76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201 qt: Hide peer detail view if multiple are selected (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Currently if multiple peers are selected the peer detail view shows the first new selected peer.
With this PR the peer detail view is hidden when multiple peers are selected. It is also a slight refactor to simplify and remove duplicate code.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201.
hebasto:
ACK 76277cc77dea39b53e09ee1c440cd37270826201, tested on Linux Mint 20 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: 16c9cfd6ccb7077a9f31917a6cb3532e32d17d21f735e43bf4720fb0c8bb1bd539d42569c105df4b551f5dccb4acaeedb6bb2362620a9cb9267a602d9d065b9f
2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a Update pruning tooltip, original author BitcoinErrorLog (Riccardo Spagni)
Pull request description:
Squashed commits from BitcoinErrorLog at his request, per the original discussion on #15: this tooltip has been adjusted to be more user-friendly and reflect what the net effect of pruning is for the user.
ACKs for top commit:
harding:
Untested ACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a
Sjors:
utACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a and welcome to the dark side!
jonasschnelli:
ACK 2fc5efc55c886f1b874ce6cd02c9082b5bb6435a
Tree-SHA512: 45d6a7efbf4d34d20b9de439c988a39c739591b854726b6682c4cffcb23dff7d9131afab572fa0c9a8bc033c46c3878efdfbf8a984aafde632e1dfc1caa1cbbb
fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pass a data pointer and a size as span in `ReceiveMsgBytes` to get the benefits of a span
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 code review, rebased to current master 12a1c3ad1a43634, debug build, unit tests, ran bitcoind/-netinfo/getpeerinfo
theStack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30
Tree-SHA512: 89bf111323148d6e6e50185ad20ab39f73ab3a58a27e46319e3a08bcf5dcf9d6aa84faff0fd6afb90cb892ac2f557a237c144560986063bc736a69ace353ab9d
c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2 refactor: Extract ParseOpCode from ParseScript (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Seems more natural to have `mapOpNames` "hidden" in `ParseOpCode` than in `ParseScript`.
A second lookup in `mapOpNames` is also removed.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
theStack:
re-ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
Tree-SHA512: d59d1964760622cf365479d44e3e676aa0bf46b60e77160140d967e012042df92121d3224c7551dc96eff5ff3294598cc6bade82adb3f60d28810e18e60e1257
ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 test: fix creation of std::string objects with \0s (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
A string literal `"abc"` contains a terminating `\0`, so that is 4
bytes. There is no need to write `"abc\0"` unless two terminating
`\0`s are necessary.
`std::string` objects do not internally contain a terminating `\0`, so
`std::string("abc")` creates a string with size 3 and is the same as
`std::string("abc", 3)`.
In `"\01"` the `01` part is interpreted as one number (1) and that is
the same as `"\1"` which is a string like `{1, 0}` whereas `"\0z"` is a
string like `{0, 'z', 0}`. To create a string like `{0, '1', 0}` one
must use `"\0" "1"`.
Adjust the tests accordingly.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83
practicalswift:
ACK ecc6cf1a3b097b9b5b047282063a0b6779631b83 modulo happily green CI
Tree-SHA512: 5eb489e8533a4199a9324b92f7280041552379731ebf7dfee169f70d5458e20e29b36f8bfaee6f201f48ab2b9d1d0fc4bdf8d6e4c58d6102f399cfbea54a219e
705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61 qt, refactor: Fix 'buttonClicked is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
c2f4e5ea1d6f01713ac69aaf6018884028aa55bd qt, refactor: Fix 'split is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
8e12d6996116e786e928077b22d9f47cee27319e qt, refactor: Fix 'QFlags is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa5749c805878304c107bcae0ae5ffa401dc7c4d qt, refactor: Fix 'pixmap is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
b02264cb5dfcef50eec8a6346471cbaa25370e00 qt, refactor: Fix 'QDateTime is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
[What's New in Qt 5.15](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/whatsnew515.html#deprecated-modules):
> To help preparing for the transition to Qt 6, numerous classes and member functions that will be removed from Qt 6.0 have been marked as deprecated in the Qt 5.15 release.
Fixes#36
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61
promag:
Tested ACK 705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61 on macos with Apple clang version 11.0.3 (clang-1103.0.32.62) and brew qt 5.15.1.
Tree-SHA512: 29e00535b4583ceec0dfb29612e86ee29bdea13651b548c6d22167917a4a10464af49160a12b05151030699f690f437ebb9c4ae9f130f66a722415222165b44f
0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190 Remove confusing and almost useless "unexpected version" warning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is useless because it isn't displayed for most users:
* It isn't displayed in normal operation (because the validation debug category is disabled by default)
* It isn't displayed for users that sync up their nodes intermittently, e.g. once a day or once a week (because it is disabled for IBD)
* It is only displayed in the debug log (as opposed to the versionbits warning, which is displayed more prominently)
It is confusing because it doesn't have a use case:
Despite the above, if a user *did* see the warning, it would most likely be a false positive (like it has been in the past). Even if it wasn't, there is nothing they can do about it. The only thing they could do is to check for updates and hope that a fixed version is available. But why would the user be so scrupulously precise in enabling the warning and reading the log, but then fail to regularly check update channels for updated software?
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190
decryp2kanon:
ACK 0000a0c
LarryRuane:
ACK 0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190
Tree-SHA512: 16e069c84be6ab6034baeefdc515d0e5cdf560b2005d2faec5f989d45494bd16cfcb4ffca6a17211d9556ae44f9737a60a476c08b5c2bb5e1bd29724ecd6d5c1
0bfce9dc46234b196a8b3679c21d6f8455962495 [addrman] Fix Connected() comment (John Newbery)
eefe19471868ef0cdc9d32473d0b57015e7647ee [net] Consolidate logic around calling CAddrMan::Connected() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Currently, the logic around whether we called CAddrMan::Connected() for
a peer is spread between verack processing (where we discard inbound
peers) and FinalizeNode (where we discard misbehaving and
block-relay-only peers). Consolidate that logic to a single place.
Also remove the CNode.fCurrentlyConnected bool, which is now
redundant. We can rely on CNode.fSuccessfullyConnected, since the two
bools were only ever flipped to true in the same place.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code review ACK 0bfce9dc46234b196a8b3679c21d6f8455962495
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 0bfce9dc46. nice tidy, and bonus that we get to remove an unnecessary call to `cs_main`
Tree-SHA512: 1ab74dae3bc12a6846da57c853033e546bb4f91caa39f4c50bf0cf7eca59cb917bdb2ef795da55363e7e9f70949cb28bb3be004cb3afa4389f970d2fe097d932
ea93bbeb26948c0ddba39b589bd166eaecf446c8 init: Fix incorrect warning "Reducing -maxconnections from N to N-1, because of system limitations" (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fix incorrect warning `Reducing -maxconnections from N to N-1, because of system limitations`.
Before this patch (only the first warning is correct):
```
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 10000000 to 1048417, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 1000000 to 999999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 100000 to 99999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 10000 to 9999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 1000 to 999, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100 | grep Warning
[no warning]
```
After this patch (no incorrect warnings):
```
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000000 | grep Warning
2020-09-26T01:23:45Z Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 10000000 to 1048417, because of system limitations.
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=10000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=1000 | grep Warning
[no warning]
$ src/bitcoind -maxconnections=100 | grep Warning
[no warning]
```
ACKs for top commit:
n-thumann:
tACK ea93bbeb26, Ran on other systems running Debian 10.5 (4.19.0-8-amd64) and Debian bullseye/sid (5.3.0-1-amd64) and was able to reproduce the issue exactly as you described above on both of them. After applying your patch the issue is fixed ✌️
laanwj:
Code review ACK ea93bbeb26948c0ddba39b589bd166eaecf446c8
theStack:
tACK ea93bbeb26948c0ddba39b589bd166eaecf446c8
Tree-SHA512: 9b0939a1a51fdf991d11024a5d20b4f39cab1a80320b799a1d24d0250aa059666bcb1ae6dd79c941c2f2686f07f59fc0f6618b5746aa8ca6011fdd202828a930
faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37 remove CRPCCommand constructor that takes rpcfn_type function pointer (MarcoFalke)
fa19bb2cd8c575593583138a84e6bb3444d6196d remove dead rpc code (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove the CRPCCommand arguments, now that they are asserted to be equal and thus redundant
### Future work
> Here or follow up, makes sense to also assert type of returned UniValue?
Sure, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. I am going to submit any further works as follow-ups, including:
* Removing all python regex linters on the args, now that RPCMan can be used to generate any output, including the cli.cpp table
* Auto-formatting and sanity checking the RPCExamples with RPCMan
* Checking passed-in json in self-check. Removing redundant checks
* Checking returned json against documentation to avoid regressions or false documentation
* Compile the RPC documentation at compile-time to ensure it doesn't change at runtime and is completely static
### Bugs found
* The assert identified issue #18607
* The changes itself fixed bug #19250
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37
promag:
Tested ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faaf9c58e4aa809019d4ca12747dd47411988e37. Two obviously good simplifications.
Tree-SHA512: 5de3b440f7b2ed2c3e86655d4f0e2e5df9c67e8ce3c7817d5ea5311d1a38690f2f3e28fab41aad6936be9fc884326d037e5f19e85d4d2fe281474dada13911ee
7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220 Tests: Unit test related to WalletDB ReadKeyValue (Bushstar)
32def8d1c29e0855fe5429687acabd2f29119316 Catch ios_base::failure specifically (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2950 a hash of the pubkey and private was added to speed up key import, this was made backwards compatible by reading the hash in a try block with an ellipses catch all in case the hash was not present.
CDataStream::read() specifically throws std::ios_base::failure, backwards compatibility expects only that error to be thrown, if something else gets thrown we should not be catching it. The change in this commit is to catch that exception only. If any other exception is thrown other than std::ios_base::failure it will be caught by the wider try block and an error written to the log and/or console.
CDataStream::read() throwing std::ios_base::failure.
2c364fde42/src/streams.h (L191)
Wider catch statements that pick up all others exceptions other than ios_base::failure.
2c364fde42/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L425)2c364fde42/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L430)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220
Tree-SHA512: 5364bf935af8ec603bf5b8fef8c23b5cdaa4fe3506090cff988413221f2eaa99f7a91929afb42a35f8881ce2328744a0d32052da51ca0a5b2e65b6809e97f604
330cb33985d0ce97c20f4a0f0bbda0fbffe098d4 src/randomenv.cpp: fix build on uclibc (Fabrice Fontaine)
Pull request description:
Check for HAVE_STRONG_GETAUXVAL or HAVE_WEAK_GETAUXVAL before using
getauxval to avoid a build failure on uclibc
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 330cb33985d0ce97c20f4a0f0bbda0fbffe098d4
Tree-SHA512: 94fbbdb0e859f0220d64b2d04565f575b410327f080125fec7fb74205d0bea0e8133561c83a696033d6dc377871133871b72c1aad19aca61e972ce67e0fdf707
6f4e3936461d0893250e7684928339f6cedf4d0c refactor: remove use of boost::algorithm::replace_first (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As discussed in #19851 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19851#issuecomment-685424702), this trivial PR substitutes the (only) use of `boost::algorithm::replace_first` by a direct implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 6f4e3936461d0893250e7684928339f6cedf4d0c
Tree-SHA512: 2ef06498e19f864a4cbae10e8d1905e3440a2d1e8e5aae83de7597c23cdab92b4612d7fa1efbc49016e530debd127d1d50531c60ff159dbea0deaa8c836a2bfb
d9141a0002bb508b2e94e206a1bd28ef8f97ffde doc: clarify CRollingBloomFilter size estimate (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Based on #19130, this change improves the comment for `CRollingBloomFilter` in `bloom.h`:
- Give examples to illustrate the heuristic "1.8 bytes per element per factor 0.1 of false positive rate"
- Add some Python code which can be copy/pasted for convenient filter size calculation (in an interpreter)
- Reconcile the newly added code with the existing approximation
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK d9141a0002bb508b2e94e206a1bd28ef8f97ffde
Tree-SHA512: e7138b3c531883a750ead06368975c750863fde7ef6f2633b137eca011079226e9205316217322014399fba05a48f294c788dd700bb7d479c58fe1f23e40419f
Sending a version message after the intial version message is peer
misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
after exactly 100 version messages. Duplicate version messages affect us
no different than any other unknown message. So remove the Misbehaving
and ignore the redundant msgs.
Sending a non-version message before the initial version message is peer
misbehavior. Though, it seems arbitrary and confusing to disconnect only
after exactly 100 non-version messages. So remove the Misbehaving and
instead rely on the existing disconnect-due-to-handshake-timeout logic.
It is unnecessary to upgrade to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT if this feature is
already supported by the wallet. Because upgrading to FEATURE_HD_SPLIT
actually requires upgrading to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL, users would
accidentally be upgraded to FEATURE_PRE_SPLIT_KEYPOOL instead of nothing
being done.
Fixes the issue described at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20403#discussion_r526063920
fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a Use std::make_unique (MarcoFalke)
faaee810e62d796d66bfb2bc4e53c8b4c8104d13 build: Require C++17 compiler (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Developers have been compiling with C++17 for a few months now (fuzz tests and the msvc build have it even enabled by default). According to #16684, the 22.0 release shall be compiled with C++17 enabled.
This only sets the build flag, any other changes need more discussion and can be done later.
ACKs for top commit:
elichai:
utACK fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a
hebasto:
ACK fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a, I've locally compiled on ARM 32bit SBC without GUI.
fanquake:
ACK fac71987281077aed7f79dce99f4eb3e8a91916a
Tree-SHA512: 53eb40ba5d496376a2d2cf16e2000bef36616cc2a3696c3ec59a5366e41fa8b872817a7ca21751f030f9c1efb339dfa63cc655eaa5199b9a3d2e52c2de0ccb29
Removes the leading 0 from the version number. The minor version, which
we had been using as the major version, is now the major version. The
revision, which we had been using as the minor version, is now the minor
version. The revision number is dropped. The build number is promoted to
being part of the version number. This also avoids issues where it was
accidentally not included in the version number.
The CLIENT_VERSION remains the same format as previous as previously,
the Major version was 0 so that was never a factor in CLIENT_VERSION.
9d09132be4ff99f98ca905c342347d5f35f13350 CConnman: initialise at declaration rather than in Start() (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Ensure nMaxOutboundTotalBytesSentInCycle and nMaxOutboundCycleStartTime are initialized even if CConnman::Start() is not called. Prevents failures in test/fuzz/connman when run under valgrind.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 9d09132be4ff99f98ca905c342347d5f35f13350: patch looks correct!
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9d09132be4ff99f98ca905c342347d5f35f13350 , checked that we call Start only once and in the same scope where connman is constructed (AppInitMain) 💸
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 9d09132be4
Tree-SHA512: 1c6c893e8c616a91947a8cc295b0ba508af3ecfcdcd94cdc5f95d808cc93c6d1a71fd24dcc194dc583854e9889fb522ca8523043367fb0263370fbcab08c6aaa
fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446 doc: Clarify that vpindexToConnect is in reverse order (MarcoFalke)
fa62304c9760f0de9838e56150008816e7a9bacb Remove dead CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The function has several code and logic bugs, which prevent it from working at all:
* `vpindexToConnect.back()` is passed to `CheckForkWarningConditionsOnNewFork`, which is the earliest connected block (least work block), *not* the new fork tip
* `ActivateBestChainStep` will never try to connect a block that descends from an invalid block, so the invalid fork will only ever be of height 1, never hitting the 7 block minimum condition
Instead of dragging the dead and wrong code around through every change in validation, remove it. In the future it could make sense to add a fork detection somewhere outside of the `ActivateBestChainStep` logic (maybe net_processing).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446
fjahr:
Code review ACK fa7eed5be704ccdbdce5c9aedb953dd9c8b30446
glozow:
utACK fa7eed5be7 I see that it's dead code
Tree-SHA512: 815bdbac7c1eb5b7594b0866a2dbd3c7619797afaadb03a5269fb96739ffb83b05b8e4f7c1e68d48d7886132dd0b12c14c3fb4ee0e72de1074726050ed203e1a
bb6441b7a4619dd11029e27126c0d727a8bdf2d2 qt: Pre-splitoff translations update (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
0.21 split-off should be near now. Let's do one final translations update just before the split-off.
(Hopefully it won't take too long, but might want to keep this open to be the last thing merged)
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK bb6441b7a4619dd11029e27126c0d727a8bdf2d2
MarcoFalke:
ACK bb6441b7a4619dd11029e27126c0d727a8bdf2d2 (checked that only changes are translation changes in `src/qt`)
Tree-SHA512: 3273246923d3020e1f7ae46cbb59f1ed45a35acb5e1582b55486c5723f5aa1e5809fe2fd87b1ac34d308eef2902e621d0ace97181a044262b2c8f002bf50daac
05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b wallet: override minfee checks (fOverrideFeeRate) for fee_rate (Jon Atack)
9a670b4f07a6140de809d73cbd7f3e614eb6ea74 wallet: update sendtoaddress, send RPC examples with fee_rate (Jon Atack)
be481b72e24fb6834bd674cd8daee67c6938b42d wallet: use MIN_RELAY_TX_FEE in bumpfee help (Jon Atack)
449b730579566459e350703611629e63e54657ed wallet: provide valid values if invalid estimate mode passed (Jon Atack)
6da3afbaee5809ebf6d88efaa3958c505c2d71c7 wallet: update remaining rpcwallet fee rate units to BTC/kvB (Jon Atack)
173b5b5fe07d45be5a1e5bc7a5df996f20ab1e85 wallet: update fee rate units, use sat/vB for fee_rate error messages (Jon Atack)
7f9835a05abf3e168ad93e7195cbaa4bf61b9b07 wallet: remove fee rates from conf_target helps (Jon Atack)
b7994c01e9a3251536fe6538a22f614774eec82d wallet: add fee_rate unit warnings to bumpfee (Jon Atack)
410e471fa42d3db04e8879c71f8c824dcc151a83 wallet: remove redundant bumpfee fee_rate checks (Jon Atack)
a0d495747320c79b27a83c216dcc526ac8df8f24 wallet: introduce fee_rate (sat/vB) param/option (Jon Atack)
e21212f01b7c41eba13b0479b252053cf482bc1f wallet: remove unneeded WALLET_BTC_KB_TO_SAT_B constant (Jon Atack)
6112cf20d43b0be34fe0edce2ac3e6b27cae1bbe wallet: add CFeeRate ctor doxygen documentation (Jon Atack)
3f7279161347543ce4e997d78ea89a4043491145 wallet: fix bug in RPC send options (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This PR builds on #11413 and #20220 to address #19543.
- replace overloading the conf_target and estimate_mode params with `fee_rate` in sat/vB in the sendtoaddress, sendmany, send, fundrawtransaction, walletcreatefundedpsbt, and bumpfee RPCs
- allow non-actionable conf_target value of `0` and estimate_mode value of `""` to be passed to use `fee_rate` as a positional argument, in addition to as a named argument
- fix a bug in the experimental send RPC described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20220#discussion_r513789526 where args were not being passed correctly into the options values
- update the feerate error message units for these RPCs from BTC/kB to sat/vB
- update the test coverage, help docs, doxygen docs, and some of the RPC examples
- other changes to address the excellent review feedback
See this wallet meeting log for more context: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2020-11-06.html#l-309
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 05e82d8
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 05e82d86b0 did not test and found a few style nits, which can be fixed later 🍯
Xekyo:
tACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Sjors:
utACK 05e82d86b09d914ebce05dbc92a7299cb026847b
Tree-SHA512: a4ee5f184ada53f1840b2923d25873bda88c5a2ae48e67eeea2417a0b35154798cfdb3c147b05dd56bd6608a784e1b91623bb985ee2ab9ef2baaec22206d0a9c
ac64cec4ce35cb7e6fbf3678c1ffeac0137791ae gui: create wallet: add advanced section (Sjors Provoost)
c99d6f644aa45d1bd929790f23a36d0dd7c29004 gui: create wallet: name placeholder (Sjors Provoost)
5bff82540b90d899ceac6390c008d653e6b665c3 [gui] create wallet: smarter checkbox toggling (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Previously only users who needed a second wallet had to use to the create wallet dialog. With the merge of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15454 now all new users have to. I don't think it was user-friendly enough for that.
<img width="403" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-09-18 om 09 41 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/93574129-52ef9680-f998-11ea-9a6f-31144f66d3bf.png">
This PR makes a few simple improvements so that new users don't have to think too much:
<img width="369" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-10-15 om 16 45 22" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/96145959-0c914700-0f06-11eb-9526-cf447d841d7a.png">
It's lightly inspired by #77. It would be better if those changes made it into the upcoming release, but this PR is a good start imo.
* wallet encryption is no longer checked by default, because such a change in the default needs a separate discussion (fwiw, I suspect it increases the number of users losing access to coins)
* watch-only and descriptor wallet stuff is moved to advanced, so new users know they can safely ignore these check boxes
* bonus: when you click on "disable private keys" it disables encrypt wallet and checks blank wallet
* label changes: see screenshot
* tooltip changes: see code diff
Note that a blank wallet name isn't allowed in the dialog; I haven't addressed that.
_Update 2020-10-30_, dropped the new strings for now:
<img width="450" alt="Schermafbeelding 2020-10-30 om 11 26 55" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/97694591-1b99fc80-1aa3-11eb-8b85-e19f1ad5add4.png">
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Tested ACK ac64cec4ce35cb7e6fbf3678c1ffeac0137791ae
jonatack:
re-ACK ac64cec4ce35cb7e6fbf3678c1ffeac0137791ae, per `git diff d393708 ac64cec` only change since my last review is improving the placeholder from "MyWallet" to "Wallet" and dropping the last commit. Tested creating a dozen wallets in signet with different combinations of options and then verifying/comparing their characteristics in the console with getwalletinfo. My remaining caveats are (1) the need for less user surprise by either (a) improving the user info or (b) with less auto-(un)selecting as mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/96#issuecomment-727017409 and (2) I prefer the "Encrypt private keys" and "Watch-only" wording and descriptions below over the current ones; hopefully these can be addressed in a follow-up.
hebasto:
re-ACK ac64cec4ce35cb7e6fbf3678c1ffeac0137791ae
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ac64cec4ce35cb7e6fbf3678c1ffeac0137791ae. Only changes since last review are tweaking placeholder text and dropping "allow nameless" commit
Tree-SHA512: a25f84eb66ee4f99af441d73e33928df9d9cf592177398ef48f0037f5913699e47a162cf1301c83b34501546d43ff4ae12607fd078c5c03b92f573bf7604a9f2
5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab wallet: Remove -upgradewallet from dummywallet (MarcoFalke)
a314271f08215feba53ead27096ac7fda34acb3c test: Remove unused wallet.dat (MarcoFalke)
bf7635963c03203e7189ddaa56c6b086a0108cbf tests: Test specific upgradewallet scenarios and that upgrades work (Andrew Chow)
4b418a9decc3e855ee4b0bbf9e61121c8e9904e5 test: Add test_framework/bdb.py module for inspecting bdb files (Andrew Chow)
092fc434854f881330771a93a1280ac67b1d3549 tests: Add a sha256sum_file function to util (Andrew Chow)
0bd995aa19be65b0dd23df1df571c71428c2bc32 wallet: upgrade the CHDChain version number when upgrading to split hd (Andrew Chow)
8e32e1c41c995e832e643f605d35a7aa112837e6 wallet: remove nWalletMaxVersion (Andrew Chow)
bd7398cc6258c258e9f4411c50630ec4a552341b wallet: have ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade check against the new version (Andrew Chow)
5f720544f34dedf75b063b962845fa8eca604514 wallet: Add GetClosestWalletFeature function (Andrew Chow)
842ae3842df489f1b8d68e67a234788966218184 wallet: Add utility method for CanSupportFeature (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up the wallet upgrade mechanism a bit, fixes some probably bugs, and adds more test cases.
The `nWalletMaxVersion` member variable has been removed as it made `CanSupportFeature` unintuitive and was causing a couple of bugs. The reason this was introduced originally was to allow a wallet upgrade to only occur when the new feature is first used. While this makes sense for the old `-upgradewallet` option, for an RPC, this does not quite make sense. It's more intuitive for an upgrade to occur if possible if the `upgradewallet` RPC is used as that's an explicit request to upgrade a particular wallet to a newer version. `nWalletMaxVersion` was only relevant for upgrades to `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` and `FEATURE_COMPRPUBKEY` both of which are incredibly old features. So for such wallets, the behavior of `upgradewallet` will be that the feature is enabled immediately without the wallet needing to be encrypted at that time (note that `FEATURE_WALLETCRYPT` indicates support for encryption, not that the wallet is encrypted) or for a new key to be generated.
`CanSupportFeature` would previously indicate whether we could upgrade to `nWalletMaxVersion` not just whether the current wallet version supported a feature. While this property was being used to determine whether we should upgrade to HD and HD chain split, it was also causing a few bugs. Determining whether we should upgrade to HD or HD chain split is resolved by passing into `ScriptPubKeyMan::Upgrade` the version we are upgrading to and checking against that. By removing `nWalletMaxVersion` we also fix a bug where you could upgrade to HD chain split without the pre-split keypool.
`nWalletMaxVersion` was also the version that was being reported by `getwalletinfo` which meant that the version reported was not always consistent across restarts as it depended on whether `upgradewallet` was used. Additionally to make the wallet versions consistent with actually supported versions, instead of just setting the wallet version to whatever is given to `upgradewallet`, we normalize the version number to the closest supported version number. For example, if given 150000, we would store and report 139900.
Another bug where CHDChain was not being upgraded to the version supporting HD chain split is also fixed by this PR.
Lastly several more tests have been added. Some refactoring to the test was made to make these tests easier. These tests check specific upgrading scenarios, such as from non-HD (version 60000) to HD to pre-split keypool. Although not specifically related to `upgradewallet`, `UpgradeKeyMetadata` is now being tested too.
Part of the new tests is checking that the wallet files are identical before and after failed upgrades. To facilitate this, a utility function `sha256sum_file` has been added. Another part of the tests is to examine the wallet file itself to ensure that the records in the wallet.dat file have been correctly modified. So a new `bdb.py` module has been added to deserialize the BDB db of the wallet.dat file. This format isn't explicitly documented anywhere, but the code and comments in BDB's source code in file `dbinc/db_page.h` describe it. This module just dumps all of the fields into a dict.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
approach ACK 5f9c0b6360
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab
jonatack:
ACK 5f9c0b6360215636cfa62a70d3a70f1feb3977ab, approach seems fine, code review, only skimmed the test changes but they look well done, rebased on current master, debug built and verified the `wallet_upgradewallet.py` test runs green both before and after running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2`
Tree-SHA512: 7c4ebf420850d596a586cb6dd7f2ef39c6477847d12d105fcd362abb07f2a8aa4f7afc5bfd36cbc8b8c72fcdd1de8d2d3f16ad8e8ba736b6f4f31f133fe5feba
9c08f3332c12aa30c70aaf390c876cc5c1f90617 doc: Missing comments for signet parameters (kanon)
Pull request description:
We have such comment in chainparams.cpp. However in Signet the comments are missing.
In example...
- Mainnet
d67883d01e/src/chainparams.cpp (L83-L84)
- Testnet
d67883d01e/src/chainparams.cpp (L196-L197)
- Regtest
d67883d01e/src/chainparams.cpp (L392-L393)
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 9c08f3332c12aa30c70aaf390c876cc5c1f90617
Tree-SHA512: d4e488cf01e50d6320282b29d776c11e6b3d423f9268226749f738a57a51f456b6bd48334d2d5a43afa782df65ea15525a0af1688003c1be6ef915c05650e147
89836a82eec63f93bbe6c3bd6a52be26e71ab54d style: minor improvements as a followup to #19845 (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Address suggestions:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495486760https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495488051https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19845#discussion_r495730125
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 89836a8 change since previous review is replacing std::runtime_error with std::exception, built/ran unit tests with gcc debian 10.2.0-15, then broke a few v3 net_tests involving `BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION`, rebuilt, ran `src/test/test_bitcoin -t net_tests -l all` and checked the error reporting.
hebasto:
re-ACK 89836a82eec63f93bbe6c3bd6a52be26e71ab54d
theStack:
ACK 89836a82eec63f93bbe6c3bd6a52be26e71ab54d
Tree-SHA512: 36477fdccabe5a8ad91fbabb4655cc363a3a7ca237a98ae6dd4a9fae4a4113762040f864d4ca13a47d081f7d16e5bd487edbfb61ab50a37e4a0424e9bec30b24
