05f9770c1f doc: Clarify developer notes about constant naming (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
I'm pretty sure developer notes were intended to say constants should be upper case and variables should be lower case, but right now they are ambiguous about whether to write:
```c++
extern const int SYMBOL;
```
or:
```c++
extern const int g_symbol;
```
First convention above is better than the second convention because it tells you without having to look anything up that the value of `SYMBOL` won't change at runtime. Also I haven't seen other c++ projects using the second convention.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 05f9770c1f
practicalswift:
ACK 05f9770c1f
jarolrod:
ACK 05f9770c1f🥃
Tree-SHA512: 766d0e25d9db818d45df4ad6386987014f2053584cbced4b755ceef8bda6b7e2cfeb34eb8516423bd03b140faaf577614d5e3be2799f7eed0eb439187ab85323
Since the flag has been removed from the RPC command table in commit
ec6902d0ea (PR #11179), this guideline
is not relevant anymore and can be removed.
a4a3fc4cd2 doc: improve subtree check instructions (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Running `git-subtree-check.sh` requires adding the subtree repository as a remote. I learned that several years ago and then forgot again.
This PR also improves the error message if the subtree commit can't be found.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a4a3fc4cd2
fanquake:
ACK a4a3fc4cd2 - this looks ok.
Tree-SHA512: 959bd923726c172d17f9f97f8a56988bf2df5a94d3131e5152a66150b941394cee9e82fdc6b86e09c0ba91d123a496599f07ca454212168d8d301738394c12c8
I'm pretty sure developer notes were intended to say constants should be upper
case and variables should be lower case, but right now they are ambiguous about
whether to write:
```c++
// foo.h
extern const int SYMBOL;
// foo.cpp
const int SYMBOL = 1;
```
or:
```c++
// foo.h
extern const int g_symbol;
// foo.cpp
const int g_symbol = 1;
```
First convention above is better than the second convention because it tells
you without having to look anything up that the value of `SYMBOL` will never
change at runtime. Also I've never seen any c++ project anywhere using the
second convention
3e32499909 Change example addresses to bech32 (Yusuf Sahin HAMZA)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #18197 that fixes RPCExamples.
Fixes#18185.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3e32499909
jonatack:
ACK 3e32499
Tree-SHA512: c7a6410ef8b6e169016c2c5eac3e6b9501caabd0e8a0871ec31e56bfc44589f056d3f5cb55b5a13bba36f6c15136c2352f883e30e4dcc0997ffd36b27f9173b9
155a11f897 doc: Added running functional tests in valgrind (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
Technically the notes only show an "example" of how to run valgrind with the suppression file,
but now that https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17633 is merged then maybe this can encourage more people to run also the functional tests in valgrind
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b8417249b720d0ed5e10b732648f2e07e8889bfc7aa7e94192d1c049b4b7837971678d30c535f273c227848f1290cf11e14369fd6c1924b734f2e47e2af41401
also contains the following changes:
- rpc: factor out example bech32 address for RPCExamples
- doc: update developer notes wrt RPCExamples addresses
(mention the EXAMPLE_ADDRESS constant as an example for an invalid bech32
address suitable for RPCExamples help documentation)
42ec499489 doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
the use of bech32 addresses by default. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r361752570 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r362564492.
Fix a typo to appease the linter.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 42ec499489, no strong opinion as whether this belongs to developer notes or not but why not.
fjahr:
ACK 42ec499
michaelfolkson:
ACK 42ec499489
Tree-SHA512: 64f90e227d256aa194c4fd48435440bdc233a51213dd4a6ac5b05d04263f729c6b4bb5f3afd3b87719b20cb1b159d5a9673d58a11b72823a4a6a16e8a26ae10e
to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
the use of bech32 addresses by default.
Fix a typo to appease the linter.
794fe91395 doc: Update and improve Developer Notes (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
- removes outdated things, e.g., global pointer `pwalletMain` etc
- adds "Sanitizers" to the TOC
- makes filenames, `peer.dat` and `debug.log`, monospaced
- specifies that _compile-time_ constant names are all uppercase
- rewords using `explicit` with constructors
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
lazy ACK 794fe91395
practicalswift:
ACK 794fe91395 -- nice improvements!
Tree-SHA512: 2c5f035b1627f5fac8dc2453199d9e46bd101f86771de567cd95698de3c61cc459444ec1a68710e1d280195e1e40b42d9f40906297d12f12bf37749eca58297d
104f7de593 remove old bootstrap relevant code (tryphe)
Pull request description:
This picks up #15954
I fixed the code and added at a functional test utilizing the scripts in `contrib/linearize` as suggested by @MarcoFalke .
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 104f7de593
Tree-SHA512: acac9f285f9785fcbc3afc78118461e45bec2962f90ab90e9f82f3ad28adc90a44f0443b712458ccf486e46d891eb8a67f53e7bee5fa6d89e4387814fe03f117
9452802480 doc: Tidy up shadowing section (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Removes the example because it violates the code format.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 9452802480
ryanofsky:
ACK 9452802480
fanquake:
ACK 9452802480 - Thanks for following up.
Tree-SHA512: 1fc31355d368225713298da7803e39e99014fbfcd229f2d3b56c082de95ab2965e51c80b172a5abce4646c53f845fa62a6d94d5df714e7835cac07a8ec7d5da7
This pull request is regarding minor grammar and punctuation errors in the developer notes. There were no modifications to the existing code, only alterations to fix the grammar and punctuation in the text.
Update developer-notes.md
Update developer-notes.md
Revert "Update developer-notes.md"
This reverts commit dfeb0bacb054ed24766f8af7bae0c0166b0cb4cb.
The "Git and GitHub tips" section was moved from doc/developer-notes.md to doc/productivity.md in 5b76c31, but the header link to that long-gone section in the developer notes remains and needs to go.
So long, Git and GitHub tips, we barely knew ya.
After this commit, the only remaining output is:
$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
Note:
* I ignore several valid alternative spellings
* homogenous is present in tinyformat, hence should be addressed upstream
* process' is correct only if there are plural processes
