d4b17c7d46 kernel: Remove batchpriority from kernel library (TheCharlatan)
Pull request description:
The current usage of ScheduleBatchPriority is not transparent. Once the thread scheduling is changed, it remains unchanged for the remainder of the thread's lifetime. So move the call from `ImportBlocks` to the init code where it is clearer that its effect lasts for the entire lifetime of the thread.
Users of the kernel library might not expect `ImportBlocks` to have an influence on the thread it is called in. Particularly since it is only a compile time option and cannot be controlled at runtime. With this patch users of the kernel library can now freely choose their own scheduling policy.
This PR is easier reviewed with `git diff --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space --color-moved=dimmed-zebra`
---
This PR is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587).
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
ACK d4b17c7d46📭
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d4b17c7d46, just added suggested comment since last review
hebasto:
ACK d4b17c7d46, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
Tree-SHA512: cafedecd9affad58ddd7f30f68bba71291ca951bb186ff4b2da04b7f21f0b26e5e3143846d032b9e391bd5ce6c7466b97aa3758d2a85ebd7353eb8b69139641a
The current usage of ScheduleBatchPriority is not transparent. Once the
thread scheduling is changed, it remains unchanged for the remainder of
the thread's lifetime. So move the call from `ImportBlocks` to the init
code where it is clearer that its effect lasts for the entire lifetime
of the thread.
Users of the kernel library might not expect `ImportBlocks` to have an
influence on the thread it is called in. Particularly since it is only a
compile time option and cannot be controlled at runtime. With this patch
users of the kernel library can now choose their own scheduling policy.
4a6d1d1e3b validation: don't clear cache on periodic flush (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17487 we no longer need to clear the coins cache when syncing to disk. A warm coins cache significantly speeds up block connection, and only needs to be fully flushed when nearing the `dbcache` limit.
Periodic flushes occur every 24 hours, which empties the cache and causes block connection to slow down. By keeping the cache through periodic flushes a node can run for several days with an increasingly hotter cache and connect blocks much more quickly. Now not only can setting a higher `dbcache` value be beneficial for IBD, it can also be beneficial for connecting blocks faster.
To benchmark in real world usage, I spun up 6 identical `t2.small` AWS EC2 instances, all running in the same region in the same VPC. I configured 2 instances to run master, 2 instances to run the change in this PR, and 2 instances to run the change in this PR but with `dbcache=1000`. All instances had `prune=5000` and a 20 GB `gp2` `EBS` volume. A 7th EC2 instance in the same VPC ran master and connected only to some trusted nodes in the outside network. Each of the 6 nodes under test only connected directly to this 7th instance. I manually pruned as much as possible and uploaded the same `blocks`, `chainstate` and `mempool.dat` to all instances. I started all 6 peers simultaneously at block height `835245` and ran them for over a week until block `836534`.
The results were much faster block connection times for this branch compared to master, and much faster for this branch with `dbcache=1000` compared to default `dbcache`.
| branch |speed |
|-----------:|----------:|
| master 1 | 1995.49ms/blk |
| master 2 | 2129.78ms/blk |
| branch default dbcache 1 | 1189.65ms/blk |
| branch default dbcache 2 | 1037.74ms/blk |
| branch dbcache=1000 1 | 393.69ms/blk |
| branch dbcache=1000 2 | 427.77ms/blk |
The log files of all 6 instances are [here](https://gist.github.com/andrewtoth/03c95033e7581d5dbc5be028639a1a91).
There is a lot of noise with the exact times of blocks being connected, so I plotted the rolling 20 block connect time averages. The large dots are the times where the cache is emptied. For the red master nodes, this happens every 24 hours. The blue branch nodes with default `dbcache` only filled up and emptied the caches once, which is seen in the middle. The green branch nodes with 1000 `dbcache` never emptied the cache. It is very clear from the chart that whenever the cache is emptied, connect block speed degrades significantly.
Also note that this still clears the cache for pruning flushes. Having frequent pruning flushes with a large cache that doesn't clear is less performant than the status quo https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15265#issuecomment-458657451. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28280.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 4a6d1d1e3b
achow101:
ACK 4a6d1d1e3b
brunoerg:
crACK 4a6d1d1e3b
Tree-SHA512: 05dbc677bc309bbcf89c52a6c5e853e2816b0ef0b5ee3719b30696df315a0427e244bb82da9ad828ec0e7ea8764552f8affe14c0184b52adf1909f5d8c1b4f9e
b77bad309e rpc: move UniValue in blockToJSON (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #24542Fixes: #30052
Without explicitly declaring the move, these `UniValues` get copied, causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the `UniValue` objects.
Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK b77bad309e
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK b77bad309e
TheCharlatan:
ACK b77bad309e
theuni:
utACK b77bad309e
hebasto:
ACK b77bad309e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK.
BrandonOdiwuor:
ACK b77bad309e
Tree-SHA512: 767608331040f9cfe5c3568ed0e3c338920633472a1a50d4bbb47d1dc69d2bb11466d611f050ac8ad1a894b47fe1ea4d968cf34cbd44d4bb8d479fc5c7475f6d
58594c7040 fuzz: txorphan tests fixups (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
Motivated by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28970#discussion_r1576401327
Adds the following fixups in txorphan fuzz tests:
- Don't bond the output count of the created orphans to the number of available coins
- Allow duplicate inputs but don't store duplicate outpoints
Most significantly, this gets rid of the `duplicate_input` flag altogether, making the test easier to reason about. Notice how, under normal conditions, duplicate inputs would be caught by `MemPoolAccept::PreChecks`, however, no validations checks are run on the test before adding data to the orphanage (neither were they before this patch)
## Rationale
The way the test is currently written, duplicate inputs are allowed based on a random flag (`duplicate_input`). If the flag is unset, upon selecting an outpoint as input for a new transaction, the input is popped to prevent re-selection and later re-added to the collection (once all inputs have been picked). However, the re-addition to the collection is performed independently of whether the flag was set or not. This means that, if the flag is set, the selected inputs are duplicated which in turn makes these inputs more likely to be re-picked in the following iteration of the loop.
Additionally, both the input and output count of the transaction are bonded to the number of available outpoints. This makes sense for the former, but the latter shouldn't be.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK 58594c7040
glozow:
ACK 58594c7
instagibbs:
ACK 58594c7040
Tree-SHA512: e97cc2a43e388f87b64d2e4e45f929dd5b0dd85d668dd693b75e4c9ceea734cd7645952385d428208d07b70e1aafbec84cc2ec264a2e07d36fc8ba3e97885a8d
95897ff181 doc: removed help text saying that peers may not connect automatically (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23542 and released in version 23.0 there has been significant time since this change (2 years).
This should be removed as it is no longer relevant
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
ACK 95897ff181
tdb3:
ACK for 95897ff181.
vasild:
ACK 95897ff181
jonatack:
ACK 95897ff181
kristapsk:
ACK 95897ff181. According to https://bitnodes.io/dashboard/#user-agents stats, most nodes on the network are v23+.
Tree-SHA512: 9e35194f8a1e06f1447450af2ea30cdc43722665c2d2e4b7aa9a52afac5c1e83fed744742c836743a555cc180c90f9eebdc6637eba6190010d693eef9c5834f7
Without explicitly declaring the move, these UniValues get copied,
causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the
UniValue objects.
Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC.
671b7a3251 gui: fix create unsigned transaction fee bump (furszy)
Pull request description:
Fixes#810.
Not much to explain; we were requiring the wallet to be unlocked for the unsigned transaction creation process.
Fix this by moving the unlock wallet request to the signed transaction creation process.
ACKs for top commit:
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 671b7a3251
hebasto:
ACK 671b7a3251, tested on Ubuntu 24.04.
Tree-SHA512: 5b9ec5a1b91c014c05c83c63daaa8ba33f9dc1bfa930442315a0913db710df17a1b6bb4ad39f1419a7054f37ebedb7ad52e1c5d3d2fb444b1676162e89a4efd2
d1ed09a764 Bugfix: GUI: Help messages already have a trailing newline, so don't add an extra one (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Reviewing #29585, I noticed that `bitcoin-qt` adds an extra newline for `-help` and `-version` beyond the other binaries'.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK d1ed09a764, tested on Ubuntu 24.04.
Tree-SHA512: 15ee9d1060c2492bb3b04a0ac4cb53f7b959bbe32bce415793da0c221f1c963c8f2bb3996ea07d1a7c192bfc2e23be2cd7d4e5649c592eb3fc03906c2763f1aa
10c5275ba4 gui: don't permit port in proxy IP option (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/809
Previously it was possible through the GUI to enter an IP address:port into the "Proxy IP" configuration box. After the node was restarted the errant setting would prevent the node starting back up until manually removed from settings.json.
Prevent this with a simple check for ":" in the string. This is acceptable here in the GUI setting because we already fail on a hostname such as "http://x.x.x.x", so it won't cause false positives.
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
utACK 10c5275ba4
hebasto:
ACK 10c5275ba4, tested on Ubuntu 24.04.
Tree-SHA512: ed83590630cf693680a3221f701ecd18dd08710a17b726dc4978a3a6e330a34fb77d73a4f710c01bcb3faf88b6604ff37bcdbb191ce1623348ca5b92fd6fe9a7
3bf00e1360 gui: debugwindow: update session ID tooltip (Marnix)
Pull request description:
When you have a v2 connection, there is always a session ID.
the _if any_ is a leftover from https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/754, where the session ID property initially would always be displayed (transport v1 and v2).
So the session ID could be empty when you have a v1 connection.
As now the _Session ID_ property only is displayed for v2 connection, there will always be a session ID.
master
PR
Session ID not shown when transport v1
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
GUI-related pull requests should be opened against
https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui
first. See CONTRIBUTING.md
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
* Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
changes are usually rejected.
-->
<!--
Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.
-->
ACKs for top commit:
vostrnad:
ACK 3bf00e1360
kristapsk:
ACK 3bf00e1360
jarolrod:
ACK 3bf00e1360
pablomartin4btc:
tACK 3bf00e1360
hebasto:
ACK 3bf00e1360.
Tree-SHA512: 4de0c56c070dc5d1cee73b629bdf3d1778c6d90d512337aa6cfd3eed4ce95cbcfbe5713e2942f6fc22907b2c4d9df7979ba8e9f91f7cc173b42699ea35113f96
96378fe734 Refactor: Remove ECC_Start and ECC_Stop from key header (TheCharlatan)
41eba5bd71 kernel: Remove key module from kernel library (TheCharlatan)
a08d2b3cb9 tools: Use ECC_Context helper in bitcoin-tx and bitcoin-wallet tools (Ryan Ofsky)
28905c1a64 test: Use ECC_Context helper in bench and fuzz tests (Ryan Ofsky)
538fedde1d common: Add ECC_Context RAII wrapper for ECC_Start/ECC_Stop (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
The key module's functionality is not used by the kernel library, but currently kernel users are still required to initialize the key module's `secp256k1_context_sign` global as part of the `kernel::Context` through `ECC_Start`. So move the `ECC_Start` call to the `NodeContext` ctor instead to completely remove the key module from the kernel library.
The gui tests currently keep multiple `NodeContext` objects in memory, so call `ECC_Stop` manually to avoid triggering an assertion on `ECC_Start`.
---
This PR is part of the [libbitcoinkernel project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587). It removes a module from the kernel library.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 96378fe734
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 96378fe734. Just suggested comment changes since last review.
theuni:
utACK 96378fe734
Tree-SHA512: 40be427e8e2c920c0e3ce64a9bdd90551be27a89af11440bfb6ab0dd3a1d1ccb7cf1f82383cd782818cd1bb44d5ae5d2161cf4d78d3127ce4987342007090bab
d53d848347 test: adds outbound eviction tests for non outbound-full-relay peers (Sergi Delgado Segura)
a8d9a0edc7 test: adds outbound eviction functional tests, updates comment in ConsiderEviction (Sergi Delgado Segura)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
While checking the outbound eviction code I realized a case was not considered within the comments, which in turn made me realize we had no functional tests for the outbound eviction case (when I went to check/add the test case).
This PR updates the aforementioned comment and adds functional tests to cover the outbound eviction logic, in addition to the existing unit tests found at `src/test/denialofservice_tests.cpp`.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
reACK d53d848347
tdb3:
Re ACK for d53d848347
achow101:
ACK d53d848347
cbergqvist:
ACK d53d848347
Tree-SHA512: 633b84bb1229fe21e2f650c1beada33ca7f190b64eafd64df2266516d21175e5d652e019ff7114f00cb8bd19f5817dc19e65adf75767a88e24dc0842ce40c63e
The key module's functionality is not used by the kernel library, but
currently kernel users are still required to initialize the key module's
`secp256k1_context_sign` global as part of the `kernel::Context` through
`ECC_Start`.
78e52f663f doc: rpc: fix submitpackage examples (stickies-v)
1a875d4049 rpc: update min package size error message in submitpackage (stickies-v)
f9ece258aa doc: rpc: submitpackage takes sorted array (stickies-v)
17f74512f0 test: add bounds checking for submitpackage RPC (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
`submitpackage` requires the package to be topologically sorted with the child being the last element in the array, but this is not documented in the RPC method or the error messages.
Also sneaking in some other minor improvements that I found while going through the code:
- Informing the user that `package` needs to be an array of length between `1` and `MAX_PACKAGE_COUNT` is confusing when `IsChildWithPackage()` requires that the package size >= 2. Remove this check to avoid code duplication and sending a confusing error message.
- fixups to the `submitpackage` examples
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
re-ACK 78e52f663f
instagibbs:
ACK 78e52f663f
achow101:
ACK 78e52f663f
glozow:
utACK 78e52f663f
Tree-SHA512: a8845621bb1cbf784167fc7c82cb8ceb105868b65b26d3465f072d1c04ef3699e85a21a524ade805d423bcecbc34f7d5bff12f2c21cbd902ae1fb154193ebdc9
75d27fefc7 net: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in ProcessGetBlockData (Andrew Toth)
613a45cd4b net: reduce LOCK(cs_main) scope in GETBLOCKTXN (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11913 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26308.
`cs_main` doesn't need to be locked while reading blocks. This removes the locks in `net_processing`.
ACKs for top commit:
sr-gi:
ACK [75d27fe](75d27fefc7)
achow101:
ACK 75d27fefc7
furszy:
ACK 75d27fefc with a non-blocking nit.
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 75d27fefc7
TheCharlatan:
ACK 75d27fefc7
Tree-SHA512: 79b85f748f68ecfb2f2afd3267857dd41b8e76dd482c9c922037399dcbce7b1e5d4c708a4f5fd17c3fb6699b0d88f26a17cc1d92db115dd43c8d4392ae27cec4
98570fe29b test: add coverage for parsing cryptographically invalid pubkeys (Sebastian Falbesoner)
c740b154d1 rpc: use `HexToPubKey` helper for all legacy pubkey-parsing RPCs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
100e8a75bf rpc: check and throw specific pubkey parsing errors in `HexToPubKey` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Parsing legacy public keys can fail for three reasons (in this order):
- pubkey is not in hex
- pubkey has an invalid length (not 33 or 65 bytes for compressed/uncompressed, respectively)
- pubkey is crytographically invalid, i.e. is not on curve (`CPubKey.IsFullyValid()` check)
Many RPCs currently perform these checks manually with different error messages, even though we already have a `HexToPubKey` helper. This PR puts all three checks in this helper (the length check was done on the call-sites before), adds specific error messages for each case, and consequently uses it for all RPCs that parse legacy pubkeys. This leads to deduplicated code and also to more consistent and detailed error messages for the user.
Affected RPC calls are `createmultisig`, `addmultisigaddress`, `importpubkey`, `importmulti`, `fundrawtransaction`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `send` and `sendall`.
Note that the error code (-5 a.k.a. `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY`) doesn't change in any of the causes, so the changes are not breaking RPC API compatibility. Only the messages are more specific.
The last commits adds test coverage for the cryptographically invalid (not-on-curve) pubkey case which wasn't exercised before.
ACKs for top commit:
stratospher:
tested ACK 98570fe.
davidgumberg:
ACK 98570fe29b
Eunovo:
Tested ACK 98570fe29b
achow101:
ACK 98570fe29b
Tree-SHA512: cfa474176e95b5b18f3a9da28fdd9e87195cd58994c1331198f2840925fff322fd323a6371feab74a1b32e4b9ea58a6dc732fa751b4cdd45402c1029af609ece
fb9f150759 gui: fix misleading signmessage error with segwit (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
As described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542 (and numerous other places), message signing in Bitcoin Core does not support "signing with a segwit address" and likely will not in the foreseeable future, or at least until a new message-signing standard is agreed upon.
Therefore update the possibly misleading error message presented to the user in the GUI to detail more specifically the reason their message cannot be signed, in the case that a non P2PKH address is entered.
This change takes the [suggested wording](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542#issuecomment-1960313569) from @adiabat.
Perhaps with this we can close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10542 ?
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fb9f150759.
Tree-SHA512: 5ba8d722ad3632dad2e0a2aa94b0f466b904e7885a247a5d26ebdfce54e3611090b103029d8dfce92adc49e50fe5f4830f687d867b4c56c3ea997e519b4e188d
fa09451f8e Add lint check for bitcoin-config.h include IWYU pragma (MarcoFalke)
dddd40ba82 scripted-diff: Add IWYU pragma keep to bitcoin-config.h includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `bitcoin-config.h` includes have issues:
* The header is incompatible with iwyu, because symbols may be defined or not defined. So the `IWYU pragma: keep` is needed to keep the include when a symbol is not defined on a platform. Compare the previous discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29408#issuecomment-1948959711
* Guarding the includes by `HAVE_CONFIG_H` is verbose and brittle. Now that all build config dependencies have been removed from low level headers, the benefits are questionable, and the guard can be removed. The linter could also be tricked by guarding the include by `#if defined(HAVE_C0NFIG_H)` (`O` replaced by `0`). Compare the previous discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29404#discussion_r1483189853 .
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK fa09451f8e
TheCharlatan:
ACK fa09451f8e
hebasto:
re-ACK fa09451f8e, only rebased since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29494#pullrequestreview-2028864535) (`timedata.cpp` removed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29623).
Tree-SHA512: 47cb973f7f24bc625acc4e78683371863675d186780236d55d886cf4130e05a78bb04f1d731aae7088313b8e963a9677cc77cf518187dbd99d776f6421ca9b52
a68fed111b net: Fix misleading comment for Discover (laanwj)
7766dd280d net: Replace ifname check with IFF_LOOPBACK in Discover (laanwj)
Pull request description:
Checking the interface name is kind of brittle. In the age of network namespaces and containers, there is no reason a loopback interface can't be called differently.
Check for the `IFF_LOOPBACK` flag to detect loopback interface instead.
Also remove a misleading comment in Discover's doc comment.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK a68fed111b
willcl-ark:
utACK a68fed111b
theuni:
utACK a68fed111b. Satoshi-era brittleness :)
Tree-SHA512: e2d7fc541f40f6a6af08286e7bcb0873ff55debdcd8b38b03f274897b673a6fb51d84d6c7241a02a9567ddf2645f50231d91bb1f55307ba7c6e68196c29b0edf
42fb5311b1 rpc: return warnings as an array instead of just a single one (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
The RPC documentation for `getblockchaininfo`, `getmininginfo` and `getnetworkinfo` states that "warnings" returns "any network and blockchain warnings". In practice, only a single warning (i.e. the latest one that is set) is returned, the other ones are ignored.
Fix that by returning all warnings as an array.
As a side benefit, clean up the GetWarnings() logic.
Since this PR changes the RPC result schema, I've added release notes. Users can temporarily revert to the old results by using `-deprecatedrpc=warnings`, until it's removed in a future version.
---
Some historical context from git log:
- when `GetWarnings` was introduced in 401926283a, it was used in the `getinfo` RPC, where only a [single error/warning was returned](401926283a (diff-7442c48d42cd5455a79915a0f00cce5e13359db46437a32b812876edb0a5ccddR250)) (similar to how it is now).
- later on, "warnings" RPC response fields were introduced, e.g. in ef2a3de25c, with the description [stating](ef2a3de25c (diff-1021bd3c74415ad9719bd764ad6ca35af5dfb33b1cd863c0be49bdf52518af54R411)) that it returned "any network warnings" but in practice still only a single warning was returned
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 42fb5311b1
tdb3:
Re ACK for 42fb5311b1
TheCharlatan:
ACK 42fb5311b1
maflcko:
ACK 42fb5311b1🔺
Tree-SHA512: 4225ed8979cd5f030dec785a80e7452a041ad5703445da79d2906ada983ed0bbe7b15889d663d75aae4a77d92e302c93e93eca185c7bd47c9cce29e12f752bd3
This also changes behavior if ReadBlockFromDisk or
ReadRawBlockFromDisk fails. Previously, the node would crash
due to an assert. This has been replaced with logging the error,
disconnecting the peer, and returning early.
63317103c9 miniscript: make operator_mst consteval (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
It seems modern compilers don't realize that all invocations of operator""_mst can be evaluated at compile time, despite the `constexpr` keyword.
Since C++20, we can force them to evaluate at compile time using `consteval`, turning all the miniscript type constants into actual compile-time constants.
This should give a nice but not very important speedup for miniscript logic, but it's also a way to start testing C++20 features.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 63317103c9.
theuni:
utACK 63317103c9
Tree-SHA512: bdc9f1a6499b8bb3ca04f1a158c31e6876ba97206f95ee5718f50efd58b5b4e6b8867c07f791848430bfaa130b9676d8a68320b763cda9a340c75527acbfcc9e
976e5d8f7b test: Fix `test/streams_tests.cpp` compilation on SunOS / illumos (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On systems where `int8_t` is defined as `char`, the `{S,Uns}erialize(Stream&, signed char)` functions become undefined.
This PR resolves the issue by testing `{S,Uns}erialize(Stream&, int8_t)` instead.
No behavior change on systems where `int8_t` is defined as `signed char`, which is the case for most other systems.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29884.
An alternative approach is mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29884#issuecomment-2058434577 as well.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 976e5d8f7b
theuni:
ACK 976e5d8f7b. Nice to have the serialization concept actually tested :)
Tree-SHA512: 1033863e584fa8e99a281b236fa01fc919f610a024bcec792116762e28c1c16ee481bd01325c3a0ca9dd9d753176aa63bd9ac7e08a9bbce772db2949d06f6e61
ffc674595c Replace remaining "520" magic numbers with MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Noticed these while reviewing BIPs yesterday.
It would be clearer and more future-proof to refer to their constant name.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK ffc674595c
sipa:
ACK ffc674595c
achow101:
ACK ffc674595c
glozow:
ACK ffc674595c, agree it's clearer for these comments to refer to the greppable name of the limit rather than the number
Tree-SHA512: 462afc1c64543877ac58cb3acdb01d42c6d08abfb362802f29f3482d75401a2a8adadbc2facd222a9a9fefcaab6854865ea400f50ad60bec17831d29f7798afe
It seems modern compilers don't realize that all invocations of operator""_mst
can be evaluated at compile time, despite the constexpr keyword.
Since C++20, we can force them to evaluate at compile time, turning all the
miniscript type constants into actual compile-time constants.
It appears that MSVC does not support consteval operator"" when used inside
certain expressions. For the few places where this happens, define a
constant outside the operator call.
Co-Authored-By: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
bd2de7ac59 refactor, test: Always initialize pointer (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This change fixes MSVC warning [C4703](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/error-messages/compiler-warnings/compiler-warning-level-4-c4703).
All `DisableSpecificWarnings` dropped from `test_bitcoin.vcxproj` as all remained are inherited from `common.init.vcxproj`.
Required to simplify warning suppression porting to the CMake-based build system.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK bd2de7ac59
sipsorcery:
utACK bd2de7ac59.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bd2de7ac59
Tree-SHA512: 006db041d3c3697a77d9df14de86cf7c8a10804b45789df01268b2236cf6452e77dc57e89f5d5a6bc26d4b5cd483f0722d6035649c8a523b57954bb1fc810d0c
As described in #10542 (and numerous other places), message signing in
Bitcoin Core only supports message signing using P2PKH addresses, at
least until a new message-signing standard is agreed upon.
Therefore update the possibly-misleading error message presented to the
user in the GUI to detail more specifically the reason their message
cannot be signed, in the case that a non P2PKH address is entered.
b50d127a77 refactor: Make 64-bit shift explicit (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes MSVC warning [C4334](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/error-messages/compiler-warnings/compiler-warning-level-3-c4334) in the fuzzing code. Similar to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26252.
All `DisableSpecificWarnings` dropped from `fuzz.vcxproj` as all remained are inherited from `common.init.vcxproj`.
Required to simplify warning suppression porting to the CMake-based build system.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
utACK b50d127a77
sipsorcery:
utACK b50d127a77
Tree-SHA512: 18f6082b4234506ad2f9df54e577031b97cdf9f7ef64cad4162f275660716ab73587a97d3af0f778dfd48d2751d8676b5d3381d0aa837fcc60a09704473a9209
8b52e7f628 update comments in cpp-subprocess (check_output references) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
97f159776e remove unused method `Popen::kill` from cpp-subprocess (Sebastian Falbesoner)
908c51fe4a remove commented out code in cpp-subprocess (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ff79adbe05 remove unused templates from cpp-subprocess (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR removes remaining code that is unused within the cpp-subprocess module (templates and commented out code). Happy to add more removals if anyone finds more unused parts. Note that there are some API functions of the `Popen` class that we don't use, e.g. `wait()`, `pid()`, `poll()`, `kill()`, but they sound IMHO common enough to be useful in the future, so not sure how deep we should go there.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 8b52e7f628
achow101:
ACK 8b52e7f628
hebasto:
ACK 8b52e7f628.
Tree-SHA512: 14c1cd2216185d941923f06fdc7acbeed66cd87e2691d9a352f7309b3e07fe4877b580f598a2e4106f9c48395ed6de00a0bfb5d3c3af9c4624d1956a0f543e99
