6da6f503a6 refactor: Let CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite return void (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite always returns true if called from a backed cache, so just return void instead. Also return void from ::Sync and ::Flush.
This allows for dropping a FatalError condition and simplifying some dead error handling code a bit.
Since we now no longer exercise the "error path" when returning from `CCoinsView::BatchWrite`, make the method clear the cache instead. This should only be exercised by tests and not change production behaviour. This might slightly improve the coins_view fuzz test's ability to generate better coverage.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK 6da6f503a6
andrewtoth:
re-ACK 6da6f503a6
achow101:
ACK 6da6f503a6
w0xlt:
ACK 6da6f503a6
Tree-SHA512: dfaa325b0cf8108910aebf1b27434aaddb639d10d860e96797c77ea42eca9035a54a7dc1d6a5d4eae2b75fcc9356206d3d5672243d2c906e80d19024c8b95408
d9319b06cf refactor: unify container presence checks - non-trivial counts (Lőrinc)
039307554e refactor: unify container presence checks - trivial counts (Lőrinc)
8bb9219b63 refactor: unify container presence checks - find (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
### Summary
Instead of counting occurrences in sets and maps, the C++20 `::contains` method expresses the intent unambiguously and can return early on first encounter.
### Context
Applied clang‑tidy's [readability‑container‑contains](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.html) check, though many cases required manual changes since tidy couldn't fix them automatically.
### Changes
The changes made here were:
| From | To |
|------------------------|------------------|
| `m.find(k) == m.end()` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.find(k) != m.end()` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k)` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `!m.count(k)` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 0` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 1` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 1` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) < 1` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) > 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
> Note that `== 1`/`!= 1`/`< 1` only apply to simple [maps](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/contains)/[sets](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/set/contains) and had to be changed manually.
There are many other cases that could have been changed, but we've reverted most of those to reduce conflict with other open PRs.
-----
<details>
<summary>clang-tidy command on Mac</summary>
```bash
rm -rfd build && \
cmake -B build \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang++" \
-DCMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT="$(xcrun --show-sdk-path)" \
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-target arm64-apple-macos11" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-target arm64-apple-macos11" \
-DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DBUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON -DBUILD_FOR_FUZZING=ON
"$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/run-clang-tidy" -quiet -p build -j$(nproc) -checks='-*,readability-container-contains' | grep -v 'clang-tidy'
```
</details>
Note: this is a take 2 of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33094 with fewer contentious changes.
ACKs for top commit:
optout21:
reACK d9319b06cf
sedited:
ACK d9319b06cf
janb84:
re ACK d9319b06cf
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK d9319b06cf
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d9319b06cf. I manually reviewed the full change, and it seems there are a lot of positive comments about this and no more very significant conflicts, so I will merge it shortly.
Tree-SHA512: e4415221676cfb88413ccc446e5f4369df7a55b6642347277667b973f515c3c8ee5bfa9ee0022479c8de945c89fbc9ff61bd8ba086e70f30298cbc1762610fe1
CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite always returns true if called from a backed
cache, so just return void instead. Also return void from ::Sync and
::Flush.
This allows for dropping a FatalError condition and simplifying some
dead error handling code a bit.
Since we now no longer exercise the "error path" when returning from
`CCoinsView::BatchWrite`, make the method clear the cache instead. This
should only be exercised by tests and not change production behaviour.
This might slightly improve the coins_view fuzz test's ability to
generate better coverage.
Co-authored-by: l0rinc <pap.lorinc@gmail.com>
The changes made here were:
| From | To |
|-------------------|------------------|
| `m.count(k)` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `!m.count(k)` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 0` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) > 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
The commit contains the trivial, mechanical refactors where it doesn't matter if the container can have multiple elements or not
Co-authored-by: Jan B <608446+janb84@users.noreply.github.com>
A few temporary `CCoinsViewCache`'s are destructed right after the `Flush()`, therefore it is not necessary to call `ReallocateCache` to recreate them right before they're killed anyway.
* `Flush()` - retains existing functionality;
* `Flush(/*will_reuse_cache=*/false)` - skips destruction and reallocation of the parent cache since it will soon go out of scope anyway;
For the `will_reuse_cache` parameter we want to see exactly which ones will reallocate memory and which won't - since both can be valid usages.
This change was based on a subset of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28945.
Co-authored-by: Martin Ankerl <martin.ankerl@gmail.com>
Historically, the headers have been bumped some time after a file has
been touched. Do it now to avoid having to touch them again in the
future for that reason.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i --regexp-extended 's;( 20[0-2][0-9])(-20[0-2][0-9])? The Bitcoin Core developers;\1-present The Bitcoin Core developers;g' $( git show --pretty="" --name-only HEAD~0 )
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This can be reproduced according to the developer notes with something
like
( cd ./src/ && ../contrib/devtools/run-clang-tidy.py -p ../bld-cmake -fix -j $(nproc) )
Also, the header related changes were done manually.
The fuzzer goes through a sequence of operations that get applied to both a
real stack of CCoinsViewCache objects, and to simulation data, comparing
the two at the end.
