d3c5e47391 wallet, refactor: Remove Legacy check and error (pablomartin4btc)
30c6f64eed test: Remove unnecessary LoadWallet() calls (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Remove dead code due to legacy wallet removal.
Leftovers from previous #32481.
---
**Note**:
While attempting to remove the legacy check in `CWallet::UpgradeDescriptorCache()` (which is called from `DBErrors WalletBatch::LoadWallet(CWallet* pwallet))`, I once again ran into the fact that `LoadWallet()` is used in two distinct scenarios — something I was already aware of:
- Wallet creation – the upgrade is ignored here because no wallet flags are yet set; attempting to set a flag (ie `WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED` at the end of the upgrade function, if the legacy check is removed) would produce a failure (`DBErrors CWallet::LoadWallet()` -> `Assert(m_wallet_flags == 0)`).
- Wallet loading – the upgrade proceeds correctly and the flag `WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED` is set.
While revisiting this, I also noticed that some `LoadWallet()` calls in the wallet tests are unnecessary and I've removed them in the first commit.
The following change in `UpgradeDescriptorCache()` could be done in PR #32636 as part of the separation between wallet loading and creation responsibilities.
```diff --git a/src/wallet/wallet.cpp b/src/wallet/wallet.cpp
void CWallet::UpgradeDescriptorCache()
{
+ // Only descriptor wallets can upgrade descriptor cache
+ Assert(IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_DESCRIPTORS));
+
- if (!IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_DESCRIPTORS) || IsLocked() || IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED)) {
+ if (IsLocked() || IsWalletFlagSet(WALLET_FLAG_LAST_HARDENED_XPUB_CACHED)) {
return;
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
crACK d3c5e47391
achow101:
ACK d3c5e47391
l0rinc:
code review ACK d3c5e47391
Tree-SHA512: ead37cf4061dfce59feb41ac50e807e6790e1a5e6b358e3b9c13e63d61a9cb82317a2e596cecb543f62f88a4338171788b651452425c1f40b5c1bec7fe78339e
Since the only remaining isminetypes are ISMINE_NO and ISMINE_SPENDABLE,
this enum is now just a bool and can be removed. IsMine is changed to
return a bool and any usage of isminetypes and isminefilters are changed
to be the remaining ISMINE_SPENDABLE case.
In descriptor wallets, we consider all outputs to be spendable as we no
longer have mixed mine and watchonly in a wallet. As such,
COutput::spendable is meaningless and can be removed.
Furthermore, CoinFilterParams::only_spendable can be removed as that was
essentially checking for COutput::spendable.
Lastly, AvailableCoinsListUnspent can also be removed as the wrapper is
now only setting the feerate to std::nullopt which is trivial enough that
a dedicated wrapper is not needed.
60d1042b9a wallet: Remove unused `WalletFeature` enums (woltx)
66de58208a wallet: Remove `CWallet::nWalletVersion` and related functions (woltx)
7cda3d0f5b wallet: Remove `IsFeatureSupported()` and `CanSupportFeature()` (woltx)
ba01585229 wallet: `MigrateToDescriptor` no longer calls `CanSupportFeature` (woltx)
63acee2797 wallet: Remove `GetClosestWalletFeature()` (woltx)
e27da3150b wallet: Remove `GetVersion()` (woltx)
Pull request description:
This PR incorporates the suggestion provided by PRabahy and pablomartin4btc in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32944 of removing `CWallet::nWalletVersion` and several related functions, such as `SetMinVersion()`, `GetVersion()`, `GetClosestWalletFeature()`, `IsFeatureSupported()`, `CanSupportFeature()`, etc ...
This field is no longer used in the descriptor wallet and there is still a lot of code related to it, so the changes here provide a good cleanup in the wallet code.
Built on top of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32944
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 60d1042b9a🐾
achow101:
ACK 60d1042b9a
pablomartin4btc:
ACK 60d1042b9a
Tree-SHA512: 1a7ad8e15d57df8f66545776e7d178a2cd5312c87769a29770588375e3de5f24247aab9919acf004ed3eca16d08ba595b5f1c7b2b3eef7752e89d9c295624583
d3b8a54a81 Refactor CFeeRate to use FeeFrac internally (Pol Espinasa)
Pull request description:
The `FeeFrac` type represents a fraction, intended to be used for `sats/vbyte` or `sats/WU`. It was added to improve accuracy when evaluating fee rates in cluster mempool. [1]
But it can also be used to fix the precision issues that the current `CFeeRate` class has now.
At the moment, `CFeeRate` handles the fee rate as satoshis per kilovirtualbyte: `CAmount / kvB` using an integer.
This PR fix `CFeeRate` precision issues by encapsulating `FeeFrac` internally keeping backwards compatibility.
This PR can also be used as a based to use multiple units on RPC calls as detailed in this issue [2].
Some previous discussions:
[1] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30535
[2] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32093
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d3b8a54a81
murchandamus:
code review, lightly tested ACK d3b8a54a81
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK d3b8a54a81📦
theStack:
Code-review ACK d3b8a54a81
Tree-SHA512: 5a8149d81e82ad4e60a0e76ff6a82a5b1c4e212cf5156c1cdd16bf9acbb351e7be458eac3f0a2ae89107f331062b299c1d9ca649d3b820ad0b68e6d1a14292e5
a3cf623364 test: Test max_selection_weight edge cases (Murch)
57fe8acc8a test: Check max_weight_exceeded error (Murch)
Pull request description:
I tested all of the reported surviving mutants that @brunoerg reported in https://gist.github.com/brunoerg/834063398d5002f738506d741513e310.
I found that all Mutants except for 12, 14, 17, 37, and 39 were now being caught by one of the existing tests. This fixes Mutants 14, 37, and 39.
Mutant 17 is not fixed, because I consider it acceptable that running BnB for 100,001 instead of 100,000 comparisons doesn’t cause an issue, and Mutant 12 is not yet fixed, because at `fee` = `long_term_fee`, the waste of inputs is 0 and only excess matters, and I haven’t evaluated yet, whether it needs to be fixed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a3cf623364
jlest01:
ACK a3cf623364
brunoerg:
code review ACK a3cf623364
Tree-SHA512: db67c52127ed98f809f64a903c6b3a012e56cf665a0cd851457af7c85c37ec3af8bb72035d7ad370dd883f99cf3014464e3576559899e37c1d6ee01230511754
cc33e45789 test: improve assertion for SRD max weight test (yancy)
Pull request description:
Replace generic assertion with a result specific assertion showing the correctness of the solution found. If the max weight parameter is exceeded, the least valuable `UTXOs` are removed from the result. Therefore, only the most valued _encountered_ `UTXO's` are selected. While the smallest set would include all the most valued `UTXO's`, in the case of the test there is one high value `UTXO` that is never found before the target value is reached.
Correct the test comment to be more specific about why the assertion is a good result.
ACKs for top commit:
murchandamus:
ACK cc33e45789
furszy:
ACK cc33e45789
Tree-SHA512: bad224063ba830c27fba1b7b80e411ac7cd6c3edcb60bade4e6e3010f3b5d360a921de742c7c20efea8fa839d7939f338270658f66bbcebedebe5c5c8a3e8f9b
Previously, the assertion only showed that a result was found, however
made no assertion about the quality of the result.
Remove comment about what UTXOs are selected and what are not
since the test does not reflect that.
Co-authored-by: Mark "Murch" Erhardt <murch@murch.one>
c5c1960f93 doc: Add release notes for changes in RPCs (pablomartin4btc)
90fd5acbe5 rpc, test: Fix error message in getdescriptoractivity (pablomartin4btc)
39fef1d203 test: Add missing logging info for each test (pablomartin4btc)
53ac704efd rpc, test: Fix error message in unloadwallet (pablomartin4btc)
1fc3a8e8e7 rpc, test: Add EnsureUniqueWalletName tests (pablomartin4btc)
b635bc0896 rpc, util: Add EnsureUniqueWalletName (pablomartin4btc)
Pull request description:
Currently, `unloadwallet` RPC call fails with a JSON parsing error when no `wallet_name` argument is provided. This behavior is misleading because the error originates from a low-level JSON type mismatch, rather than clearly indicating that the wallet name or RPC endpoint (`-rpcwallet=...`) is missing. Also, found out that the [issue](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13111#issuecomment-398831543) was noticed during its implementation but never addressed.
In addition, I've verified all RPC commands calls finding that `getdescriptoractivity` had the same problem, but related to the array input types (blockhashes & descriptors), so I've corrected that RPC as well. For consistency I've added the missing logging info for each test case in `test/functional/rpc_getdescriptoractivity.py` in preparation for the new test.
**_-Before_**
```
./build/bin/bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/tmp/btc unloadwallet
error code: -3
error message:
JSON value of type number is not of expected type string
```
```
./build/bin/bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/tmp/btc getdescriptoractivity
error code: -3
error message:
JSON value of type null is not of expected type array
```
```
./build/bin/bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/tmp/btc getdescriptoractivity '[]'
error code: -3
error message:
JSON value of type null is not of expected type array
```
**_-After_**
```
./build/bin/bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/tmp/btc unloadwallet
error code: -8
error message:
Either the RPC endpoint wallet or the wallet name parameter must be provided
```
```
./build/bin/bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/tmp/btc getdescriptoractivity
error code: -1
error message:
getdescriptoractivity ["blockhash",...] [scanobjects,...] ( include_mempool )
Get spend and receive activity associated with a set of descriptors for a set of blocks. This command pairs well with the `relevant_blocks` output of `scanblocks()`.
This call may take several minutes. If you encounter timeouts, try specifying no RPC timeout (bitcoin-cli -rpcclienttimeout=0)
Arguments:
1. blockhashes (json array, required) The list of blockhashes to examine for activity. Order doesn't matter. Must be along main chain or an error is thrown.
[
"blockhash", (string) A valid blockhash
...
]
2. scanobjects (json array, required) Array of scan objects. Every scan object is either a string descriptor or an object:
[
"descriptor", (string) An output descriptor
{ (json object) An object with output descriptor and metadata
"desc": "str", (string, required) An output descriptor
"range": n or [n,n], (numeric or array, optional, default=1000) The range of HD chain indexes to explore (either end or [begin,end])
},
...
]
3. include_mempool (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether to include unconfirmed activity
...
```
```
./build/bin/bitcoin-cli -regtest -datadir=/tmp/btc getdescriptoractivity '[]'
error code: -1
error message:
getdescriptoractivity ["blockhash",...] [scanobjects,...] ( include_mempool )
...
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK c5c1960f93
stickies-v:
re-ACK c5c1960f93
furszy:
ACK c5c1960f93
Tree-SHA512: e831ff1acbfd15d2ce3a69bb408cce94664c0b63b2aa2f4627a05c6c052241ae3b5cc238219ef1b30afb489a4a3f4c3030e2168b0c8f08b4d20805d050d810f5
Slays Mutant 37 from Bruno’s report:
https://gist.github.com/brunoerg/834063398d5002f738506d741513e310
diff --git a/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp b/muts/coinselection.mutant.37.cpp
index cee558088f..9747cd26c9 100644
--- a/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp
+++ b/muts/coinselection.mutant.37.cpp
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> SelectCoinsBnB(std::vector<OutputGroup>& utxo_pool
curr_value > selection_target + cost_of_change || // Selected value is out of range, go back and try other branch
(curr_waste > best_waste && is_feerate_high)) { // Don't select things which we know will be more wasteful if the waste is increasing
backtrack = true;
- } else if (curr_selection_weight > max_selection_weight) { // Selected UTXOs weight exceeds the maximum weight allowed, cannot find more solutions by adding more inputs
+ } else if (curr_selection_weight >= max_selection_weight) { // Selected UTXOs weight exceeds the maximum weight allowed, cannot find more solutions by adding more inputs
max_tx_weight_exceeded = true; // at least one selection attempt exceeded the max weight
backtrack = true;
} else if (curr_value >= selection_target) { // Selected value is within range
This slays the mutants 14 and 39 Bruno reported via
https://gist.github.com/brunoerg/834063398d5002f738506d741513e310,
that changing the intial or subsequent value of
`max_tx_weight_exceeded` in BnB would not fail any tests:
diff --git a/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp b/muts/coinselection.mutant.14.cpp
index cee558088f..947bf7b642 100644
--- a/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp
+++ b/muts/coinselection.mutant.14.cpp
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> SelectCoinsBnB(std::vector<OutputGroup>& utxo_pool
CAmount best_waste = MAX_MONEY;
bool is_feerate_high = utxo_pool.at(0).fee > utxo_pool.at(0).long_term_fee;
- bool max_tx_weight_exceeded = false;
+ bool max_tx_weight_exceeded = true;
// Depth First search loop for choosing the UTXOs
for (size_t curr_try = 0, utxo_pool_index = 0; curr_try < TOTAL_TRIES; ++curr_try, ++utxo_pool_index) {
diff --git a/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp b/muts/coinselection.mutant.39.cpp
index cee558088f..bbfdc23889 100644
--- a/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp
+++ b/muts/coinselection.mutant.39.cpp
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ util::Result<SelectionResult> SelectCoinsBnB(std::vector<OutputGroup>& utxo_pool
(curr_waste > best_waste && is_feerate_high)) { // Don't select things which we know will be more wasteful if the waste is increasing
backtrack = true;
} else if (curr_selection_weight > max_selection_weight) { // Selected UTXOs weight exceeds the maximum weight allowed, cannot find more solutions by adding more inputs
- max_tx_weight_exceeded = true; // at least one selection attempt exceeded the max weight
+ max_tx_weight_exceeded = false; // at least one selection attempt exceeded the max weight
backtrack = true;
} else if (curr_value >= selection_target) { // Selected value is within range
curr_waste += (curr_value - selection_target); // This is the excess value which is added to the waste for the below comparison
6135e0553e wallet, rpc: Move (Un)LockCoin WalletBatch creation out of RPC (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
If the locked coin needs to be persisted to the wallet database, insteead of having the RPC figure out when to create a WalletBatch and having LockCoin's behavior depend on it, have LockCoin take whether to persist as a parameter so it makes the batch.
Since unlocking a persisted locked coin requires a database write as well, we need to track whether the locked coin was persisted to the wallet database so that it can erase the locked coin when necessary.
Keeping track of whether a locked coin was persisted is also useful information for future PRs.
Split from #32489
ACKs for top commit:
rkrux:
ACK 6135e05
Sjors:
ACK 6135e0553e
w0xlt:
ACK 6135e0553e
Tree-SHA512: 0e2367fc4d50c62ec41443374b64c4c5ecf679998677df47fb8776cfb44704713bc45547e32e96cd30d1dbed766f5d333efb6f10eb0e71271606638e07e61a01
This argument might have been used in the legacy wallets, but I don't
see any implementation using this argument in the SQLite wallets.
Removing it cleans up the code a bit.
c10e382d2a flatfile: check whether the file has been closed successfully (Vasil Dimov)
4bb5dd78ea util: check that a file has been closed before ~AutoFile() is called (Vasil Dimov)
8bb34f07df Explicitly close all AutoFiles that have been written (Vasil Dimov)
a69c4098b2 rpc: take ownership of the file by WriteUTXOSnapshot() (Hodlinator)
Pull request description:
`fclose(3)` may fail to flush the previously written data to disk, thus a failing `fclose(3)` is as serious as a failing `fwrite(3)`.
Previously the code ignored `fclose(3)` failures. This PR improves that by changing all users of `AutoFile` that use it to write data to explicitly close the file and handle a possible error.
---
Other alternatives are:
1. `fflush(3)` after each write to the file (and throw if it fails from the `AutoFile::write()` method) and hope that `fclose(3)` will then always succeed. Assert that it succeeds from the destructor 🙄. Will hurt performance.
2. Throw nevertheless from the destructor. Exception within the exception in C++ I think results in terminating the program without a useful message.
3. (this is implemented in the latest incarnation of this PR) Redesign `AutoFile` so that its destructor cannot fail. Adjust _all_ its users 😭. For example, if the file has been written to, then require the callers to explicitly call the `AutoFile::fclose()` method before the object goes out of scope. In the destructor, as a sanity check, assume/assert that this is indeed the case. Defeats the purpose of a RAII wrapper for `FILE*` which automatically closes the file when it goes out of scope and there are a lot of users of `AutoFile`.
4. Pass a new callback function to the `AutoFile` constructor which will be called from the destructor to handle `fclose()` errors, as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29307#issuecomment-2243842400. My thinking is that if that callback is going to only log a message, then we can log the message directly from the destructor without needing a callback. If the callback is going to do more complicated error handling then it is easier to do that at the call site by directly calling `AutoFile::fclose()` instead of getting the `AutoFile` object out of scope (so that its destructor is called) and inspecting for side effects done by the callback (e.g. set a variable to indicate a failed `fclose()`).
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK c10e382d2a
achow101:
ACK c10e382d2a
hodlinator:
re-ACK c10e382d2a
Tree-SHA512: 3994ca57e5b2b649fc84f24dad144173b7500fc0e914e06291d5c32fbbf8d2b1f8eae0040abd7a5f16095ddf4e11fe1636c6092f49058cda34f3eb2ee536d7ba
b789907346 wallet: migration, avoid creating spendable wallet from a watch-only legacy wallet (furszy)
e86d71b749 wallet: refactor, dedup wallet re-loading code (furszy)
1de423e0a0 wallet: introduce method to return all db created files (furszy)
d04f6a97ba refactor: remove sqlite dir path back-and-forth conversion (furszy)
Pull request description:
Currently, the migration process creates a brand-new descriptor wallet with no
connection to the user's legacy wallet when the legacy wallet lacks key material
and contains only watch-only scripts. This behavior is not aligned with user
expectations. If the legacy wallet contains only watch-only scripts, the migration
process should only generate a watch-only wallet instead.
TODO List:
* Explain that `migratewallet` renames the watch-only after migration, and
also that the wallet will not have keys enabled.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK b789907346
pablomartin4btc:
tACK b789907346
rkrux:
LGTM ACK b789907346
Tree-SHA512: 1d583ac4b206fb477e9727daf4b5ad9c3e18b12d40e1ab4a61e8565da44c3d0327c892b51cf47b4894405d122e414cefb6b6366c357e02a74a7ca96e06762d83
There is no way to report a close error from `AutoFile` destructor.
Such an error could be serious if the file has been written to because
it may mean the file is now corrupted (same as if write fails).
So, change all users of `AutoFile` that use it to write data to
explicitly close the file and handle a possible error.
Historically, the headers have been bumped some time after a file has
been touched. Do it now to avoid having to touch them again in the
future for that reason.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i --regexp-extended 's;( 20[0-2][0-9])(-20[0-2][0-9])? The Bitcoin Core developers;\1-present The Bitcoin Core developers;g' $( git show --pretty="" --name-only HEAD~0 )
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This can be reproduced according to the developer notes with something
like
( cd ./src/ && ../contrib/devtools/run-clang-tidy.py -p ../bld-cmake -fix -j $(nproc) )
Also, the header related changes were done manually.
If the locked coin needs to be persisted to the wallet database,
insteead of having the RPC figure out when to create a WalletBatch and
having LockCoin's behavior depend on it, have LockCoin take whether to
persist as a parameter so it makes the batch.
Since unlocking a persisted locked coin requires a database write as
well, we need to track whether the locked coin was persisted to the
wallet database so that it can erase the locked coin when necessary.
Keeping track of whether a locked coin was persisted is also useful
information for future PRs.
785e1407b0 wallet: Use util::Error throughout AddWalletDescriptor (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
#32023 changed `AddWalletDescriptor` to return `util::Error`, but did not change all of the failure cases to do so. This may result in some callers continuing when there was actually an error. Unify all of the failure cases to use `util::Error` so that all callers handle `AddWalletDescriptor` errors in the same way.
The encapsulated return type is changed from `ScriptPubKeyMan*` to `std::reference_wrapper<DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan>`. This avoids having a value that can be interpreted as a bool, and also removes the need to constantly dynamic_cast the returned value. The only kind of `ScriptPubKeyMan` that can come out of `AddWalletDescriptor` is a `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` anyways.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 785e1407b0
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 785e1407b0
furszy:
Code review ACK 785e1407b0
Tree-SHA512: 52a48263c8d4161a8c0419b7289c25b0986f8e3bcd10b639eeeb0b6862d08b6c5e70998d20070ab26b39ecd90ab83dc8b71c65d85f70626282cf8cc6abff50e7
ee045b61ef rpc, psbt: Require sighashes match for descriptorprocesspsbt (Ava Chow)
2b7682c372 psbt: use sighash type field to determine whether to remove non-witness utxos (Ava Chow)
28781b5f06 psbt: Add sighash types to PSBT when not DEFAULT or ALL (Ava Chow)
15ce1bd73f psbt: Enforce sighash type of signatures matches psbt (Ava Chow)
1f71cd337a wallet: Remove sighash type enforcement from FillPSBT (Ava Chow)
4c7d767e49 psbt: Check sighash types in SignPSBTInput and take sighash as optional (Ava Chow)
a118256948 script: Add IsPayToTaproot() (Ava Chow)
d6001dcd4a wallet: change FillPSBT to take sighash as optional (Ava Chow)
e58b680923 psbt: Return PSBTError from SignPSBTInput (Ava Chow)
2adfd81532 tests: Test PSBT sighash type mismatch (Ava Chow)
5a5d26d612 psbt: Require ECDSA signatures to be validly encoded (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, we do not add the sighash field to PSBTs at all, even when we have signed with a non-default sighash. This PR changes the behavior such that when we (attempt to) sign with a sighash other than DEFAULT or ALL, the sighash type field will be added to the PSBT to inform the later signers that a different sighash type was used by a signer. Notably, this is necessary for MuSig2 support as all signers must sign using the same sighash type, but the sighash is not provided in partial signatures.
Furthermore, because the sighash type can also be provided on the command line, we require that if both a command line sighash type and the sighash field is present, they must specify the same sighash type. However, this was being checked by the wallet, rather than the signing code, so the `descriptorprocesspsbt` RPC was not enforcing this restriction at all, and in fact ignored the sighash field entirely. This PR refactors the checking code so that the underlying PSBT signing function `SignPSBTInput` does the check.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK ee045b61ef
rkrux:
re-ACK ee045b61ef
fjahr:
Code review ACK ee045b61ef
Tree-SHA512: 4ead5be1ef6756251b827f594beba868a145d75bf7f4ef6f15ad21f0ae4b8d71b38c83494e5a6b75f37fadd097178cddd93d614b962a2c72fc134f00ba2f74ae
97d383af6d Test updating non-ranged descriptor with [0,0] range succeeds (Novo)
2ae1788dd4 Skip range verification for non-ranged desc (Novo)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31728
This PR updates the `DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan` to skip range checks for non-ranged descriptors, which previously caused errors when updating a non-ranged descriptor with the range [0,0]
#### Testing
A unit test was added to test the new behaviour
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 97d383af6d
rkrux:
ACK 97d383a
Tree-SHA512: 6dbd058376d9e57d26477d9d6d89646e80a32e3ffcc9f4e30eeda273575d12583ce520cc0032cc67c12ea0b3ad344fbd3945d9fc5e389b6a6bce1ea7ad5d6e59
7193245cd6 doc: remove For ... comments (fanquake)
1b9cdc933f net: drop win32 ifdef (fanquake)
19ba499b1f init: cerrno is used on all platforms (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We don't add or maintain these, and they are of little value, as
well as having the effect of polluting diffs, if changed.
They are also wrong, i.e `DEFAULT_SCRIPTCHECK_THREADS` is not in
`validation.h`.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 7193245cd6
fjahr:
ACK 7193245cd6
willcl-ark:
reACK 7193245cd6
Tree-SHA512: 6b5f83cd1df699356e1cbb78949f8d456b13ce288f0064138118cfb45b4c77e2d1945babe91598dffe9823ab07dfae36f4c3b61c586cf98baf16890bdf322b08
32023 changed AddWalletDescriptor to return util::Error, but did not
change all of the failure cases to do so. This may result in some
callers continuing when there was actually an error. Unify all of the
failure cases to use util::Error so that all callers handle
AddWalletDescriptor errors in the same way.
The encapsulated return type is changed from ScriptPubKeyMan* to
std::reference_wrapper<DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan>. This avoids having a
value that can be interpreted as a bool, and also removes the need to
constantly dynamic_cast the returned value. The only kind of
ScriptPubKeyMan that can come out of AddWalletDescriptor is a
DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan anyways.
30a94b1ab9 test, wallet: Remove concurrent writes test (Ava Chow)
b44b7c03fe wallet: Write best block record on unload (Ava Chow)
876a2585a8 wallet: Remove unnecessary database Close step on shutdown (Ava Chow)
98a1a5275c wallet: Remove chainStateFlushed (Ava Chow)
7fd3e1cf0c wallet, bench: Write a bestblock record in WalletMigration (Ava Chow)
6d3a8b195a wallet: Replace chainStateFlushed in loading with SetLastBlockProcessed (Ava Chow)
7bacabb204 wallet: Update best block record after block dis/connect (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Implements the idea discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29652#issuecomment-2010579484
Currently, `m_last_block_processed` and `m_last_block_processed_height` are not guaranteed to match the block locator stored in the wallet, nor do either of those fields actually represent the last block that the wallet is synced up to. This is confusing and unintuitive.
This PR changes those last block fields to be updated whenever the wallet makes a change to the db for new transaction state found in new blocks. Whenever a block is received that contains a transaction relevant to the wallet, the last block locator will now be written to disk. Furthermore, every block disconnection will now write an updated locator.
To ensure that the locator is relatively recent and loading rescans are fairly quick in the event of unplanned shutdown, it is also now written every 144 blocks (~1 day). Additionally it is now written when the wallet is unloaded so that it is accurate when the wallet is loaded again.
Lastly, the `chainstateFlushed` notification in the wallet is changed to be a no-op. The best block locator record is no longer written when `chainstateFlushed` is received from the node since it should already be mostly up to date.
ACKs for top commit:
rkrux:
ACK 30a94b1ab9
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 30a94b1ab9
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 30a94b1ab9. Only changes since last review are using WriteBestBlock method more places and updating comments.
Tree-SHA512: 46117541f8aaf13dde57430e813b4bbbd5e146e2632769675803c8e65a82f149a7cc6026489a127d32684b90124bd2b7c28216dbcfa6a47447300e8f3814e029
We don't add or maintain these, and they are of little value, as
well as having the effect of polluting diffs.
They are also wrong, i.e DEFAULT_SCRIPTCHECK_THREADS is not in
validation.h.
0671d66a8e wallet, refactor: Convert uint256 to Txid in wallet (marcofleon)
c8ed51e62b wallet, refactor: Convert uint256 to Txid in wallet interfaces (marcofleon)
b3214cefe6 qt, refactor: Convert uint256 to Txid in the GUI (marcofleon)
Pull request description:
This is part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32189.
Converts all instances of transactions from `uint256` to `Txid` in the wallet, GUI, and related interfaces.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 0671d66a8e, no changes since 65fcfbb2b38bef20a58daa6c828c51890180611d except rebase.
achow101:
ACK 0671d66a8e
furszy:
Code review ACK 0671d66a8e
Tree-SHA512: 9fd4675db63195c4eed2d14c25015a1821fb597f51404674e4879a44a9cf18f475021a97c5f62f3926b7783ade5a38567386f663acba9f5861f1f59c1309ed60
Instead of having the caller have to figure out the correct sane default
to provide to FillPSBT, have FillPSBT do that by having it take the
sighash type as an optional. This further allows it to distinguish
between an explicit sighash type being provided and expecting the
default value to be used.
When a block is connected, if the new block had anything relevant to the
wallet, update the best block record on disk. If not, also sync the best
block record to disk every 144 blocks.
Also reuse the new WriteBestBlock method in BackupWallet.
de054df6dc contrib: Remove legacy wallet RPCs from bash completions (Ava Chow)
5dff04a1bb legacy spkm: Make IsMine() and CanProvide() private and migration only (Ava Chow)
c0f3f3264f wallet: Remove unused db functions (Ava Chow)
83af1a3cca wallet: Delete LegacySPKM (Ava Chow)
8ede6dea0c wallet, rpc: Remove legacy wallet only RPCs (Ava Chow)
4de3cec28d test: rpcs disabled for descriptor wallets will be removed (Ava Chow)
84f671b01d test: Run multisig script limit test (Ava Chow)
810476f31e test: Remove unused options and variables, correct comments (Ava Chow)
04a7a7a28c build, wallet, doc: Remove BDB (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
The final step of #20160.
A bare minimum of legacy wallet code is kept in order to perform wallet migration. Migration of legacy wallets uses the independent BDB parser and a minimal `LegacyDataSPKM` that allows the legacy data to be loaded so that the migration can be completed.
BDB has been removed as a dependency and documentation have been updated to reflect that.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-ACK de054df6dc
maflcko:
re-ACK de054df6dc🔗
w0xlt:
reACK de054df6dc
rkrux:
Concept ACK de054df6dc
Tree-SHA512: 16a6c265bc1ada5e7a5ef9b95f0ff65015672ca46d9a43b7e10d60e9e085052e9bbfe01ac3e494cc606afb652a1b476b10e434d13e9877b67d2cb0196a9bd190
85368aafa0 test: Run simple tests at various feerates (Murch)
d610951c15 test: Recreate BnB iteration exhaustion test (Murch)
2a1b2754f1 test: Remove redundant repeated test (Murch)
4781f5c8be test: Recreate simple BnB failure tests (Murch)
a94030ae98 test: Recreate BnB clone skipping test (Murch)
7db6f012c0 test: Move BnB feerate sensitivity tests (Murch)
2bafc46261 test: Recreate simple BnB success tests (Murch)
Pull request description:
This PR is splitting off some of the improvements made in #28985 and starts addressing the issues raised in #27754.
I aim to completely replace `coinselector_tests` with `coinselection_tests`. The goal is to generally use coins created per a nominal _effective value_ so we can get away from testing with `CoinSelectionParams` that are non-representative and effectuate counterintuitive behavior such as `feerate = 0` or `cost_of_change = 0`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 85368aafa0
monlovesmango:
ACK 85368aafa0
w0xlt:
ACK 85368aafa0
Tree-SHA512: 1a984837b4efddc0d8abe11668898fb207fb539e784bf911d4038211274b82e0fe1f8fffe7e5a19e0e013ccb7dc40e3f62d853a2a729980d0d935e66f12b9156
