aaaa7bd0ba60aa7114810d4794940882d987c0aa iwyu: Add missing includes (MacroFake)
fa9ebec096ae185576a54aa80bd2a9e57f867ed4 Remove g_parallel_script_checks (MacroFake)
fa7c834b9f988fa7f2ace2d67b1628211b7819df Move ::fCheckBlockIndex into ChainstateManager (MacroFake)
fa43188d86288fa6666307a77c106c8f069ebdbe Move ::fCheckpointsEnabled into ChainstateManager (MacroFake)
cccca83099453bf0882bce4f897f77eee5836e8b Move ::nMinimumChainWork into ChainstateManager (MacroFake)
fa29d0b57cdeb91c8798d5c90ba9cc18085e99fb Move ::hashAssumeValid into ChainstateManager (MacroFake)
faf44876db555f7488c8df96db9fa88b793f897c Move ::nMaxTipAge into ChainstateManager (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It seems preferable to assign globals to a class (in this case `ChainstateManager`), than to leave them dangling. This should clarify scope for code-readers, as well as clarifying unit test behaviour.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
Code review ACK aaaa7bd0ba60aa7114810d4794940882d987c0aa
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK aaaa7bd0ba60aa7114810d4794940882d987c0aa. No changes since last review, other than rebase
aureleoules:
reACK aaaa7bd0ba60aa7114810d4794940882d987c0aa
Tree-SHA512: 83ec3ba0fb4f1dad95810d4bd4e578454e0718dc1bdd3a794cc4e48aa819b6f5dad4ac4edab3719bdfd5f89cbe23c2740a50fd56c1ff81c99e521c5f6d4e898d
9153ff3e274953ea0d92d53ddab4c72deeace1b1 rpc: add non-regression test about deriveaddresses crash when index is 2147483647 (muxator)
addf9d6502db12cebcc5976df3111cac1a369b82 rpc: fix crash in deriveaddresses when derivation index is 2147483647 (muxator)
Pull request description:
This PR is a proposal for fixing #26274 (better described there).
The problem is due to a signed int wrapping when the `index` parameter of the `deriveaddresses` RPC call has the value `2^31-1`.
```C++
for (int i = range_begin; i <= range_end; ++i) {
```
* the first commit adds a "temporary" test case (`test/functional/rpc_deriveaddresses_crash.py`) that shows the crash, and can be used to generate a core dump;
* the second commit fixes the problem giving an explicit size to the `i` variable in a for loop, from `int` to `int64_t`. The same commit also removes the ephemeral test case and adds a passing test to `test/functional/rpc_deriveaddresses.py`, in order to prevent future regressions.
This is my first submission to this project and I do not know its conventions. Please advise if something needs to be changed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 9153ff3e274953ea0d92d53ddab4c72deeace1b1
Tree-SHA512: 0477b57b15dc2c682cf539d6002f100d44a8c7e668041aa3340c39dcdbd40e083c75dec6896b6c076b044a01c2e5254272ae6696d8a1467539391926f270940a
796b020c37c793674f9d614d5d70fd1ed65f0938 wallet: add taproot support to external signer (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Builds on #22558 (merged on 2022-06-28).
[HWI 2.1.0](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/releases/tag/2.1.0) or newer is required to import and use taproot descriptors. Older versions will work, but won't import a taproot descriptor.
Tested with HWI 2.1.1:
* Trezor T (firmware v2.5.1) on Signet: signs, change detection works
* Ledger Nano S (firmware 2.1.0, Bitcoin app 2.0.6): signs, change detection works
Only the most basic `tr(key)` descriptor is supported, script path spending is completely untested (if it works at all).
ACKs for top commit:
jb55:
utACK 796b020c37c793674f9d614d5d70fd1ed65f0938
achow101:
ACK 796b020c37c793674f9d614d5d70fd1ed65f0938
Tree-SHA512: 6dcb7eeb45421a3bbf2bdabeacd29979867db69077d7bf192bb77faa4bfefe446487b8df07bc40f9457009a88e598bdc09f769e6106fed2833ace7ef205a157a
This extra method will be needed for updating the filter set for
faster wallet rescans; after an internal top-up has happened, we only
want to add the newly created scriptPubKeys.
This is useful for speeding up wallet rescans and is based on an
earlier version from PR #15845 ("wallet: Fast rescan with BIP157 block
filters"), which was never merged.
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>
393be867241bed175bc65c05ad40c7579b51c393 build, msvc: Drop no longer required macro definitions for leveldb (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Since levedb v1.21:
- the `__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS` macro definition is unneeded;
commit: [50fbc87e8c62a816d6afd4740e0652a13ac6dc3e](50fbc87e8c)
- the `LEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT` macro is unused;
commit: [04f39105c5a418905da8b7657ca244d672c99d3b](04f39105c5)
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK 393be867241bed175bc65c05ad40c7579b51c393.
jarolrod:
crACK 393be867241bed175bc65c05ad40c7579b51c393
Tree-SHA512: 845bb310474cf17f9f0f70a585054a222914313a0fc28c42a023133250efbb9ab7fb2d1ebb355943233b6fd24d5bddfb73fbbf5dce71ea232ae652af8b695149
e1eadaa72d6831d1d0a53ba97c215dc4cdb64436 Revert "test: check importing wallets when blocks are pruned throw an error" (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
The test doesn't pass (not detected by the normal CI, because it is an extended test):
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 133, in main
self.run_test()
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/bitcoin-core/test/functional/feature_pruning.py", line 480, in run_test
self.wallet_test()
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/bitcoin-core/test/functional/feature_pruning.py", line 361, in wallet_test
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Importing wallets is disabled when blocks are pruned", self.nodes[2].importwallet, "abc")
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 130, in assert_raises_rpc_error
assert try_rpc(code, message, fun, *args, **kwds), "No exception raised"
File "/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/bitcoin-core/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 145, in try_rpc
raise AssertionError(
AssertionError: Expected substring not found in error message:
substring: 'Importing wallets is disabled when blocks are pruned'
error message: 'Only legacy wallets are supported by this command'.
```
So revert it for now, which will be done anyway in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24865/commits. (This commit is taken from there)
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
ACK e1eadaa72d6831d1d0a53ba97c215dc4cdb64436
Tree-SHA512: 10f556ea1aa97dc9cb64f91055977eecb9534f658170aabb4909c3e85ca6c20588c7a021219356fab678e0e2bec999d347facd00054f07a9445ad393e6353b4c
7ad15d11005eac36421398530da127333d87ea80 [net processing] Handle IsContinuationOfLowWorkHeadersSync return value correctly when new headers sync is started (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a bug in the headers sync logic that enables submitting headers to a nodes block index that don't lead to a chain that surpasses our DoS limit.
The issue is that we ignore the return value on [the first `IsContinuationOfLowWorkHeadersSync` call after a new headers sync is started](fabc031048/src/net_processing.cpp (L2553-L2568)), which leads to us passing headers to [`ProcessNewBlockHeaders`](fabc031048/src/net_processing.cpp (L2856)) when that initial `IsContinuationOfLowWorkHeadersSync` call returns `false`. One easy way (maybe the only?) to trigger this is by sending 2000 headers where the last header has a different `nBits` value than the prior headers (which fails the pre-sync logic [here](fabc031048/src/headerssync.cpp (L189))). Those 2000 headers will be passed to `ProcessNewBlockHeaders`.
I haven't included a test here so far because we can't test this without changing the default value for `CRegTestParams::consensus.fPowAllowMinDifficultyBlocks` or doing some more involved refactoring.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 7ad15d11005eac36421398530da127333d87ea80
glozow:
ACK 7ad15d1100
Tree-SHA512: 9aabb8bf3700401e79863d0accda0befd2a83c4d469a53f97d827e51139e2f826aee08cdfbc8866b311b153f61fdac9b7aa515fcfa2a21c5e2812c2bf3c03664
a079103c94fbaabb40bc086d56e91af6fcee6fe9 gui: update peers window "Transaction Relay" label and tooltip (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
to current v24.0 p2p behavior. Similar updates have been made to RPC getpeerinfo and CLI -netinfo.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 400a794f655f799eefcb77c479fef6bcd3f81aede2af54a4a9bcb7c0c783e2e3f18bc5fd2484a79e8c30af279747a05fc0ebb69dbc47375d4c55b16ceba97b99
c2a21c06703fd20e314da8431220776c8f1cc08d gui: use fallback value for Version and User Agent during peer connection (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
During connection setup for a peer, getpeerinfo returns `"version": 0, "subver": ""` and the GUI Peers window displays 0 and an empty field, respectively.
Give these fields the same behavior as the other fields in the GUI Peers window: display the fallback value in `src/qt/forms/debugwindow.ui` (i.e. `N/A`) until a valid result is available after the peer connection completes.
An alternative would be to display nothing for both, as is the case currently for User Agent.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK c2a21c06703fd20e314da8431220776c8f1cc08d
furszy:
code ACK c2a21c06
Tree-SHA512: 4f0060fa9abde120a2bb48c9dcc87894d9bb70c33e6ab43b22400a4bcd0ceff0fa098adf7f385b0a7a4cf5d7053463b36fe1232e19a8d5025eecd8db9833f73b
1184a66347afbaeca69e2d891a138e435fbfd5bb doc: Rearrange some lines in the dependency graph of libraries (Stacie Waleyko)
Pull request description:
In this PR, I've attempted to improve readability in the [dependency graph of libraries](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/design/libraries.md) by untangling a few crossed lines. I'm not sure if this is that big of an improvement but wanted to throw it out there.
I used an extremely scientific method of manually counting the number of crossed lines in the original diagram and got 15. This PR reduces that number down to about 10.
I also changed the curve of the lines to "basis" which rounds the edges out. Again, not sure if it really is that much of an improvement, but it seems marginally easier on the eyes.
Here is what the new graph looks like rendered:
The changes can be verified independently with [Mermaid](https://mermaid-js.github.io/mermaid/#/), with the easiest way being the online editor: https://mermaid.live/
I did try moving some more stuff around, particularly the top level of library callers, but was not able to simplify the graph any further.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK 1184a66347afbaeca69e2d891a138e435fbfd5bb
Tree-SHA512: 61d33d68c1e6fa354aebdda5e06e9c7a722ca20886c6acc30dd08af7133d737130d7a646d87f9e5a8ae0bc5a5aabfbc64ded9ee04dfeed8f23d948444add916b
fa51cc965110e14661c848364a29c493287673be refactor: Use type-safe time point for CWallet::m_next_resend (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
`GetTime` is not type-safe, thus deprecated, see 75cbbfa279/src/util/time.h (L62-L70)
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
Code Review ACK fa51cc965110e14661c848364a29c493287673be
aureleoules:
ACK fa51cc965110e14661c848364a29c493287673be
Tree-SHA512: 030de10070518580763ea75079442e2f934c54d3083be3ebe35e7f1bc6db2096745bb46d95aa1e6efe29ced30a048acfe5cd999178e6787b7647dfbec5ecb444
Since levedb v1.21:
- the `__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS` macro definition is unneeded;
commit: 50fbc87e8c62a816d6afd4740e0652a13ac6dc3e
- the `LEVELDB_ATOMIC_PRESENT` macro is unused;
commit: 04f39105c5a418905da8b7657ca244d672c99d3b
ff138f9cf11b94bdfa5b16d7d03af93e619842d8 doc: add `scanblocks` to list of descriptor RPCs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a tiny documentation follow-up to #23549.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK ff138f9cf11b94bdfa5b16d7d03af93e619842d8
shaavan:
ACK ff138f9cf11b94bdfa5b16d7d03af93e619842d8
Tree-SHA512: cc45b78c13ec4aa5bac688648f8e83f04a9ae54376e67371b280428f0253e2585cf0575fa51e3835d4c13c940559bfcdd88d7504bf97a81b2a73bb34a0db7577
dddd1acf58cb7bf328ce3e74d1dc0e8cbd503247 net: Set relay in version msg to peers with relay permission (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to set the `relay` permission in -blocksonly mode and also ask the peer not to relay transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK dddd1acf58cb7bf328ce3e74d1dc0e8cbd503247
naumenkogs:
ACK dddd1acf58
mzumsande:
ACK dddd1acf58cb7bf328ce3e74d1dc0e8cbd503247
Tree-SHA512: 7bb0e964993ea4982747ae2801fe963ff88586e2ded03015b60ab83172b5b61f2d50e9cde9d7711b7ab207f8639467ecafc4d011ea151ec6c82c722f510f4df7
deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e test: update feature_config_args.py (josibake)
2e3826cbcd675dcd1d03970233ba5e143e09eb75 util: warn if reindex is used in conf (josibake)
5e744f423838fe7d45453541271bc1a07cd62eac util: disallow setting conf in bitcoin.conf (josibake)
Pull request description:
In help from `bitcoind -h` it specifes that `conf` can only be used from the commandline. However, if `conf` is set in a `bitcoin.conf` file, there is no error and from reading the logs it seems as if the `conf=<other file>` is being used, despite it being ignored. To recreate, you can setup a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default directory, add `conf=<some other file>.conf` and in the separate config file set whichever config value you want and verify that it is being ignored. alternatively, if you set `includeconf=<some other file>.conf` , your config in `<some other file>` will be picked up.
This PR fixes this by having the node error when reading the config file if `conf=` is set.
Additionally, it was mentioned in a recent [PR review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/24858) that if `reindex=1` is set in the config file, the node will reindex on every startup, which is undesirable:
```irc
17:14 <larryruane> michaelfolkson: Reindex is requested by the user (node operator) as a configuration option (command line or in the config file, tho you probably would never put it in the file, or else it would reindex on every startup!)
```
This PR also has a commit to warn if `reindex=1` is set in the config file.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
aureleoules:
tACK deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK deba6fe3158cd0b2283e0901a072e434ba5b594e.
Tree-SHA512: 619fd0aa14e98af1166d6beb92651f5ba3f10d38b8ee132957f094f19c3a37313d9f4d7be2e4019f3fc9a2ca5fa42d03eb539ad820e27efec7ee58a26eb520b1
fafc96aaf4c92feec50074e34a3fc1edc13cab4c test: Test year 2106 block timestamps (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Alternative to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21362 that closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21356
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fafc96a
Tree-SHA512: 196d98f42d6f7f0222312b7bd1c68b3bd30cb6f0cbaccb900cfc5fcc689494adb2a7d7d6023c1ff1e8cf871047ec37eeca41386e31029d99cabf9343b4fd2a03
315fd4dbabb6b631b755811742a3bdf93e1241bf test: Test for out of bounds vout in sendall (Andrew Chow)
b132c85650afb2182f2e58e903f3d6f86fd3fb22 wallet: Check utxo prevout index out of bounds in sendall (Andrew Chow)
708b72b7151c855cb5dac2fb6a81e8f35153c46f test: Test that sendall works with watchonly spending specific utxos (Andrew Chow)
6bcd7e2a3b52f855db84cd23b5ee70d27be3434f wallet: Correctly check ismine for sendall (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `sendall` RPC would previously fail when used with a watchonly wallet and specified inputs. This failure was caused by checking isminetype equality with ISMINE_ALL rather than a bitwise AND as IsMine can never return ISMINE_ALL.
Also added a test.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK 315fd4dbab
furszy:
ACK 315fd4db
Tree-SHA512: fb55cf6524e789964770b803f401027319f0351433ea084ffa7c5e6f1797567a608c956b7f7c5bd542aa172c4b7b38b07d0976f5ec587569efead27266e8664c
3e9d0bea8deb61596c91ead997e9db83f5b0ff68 build: only run high priority benchmarks in 'make check' (furszy)
466b54bd4ab8227ff8c066a027a92791366a81c1 bench: surround main() execution with try/catch (furszy)
3da7cd2a762077fa81dc40832d556d8a3fd53674 bench: explicitly make all current benchmarks "high" priority (furszy)
05b8c76232dedf938740e8034c725ac16d32974a bench: add "priority level" to the benchmark framework (furszy)
f1593780b8e3b6adefee08b10d270c5c329f91fe bench: place benchmark implementation inside benchmark namespace (furszy)
Pull request description:
This is from today's meeting, a simple "priority level" for the benchmark framework.
Will allow us to run certain benchmarks while skip non-prioritized ones in `make check`.
By default, `bench_bitcoin` will run all the benchmarks. `make check`will only run the high priority ones,
and have marked all the existent benchmarks as "high priority" to retain the current behavior.
Could test it by modifying any benchmark priority to something different from "high", and
run `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=high` and/or `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=medium,low`
(the first command will skip the modified bench while the second one will include it).
Note: the second commit could be avoided by having a default arg value for the priority
level but.. an explicit set in every `BENCHMARK` macro call makes it less error-prone.
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8deb61596c91ead997e9db83f5b0ff68
achow101:
ACK 3e9d0bea8deb61596c91ead997e9db83f5b0ff68
theStack:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8deb61596c91ead997e9db83f5b0ff68
stickies-v:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
Tree-SHA512: ece59bf424c5fc1db335f84caa507476fb8ad8c6151880f1f8289562e17023aae5b5e7de03e8cbba6337bf09215f9be331e9ef51c791c43bce43f7446813b054
e133264c5b1f72e94dcb9cebd85cdb523fcf8070 Add test for PSBT input verification (Greg Sanders)
d25699280af1ea45bebc884f63a10da7ea275ef9 Verify PSBT inputs rather than check for fields being empty (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
In a few keys spots, PSBT finality is checked by looking for non-empty witness data.
This complicates a couple things:
1) Empty data can be valid in certain cases
2) User may be passed bogus final data by a counterparty during PSBT work happening, and end up with incorrect signatures that they may not be able to check in other contexts if the UTXO doesn't exist yet in chain/mempool, timelocks, etc.
On the whole I think these heavier checks are worth it in case someone is actually assuming the signatures are correct if our API is saying so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e133264c5b1f72e94dcb9cebd85cdb523fcf8070
Tree-SHA512: 9de4fbb0be1257b081781f5df908fd55666e3acd5c4e36beb3b3f2f5a6aed69ff77068c44cde6127e159e773293fd9ced4c0bb47e693969f337e74dc8af030da
