fa89badf887dcc01e5bdece248b5e7d234fee227 test: Require standard txs in regtest (MarcoFalke)
fa9b4191609c3ef75e69d391eb91e4d5c1e0bcf5 test: Add test that mainnet requires standard txs (MarcoFalke)
fa613ca0a8f99c4771859de9e571878530d3ecb5 chainparams: Remove unused fMineBlocksOnDemand (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I don't see a reason why regtest should allow non-standard txs, as it makes testing mainnet behaviour such as #15846 unnecessarily hard and unintuitive.
Of course, testnet policy remains unchanged to allow propagation of non-standard txs.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK fa89badf887dcc01e5bdece248b5e7d234fee227
Tree-SHA512: c4c675affb054868850bd2683aa07f4c741a448cbacb2ea8334191e105f426b0790fe6a468be61e9c5880d24154f7bf1c7075051697172dce92180c1bc3a1c90
8f250ab7882a852f1b1947cef4837d2de5ca6913 TEST: Replace hard-coded hex tx with classes (Steven Roose)
Pull request description:
Came across these breaking Elements.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8f250ab7882a852f1b1947cef4837d2de5ca6913
instagibbs:
utACK 8f250ab788
Tree-SHA512: e8615dad4cda0beea4b0c7d4951a467fb9882a0a64d49c9b5ecf167369ea62a3fe5348e2401153162b0ccadecdb128492c94be36ebb881c3c42659626d86eda8
Currently, passing wildcard testname args to the test runner from outside the `test/functional/` directory does not work. See this recent IRC discussion for more background: http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-07-10.html#l-262 (lines 262 to 323).
This small change enables passing multiple wildcards with paths, as long as the paths are coherent. Examples:
- test/functional/test_runner.py test/functional/wallet*
- functional/test_runner.py functional/wallet*
- test/functional/test_runner.py ./test/functional/tool* test/functional/mempool*
A current limitation that this PR does not change: 9 test files with arguments in their name are not picked up by wildcard search.
- Squashed commit: non-mutating version
- Squashed commit: minor code optimisation
e263a343d4b6a2622df6bb734cd9d51a0d20a663 test: rpc_users: Make variable names more clear. (Carl Dong)
830dc2dd0fccb7f3ec49ff7233a188d92c541e7e test: rpc_users: Also test rpcauth.py with specified password. (Carl Dong)
c73d871799982ca29c29cef90e1a78814cf34019 test: rpc_users: Add function for testing auth params. (Carl Dong)
604e2a997ff26202dd0fa1932d60dc14cc53ac6d test: rpc_users: Add function for auth'd requests. (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Fixes#14758
First two commits are tidy-ups which I feel are worthwhile as they are very straightforward, cut down the file by 50%, and made the final diff more minimal. Happy to squash after review.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK e263a343d4b6a2622df6bb734cd9d51a0d20a663
Tree-SHA512: aa75c48570a87060238932d4c68e17234e158077f6195fb4917367e1ecc565e3cd8dd0ae51f9159ddd3d03742739680391bc1246454302db22d4a608c0633e80
0d101a340c44841cbbc5982d55354b1787bc39e2 test: Add test for maxtxfee option (MarcoFalke)
177550101b600ccb32886695326eb72cd9752c8b wallet: Remove unreachable code in CreateTransaction (MarcoFalke)
5c1b9714cb0a13be28324f91f4ec9ca66a1de8c7 wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to CWallet::CreateTransaction (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Follow up to #16257, this PR makes `bumpfee` aware of `-maxtxfee`.
It also prevents dangling locked unspents when calling `fundrawtransaction` - because the previous check was after `LockCoin`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 0d101a340c44841cbbc5982d55354b1787bc39e2, only change is small test fixup
Tree-SHA512: 3464b24ae7cd4e72ed41438c6661828ba1304af020f05da62720b23668ae734e16cf47c6d97e150cc84ef631ee099b16fc786c858f3d089905845437338fd512
This implements the proposed policy change from [1], which allows
certain classes of contract protocols involving revocation
punishments to use CPFP. Note that some such use-cases may still
want some form of one-deep package relay, though even this alone
may greatly simplify some lightning fee negotiation.
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html
c4606b84329d760d7cee144bebe05807857edaae Add Travis check for single parameter constructors not marked "explicit" (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Make single parameter constructors `explicit` (C++11).
Rationale from the developer notes:
> - By default, declare single-argument constructors `explicit`.
> - *Rationale*: This is a precaution to avoid unintended conversions that might
> arise when single-argument constructors are used as implicit conversion
> functions.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c4606b84329d760d7cee144bebe05807857edaae
Tree-SHA512: 3e6fd51935fd93b2604b2188664692973d0897469f814cd745b5147d71b99ea5d73c1081cfde9f6393f51f56969e412fcda35d2d54e938a3235b8d40945f31fd
fa64b947bb3075ff8737656706b941af691908ab util: No translation of `Bitcoin Core` in the copyright (MarcoFalke)
fab85208f678ba1be53bdb73a73ce3c5c937d448 qt: Run «make translate» in ./src/ (MarcoFalke)
fabe87d2c923ab3a70b8cde2666a4d1cda8b22fb scripted-diff: Avoid passing PACKAGE_NAME for translation (MarcoFalke)
fa5e9f157e568b7fbbea1482b393181f0733f2ba build: Stop translating PACKAGE_NAME (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Generally the package name is not translated, but the package description is.
E.g. `GIMP` or `Firefox` are always called that way regardless of the system language. However, "`Firefox` webbrowser" or "`GIMP` image manipulation program" are translated.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa64b947bb3075ff8737656706b941af691908ab, I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 626f811531182d0ba0ef1044930d32726773349bcb49b10261288a86ee6b80a183db30a87d817d5b0d501fad058ac22d6272311716b4f5a154f17c6f391a5a1a
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
This commit adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608:
- wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix in the form of commented-out assertions to be uncommented when testing/fixing.
2. Provisionally extend the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
3. Add some logging for sanity checking.
------
Changes after rebase:
5. Make wallet_path an instance method instead of a function in tool_wallet.py as per Marco Falke review suggestion.
6. Assert wallet permissions instead of logging them in tool_wallet.py. This ran into an issue with Appveyor keeping permissions at 666 so allowed for 666 as a workaround.
7. Change the added logging from info to debug level.
8. More helpful assertions order in tool_wallet.py#assert_tool_output. This change makes #assert_tool_output raise "Error loading wallet.dat. Is wallet being used by another process?" rather than a less-helpful message when debugging the read-only wallet permissions issue.
91cc18f602fe2ff7fe47335a8e1e7734895a19d9 [docs] Add release notes for PR 15427 (John Newbery)
3b11420b3c91f731b03805a39e48ee32e54484a2 [RPC] add new utxoupdatepsbt arguments to the CRPCCommand and CPRCConvertParam tables (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The new `descriptors` argument was not added to the CRPCCommand and CPRCCvertParam tables, meaning that it couldn't be used with bitcoin-cli or named arguments.
Before this PR:
```
> bitcoin-cli utxoupdatepsbt 'cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' "[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
error code: -3
error message:
Expected type array, got string
> bitcoin-cli --named utxoupdatepsbt psbt='cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' descriptors="[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
error code: -8
error message:
Unknown named parameter descriptors
```
After this PR:
```
bitcoin-cli utxoupdatepsbt 'cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' "[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==
bitcoin-cli --named utxoupdatepsbt psbt='cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' descriptors="[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==
```
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 91cc18f.
fanquake:
re-ACK 91cc18f602fe2ff7fe47335a8e1e7734895a19d9
Tree-SHA512: 279b2339a5cac17e363002e4ab743e251d6757c904c89f1970575bdce18d4f63d5e13507e171bf2bdc1bf6dd457db345a4b11b15d4ff71b96c2fedc4ffe52b23
1ac454a3844b9b8389de0f660fa9455c0efa7140 Enable ShellCheck rules (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Enable some simple ShellCheck rules.
Note for reviewers: `bash` and `shellcheck` on macOS are different from ones on Ubuntu.
For local tests the latest `shellcheck` version 0.6.0 should be used (see #15166).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
utACK 1ac454a3844b9b8389de0f660fa9455c0efa7140
dongcarl:
utACK 1ac454a
fanquake:
ACK 1ac454a3844b9b8389de0f660fa9455c0efa7140
Tree-SHA512: 8d0a3a5c09fe1a0c22120178f5e6b80f81f746f8c3356b7701ff301c117acb2edea8fe08f08fb54ed73f94b1617515fb239fa28e7ab4121f74872e6494b6f20e
The new `descriptors` argument needs to be added to the Command and
ConvertParams tables to by usable as a named argument and by
bitcoin-cli.
Also update the test to use named arguments to test this.
fab0c820fa4c0c3227eec85c64310a3bf938a149 rpc: Clarify that block count means height excl genesis (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is a common misconception that the block count returned by the blockchain rpcs includes the genesis block. See for example the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16292#issuecomment-506303256.
However, it really returns the height, which is `0` for the genesis block.
So clarify that and also remove the misleading "longest blockchain" comment.
Finally, fix the wallet test that incorrectly used this rpc.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK fab0c820fa
promag:
ACK fab0c82, sorry for the misconception.
Tree-SHA512: 0d087cbb628d3866352bca6420402f392e6a997e579941701a408a7fca355d84645045661f39b022e4479cc07f85a6cddaa9095b6fd9911b245692482420a5e4
8a6810d0d2759c69f63b53c48aa79e0cfdd88ffb Add a 'logpath' field to getrpcinfo (darosior)
Pull request description:
as discussed in #15438
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK 8a6810d0d2759c69f63b53c48aa79e0cfdd88ffb
Tree-SHA512: 752c7d90f670677c8144efb338c5c97c2264f85f1e65e031fd5a44f04230b6eafbabd0f634db263eb42c25642ecc1c4b1b602d4735e3fab07ec00b566134ddab
01174596e69568c434198a86f54cb9ea6740e6c2 signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript param (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adding support for "witnessScript" as an alternative to "redeemScript" when using "signrawtransactionwithkey" meant that the `RPCTypeCheckObj()` call in `SignTransaction` can't error out just because either parameter is missing -- it's only a problem if both are missing, which isn't a state `RPCTypeCheckObj()` tests for. This results in the regression described in #16249. This patch adds some code to test for this case and give a similar error, namely:
error code: -8
error message:
Missing redeemScript/witnessScript
Fixes: #16249
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 01174596e6
promag:
ACK 01174596e. Could also write test without `dict`/`del`:
Tree-SHA512: cf51346b7dea551b7f18f2a93c2a336a293b2535c62c03a5263cd2be8c58cf0cc302891da659c167e88ad1a68a756472c3c07e99f71627c61d32886fc5a3a353
26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille)
fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means:
* Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known.
* P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs.
This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f
laanwj:
utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments)
promag:
ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later.
Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245
276972cb95ba944a7a4b1858a08d333962261396 wallet_bumpfee.py: Make sure coin selection produces change (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I was hitting the case where change-less transactions were being made.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
utACK 276972cb95ba944a7a4b1858a08d333962261396
Tree-SHA512: e2b7a50363daddd3ee749cacfc9d3d685a6c0c7e3e48118bb60131d205bf83ea06cdd66b69dfa3bd4dbb3bbf2b5b673d7225171486ae72fc762e5dabe2c01ef5
806b0052c3b45415862f74f20ba5f389e5b673de [wallet] abort when attempting to fund a transaction above maxtxfee (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
`FundTransaction` calls `GetMinimumFee` which, when the fee rate is absurdly high, quietly reduces the fee to `-maxtxfee`.
Becaue an absurdly high fee rate is usually the result of a fat finger, aborting seems safer behavior.
Before:
```
bitcoin-cli walletcreatefundedpsbt '[]' '[{"tb1q...": 0.01}]' 0 '{"feeRate": 10}' true
{
"psbt": "cHNidP8...gAA=",
"fee": 0.10000000,
"changepos": 1
}
```
After:
```
bitcoin-cli walletcreatefundedpsbt '[]' '[{"tb1q...": 0.01}]' 0 '{"feeRate": 10}' true
error code: -25
error message:
Fee exceeds maximum configured by -maxtxfee
```
QT still checks the max fee rate as expected:
<img width="566" alt="Schermafbeelding 2019-06-20 om 19 52 00" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/59888424-a2aa7100-9395-11e9-8ae6-8a3c1f7de585.png">
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 806b0052c3b45415862f74f20ba5f389e5b673de
Tree-SHA512: bee95811711cdab100b614d2347921407af3b400aea613ca156953ed3f60b924ad29a1d335bd0e240c0b7c0fbb360226bab03294d226a5560cdf2a3f21e6d406
FundTransaction calls GetMinimumFee which, when the fee rate is absurdly high, quietly reduced the fee to -maxtxfee. Becaue an absurdly high fee rate is usually the result of a fat finger, aborting seems safer behavior.
71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff379131a01e4e9f9648b150e806104a23795 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e20f881c843a9219e48cec202e962f8 wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
e61de6306fd89fe9aae90253062e7b1b20343f8a Change ismine to take a CWallet instead of CKeyStore (Andrew Chow)
7c611e20007bf5face34d33dffa26c8db67e29ec Move ismine to wallet module (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`IsMine` isn't used outside of the wallet except for the tests. It also doesn't make sense to be outside of the wallet. This PR moves `IsMine` into the wallet module and for it to take a `CWallet` instead of `CKeyStore`. The test that used `IsMine` is also moved to the wallet tests.
This is first [prerequisites](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Class-Structure-Changes#ismine) for the wallet structure changes.
ACKs for commit e61de6:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK e61de6306f (only change is rebase with git auto-merge)
meshcollider:
Very light code review ACK e61de6306f
Tree-SHA512: 1cb4ad12652aef7922ab7460c6d413e8b9d1855dca78c0a286ae49d5c0765bc7996c55f262c742001d434eb9bd4215dc2cc7aae1b371ee1a82d46b32c17e6341
a49503402b6bc21e3878e151c07529941d36aed0 Make and get the multisig redeemscript and destination in one function instead of two (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`CreateMultisigRedeemscript()` is changed to `AddAndGetMultisigDestination()` so that the process of constructing the redeemScript and then getting the `CTxDestination` are done in the same function. This allows that function to see what the keys in the multisig are so that the correct address type is returned from `AddAndGetDestinationForScript()`.
This only effects the `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress` RPCs and does not change signing logic as #16022 does.
Alternative to #16022 and #16012Fixes#16011
ACKs for commit a49503:
Tree-SHA512: 5b0154a714deea3b2cc3a54beb420c95eeeacf4ca30c40ca80940d9d640f8b03611b0fc14c2f0710bfd8a79e8d27ad7d9ae380b4b83d52b40ab201624f2a63f0
