c93bf0e6e2 test: Add missing %c character test (Hodlinator)
76cca4aa6f test: Document non-parity between tinyformat and ConstevalFormatstring (Hodlinator)
533013cba2 test: Prove+document ConstevalFormatString/tinyformat parity (Hodlinator)
b81a465995 refactor test: Profit from using namespace + using detail function (Hodlinator)
Pull request description:
Clarifies and puts the extent of parity under test.
Broken out from #30546 based on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30546#discussion_r1755013263 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30546#discussion_r1756495304.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK c93bf0e6e2 🗜
l0rinc:
ACK c93bf0e6e2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK c93bf0e6e2. Just a few cleanups tweaking function declarations and commit comments and consolidating some test cases since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 5ecc893b26cf2761c0009861be392ec4c4fceb0ef95052a2f6f9df76b2e459cfb3f9e257f61be07c3bb2ecc6e525e72c5ca853be1f63b70b52785323d3db6b42
Same as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113951.
Avoids compile failures under clang-20 &
`D_LIBCPP_REMOVE_TRANSITIVE_INCLUDES`:
```bash
In file included from /bitcoin/src/test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:5:
/bitcoin/src/test/fuzz/FuzzedDataProvider.h:209:5: error: use of undeclared identifier 'abort'
209 | abort();
| ^
/bitcoin/src/test/fuzz/FuzzedDataProvider.h:250:5: error: use of undeclared identifier 'abort'
250 | abort();
```
31e59d94c6 iwyu: Drop backported mapping (Hennadii Stepanov)
fe9bc5abef ci: Update Clang in "tidy" job (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR switches to the latest [IWYU 0.23](https://github.com/include-what-you-use/include-what-you-use/releases/tag/0.23), which is compatible with Clang 19.
New "bugprone-use-after-move" and "modernize-use-starts-ends-with" warnings that emerged have been addressed.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 31e59d94c6
l0rinc:
ACK 31e59d94c6
theuni:
ACK 31e59d94c6
Tree-SHA512: ae0ca150673e1bfa78664f2ef35dbc965094b32374cafeeae390c6d368c28169a7f7790debe9a6eeb5efc39c9a468f5032d92f30cc4032b09d8265f6a75de882
- For "%n", which is supposed to write to the argument for printf.
- For string/integer mismatches of width/precision specifiers.
Co-Authored-By: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
Also adds BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW() while touching that line, clarifying part of what we are checking for.
Also removed redundant inline from template functions in .cpp file.
0184d33b3d scripted-diff: Replace strprintf(Untranslated) with Untranslated(strprintf) (Ryan Ofsky)
006e4d1d59 refactor: Use + instead of strformat to concatenate translated & untranslated strings (Ryan Ofsky)
831d2bfcf9 refactor: Don't embed translated string in untranslated string. (Ryan Ofsky)
058021969b refactor: Avoid concatenation of format strings (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR cleans up string formatting in the codebase so other PRs adding compile time checking can be simpler and easier to review (specifically #30928, #31061, #31074, and #31149).
Currently these PRs are hard to review because in addition to changing formatting APIs, they have to update callers that are using the API's in unusual ways. Clean up these callers now so later PRs can be simpler. Specifically:
- Use string literals instead of `std::string` format strings to enable more compile-time checking.
- Avoid using untranslated bilingual strings as format strings. Use originals so they can by checked at compile time.
- Favor `Untranslated(strprintf(...))` over `strprintf(Untranslated(...), ...)` for consistency and to prevent translated and untranslated strings from being unintentionally combined.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 0184d33b3d🔹
l0rinc:
ACK 0184d33b3d - no overall difference because of the rebase
Tree-SHA512: 37eb771187d30977f5f054eddb82af6dd69878ace89cede72032bb389e57200898119f9fe486ce6903ebb00cb24648be215ab3e44842b3d206b35e26038da750
This change switches to the latest IWYU 0.23, which is compatible with
Clang 19.
Fixed new "modernize-use-starts-ends-with" warnings.
The new "bugprone-use-after-move" warning in `result_tests.cpp` is a
false positive caused by a bug in Boost.Test versions < 1.87. This has
been addressed by introducing a local variable.
See upstream references:
- Issue: https://github.com/boostorg/test/issues/343
- Fix: https://github.com/boostorg/test/pull/348
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <*~=`'#}+{/-|&$^_@721217.xyz>
1807df3d9f test: addrman: tried 3 times and never a success so `isTerrible=true` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
This PR adds test coverage for the following verification:
```cpp
if (TicksSinceEpoch<std::chrono::seconds>(m_last_success) == 0 && nAttempts >= ADDRMAN_RETRIES) { // tried N times and never a success
return true;
}
```
If we've tried an address for 3 or more times and were unsuccessful, this address should be pointed out as "terrible".
-------
You can test this by applying:
```diff
diff --git a/src/addrman.cpp b/src/addrman.cpp
index 054a9bee32..93a9521b59 100644
--- a/src/addrman.cpp
+++ b/src/addrman.cpp
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ bool AddrInfo::IsTerrible(NodeSeconds now) const
}
if (TicksSinceEpoch<std::chrono::seconds>(m_last_success) == 0 && nAttempts >= ADDRMAN_RETRIES) { // tried N times and never a success
- return true;
+ return false;
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 1807df3d9f
naumenkogs:
ACK 1807df3d9f
achow101:
ACK 1807df3d9f
Tree-SHA512: e3cc43c98bddfe90f585d5b4bd00543be443b77ecaf038615261aa8cc4d14fc2f1006d0b00c04188040eaace455c5c6dbb3bb200a2c0f29c3b4ef5128bf0973a
This makes code more consistent and makes it easier to add compile-time checking to
enforce that format strings contain the right specifiers, because it stops
using Untranslated() to create the format string, so the Untranslated()
function will not need to get involved in formatting.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
quote='"[^"]+"'
quotes="(?:$quote|\\s)*"
nonparens="[^()]*"
single_level_paren="\($nonparens\)"
double_level_paren="\($nonparens\($nonparens\)$nonparens\)"
exprs="(?:$double_level_paren|$single_level_paren|$nonparens)*"
git grep -l 'Untranslated' | xargs perl -0777 -i -pe "s/strprintf\((\\W*)Untranslated\(($quotes)\)($exprs)(\))/Untranslated(\1strprintf(\2\3))/gs"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
50cce20013 test, refactor: Compact ccoins_access and ccoins_spend (Lőrinc)
0a159f0914 test, refactor: Remove remaining unbounded flags from coins_tests (Lőrinc)
c0b4b2c1ee test: Validate error messages on fail (Lőrinc)
d5f8d607ab test: Group values and states in tests into CoinEntry wrappers (Lőrinc)
ca74aa7490 test, refactor: Migrate GetCoinsMapEntry to return MaybeCoin (Lőrinc)
15aaa81c38 coins, refactor: Remove direct GetFlags access (Lőrinc)
6b733699cf coins, refactor: Assume state after SetClean in AddFlags to prevent dangling pointers (Lőrinc)
fc8c282022 coins, refactor: Make AddFlags, SetDirty, SetFresh static (Lőrinc)
cd0498eabc coins, refactor: Split up AddFlags to remove invalid states (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Similarly to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30849, this cleanup is intended to de-risk https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30673#discussion_r1739909068 by simplifying the coin cache public interface.
`CCoinsCacheEntry` provided general access to its internal flags state, even though, in reality, it could only be `clean`, `fresh`, `dirty`, or `fresh|dirty` (in the follow-up, we will remove `fresh` without `dirty`).
Once it was marked as `dirty`, we couldn’t set the state back to clean with `AddFlags(0)`—tests explicitly checked against that.
This PR refines the public interface to make this distinction clearer and to make invalid behavior impossible, rather than just checked by tests. We don't need extensive access to the internals of `CCoinsCacheEntry`, as many tests were simply validating invalid combinations in this way.
The last few commits contain significant test refactorings to make `coins_tests` easier to change in follow-ups.
ACKs for top commit:
andrewtoth:
Code Review ACK 50cce20013
laanwj:
Code review ACK 50cce20013
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 50cce20013. Looks good! Thanks for the followups.
Tree-SHA512: c0d65f1c7680b4bb9cd368422b218f2473c2ec75a32c7350a6e11e8a1601c81d3c0ae651b9f1dae08400fb4e5d43431d9e4ccca305a718183f9a936fe47c1a6c
fa3e074304 refactor: Tidy fixups (MarcoFalke)
fa72646f2b move-only: Detail_CheckNumFormatSpecifiers and G_TRANSLATION_FUN (MarcoFalke)
faff8403f0 refactor: Pick translated string after format (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The changes are required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31061, however they also make sense on their own. For example, they are fixing up an `inline namespace`, which lead to compile errors otherwise (can be tested by observing the compile error after reverting the changes to `src/util/strencodings.h`). Also, a unit test comment is fixed.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa3e074304. Nice changes! These should allow related PRs to be simpler.
l0rinc:
ACK fa3e074304
hodlinator:
cr-ACK fa3e074304
Tree-SHA512: 37371181a348610442186b5fbb7a6032d0caf70aae566002ad60be329a3131a2b89f28f6c51e10872079f987986925dc8c0611bde639057bee4f572d2b9ba92a
faf70cc994 Remove wallet::ParseISO8601DateTime, use ParseISO8601DateTime instead (MarcoFalke)
2222aecd5f util: Implement ParseISO8601DateTime based on C++20 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`boost::posix_time` in `ParseISO8601DateTime` has many issues:
* It parses random strings that are clearly invalid and returns a time value for them, see [1] below.
* None of the separators `-`, or `:`, or `T`, or `Z` are validated.
* It may crash when running under a hardened C++ library, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28917.
* It has been unmaintained for years, so reporting or fixing any issues will most likely be useless.
* It pulls in a third-party dependency, when the functionality is already included in vanilla C++20.
Fix all issues by replacing it with a simple helper function written in C++20.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28917.
[1] The following patch passes on current master:
```diff
diff --git a/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp b/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp
index 32f6f5ab46..c1c94c7116 100644
--- a/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/test/rpc_util_tests.cpp
@@ -12,6 +12,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(wallet_util_tests)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_ParseISO8601DateTime)
{
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("964296"), 242118028800);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("244622"), 15023836800);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("+INfINITy"), 9223372036854);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("7000802 01"), 158734166400);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("7469-2 +INfINITy"), 9223372036854);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("maXimum-datE-time"), 253402300799);
+ BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("577737 114maXimum-datE-time"), 253402300799);
+
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("1970-01-01T00:00:00Z"), 0);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("1960-01-01T00:00:00Z"), 0);
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(ParseISO8601DateTime("2000-01-01T00:00:01Z"), 946684801);
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK faf70cc994, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
dergoegge:
utACK faf70cc994
Tree-SHA512: 9dd745a356d04acf6200e13a6af52c51a9e2a0eeccea110093ce5da147b3c669c0eda918e46db0164c081a78c8feae3fe557a4759bea18449a8ff2d090095931
32fc59796f rpc: Allow single transaction through submitpackage (glozow)
Pull request description:
There's no particular reason to restrict single transaction submissions with submitpackage. This change relaxes the RPC checks as enables the `AcceptPackage` flow to accept packages of a single transaction.
Resolves#31085
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 32fc59796f
achow101:
ACK 32fc59796f
glozow:
ACK 32fc59796f
Tree-SHA512: ffed353bfdca610ffcfd53b40b76da05ffc26df6bac4b0421492e067bede930380e03399d2e2d1d17f0e88fb91cd8eb376e3aabebbabcc724590bf068d09807c
This makes the debug output mostly the same for -par=1 and parallel validation runs. Of course,
parallel validation is non-deterministic in what error it may encounter first if there are
multiple issues. Also, the way certain script-related and non-script-related checks are
performed differs between the two modes still, which may result in discrepancies.
The check type function now needs to return a std::optional<R> for some type R,
and the check queue overall will return std::nullopt if all individual checks
return that, or one of the non-nullopt values if there is at least one.
For most tests, we use R=int, but for the actual validation code, we make it return
the ScriptError.
The `ccoins_add` and `ccoins_write` tests check the actual exception error messages now instead of just that they fail for the given parameters.
This enables us testing different exceptions in a more fine-grained way in later changes.
We don't need so much access to the internals of CCoinsCacheEntry, since many tests are just exercising invalid combinations this way.
This implies that `AddFlags` has private access now.
CCoinsCacheEntry provided general access to its internal flags state, even though in reality it could only be clean, fresh, dirty or fresh|dirty.
After it got dirtied we couldn't set the state back to clean by AddFlags(0) - tests were explicitly checking against that.
This commit cleans up the public interface to make this distinction cleaner and invalid behavior impossible instead of just checked by tests.
This includes the removal of redundant `inline` qualifiers (we're inside a struct).
Also renamed `self` to `pair` to simplify the upcoming commits.
Also modernized `EmplaceCoinInternalDANGER` since it was already modified.
Co-authored-by: Andrew Toth <andrewstoth@gmail.com>
37a5c5d836 doc: update descriptors.md for getdescriptoractivity (James O'Beirne)
ee3ce6a4f4 test: rpc: add no address case for getdescriptoractivity (James O'Beirne)
811f76f3a5 rpc: add getdescriptoractivity (James O'Beirne)
25fe087de5 rpc: move-only: move ScriptPubKeyDoc to utils (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
The RPC command `scanblocks` provides a useful way to get a set of blockhashes that have activity relevant to a set of descriptors (`relevant_blocks`). However actually extracting the activity from those blocks is left as an exercise to the end user.
This process involves not only generating the (potentially ranged) set of scripts for the descriptor set on the client side (maybe via `deriveaddresses`), but then the user must retrieve each block's contents one-by-one using `getblock <hash>`, which is transmitted over a network link. And that's all before they perform the actual search over block content. There's even more work required to incorporate unconfirmed transactions.
This PR introduces an RPC `getdescriptoractivity` that [dovetails](https://bitcoin-irc.chaincode.com/bitcoin-core-dev/2024-08-16#1046393;) with `scanblocks` output, handling the process described above. Users specify the blockhashes (perhaps from `relevant_blocks`) and a set of descriptors; they are then given all spend/receive activity in that set of blocks.
This is a very useful tool when implementing lightweight wallets that want neither to require a third-party indexer like electrs, nor the overhead of creating and managing watch-only wallets in Core. This allows Core to be more easily used in a "stateless" manner by wallets, with potentially many nodes interchangeably acting as backends.
### Example usage
```
% ./src/bitcoin-cli scanblocks start \
'["addr(bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t)"]' \
857263
{
"from_height": 857263,
"to_height": 858263,
"relevant_blocks": [
"00000000000000000002bc5cc78f5b0913a5230a8f4b0d5060bc9a60900a5a88",
"00000000000000000001c5291ed6a40c06d3db5c8fb738567654b24a14b24ecb"
],
"completed": true
}
% ./src/bitcoin-cli getdescriptoractivity \
'["00000000000000000002bc5cc78f5b0913a5230a8f4b0d5060bc9a60900a5a88", "00000000000000000001c5291ed6a40c06d3db5c8fb738567654b24a14b24ecb"]' \
'["addr(bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t)"]'
{
"activity": [
{
"type": "receive",
"amount": 0.00002900,
"blockhash": "00000000000000000002bc5cc78f5b0913a5230a8f4b0d5060bc9a60900a5a88",
"height": 857907,
"txid": "c9d34f202c1f66d80cae76f305350f5fdde910b97cf6ae6bf79f5bcf2a337d06",
"vout": 254,
"output_spk": {
"asm": "1 7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"desc": "rawtr(7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b)#yewcd80j",
"hex": "51207e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"address": "bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t",
"type": "witness_v1_taproot"
}
},
{
"type": "spend",
"amount": 0.00002900,
"blockhash": "00000000000000000001c5291ed6a40c06d3db5c8fb738567654b24a14b24ecb",
"height": 858260,
"spend_txid": "7f61d1b248d4ee46376f9c6df272f63fbb0c17039381fb23ca5d90473b823c36",
"spend_vin": 0,
"prevout_txid": "c9d34f202c1f66d80cae76f305350f5fdde910b97cf6ae6bf79f5bcf2a337d06",
"prevout_vout": 254,
"prevout_spk": {
"asm": "1 7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"desc": "rawtr(7e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b)#yewcd80j",
"hex": "51207e02f613a8d427f5f55ff62bddc47ccfb394953e57fdcb9a8add58af3124698b",
"address": "bc1p0cp0vyag6snlta2l7c4am3rue7eef9f72l7uhx52m4v27vfydx9s8tfs7t",
"type": "witness_v1_taproot"
}
}
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 37a5c5d836
achow101:
ACK 37a5c5d836
tdb3:
Code review and light retest ACK 37a5c5d836
rkrux:
re-ACK 37a5c5d836
Tree-SHA512: 04aa51e329c6c2ed72464b9886281d5ebd7511a8a8e184ea81249033a4dad535a12829b1010afc2da79b344ea8b5ab8ed47e426d0bf2eb78ab395d20b1da8dbb
11f3bc229c refactor: Reserve vectors in fuzz tests (Lőrinc)
152fefe7a2 refactor: Preallocate PrevectorFillVector(In)Direct without vector resize (Lőrinc)
a774c7a339 refactor: Fix remaining clang-tidy performance-inefficient-vector errors (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
PR inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29608#issuecomment-2437847307 (and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29458, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29606, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29607, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30093).
The `clang-tidy` check can be run via:
```bash
cmake -B build -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DBUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON -DBUILD_FOR_FUZZING=ON && cmake --build build -j$(nproc)
run-clang-tidy -quiet -p build -j $(nproc) -checks='-*,performance-inefficient-vector-operation' | grep -v 'clang-tidy'
```
which revealed 3 tests and 1 prod warning (+ fuzz and benching, found by hebasto).
Even though the tests aren't performance critical, getting rid of these warnings (for which the checks were already enabled via https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/.clang-tidy#L18, see below), the fix was quite simple.
<details>
<summary>clang-tidy -list-checks</summary>
```bash
cd src && clang-tidy -list-checks | grep 'vector'
performance-inefficient-vector-operation
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>Output before the change</summary>
```
src/test/rpc_tests.cpp:434:9: error: 'emplace_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
433 | for (int64_t i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
434 | feerates.emplace_back(1 ,1);
| ^
src/test/checkqueue_tests.cpp:366:13: error: 'emplace_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
365 | for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
366 | tg.emplace_back(
| ^
src/test/cuckoocache_tests.cpp:231:9: error: 'emplace_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
228 | for (uint32_t x = 0; x < 3; ++x)
229 | /** Each thread is emplaced with x copy-by-value
230 | */
231 | threads.emplace_back([&, x] {
| ^
src/rpc/output_script.cpp:127:17: error: 'push_back' is called inside a loop; consider pre-allocating the container capacity before the loop [performance-inefficient-vector-operation,-warnings-as-errors]
126 | for (unsigned int i = 0; i < keys.size(); ++i) {
127 | pubkeys.push_back(HexToPubKey(keys[i].get_str()));
| ^
```
And the fuzz and benchmarks, noticed by hebasto: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31305#issuecomment-2483124499
</details>
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 11f3bc229c🎦
achow101:
ACK 11f3bc229c
theuni:
ACK 11f3bc229c
hebasto:
ACK 11f3bc229c, tested with clang 19.1.5 + clang-tidy.
Tree-SHA512: 41691c19f35c63b922a95407617a54f9bff1af3f95f99d15642064f321df038aeb1ae5f061f854ed913f69036807cc28fa6222b2ff4c24ef43b909027fa0f9b3
And under the hood suppoert single transactions
in AcceptPackage. This simplifies user experience
and paves the way for reducing number of codepaths
for transaction acceptance in the future.
Co-Authored-By: instagibbs <gsanders87@gmail.com>
* Since the main LIMITED_WHILE stated `outpoints.size() < 200'000`, I've presized outpoints accordingly.
* `tx_mut.vin` and `tx_mut.vout` weren't caught by the clang-tidy, but addressed them anyway.
When BasicTestingSetup is used in fuzz-tests it will now create test directories containing the fuzz target names. Example:
/tmp/test_common bitcoin/tx_package_eval/153d7906294f7d0606a7/
This is already implemented for bench and unit tests.
5736d1ddac tracing: pass if replaced by tx/pkg to tracepoint (0xb10c)
a4ec07f194 doc: add comments for CTxMemPool::ChangeSet (Suhas Daftuar)
83f814b1d1 Remove m_all_conflicts from SubPackageState (Suhas Daftuar)
d3c8e7dfb6 Ensure that we don't add duplicate transactions in rbf fuzz tests (Suhas Daftuar)
d7dc9fd2f7 Move CalculateChunksForRBF() to the mempool changeset (Suhas Daftuar)
284a1d33f1 Move prioritisation into changeset (Suhas Daftuar)
446b08b599 Don't distinguish between direct conflicts and all conflicts when doing cluster-size-2-rbf checks (Suhas Daftuar)
b53041021a Duplicate transactions are not permitted within a changeset (Suhas Daftuar)
b447416fdd Public mempool removal methods Assume() no changeset is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)
2b30f4d36c Make RemoveStaged() private (Suhas Daftuar)
18829194ca Enforce that there is only one changeset at a time (Suhas Daftuar)
7fb62f7db6 Apply mempool changeset transactions directly into the mempool (Suhas Daftuar)
34b6c5833d Clean up FinalizeSubpackage to avoid workspace-specific information (Suhas Daftuar)
57983b8add Move LimitMempoolSize to take place outside FinalizeSubpackage (Suhas Daftuar)
01e145b975 Move changeset from workspace to subpackage (Suhas Daftuar)
802214c083 Introduce mempool changesets (Suhas Daftuar)
87d92fa340 test: Add unit test coverage of package rbf + prioritisetransaction (Suhas Daftuar)
15d982f91e Add package hash to package-rbf log message (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
part of cluster mempool: #30289
It became clear while working on cluster mempool that it would be helpful for transaction validation if we could consider a full set of proposed changes to the mempool -- consisting of a set of transactions to add, and a set of transactions (ie conflicts) to simultaneously remove -- and perform calculations on what the mempool would look like if the proposed changes were to be applied. Two specific examples of where we'd like to do this:
- Determining if ancestor/descendant/TRUC limits would be violated (in the future, cluster limits) if either a single transaction or a package of transactions were to be accepted
- Determining if an RBF would make the mempool "better", however that idea is defined, both in the single transaction and package of transaction cases
In preparation for cluster mempool, I have pulled this reworking of the mempool interface out of #28676 so it can be reviewed on its own. I have not re-implemented ancestor/descendant limits to be run through the changeset, since with cluster mempool those limits will be going away, so this seems like wasted effort. However, I have rebased #28676 on top of this branch so reviewers can see what the new mempool interface could look like in the cluster mempool setting.
There are some minor behavior changes here, which I believe are inconsequential:
- In the package validation setting, transactions would be added to the mempool before the `ConsensusScriptChecks()` are run. In theory, `ConsensusScriptChecks()` should always pass if the `PolicyScriptChecks()` have passed and it's just a belt-and-suspenders for us, but if somehow they were to diverge then there could be some small behavior change from adding transactions and then removing them, versus never adding them at all.
- The error reporting on `CheckConflictTopology()` has slightly changed due to no longer distinguishing between direct conflicts and indirect conflicts. I believe this should be entirely inconsequential because there shouldn't be a logical difference between those two ideas from the perspective of this function, but I did have to update some error strings in some tests.
- Because, in a package setting, RBFs now happen as part of the entire package being accepted, the logging has changed slightly because we do not know which transaction specifically evicted a given removed transaction.
- Specifically, the "package hash" is now used to reference the set of transactions that are being accepted, rather than any single txid. The log message relating to package RBF that happen in the `TXPACKAGES` category has been updated as well to include the package hash, so that it's possible to see which specific set of transactions are being referenced by that package hash.
- Relatedly, the tracepoint logging in the package rbf case has been updated as well to reference the package hash, rather than a transaction hash.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 5736d1ddac
instagibbs:
ACK 5736d1ddac
ismaelsadeeq:
reACK 5736d1ddac
glozow:
ACK 5736d1ddac
Tree-SHA512: 21810872e082920d337c89ac406085aa71c5f8e5151ab07aedf41e6601f60a909b22fbf462ef3b735d5d5881e9b76142c53957158e674dd5dfe6f6aabbdf630b
