78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction (Jameson Lopp)
Pull request description:
Fixes#22382
Motivation: prevent excessive disk reads if txindex is enabled.
Worth noting that this could be argued to be less of a bug and more of an issue of undefined behavior. If a user calls GetTransaction with the wrong block hash, what should happen?
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
theStack:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
LarryRuane:
tACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
luke-jr:
utACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
jnewbery:
utACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
rajarshimaitra:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK and Tested ACK 78f4c8b98e on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: af7db5b98cb2ae4897b28476b2fa243bf7e6f850750d9347062fe8013c5720986d1a3c808f80098e5289bd84b085de03c81a44e584dc28982f721c223651bfe0
a806647d260132a00cd633160040625c7dd17803 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220190a588500b8e74ee7ae47671b9558 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db77ec843af82dcdf040dfdbc98c8ff26 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b8256a6703a6f5e592dfa77fa024a7035 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd6460c98e75d0422bd394e12af7f11e4c [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d260132a00cd633160040625c7dd17803
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d260132a00cd633160040625c7dd17803, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d260132a00cd633160040625c7dd17803
theStack:
ACK a806647d260132a00cd633160040625c7dd17803
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0 fuzz: Extend addrman fuzz test with deserialize (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Requested on IRC:
```
[18:01] <vasild> => I think there is a good chance fuzzing addrman unserialize will find more bugs
[18:04] <sipa> definitely
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0 per `git diff fa74025 aaaa9c6`
vasild:
ACK aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0
Tree-SHA512: f57d0aecf22a933e48d3181d7398218949588dd0de31218d1d28c825649e55fd60b0de6fbc92d2497cf5639a4adc2061c9bf8216546a2be916feac4f03f16e8f
7b3a20b2602f902c344a615f23f8f0280b6f6bcc mempool: apply rule of 5 to epochguard.h, fix compiler warnings (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Apply the rule of five to `src/util/epochguard.h::{Epoch, Marker}` for safety, which also nicely fixes the `-Wdeprecated-copy` compiler warnings with Clang 13.
References:
- https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/rule_of_three
- https://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#default
- https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rc-five
<details><summary>Compiler warnings fixed</summary><p>
```bash
In file included from policy/rbf.cpp:5:
In file included from ./policy/rbf.h:8:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
policy/rbf.cpp:29:29: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
CTxMemPoolEntry entry = *pool.mapTx.find(tx.GetHash());
```
```bash
In file included from txmempool.cpp:6:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:150:23: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
{ ::new((void *)__p) _Up(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:512:8: note: in instantiation of function template specialization '__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>>>>>>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, const CTxMemPoolEntry &>' requested here
__a.construct(__p, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:655:24: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>>>>>>>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, const CTxMemPoolEntry &>' requested here
node_alloc_traits::construct(
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/index_base.hpp:108:15: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::construct_value' requested here
final().construct_value(x,v);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_impl.hpp:770:33: note: (skipping 5 contexts in backtrace; use -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=0 to see all)
final_node_type* res=super::insert_(v,x,variant);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:693:33: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::insert_<boost::multi_index::detail::lvalue_tag>' requested here
final_node_type* res=super::insert_(v,x,variant);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:705:12: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::insert_<boost::multi_index::detail::lvalue_tag>' requested here
return insert_(v,detail::lvalue_tag());
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/index_base.hpp:213:21: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::insert_' requested here
{return final().insert_(x);}
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/hashed_index.hpp:284:46: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::detail::index_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>::final_insert_' requested here
std::pair<final_node_type*,bool> p=this->final_insert_(x);
^
txmempool.cpp:363:53: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::insert' requested here
indexed_transaction_set::iterator newit = mapTx.insert(entry).first;
```
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:9:
In file included from ./test/fuzz/util.h:27:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:150:23: note: in implicit move constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
{ ::new((void *)__p) _Up(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:512:8: note: in instantiation of function template specialization '__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
__a.construct(__p, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/vector.tcc:115:21: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
_Alloc_traits::construct(this->_M_impl, this->_M_impl._M_finish,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/stl_vector.h:1204:9: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry>::emplace_back<CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
{ emplace_back(std::move(__x)); }
^
test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:49:37: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry>::push_back' requested here
mempool_entries.push_back(ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry(fuzzed_data_provider, tx));
```
</p></details>
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7b3a20b2602f902c344a615f23f8f0280b6f6bcc
vasild:
ACK 7b3a20b2602f902c344a615f23f8f0280b6f6bcc
Tree-SHA512: 0406dfcec180152d4f9ed07cbc2f406ad739b41f9c9cb38f8c75159c15d9d8a9a5c7526765966e40d695d265c178f6a80152e7edf82da344a65e55938dddb63d
8169fc4e73a87331e02502fc24e293831765c8b1 qt, refactor: Fix code styling of moved InitExecutor class (Hennadii Stepanov)
c82165a55701fe4ff604d7f30163051cd47c2363 qt, refactor: Move InitExecutor class into its own module (Hennadii Stepanov)
dbcf56b6c6e939923673b3f07bed7bb3632dbeb1 scripted-diff: Rename BitcoinCore class to InitExecutor (Hennadii Stepanov)
19a1d008310f250b69b7aa764a9f26384d5a4a85 qt: Add BitcoinCore::m_thread member (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR makes the `BitcoinCore` class reusable, i.e., it can be used by the widget-based GUI or by the [QML-based](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/tree/main/src/qml) one, and it makes the divergence between these two repos minimal.
The small benefit to the current branch is more structured code.
Actually, this PR is ported from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/10.
The example of the re-using of the `BitcoinCore` class is https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui-qml/pull/11.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 8169fc4e73a87331e02502fc24e293831765c8b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 8169fc4e73a87331e02502fc24e293831765c8b1. Only change is switching from `m_executor` from pointer to optional type (thanks for update!)
Tree-SHA512: a0552c32d26d9acf42921eb12bcdf68f02d52f7183c688c43257b1a58679f64e45f193ee2d316850c7f0f516561e17abe989fe545bfa05e158ad3f4c66d19bca
3e33d170cc0a8f386791777f3cc597e2bd0bf2ee Add ipc::Context and ipc::capnp::Context structs (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
These are currently empty structs but they will be used to pass some function and object pointers from bitcoin application code to IPC hooks that run, for example, when a remote object is created or destroyed, or a new process is created.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK 3e33d170
Tree-SHA512: fd949fae5f1a973d39cb97f2745821ab2f62b98e166e53bc2801f97dcde988e18faaaaa0ffc2a82c170938b3a18078b6162fa35460e6e7c635e681b3c9e5b0a6
007910388b54abc97057e44a7a8f7241e83c203b [Refactor] Rename scriptPubKey -> exec_script (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Rename scriptPubKey to witness_script in ExecuteWitnessScript() function to correctly reflect which script is being executed.
For example in segwitv0, this scriptPubKey refers to the script of the form `OP_0 <script_hash>`, but witness_script refers to the script that actually hashes to the `script_hash`.
If there is a reason why it's named this way, I would love to know
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 007910388b54abc97057e44a7a8f7241e83c203b 🖖
theStack:
ACK 007910388b54abc97057e44a7a8f7241e83c203b
lsilva01:
Code Review 007910388b ACK
Tree-SHA512: 768e10e656b60b1293beb560fb7adbc2c1495e6db1f54f0c2c63109692ae0c579c856b194b33f72afd0d332159a9796c0e2bd99b79ea5c4b1803469a81301fd6
a37e29d32fde8c7b4143322deeef2a8a06114d43 cli: Implement human readable -getinfo. (Klement Tan)
Pull request description:
# Overview
**Description** This PR changes the return format of `-getinfo`
**Rationale**
- make `-getinfo` more user-friendly
- uses less vertical screen space.
Fixes: Issue 17314(Not linking issue to prevent it from closing)
> Alternative, more human-friendly, format besides JSON? Colors, progress bars
### Return Format
```bash
// Data from getblockchaininfo
Chain: [getblockchaininfo.chain]
Blocks: [getblockchaininfo.blocks]
Headers: [getblockchaininfo.headers]
Verification progress: [getblockchaininfo.verificationprogress]
Difficulty: [getblockchaininfo.difficulty]
# Data from getnetworkinfo
Network: in [getnetworkinfo.connections_in], out [getnetworkinfo.connections_out], total [getnetworkinfo.connections]
Version: [getnetworkinfo.version]
Time offset (s): [getnetworkinfo.timeoffset]
Proxy: [getnetworkinfo.proxy] // "N/A" if no proxy
Min tx relay fee rate (BTC/kvB): [getnetworkinfo.relayfee]
# Data from getwalletinfo. Will only be present when a single wallet is loaded
Wallet: [getnetworkinfo.walletname] // "" if walletname is empty(default wallet)
Keypool size: [getnetworkinfo.keypoolsize]
Unlocked until: [getnetworkinfo.unlocked_until]
Transaction fee rate (-paytxfee) (BTC/kvB): [getnetworkinfo.paytxfee]
# Data from getbalances. Will only be present when a single wallet is loaded
Balance: [getbalances.mine.trusted]
# Data from listwallets then getbalances for each wallet. Will only be present for multiple wallets loaded
Balances
[getbalances.mine.trusted] [listwallets[i]] // Right justify on balance
Warnings: [getnetworkinfo.warnings]
```
#### Coloring
The following lines would be colored to better show the differences between the various `-getinfo` components. However, this will not apply for `WIN32`(ANSI code not supported) and users that connect the `stdout` to a non-terminal process.
- `Chain: ...`: BLUE(`\x1B[34m`)
- `Network: ...`: GREEN(`\x1B[32m`)
- `Wallet: ...`: MAGENTA(`\x1B[35m`)
- `Balance: ...` CYAN(`\x1B[36m`)
- `Balances: ...` CYAN(`\x1B[36m`)
- `Warnings: ...` Yellow(`\x1B[33m`)
### Screenshots
*No wallet loaded:*
*Single wallet loaded*
*Multi wallet loaded*
# Reviewing Notes
## Testing Scenarios
**1. No wallet loaded**
- When there no wallets are loaded(Unload wallet with `./src/bitcoin-cli unloadwallet "YOUR_WALLETNAME"`
- Test with `./src/bitcoin-cli -getinfo`.
- Should only display `chain` and `network` segment
**2. Single wallet loaded**
- When only a single wallet loaded or `-rpcwallet` is set(Load wallet with `./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet "YOUR_WALLETNAME"`)
- Test with `./src/bitcoin-cli -rpcwallet="YOUR_WALLETNAME" -getinfo`(Load wallet with `./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet "YOUR_WALLETNAME"`)
- Should only display `chain`, `network`, `wallet` and `balance` segment
**3. Multiple wallet loaded**
- When there are multiple wallets loaded(Load wallet with `./src/bitcoin-cli loadwallet "YOUR_WALLETNAME"`)
- Test with `./src/bitcoin-cli -getinfo`
- Should only display `chain`, `network` and `balances` segment
## Implementation
**Current Flow**
1. `GetinfoRequestHandler` is instantiated
2. `ConnectAndCallRPC` is called with `GetinfoRequestHandler`. It returns `UniValue::VOBJ result`
3. If `-rpcwallet` wallet is not set, `GetWalletBalances` is called with a pointer to `result` as a parameter. It adds the balances for all the wallets to `result`
**New Flow**
1. `GetinfoRequestHandler` is instantiated
2. `ConnectAndCallRPC` is called with `GetinfoRequestHandler`. It returns `UniValue::VOBJ result`
3. If `-rpcwallet` wallet is not set, `GetWalletBalances` is called with a pointer to `result` as a parameter. It adds the balances for all the wallets to `result`
4. **New** `ParseGetInfoResult` is called with `result` as parameter. It converts results type from `UniValue::VOBJ` to `UniValue::VSTR` according to the format stated above.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK a37e29d32fde8c7b4143322deeef2a8a06114d43
Tree-SHA512: 5e90606a397abfc4e5921f6db70a0a4888cbebba9da9b70cfe72d593caf669fd090de3e58eecf1cb5c20d5f448ad278999165d32d01667037d09bd352d23ac5d
cdd51e8ee156f3bb3135be8aa51530a53734153e torcontrol: Resolve Tor control plane address (Adrian-Stefan Mares)
Pull request description:
Closes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22236
This PR forces the Tor control plane address to be resolved before a connection attempt is made, similar to how the `-proxy` / `-onion` address is resolved.
The use case for this change is that the control plane may not have a stable address - in a containerized environment perhaps.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK cdd51e8ee156f3bb3135be8aa51530a53734153e tested various configurations on signet with this branch versus master
laanwj:
LGTM ACK cdd51e8ee156f3bb3135be8aa51530a53734153e
theStack:
ACK cdd51e8ee156f3bb3135be8aa51530a53734153e 🪐
prayank23:
ACK cdd51e8ee1
Tree-SHA512: 5335cfcb89089a2acd6d02b88c2022dec60bb74388a99187c901c1c35d32896814d5f81df55c053953276c51fcec263c6ddadd068316f8e428b841bd599fc21e
2ce7f95d4a1583bf0090a3fc1f5d1aba9c1d1b06 doc: clean out release notes post branch-off (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Should probably be done, given we've already had a PR add a release note for 23.0 (#22407).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2ce7f95d4a1583bf0090a3fc1f5d1aba9c1d1b06
Tree-SHA512: 1c524b55daecb8c69e110759b82a5caf31080ea7abbae39ecfefe0107786199623499c9950dedd8e72594a55b072eda93801ee787e896a3f242cde73d8a984f6
2ebf2fe0e4727a5a57a03f4283bdf1e263855803 test: check for RPC error 'Transaction already in block chain' (-27) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing test coverage for the RPC error "Transaction already in block chain" (error code `RPC_VERIFY_ALREADY_IN_CHAIN` = `RPC_TRANSACTION_ALREADY_IN_CHAIN` = -27), which is thrown in the function `BroadcastTransaction` (src/node/transaction.cpp).
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 2ebf2fe0e4727a5a57a03f4283bdf1e263855803 (ran linter, looked at changes and ran modified test and checked code in `src/node/transaction.cpp`)
darosior:
ACK 2ebf2fe0e4727a5a57a03f4283bdf1e263855803
Tree-SHA512: 8bfbd3ff3da0cb3b8745f69b8ca2377f85fa99f0270750840b60e6ae43b5645c5c59b236993e8b2ad0444ec4171484e4f1ee23fa7e81b79d4222bcb623666fa5
2b19f3443efc9e7868746ea1c603b1027d822f32 RPC/blockchain: getblockchaininfo: Include versionbits signalling details during LOCKED_IN (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
While the signal has no effect during `LOCKED_IN`, the bit is still defined and recommended for measuring uptake. Makes sense to expose statistics too.
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
ACK 2b19f3443e
Sjors:
tACK 2b19f34
theStack:
Tested ACK 2b19f3443efc9e7868746ea1c603b1027d822f32
MarcoFalke:
review-only ACK 2b19f3443efc9e7868746ea1c603b1027d822f32
Tree-SHA512: a9bb5adb21992586119cbb5f87e5348eabcab11d5a3bf769b00b69e466589a669846e503f8384fa8927fd77da0c2d64a54f13a7a55a62980046d70f8255ddf47
20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364 rpc: Return block time in getblockchaininfo (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Return tip time in `getblockchaininfo`, for some use cases this can save a call to `getblock`.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
theStack:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
0xB10C:
ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
kristapsk:
ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
Tree-SHA512: 29a920cfff1ef53e0af601c3f93f8f9171f3be47fc84b0fa293cb865b824976e8c1510b17b27d17daf0b8e658dd77d9dc388373395f0919fc4a23cd5019642d5
acaac6e86a9e808244d9c69a59ab3c2d8e34cad6 ci: Bump Android NDK to r22 which supports std::filesystem (Hennadii Stepanov)
cac7890386e773d9c268febd38b4311e6d35e03f build: Add support for Android NDK r22+ (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This is required to support [`std::filesystem`](https://github.com/android/ndk/wiki/Changelog-r22#changes) on Android (see #20744).
Fixes#22074.
ACKs for top commit:
icota:
re-tACK acaac6e86a
Tree-SHA512: ecbec374ee590c4cb30012210f1422d469e7e8b68989f9eb53d36b5feee150d31e6bd10e1fc4a2056fbf4f8f8513e435b446e5feaf21a3a4d09dfc561fb22e73
f036dfbb692c4d44d0f59194d089ed0aa1096347 [addrman] Remove unused test_before_evict argument from Good() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This has never been used in the public interface method since it was
introduced in #9037.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
Tested ACK f036dfbb69 on Ubuntu 20.04.
theStack:
Code-review ACK f036dfbb692c4d44d0f59194d089ed0aa1096347
Tree-SHA512: 98145d9596b4ae1f354cfa561be1a54c6b8057c920e0ac3d4c1d42c9326b2dad2d44320f4171bb701d97088b216760cca8017b84c8b5dcd2b1dc8f158f28066d
fafade9c79f55c186c1938ce3e27077d12dee6c5 doc: Adjust commit message template for the guix.sigs repo (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems to be the most common template used, so adjust this here, too.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fafade9c79f55c186c1938ce3e27077d12dee6c5
hebasto:
re-ACK fafade9c79f55c186c1938ce3e27077d12dee6c5
Tree-SHA512: 20477d14ecfad94f3b28b94786a4c0d98df539360d0c1deefa94766064a7d0700c849e54d6b251f922e135fcfa964ada0c724090f7f92b459ea39f7c3ca8c65d
faa54e375782b21cbc2761c763128131c569e903 Move pblocktree global to BlockManager (MarcoFalke)
fa27f03b4943540aa2eab283d4cf50ad4a1a01f8 Move LoadBlockIndexDB to BlockManager (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The block tree db is used within BlockManager to write and read the block index, so make the db global a member variable of BlockManager.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK faa54e375782b21cbc2761c763128131c569e903 ([`jamesob/ackr/22371.1.MarcoFalke.move_pblocktree_global_t`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22371.1.MarcoFalke.move_pblocktree_global_t))
theStack:
re-ACK faa54e375782b21cbc2761c763128131c569e903 🥧
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK faa54e375782b21cbc2761c763128131c569e903. I was thinking this looked like a change Carl would like, so no surprised he [Mega-acked](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22371#pullrequestreview-696450475)
Tree-SHA512: 1b7badbf503d53f5d4dbd9ed8f2e5c1ebfe48102665197048cc9e37bc87b5cec5f2277f3aae9f73a1095bfe879b19d288286ca3daa28031f5f1b64b1184439a9
fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec refactor: Pass script verify flags as uint32_t (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The flags are cast to unsigned in the interpreter anyway, so avoid the confusion (and fuzz crashes) by just passing them as unsigned from the beginning.
Also, the flags are often inverted bit-wise with the `~` operator, which also works on signed integers, but might cause confusion as the sign bit is flipped.
Fixes#22233
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec
kristapsk:
ACK fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec
jonatack:
ACK fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec
Tree-SHA512: ea0720f32f823fa7f075309978672aa39773c6019d12b6c1c9d611fc1983a76115b7fe2a28d50814673bb6415c311ccc05b99d6e871575fb6900faf75ed17769
eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 Update assumed chain params (Sriram)
Pull request description:
Update the relevant variables in `src/chainparams.cpp` for `mainnet`, `testnet`, and `signet` as given [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#before-branch-off).
To review this PR, check out [this guide](https://github.com/fanquake/core-review/blob/master/update-assumevalid.md).
Note: added a 10% overhead to the base value of `mainnet` in `m_assumed_blockchain_size`
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415, checked against my node 🌮
bfolkens:
ACK eeddd1c - checked against `mainnet`
achow101:
Code Review ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415
0xB10C:
ACK mainnet, testnet, and signet eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415
jamesob:
ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 ([`jamesob/ackr/22499.1.sriramdvt.update_assumed_chain_par`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22499.1.sriramdvt.update_assumed_chain_par))
darosior:
ACK eeddd1c8fa96cf546b0bf92063cefa4fd8c6b415 mainnet and testnet
Tree-SHA512: 0ab19d2acc6a854c6aa38fba199d61c68cec40f005d1d54341ea32b59aae9b7d1aabfd21d7c0bc79f54be99d3e71d1d727196cab88f370259fd2c6e002d3e43c
9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 tests: Test for dumpwallet lock order issue (Andrew Chow)
25d99e6511d8c43b2025a89bcd8295de755346a7 Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go first (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When a wallet is loaded which has an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool, it will end up establishing the lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. If `dumpwallet` is used on this wallet, then a lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main will be used, which causes a lock order assertion. This PR fixes this by reordering `dumpwallet` and `GetKeyBirthTimes` (only used by `dumpwallet`). Specifically, in both functions, the function calls which lock cs_main are done prior to locking cs_KeyStore. This avoids the lock order issue.
Additionally, I have added a test case to `wallet_dump.py`. Of course testing this requires `--enable-debug`.
Fixes#22489
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 🎰
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4. Nice to reduce lock scope, and good test!
prayank23:
tACK 9b85a5e2f7
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 9b85a5e2f7 under the same conditions reported in issue #22489 and the `dumpwallet` command completed successfully.
Tree-SHA512: d370a8f415ad64ee6a538ff419155837bcdbb167e3831b06572562289239028c6b46d80b23d227286afe875d9351f3377574ed831549ea426fb926af0e19c755
5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5 [style] Clean up BroadcastTransaction() (John Newbery)
7282d4c0363ab5152baa34af626cb49afbfddc32 [test] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (glozow)
cd48372b67d961fe661990a2c6d3cc3d91478924 [mempool] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (John Newbery)
847b6ed48d7bacec9024618922e9b339d2d97676 [test] Test transactions are not re-added to unbroadcast set (Duncan Dean)
2837a9f1eaa2c6bf402d1d9891d9aa84c4a56033 [mempool] Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
1. Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool
Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a
transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the
transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been
broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again,
meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed
from m_unbroadcast_txids.
Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the
transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until
the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction
(or perhaps indefinitely).
Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added to the mempool.
2. Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions
There is some slightly unexpected behaviour when:
- there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx")
- BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid
as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx")
Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with
relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of
the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers,
in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from
setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of
wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction
(the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from
the new tx).
Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool
transaction in this case.
The third commit is a comment/whitespace only change to tidy up the BroadcastTransaction() function.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5a77abd
naumenkogs:
ACK 5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5
theStack:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e657458852875a07692898982f4b1db5
lsilva01:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
Tree-SHA512: d1a46d32a9f975220e5b432ff6633fac9be01ea41925b4958395b8d641680500dc44476b12d18852e5b674d2d87e4d0160b4483e45d3d149176bdff9f4dc8516
5730a43703f7e5a5ca26245ba3b55fbdd027d0b6 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande)
c34ad3309f93979b274a37de013502b05d25fad8 net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande)
533500d9072b7d5a36a6491784bdeb9247e91fb0 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande)
b6c5d1e450dde6a54bd785504c923adfb45c7060 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them.
This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement.
So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`.
I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us.
The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.
Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1.
[Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 5730a43703f7e5a5ca26245ba3b55fbdd027d0b6
naumenkogs:
ACK 5730a43703f7e5a5ca26245ba3b55fbdd027d0b6
jnewbery:
ACK 5730a43703
Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
Now that m_recent_confirmed_transactions is owned by PeerManagerImpl,
and PeerManagerImpl's lifetime is managed by the node context, we can
just default initialize m_recent_confirmed_transactions during object
initialization. We can also remove the unique_ptr indirection.
Now that recentRejects is owned by PeerManagerImpl, and
PeerManagerImpl's lifetime is managed by the node context, we can just
default initialize recentRejects during object initialization. We can
also remove the unique_ptr indirection.
