168b6c317ca054c1287c36be532964e861f44266 add dummy file param to fix jupyter (Josiah Baker)
Pull request description:
this fixes argparse to use `parse_known_args`. previously, if an unknown argument was passed, argparse would fail with an `unrecognized arguments: %s` error.
## why
the documentation mentions being able to run `TestShell` in a REPL interpreter or a jupyter notebook. when i tried to run inside a jupyter notebook, i got the following error:
this was due to the notebook passing the filename of the notebook as an argument. this is a known problem with notebooks and argparse, documented here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48796169/how-to-fix-ipykernel-launcher-py-error-unrecognized-arguments-in-jupyter
## testing
to test, make sure you have jupyter notebooks installed. you can do this by running:
```
pip install notebook
```
or following instructions from [here](https://jupyterlab.readthedocs.io/en/stable/getting_started/installation.html).
once installed, start a notebook (`jupyter notebook`), launch a python3 kernel and run the following snippet:
```python
import sys
# make sure this is the path for your system
sys.path.insert(0, "/path/to/bitcoin/test/functional")
from test_framework.test_shell import TestShell
test = TestShell().setup(num_nodes=2, setup_clean_chain=True)
```
you should see the following output, without errors:
if you are unfamiliar with notebooks, here is a short guide on using them: https://jupyter.readthedocs.io/en/latest/running.html
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 168b6c317ca054c1287c36be532964e861f44266
jamesob:
crACK 168b6c317c
practicalswift:
cr ACK 168b6c317ca054c1287c36be532964e861f44266
Tree-SHA512: 4fee1563bf64a1cf9009934182412446cde03badf2f19553b78ad2cb3ceb0e5e085a5db41ed440473494ac047f04641311ecbba3948761c6553d0ca4b54937b4
The `on_addr` functionality of `AddrReceiver` tests logic specific to how the
addr messages are set up in the test bodies. To allow other callers to also use
`AddrReceiver`, only apply the assertion logic if the caller indicates
desirability by setting `test_addr_contents` to true when initializing the
class.
testshell in jupyter was failing due to an extra arg.
this adds a dummy -f param, which allows TestShell to
be used in a command line or jupyter environment
d6d2ab984547be4a9f7ba859a2a4c9ac9bfbf206 test: MiniWallet: fix fee calculation for P2PK and check tx vsize (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce024b1c0ef2dcd307023aaaab40373c8bf17db1 test: MiniWallet: force P2PK signature to have fixed size (71 bytes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #21945. It aims to both fix the fee calculation for P2PK mode transactions and enable its vsize check. Currently, the latter assumes a fixed tx length, which is fine for anyone-can-spend txs but doesn't apply to P2PK output spends due to varying DER signature size; the vsize check is therefore disabled for P2PK mode on master branch.
Creating one million DER signatures with MiniWallet shows the following distribution of sizes (smart people with better math skills probably could deduce the ratios without trying, but hey):
| DER signature size [bytes] | #occurences (ratio) |
| ------------- | ------------- |
| 71 | 498893 (49.89%) |
| 70 | 497244 (49.72%) |
| 69 | 3837 (0.38%) |
| 68 | 22 (0.0022%) |
Note that even smaller signatures are possible (for smaller R and S values with leading zero bytes), it's just that the probability decreases exponentially. Instead of choosing a large vsize check range and hoping that smaller signatures are never created (potentially leading to flaky tests), the proposed solution is ~~to limit the signature size to the two most common sizes 71 and 70 (>99.6% probability) and then accordingly only check for two vsize values; the value to be used for fee calculation is a decimal right between the two possible sizes (167.5 vbytes) and for the vsize check it's rounded down/up integer values are used.~~ to simply grind the signature to a fixed size of 71 bytes (49.89% probability, i.e. on average each call to `sign_tx()`, on average two ECC signing operations are needed).
~~The idea of grinding signatures to a fixed size (similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13666 which grinds to low-R values) would be counter-productive, as the signature creation in the test suite is quite expensive and this would significantly slow down tests that calculate hundreds of signatures (like e.g. feature_csv_activation.py).~~
For more about transaction sizes on different input/output types, see the following interesting article: https://medium.com/coinmonks/on-bitcoin-transaction-sizes-97e31bc9d816
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Concept ACK d6d2ab984547be4a9f7ba859a2a4c9ac9bfbf206
Tree-SHA512: 011c70ee0e4adf9ba12902e4b6c411db9ae96bdd8bc810bf1d67713367998e28ea328394503371fc1f5087a819547ddaea56c073b28db893ae1c0031d7927f32
b9e76f1bf08c52fcd402b2314e00db4ad247ebc8 rpc: Add test for -rpcwaittimeout (Christian Decker)
f76cb10d7dc9a7b0c55d28011161606399417664 rpc: Prefix rpcwaittimeout error with details on its nature (Christian Decker)
c490e17ef698a1695050f82ef6567b3b87a21861 doc: Add release notes for the `-rpcwaittimeout` cli parameter (Christian Decker)
a7fcc8eb59fe51473571661316214156fbdbdcae rpc: Add a `-rpcwaittimeout` parameter to limit time spent waiting (Christian Decker)
Pull request description:
Adds a new numeric `-rpcwaittimeout` that can be used to limit the
time we spend waiting on the RPC server to appear. This is used by
downstream projects to provide a bit of slack when `bitcoind`s RPC
interface is not available right away.
This makes the `-rpcwait` argument more useful, since we can now limit
how long we'll ultimately wait, before potentially giving up and reporting
an error to the caller. It was discussed in the context of the BTCPayServer
wanting to have c-lightning wait for the RPC interface to become available
but still have the option of giving up eventually ([4355]).
I checked with laanwj whether this is already possible ([comment]), and
whether this would be a welcome change. Initially I intended to repurpose
the (optional) argument to `-rpcwait`, however I decided against it since it
would potentially break existing configurations, using things like `rpcwait=1`,
or `rpcwait=true` (the former would have an unintended short timeout, when
old behavior was to wait indefinitely).
~Due to its simplicity I didn't implement a test for it yet, but if that's desired I
can provide one.~ Test was added during reviews.
[4355]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355
[comment]: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning/issues/4355#issuecomment-768288261
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b9e76f1bf08c52fcd402b2314e00db4ad247ebc8
promag:
ACK b9e76f1bf08c52fcd402b2314e00db4ad247ebc8.
Tree-SHA512: 3cd6728038ec7ca7c35c2e7ccb213bfbe963f99a49bb48bbc1e511c4dd23d9957c04f9af1f8ec57120e47b26eaf580b46817b099d5fc5083c98da7aa92db8638
With `banlist.dat` (being written in addrv1 format) if we would try to
write a Tor v3 subnet, it would serialize as a dummy-all-0s IPv6
address and subsequently, when deserialized will not result in the same
subnet.
This problem does not exist with `banlist.json` where the data is saved
in textual, human-readable form.
30aee2dfe671b347438c1c327c6f79edfacff1ce tests: Add test for compact block HB selection (Pieter Wuille)
6efbcec4ded6116a42d2783c96c60ef0f255a1b2 Protect last outbound HB compact block peer (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
If all our high-bandwidth compact block serving peers (BIP 152) stall block
download, then we can be denied a block for (potentially) a long time. As
inbound connections are much more likely to be adversarial than outbound
connections, mitigate this risk by never removing our last outbound HB peer if
it would be replaced by an inbound.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 30aee2dfe671b347438c1c327c6f79edfacff1ce
ariard:
Code ACK 30aee2dfe
jonatack:
ACK 30aee2dfe671b347438c1c327c6f79edfacff1ce
Tree-SHA512: 5c6c9326e3667b97e0864c371ae2174d2be9054dad479f4366127b9cd3ac60ffa01ec9707b16ef29cac122db6916cf56fd9985733390017134ace483278921d5
fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a test: Run pep-8 on touched test (MarcoFalke)
fab7e99c2a4b02a41b7448b45f0e6cdfdbb53ac3 test: Use MiniWallet in test_no_inherited_signaling RBF test (MarcoFalke)
fab871f649e3da4a5a5f6cffac3fc748bb1ca900 test: Remove unused generate() from test (MarcoFalke)
faff3f35b778d9af3d649b303d7edab49bfe40b4 test: Add txin.sequence option to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This comes with nice benefits:
* Less code and complexity
* Test can be run without wallet compiled in
Also add some additional checks for `getmempoolentry` (#22209) and other cleanups 🎨
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
Tested ACK fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a thanks for the explanations, nicely done
theStack:
ACK fa7d71f270b89c9d06230d4ff262646f9ea29f4a 🍷
Tree-SHA512: 0e9b8fe985779d8d7034d256deed627125bb374b6ae2972c461b3a220739a51061c6147ad69339bee16282f82716c7f3f8a7a89c693ceb1e47ea50709272332a
55311197c483477b79883da5da09f2bc71acc7cf Added new test for future blocks reacceptance (sanket1729)
511a5af4622915c236cfb11df5234232c2983e45 Fixed inconsistencies between code and comments (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
This Commit does 3 things:
1) Adds a test case for checking reacceptance a previously rejected block which
was too far in the future.
~~2) clean up uses of rehash or calc_sha256 where it was not needed~~
3) While constructing block 44, this commit makes the code consistent with the expected figure in
the comment just above it by adding a transaction to the block.
4) Fix comment describing `sign_tx()` function
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5531119
brunoerg:
reACK 55311197c483477b79883da5da09f2bc71acc7cf
Tree-SHA512: d40c72fcdbb0b2a0715adc58441eeea08147ee2ec5e371a4ccc824ebfdc6450698bd40aaeecb7ea7bfdb3cd1b264dd821b890276fff8b8d89b7225cdd9d6b546
451b96f7d2796d00eabaec56d831f9e9b1a569cc test: kill process group to avoid dangling processes (S3RK)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #19281
This PR fixes a problem when after test failure with `--failfast` option there could be dangling nodes. The nodes will continue to occupy rpc/p2p ports on the machine and will cause further test failures.
If there are any dangling nodes left at the end of the test run we kill the whole process group.
Pros: the operations is immediate and won't lead to CI timeout
Cons: the test_runner process is also killed and exit code is 137
Example output:
```
...
Early exiting after test failure
TEST | STATUS | DURATION
rpc_decodescript.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_deprecated.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_deriveaddresses.py | ✓ Passed | 2 s
rpc_dumptxoutset.py | ✖ Failed | 2 s
ALL | ✖ Failed | 8 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 4 s
Killed: 9
> echo $?
137
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 451b96f7d2796d00eabaec56d831f9e9b1a569cc
aitorjs:
ACK 451b96f7d2796d00eabaec56d831f9e9b1a569cc. Manual testing with and without **--failfast**.
Tree-SHA512: 87e510a1411b9e7571e63cf7ffc8b9a8935daf9112ffc0f069d6c406ba87743ec439808181f7e13cb97bb200fad528589786c47f0b43cf3a2ef0d06a23cb86dd
458a345b0590fd2fa04c7d8d70beb8d57e34bbc8 Add support for SIGHASH_DEFAULT in RPCs, and make it default (Pieter Wuille)
c0f0c8eccb04f90940007e0c6aaff56bf2ab35b5 tests: check spending of P2TR (Pieter Wuille)
a2380127e905e5849f90acc7c69832859d8336aa Basic Taproot signing logic in script/sign.cpp (Pieter Wuille)
49487bc3b6038393c1b9c2dbdc04a78ae1178f1a Make GetInputUTXO safer: verify non-witness UTXO match (Pieter Wuille)
fd3f6890f3dfd683f6f13db912caf5c4288adf08 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in PSBT signing (Pieter Wuille)
5cb6502ac5730ea453edbec4c46027ac2ada97e0 Construct and use PrecomputedTransactionData in SignTransaction (Pieter Wuille)
5d2e22437b22e7465ae4be64069443bcc1769dc9 Don't nuke witness data when signing fails (Pieter Wuille)
ce9353164bdb6215a62b2b6dcb2121d331796f60 Permit full precomputation in PrecomputedTransactionData (Pieter Wuille)
e841fb503d7a662bde01ec2e4794faa989265950 Add precomputed txdata support to MutableTransactionSignatureCreator (Pieter Wuille)
a91d532338ecb66ec5bed164929d878dd55d63a4 Add CKey::SignSchnorr function for BIP 340/341 signing (Pieter Wuille)
e77a2839b54fa2039bba468e8c09dbbbf19b150a Use HandleMissingData also in CheckSchnorrSignature (Pieter Wuille)
dbb0ce9fbff01ffe4dd29da465f43ecaddc2854c Add TaprootSpendData data structure, equivalent to script map for P2[W]SH (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Builds on top of #22051, adding signing support after derivation support.
Nothing is changed in descriptor features. Signing works for key path and script path spending, through the normal sending functions, and PSBT-based RPCs. However, PSBT usability is rather low as no extensions have been defined to convey Taproot-specific information, so all script information must be known to the signing wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 458a345b0590fd2fa04c7d8d70beb8d57e34bbc8
fjahr:
Code review ACK 458a345b0590fd2fa04c7d8d70beb8d57e34bbc8
Sjors:
ACK 458a345b0590fd2fa04c7d8d70beb8d57e34bbc8
Tree-SHA512: 30ed212cf7754763a4a81624ebc084c51727b8322711ac0b390369213c1a891d367ed8b123882ac08c99595320c11ec57ee42304ff22a69afdc3d1a0d55cc711
754e802274e9373ad7e1dccb710acf74ded6e7fb test: check rejected future block later accepted (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
(Luke) was unsure if the code sufficiently avoided caching a
time-too-new rejection, so wrote this test to check it. It looks like
despite only exempting BLOCK_MUTATED, it is still okay because header
failures never cache block invalidity. This test will help ensure that
if this ever changes, BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE gets excluded at the same time.
This PR re-opens https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17872 which went stale and addresses the nits raised by reviewers there.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 754e802274e9373ad7e1dccb710acf74ded6e7fb
Tree-SHA512: a2bbc8fffb523cf2831e1ecb05f20868e30106a38cc2e369e4973fa549cca06675a668df16f76c49cc4ce3a22925404255e5c53c4232d63ba1b9fca878509aa0
1) Makes the code for block 44 consistent with the expected figure in
the comment above it by adding a transaction to the block
2) Fixed comment describing sign_tx() function
(Luke) was unsure if the code sufficiently avoided caching a
time-too-new rejection, so wrote this test to check it. It looks like
despite only exempting BLOCK_MUTATED, it is still okay because header
failures never cache block invalidity. This test will help ensure that
if this ever changes, BLOCK_TIME_FUTURE gets excluded at the same time.
Co-authored-by: Will Clark <will8clark@gmail.com>
01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7 test: doc: improve doc for chain_transaction() helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
6e63e366d609312ab984b4439de2d59bb618620b test: refactor: dedup utility function chain_transaction() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Both tests `mempool_packages.py` and `mempool_package_onemore.py` define a utility function `chain_transaction` with a similar implementation. This PR deduplicates it by moving it into the util package and keeping the more general properties:
* pass a list of parent_txids/vouts instead of single values
* always mark the BIP125-replaceable flag for txs, created via `createrawtransaction` (this is needed by the `mempool_package_onemore.py` test, but doesn't hurt the other one)
This is a low-hanging fruit; as a potential follow-up one could probably also deduplicate the function `chain_transaction` in `rpc_packages.py`, which looks a bit different, as it also takes the parent locking script into account and doesn't send the tx.
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
reACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7
klementtan:
Code review ACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 01eedf3821f2c3ee6bab8733f8549531c844add7 🙅
Tree-SHA512: ac7105d02c23f53d76d4ec9dc8de1074dd8faefeecd44b107921b78665279498966152fed312ecbe252a1c34a9643d531166329a4fea0e773df3bb75d43092b0
6d7e46ce23217da53ff52f535879c393c02fa2b2 Remove `Warning:` (Prayank)
Pull request description:
Reason: I noticed that `Warning` is printed 2 times in `-getinfo` while reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21832#issuecomment-851004943
Same string is used for GUI, log and stderr. If we need to add `Warning:` in GUI or other place we can always prepend to this string.
CLI:
```
Warnings: Unknown new rules activated (versionbit 28)
```
GUI:
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 6d7e46ce23217da53ff52f535879c393c02fa2b2
Tree-SHA512: 25760cf6d850f6c2216d651fa46574d2d21a9d58f4577ecb58f9566ea8cd07bfcd6679bb8a1f53575e441b02d295306f492c0c99a48c909e60e5d977ec1861f6
fbf485c9b2bf1d056bfea77345a15cf56a9cd786 Allow tr() import only when Taproot is active (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
To avoid issues around fund loss, only allow descriptor wallets to import `tr()` descriptors after taproot has activated.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fbf485c9b2bf1d056bfea77345a15cf56a9cd786
fjahr:
Code review ACK fbf485c9b2bf1d056bfea77345a15cf56a9cd786
laanwj:
Code review ACK fbf485c9b2bf1d056bfea77345a15cf56a9cd786
prayank23:
utACK fbf485c9b2
Tree-SHA512: 83c43376515eea523dbc89bc5a0fde53e54aec492e49a40c2a33d80fc94aac459e232ae07b024b4bd75b58078c8d090bc7a2d69541c5d3d4834d2f4cfc9c8208
In order to enable exact fee calculation for transactions that spend
P2PK outputs in the MiniWallet, we enforce the created signatures to
have a fixed length (>49.89% probability) by default. With that it is
easier to check the created transactions vsize and avoid flaky tests
that would appear whenever the signatures R- or S-values are smaller
(due to leading zero bytes).
Note that to get the total scriptSig size one has to add another
2 bytes, as there is also the OP_PUSHx instruction on the front and
the sighash type byte on the back, leading to a final scriptSig size
of 73 bytes.
2eb0eeda39cab997f9a5f817f7c12e7fffeaf35a validation: document lack of inherited signaling in RBF policy (Antoine Riard)
906b6d9da6a6b2e6a5f1d9046b3b9c2c7e490c99 test: Extend feature_rbf.py with no inherited signaling (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Contrary to BIP125 or other full-node implementation (e.g btcd), Bitcoin Core's mempool policy doesn't implement inherited signaling.
This PR documents our mempool behavior on this and add a test demonstrating the case.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2eb0eeda39cab997f9a5f817f7c12e7fffeaf35a
benthecarman:
ACK 2eb0eeda39cab997f9a5f817f7c12e7fffeaf35a
Tree-SHA512: d41453d3b49bae3c1eb532a968f43bc047084913bd285929d4d9cba142777ff2be38163d912e28dfc635f4ecf446de68effad799c6e71be52f81e83410c712fb
Add an explicit sync_blocks call in wallet_orphanedreward.py, which was
missing and could lead to intermittent failures of the test due to
race conditions.
This will presumably fix https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22181.
