4637bbe448 rpc: Explain active and internal in listdescriptors (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The current help text for active and internal in listdescriptors is not particularly helpful. They require the reader to already know what those terms mean. This help text is updated to actually explain the definitions of those words in context of a descriptor wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
S3RK:
ACK 4637bbe448
jarolrod:
ACK 4637bbe448
w0xlt:
ACK 4637bbe448
Tree-SHA512: 0af2c04f3b9920799cf616ad618bde9248eb9f74cc28f443b5b0f6646deba76e9b1415aca0865ad3bcc24aa6af0e9d07ad7b7cd80f0fe80838cf847f1b944426
a62e84438d fuzz: add `SplitString` fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
4fad7e46d9 test: add unit tests for `SplitString` helper (Kiminuo)
9cc8e876e4 refactor: introduce single-separator split helper `SplitString` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a simple string split helper `SplitString` that takes use of the spanparsing `Split` function that was first introduced in #13697 (commit fe8a7dcd78). This enables to replace most calls to `boost::split`, in the cases where only a single separator character is used. Note that while previous attempts to replace `boost::split` were controversial (e.g. #13751), this one has a trivial implementation: it merely uses an internal helper (that is unit tested and in regular use with output descriptiors) and converts its result from spans to strings. As a drawback though, not all `boost::split` instances can be tackled.
As a possible optimization, one could return a vector of `std::string_view`s (available since C++17) instead of strings, to avoid copies. This would need more carefulness on the caller sites though, to avoid potential lifetime issues, and it's probably not worth it, considering that none of the places where strings are split are really performance-critical.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
Code review ACK a62e84438d. Ran all tests. I also like that with `boost::split` it was not obvious that the resulting container was cleared, and with `SplitString` API that's obvious.
Tree-SHA512: 10cb22619ebe46831b1f8e83584a89381a036b54c88701484ac00743e2a62cfe52c9f3ecdbb2d0815e536c99034558277cc263600ec3f3588b291c07eef8ed24
The current help text for active and internal in listdescriptors is not
particularly helpful. They require the reader to already know what those
terms mean. This help text is updated to actually explain the
definitions of those words in context of a descriptor wallet.
This helper uses spanparsing::Split internally and enables to replace
all calls to boost::split where only a single separator is passed.
Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <Martin.Ankerl@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Warning: Replacing fs::system_complete calls with fs::absolute calls
in this commit may cause minor changes in behaviour because fs::absolute
no longer strips trailing slashes; however these changes are believed to
be safe.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
e5b6aef612 Move CBlockFileInfo::ToString method where class is declared (Russell Yanofsky)
f7086fd8ff Add src/wallet/* code to wallet:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
90fc8b089d Add src/node/* code to node:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
There are no code changes, this is just adding `namespace` and `using` declarations and `node::` or `wallet::` qualifiers in some places.
Motivations for this change are:
- To make it easier to see when node and wallet code is being accessed places where it shouldn't be. For example if GUI code is accessing node and wallet internals or if wallet and node code are referencing each other.
- To make source code organization clearer ([#15732](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15732)), being able to know that `wallet::` code is in `src/wallet/`, `node::` code is in `src/node/`, `init::` code is in `src/init/`, `util::` code is in `src/util/`, etc.
Reviewing with `git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.` can be helpful to verify this is only updating declarations, not changing code.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e5b6aef612
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK e5b6aef612🍨
Tree-SHA512: 3797745c90246794e2d55a2ee6e8b0ad5c811e4e03a242d3fdfeb68032f8787f0d48ed4097f6b7730f540220c0af99ef423cd9dbe7f76b2ec12e769a757a2c8d
`fs::path` looks more native than `std::string` for a parameter which
represents a backup file. This change eliminates back-and-forth type
conversions.
65efbba45d rpcwallet: mention labels are deactivated for ranged descriptors (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
It was confusing when trying to use it as a blackbox. So mention it so next ones don't have to open the said box :)
See #23749 for context
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 65efbba45d
achow101:
ACK 65efbba45d
Tree-SHA512: d8a3d1f81c16d95855ac2b01e8fd20e83d6dac1721b3da464a9a890e46102992a6882918be87b2a28b929349ee7f1beb1af6c88b22f065fbbb6948275a6d2b8f
62fa61fa4a refactor: remove the wallet folder if the restore fails (w0xlt)
abbb7eccef refactor: Move restorewallet() RPC logic to the wallet section (w0xlt)
4807f73f48 refactor: Implement restorewallet() logic in the wallet section (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
Currently `restorewallet()` logic is written in the RPC layer and it can´t be reused by GUI. So it moves this to the wallet section and then, GUI can access it.
This is necessary to implement the "Restore Wallet" menu item in the GUI (which is already implemented in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/471 ).
This commit also simplifies error handling and adds a new behavior: if the restore fails, the invalid wallet folder is removed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 62fa61fa4a
shaavan:
crACK 62fa61fa4a
Tree-SHA512: 7ccfbad5943f38616ba0c2dd443c97a4b5bc1f6612dbf5a9e7a0263100aba36671fae929a2e7688442667be394645f44484af137a4802f204a33c4689eb27c39
Wallet RPCs that allow a rescan based on block-timestamp or block-height
need to sync with the active chain first, because the user might assume
the wallet is up-to-date with the latest block they got reported via a
blockchain RPC.
11daf6ceb1 More Span simplifications (Pieter Wuille)
568dd2f839 Replace MakeSpan helper with Span deduction guide (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
C++17 supports [user-defined deduction guides](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/class_template_argument_deduction), allowing class constructors to be invoked without specifying class template arguments. Instead, the code can contain rules to infer the template arguments from the constructor argument types.
This alleviates the need for the `MakeSpan` helper. Convert the existing MakeSpan rules into deduction rules for `Span` itself, and replace all invocations of `MakeSpan` with just `Span` ones.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 11daf6ceb1 Only change is removing a hunk in the tests 🌕
Tree-SHA512: 10f3e82e4338f39d9b7b407cd11aac7ebe1e9191b58e3d7f4e5e338a4636c0e126b4a1d912127c7446f57ba356c8d6544482e47f97901efea6a54fffbfd7895f
