55696a0ac30bcfbd555f71cbc8eac23b725f7dcf wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` (w0xlt)
bf19069c53501231a2f3ba59afa067913ec4d3b2 wallet: remove `mempool_sequence` from `transactionAddedToMempool` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR removes `mempool_sequence` from `transactionRemovedFromMempool` and `transactionAddedToMempool`.
`mempool_sequence` is not used in these methods, only in ZMQ notifications.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 55696a0ac3
Tree-SHA512: 621e89230bcb6edfed83e2758601a2b093822fc2dc4e9bfb00487e340f2bc4c5ac3bf6df3ca00b7fe55bb3df15858820f2bf698f403d2e48b915dd9eb47b63e0
This is useful for speeding up wallet rescans and is based on an
earlier version from PR #15845 ("wallet: Fast rescan with BIP157 block
filters"), which was never merged.
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Replace CommitInternal method with CustomCommit and use interfaces::Chain
instead of CChainState to generate block locator.
This commit does not change behavior in any way, except in the
(m_best_block_index == nullptr) case, which was added recently in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24117 as part of an ongoing attempt to
prevent index corruption if bitcoind is interrupted during startup. New
behavior in that case should be slightly better than the old behavior (skipping
the entire custom+base commit now vs only skipping the base commit previously)
and this might avoid more cases of corruption.
Add new interfaces::BlockInfo struct to be able to pass extra block
information (file and undo information) to indexes which they are
updated to use high level interfaces::Chain notifications.
This commit does not change behavior in any way.
817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411 wallet: avoid rescans if under the snapshot (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of assumed-valid blocks.
Of course in live code right now, `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID` block index entries don't exist since they're a unique flag introduced by the use of UTXO snapshots, so this is prophylactic code exercised only by unittests.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 817326a828d6148dc63d9ef08f641b9c0c522411. This seems like the simplest change we can make to avoid wallet problems when an assumeutxo snapshot is loaded.
Tree-SHA512: cfa44b2eb33d1818d30df45210d0dde1e9b78cc9b7c88cb985054dc28427bba9e0905debe4196065d1d3a5ce7bca7e605e629d5ce5f0225b25395746e6d3d596
Currently, the wallet scan progress is not saved.
If it is interrupted, it will be necessary to start from
scratch on the next load.
With this change, progress is saved every 60 seconds.
Co-authored-by: furszy <matiasfurszyfer@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Refuse to load a wallet if it requires a rescan lower than the height of
an unvalidated snapshot we're running -- in more general terms, if we
don't have data for the blocks.
7e88f61b285e6a356ea4f6ba384858f109559985 multiprocess: Make interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive non-const (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
`interfaces::Chain` is an abstract class, so declaring the method const would be exposing internal implementation details of subclasses to interface callers. And specifically this doesn't work because the multiprocess implementation of the `interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive` method can't be const because IPC connection state and request state is not constant during the call.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 7e88f61b28
Tree-SHA512: 1c5ed89870aeb7170b9048c41299ab650dfa3d0978088e08c4c866fa0babb292722710b16f25540f26667220cb4747b1c256c4bd42893c552291eccc155346a3
interfaces::Chain is an abstract class, so declaring the method const
would be exposing internal implementation details of subclasses to
interface callers. And specifically this doesn't work because the
multiprocess implementation of the interfaces::Chain::isTaprootActive
method can't be const because IPC connection state and request state is
not constant during the call.
49ee2a0ad88e0e656234b769d806987784ff1e28 Avoid wallet code writing node settings file (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Change wallet loading code to access settings through the Chain interface instead of writing settings.json directly. This is for running wallet and node in separate processes, since multiprocess code wouldn't easily work with different processes updating the same file.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 49ee2a0ad88e0e656234b769d806987784ff1e28 ([`jamesob/ackr/22217.1.ryanofsky.refactor_avoid_wallet_co`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22217.1.ryanofsky.refactor_avoid_wallet_co))
ryanofsky:
> ACK [49ee2a0](49ee2a0ad8) ([`jamesob/ackr/22217.1.ryanofsky.refactor_avoid_wallet_co`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22217.1.ryanofsky.refactor_avoid_wallet_co))
Zero-1729:
crACK 49ee2a0ad88e0e656234b769d806987784ff1e28
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 49ee2a0ad88e0e656234b769d806987784ff1e28
Tree-SHA512: a81c63b87816f739e02e3992808f314294d6c7213babaafdaaf3c4650ebc97ee4f98f9a4684ce4ff87372df59989b8ad5929159c5686293a7cce04e97e2fabba
5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5 Add FoundBlock.found member (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the block was found.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5
jamesob:
ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5 ([`jamesob/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock))
Zero-1729:
crACK 5c5d0b6
Tree-SHA512: d906e1b7100ff72c3aa06d80bd77673887b2db670ebd52dce7c4f6f557a23a1744c6109308228a37fda6c6ea74f05ba0efecff0ef235ab06ea8acd861fbb8675
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more
simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to
determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So
in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output
variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to
read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send
them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote
process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With
FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read
or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final
output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the
block was found.
Using the zmq notifications to avoid excessive mempool polling can be difficult
given the current notifications available. It announces all transactions
being added to mempool or included in blocks, but announces no evictions
and gives no indication if the transaction is in the mempool or a block.
Block notifications for zmq are also substandard, in that it only announces
block tips, while all block transactions are still announced.
This commit adds a unified stream which can be used to closely track mempool:
1) getrawmempool to fill out mempool knowledge
2) if txhash is announced, add or remove from set
based on add/remove flag
3) if blockhash is announced, get block txn list,
remove from those transactions local view of mempool
4) if we drop a sequence number, go to (1)
The mempool sequence number starts at the value 1, and
increments each time a transaction enters the mempool,
or is evicted from the mempool for any reason, including
block inclusion. The mempool sequence number is published
via ZMQ for any transaction-related notification.
These features allow for ZMQ/RPC consumer to track mempool
state in a more exacting way, without unnecesarily polling
getrawmempool. See interface_zmq.py::test_mempool_sync for
example usage.
Add WalletClient interface so node interface is cleaner and don't need
wallet-specific methods.
The new NodeContext::wallet_client pointer will also be needed to eliminate
global wallet variables like ::vpwallets, because createWallet(), loadWallet(),
getWallets(), etc methods called by the GUI need a way to get a reference to
the list of open wallets if it is no longer a global variable.
Also tweaks splash screen registration for load wallet events to be delayed
until after wallet client is created.
This maintains a persistent list of wallets stored in settings that will
automatically be loaded on startup. Being able to load a wallet automatically
on startup will be more useful in the GUI when the option to create wallets is
added in #15006, but it's reasonable to expose this feature by RPC as well.
fs.cpp:35:17: error: no member named 'strerror' in namespace 'std'
return std::strerror(errno);
~~~~~^
fs.cpp:49:9: error: use of undeclared identifier 'close'
close(fd);
^
2 errors generated.
./interfaces/chain.h:265:55: error: ‘std::function’ has not been declared
virtual void rpcRunLater(const std::string& name, std::function<void()> fn, int64_t seconds) = 0;
^~~
This fix is a based on the fix by Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18600.
Unlike that PR, which implements some new behavior, this just restores previous
wallet notification and status behavior for transactions removed from the
mempool because they conflict with transactions in a block. The behavior was
accidentally changed in two `CWallet::BlockConnected` updates:
a31be09bfd77eed497a8e251d31358e16e2f2eb1 and
7e89994133725125dddbfa8d45484e3b9ed51c6e from
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16624, causing issue
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18325.
The change here could be improved and replaced with a more comprehensive
cleanup, so it includes a detailed comment explaining future considerations.
Fixes#18325
Co-authored-by: Antoine Riard <ariard@student.42.fr>
This change is intended to make the bitcoin node and its rpc, network
and gui interfaces more responsive while the wallet is in use. Currently
because the node's cs_main mutex is always locked before the wallet's
cs_wallet mutex (to prevent deadlocks), cs_main currently stays locked
while the wallet does relatively slow things like creating and listing
transactions.
This commit only remmove chain lock tacking in wallet code, and invert
lock order from cs_main, cs_wallet to cs_wallet, cs_main.
must happen at once to avoid any deadlock. Previous commit were only
removing Chain::Lock methods to Chain interface and enforcing they
take cs_main.
Remove LockChain method from CWallet and Chain::Lock interface.
48973402d8bccb673eaeb68b7aa86faa39d3cb8a wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::GetKeyBirthTimes (Russell Yanofsky)
e958ff9ab5607da2cd321f29fc785a6d359e44f4 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::CreateTransaction (Russell Yanofsky)
c0d07dc4cba7634cde4e8bf586557772f3248a42 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::ScanForWalletTransactions (Russell Yanofsky)
1be8ff280c78c30baabae9429c53c0bebb89c44d wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in rescanblockchain (Russell Yanofsky)
3cb85ac594f115db99f96b0a0f4bfdcd69ef0590 wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in CWallet::RescanFromTime (Russell Yanofsky)
f7ba881bc669451a60fedac58a449794702a3e23 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in listsinceblock (Russell Yanofsky)
bc96a9bfc61afdb696fb92cb644ed5fc3d1793f1 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importmulti (Russell Yanofsky)
25a9fcf9e53bfa94e8f8b19a4abfda0f444f6b2a wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importwallet and dumpwallet (Russell Yanofsky)
c1694ce6bb7e19a8722d5583cd85ad17da40bb67 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in importprunedfunds (Russell Yanofsky)
ade5f87971211bc67753f14a0d49e020142efc7c wallet refactor: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in qt wallettests (Russell Yanofsky)
f6da44ccce4cfff53433e665305a6fe0a01364e4 wallet: Avoid use of Chain::Lock in tryGetTxStatus and tryGetBalances (Russell Yanofsky)
bf30cd4922ea62577d7bf63f5029e8be62665d45 refactor: Add interfaces::FoundBlock class to selectively return block data (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a set of changes updating wallet code to make fewer calls to `Chain::Lock` methods, so the `Chain::Lock` class will be easier to remove in #16426 with fewer code changes and small changes to behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 48973402d8, only change is fixing bug 📀
fjahr:
re-ACK 48973402d8bccb673eaeb68b7aa86faa39d3cb8a, reviewed rebase and changes since last review, built and ran tests locally
ariard:
Coce Review ACK 4897340, only changes are one suggested by last review on more accurate variable naming, human-readable output, args comments in `findCommonAncestor`
Tree-SHA512: cfd2f559f976b6faaa032794c40c9659191d5597b013abcb6c7968d36b2abb2b14d4e596f8ed8b9a077e96522365261299a241a939b3111eaf729ba0c3ef519b
3ce16ad2f91d1e2edc7e7bdc5a19f72aa8c3e739 refactor: Use psbt forward declaration (Russell Yanofsky)
1dde238f2c21a0cc9bada10a2449cf9c6b2178ad Add ChainClient setMockTime, getWallets methods (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
These changes are needed to set mock times, and get wallet interface pointers correctly when
wallet code is running in a different process from node code in #10102
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3ce16ad2f91d1e2edc7e7bdc5a19f72aa8c3e739 🔙
promag:
Code review ACK 3ce16ad2f91d1e2edc7e7bdc5a19f72aa8c3e739.
Tree-SHA512: 6c093bfcd68adf5858a1aade4361cdb7fb015496673504ac7a93d0bd2595215047184551d6fd526baa27782331cd2819ce45c4cf923b205ce93ac29e485b5dd8
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip, where it will treat the last block processed as the
current tip.
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change affects behavior in a few small ways.
- If there's no max_height specified, percentage progress is measured ending at
wallet last processed block instead of node tip
- More consistent error reporting: Early check to see if start_block is on the
active chain is removed, so start_block is always read and the triggers an
error if it's unavailable
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip. The rescanblockchain error height error checking
will just be stricter in this case and only accept values up to the last
processed height
This is a step toward removing the Chain::Lock class and reducing cs_main
locking.
This change only affects behavior in the case where wallet last block processed
falls behind the chain tip. Previously listsinceblock might not have returned
all transactions up to the claimed "lastblock" value in this case, resulting in
race conditions and potentially missing transactions in cases where
listsinceblock was called in a loop like
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14338#issuecomment-426706574
