
bc5d65b3ca [refactor] Remove IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate (Amiti Uttarwar)
2f2e13b6c2 [net/refactor] Simplify multiple-connection checks (Amiti Uttarwar)
7f7b83deb2 [net/refactor] Rework ThreadOpenConnections logic (Amiti Uttarwar)
35839e963b [net] Fix bug where AddrFetch connections would be counted as outbound full relay (Amiti Uttarwar)
4972c21b67 [net/refactor] Clarify logic for selecting connections in ThreadOpenConnections (Amiti Uttarwar)
60156f5fc4 [net/refactor] Remove fInbound flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
7b322df629 [net/refactor] Remove m_addr_fetch member var from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
14923422b0 [net/refactor] Remove fFeeler flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
49efac5cae [net/refactor] Remove m_manual_connection flag from CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
d3698b5ee3 [net/refactor] Add connection type as a member var to CNode (Amiti Uttarwar)
46578c03e9 [doc] Describe different connection types (Amiti Uttarwar)
442abae2ba [net/refactor] Add AddrFetch connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
af59feb052 [net/refactor] Extract m_addr_known logic from initializer list (Amiti Uttarwar)
e1bc29812d [net/refactor] Add block relay only connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
0e52a659a2 [net/refactor] Add feeler connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
1521c47438 [net/refactor] Add manual connections to ConnectionType enum (Amiti Uttarwar)
26304b4100 [net/refactor] Introduce an enum to distinguish type of connection (Amiti Uttarwar)
3f1b7140e9 scripted-diff: Rename OneShot to AddrFetch (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
**This is part 1 of #19315, which enables the ability to test `outbound` and `block-relay-only` connections from the functional tests.** Please see that PR for more information of overall functionality.
**This PR simplifies how we manage different connection types.** It introduces an enum with the various types of connections so we can explicitly define the connection type. The existing system relies on a series of independent flags, then has asserts scattered around to ensure that conflicting flags are not enabled at the same time. I find this approach to be both brittle and confusing. While making these changes, I found a small bug due to the silent assumptions.
This PR also proposes a rename from `OneShot` to `AddrFetch`. I find the name `OneShot` to be very confusing, especially when we also have `onetry` manual connections. Everyone I've talked to offline has agreed that the name is confusing, so I propose a potential alternative. I think this is a good opportunity for a rename since I'm creating an enum to explicitly define the connection types.
(some context for the unfamiliar: `oneshot` or `addrfetch` connections are short-lived connections created on startup. They connect to the seed peers, send a `getaddr` to solicit addresses, then close the connection.)
Overview of this PR:
* rename `oneshot` to `addrfetch`
* introduce `ConnectionType` enum
* one by one, add different connection types to the enum
* expose the `conn_type` on CNode, and use this to reduce reliance on flags (& asserts)
* fix the bug in counting different type of connections
* some additional cleanup to simplify logic and make expectations explicit/inclusive rather than implicit/exclusive.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 01e283068b
laanwj:
Code review ACK 01e283068b, the commits are pretty straightforward to follow, and I think this is a move in the right direction overall
vasild:
ACK 01e283068
sdaftuar:
ACK 01e283068b.
fanquake:
ACK 01e283068b - I don't have as much experience with the networking code but these changes look fairly straight forward, the new code seems more robust/understandable and the additional documentation is great. I'm glad that a followup branch is already underway. There might be some more review comments here later today, so keep an eye on the discussion, however I'm going to merge this now.
jb55:
wow this code was messy before... ACK 01e283068b
Tree-SHA512: 7bb644a6ed5849913d777ebc2ff89133ca0fbef680355a9a344e07496a979e6f9ff21a958e8eea93dcd7d5c343682b0c7174b1a3de380a4247eaae73da436e15
This commit was a fix to `m_assumed_blockchain_size` reverted from
3fc2063's 220 to 9d0e528's 200 since work on 9d0e528 was being done in
parallel and ended up reverting `m_assumed_blockchain_size`.
This commits is now a intended to be a bump of
`m_assumed_blockchain_size` for both mainnet and testnet for new
reasonable values.
de7266fc3c [net] add dnsseed.emzy.de to DNS seeds (Stephan Oeste)
Pull request description:
ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/dnsseed-policy.md
I'm willing to keep it up and running, unless something bad happens.
I have 15+ years experience running dns servers.
About my setup:
- the server may change over time, but the service will be up all the time
- running [sipa/bitcoin-seeder](https://github.com/sipa/bitcoin-seeder) with default settings (and the non-root port redirect)
Tree-SHA512: 7abc975c148cc738d045c79d5bdb8d9926da41bb8dde66c21e954652b3c72a7aa2526af0c3c4fb8c234d3deaed5563542defe8a5137188d65ad7201b6b1d80eb
9d0e52834 implements different disk sizes for different networks on intro (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13213.
Mostly, I layed out the concept to open the PR for refinement and getting feedback if the approach is okay. Changes are expected.
Two points:
- The values for both new consts `TESTNET_BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE` and `TESTNET_CHAIN_STATE_SIZE` is certainly not optimal; I just checked the size of my testnet3 related dirs and set them to little bit higher values. Which values should be used?
- Should we do something like this to regtest? Or these "niceties" do not matter when on regtest?
Thanks!
Tree-SHA512: 8ae87a29fa8356b899e7a823c76cde793d9126b4ee59554d7a2a8edb088fe42a19976b34c06c2fd4a98a727e1e4971dd983f42b6093ea6caa255b45004e22bb4
- Creates m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_chain_state_size on CChainParams.
- Implements access to CChainParams' m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_chain_state_size on node interface.
- Implements m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_chain_state_size on qt/intro via node interface.
- Updates release process document with the new CChainParam's values.
3fc20632a3 qt: Set BLOCK_CHAIN_SIZE = 220 (DrahtBot)
2b6a2f4a28 Regenerate manpages (DrahtBot)
eb7daf4d60 Update copyright headers to 2018 (DrahtBot)
Pull request description:
Some trivial maintenance to avoid having to do it again after the 0.17 branch off.
(The scripts to do this are in `./contrib/`)
Tree-SHA512: 16b2af45e0351b1c691c5311d48025dc6828079e98c2aa2e600dc5910ee8aa01858ca6c356538150dc46fe14c8819ed8ec8e4ec9a0f682b9950dd41bc50518fa
