When dealing with URI parts, it seems more consistent to use
corresponding SAFE_CHARS_URI mode in error messages.
Co-Authored-By: stickies-v <stickies-v@protonmail.com>
It is better to reject it with an error. For example,
$ bitcoin-cli -rpcconnect=127.0.0.1:+23501 -getinfo
error: Invalid port provided in -rpcconnect: 127.0.0.1:+23501
It does not make sense and it is rejected by other parsers as well:
>>> ipaddress.ip_network("1.2.3.0/+24")
ValueError: '1.2.3.0/+24' does not appear to be an IPv4 or IPv6 network
a0eed55398 run_command: Enable close_fds option to avoid lingering fds (Luke Dashjr)
c7c356a448 cpp-subprocess: Iterate through /proc/self/fd for close_fds option on Linux (Luke Dashjr)
4f5e04da13 Revert "remove unneeded close_fds option from cpp-subprocess" (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Picks up stale #30756, while addressing my fallback comment (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30756#discussion_r2030844440).
> Currently, RunCommandParseJSON runs its target with whatever fds happen to be open inherited on POSIX platforms. I don't think there's any practical scenario where this is a problem right now, but there's a lot of potential for weird problems (eg, if a process manages to outlive bitcoind - perhaps it's hanging - the listening port(s) won't get released and starting bitcoind again will fail). It's also a potential security issue if a child process is intended to be sandboxed at some point. Not to mention plain ugly :)
>
> cpp-subprocess has a feature to address this called close_fds. Not sure why it was removed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29961 rather than fixing this during the migration, but this PR restores it, enables it for RunCommandParseJSON, and optimises it by iterating over /proc/self/fd/ like most other libraries do these days ([eg, glib]> (487b1fd20c/glib/gspawn.c (L1094))) since iterating all possible fd numbers [has been found to be problematic](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537564).
>
> (Equivalent to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22417 was for boost::process)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a0eed55398
hebasto:
ACK a0eed55398, tested on Ubuntu 25.04:
vasild:
ACK a0eed55398
Tree-SHA512: 7dc1cb6cc1f45ff7c4f53512e400baad1a033b4ebf14ba6f6ffa38588314932d6d01ef67b197f081e8202bb802659ac6a87998277797721d6d7b20efde8e9a6b
5bf91ba880 wallet: Drop unused fFromMe from CWalletTx (David Gumberg)
Pull request description:
This has been unused since commit fe52346, this is a re-opening of #9351.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 5bf91ba880
achow101:
ACK 5bf91ba880
Tree-SHA512: b9a84f27b6cfe7796dcf629be6a8e01a97d931ea81ef088951d54d6691ffe79d22138baacc632375093cf3176a22c265e30a80f1f63c3bc620d08bf16f6a488f
faf9082a5f test: Fix whitespace in prevector_tests.cpp (MarcoFalke)
fa7f04c8a7 refactor: Remove UB in prevector reverse iterators (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`rend()` creates a pointer with offset `-1`. This is UB, according to the C++ standard: https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
When an expression J that has integral type is added to [...] an
expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
... if P points to a (possibly-hypothetical) array element i of an
array object x with n elements [...] the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n [...]
Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
Also, it is unclear why the functions exist at all, when stdlib utils such as `std::reverse_iterator{it}` or `std::views::reverse` can be used out of the box.
So remove them, along with the ubsan suppressions, that are no longer used.
I've tagged this a refactor, because the code was always dead (unused outside of tests). And since commit 2925bd537c it was completely dead. Also, I could not find a sanitizer that detects this type of UB.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
tested ACK faf9082a5f
achow101:
ACK faf9082a5f
stickies-v:
ACK faf9082a5f, nice find.
theuni:
utACK faf9082a5f
Tree-SHA512: 31511d520a1c0fdd65c2e5f1a8ef6fd17464303b6bff88a5d9d9577adfee849d431deb510882b6f4e15e8fb7168861bc0d26fca3bed4278f57a9d6e7b1235dce
62fc42d475 interfaces: refactor: move `waitTipChanged` implementation to miner (ismaelsadeeq)
c39ca9d4f7 interfaces: move getTip implementation to miner (Sjors Provoost)
720f201e65 interfaces: refactor: move `waitNext` implementation to miner (ismaelsadeeq)
e6c2f4ce7a interfaces: refactor: move `submitSolution` implementation to miner (ismaelsadeeq)
02d4bc776b interfaces: remove redundant coinbase fee check in `waitNext` (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
#### Motivation
In [Internal interface guidelines](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#internal-interface-guidelines)
It's stated that
> Interface method definitions should wrap existing functionality instead of implementing new functionality. Any substantial new node or wallet functionality should be implemented in [src/node/](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/node) or [src/wallet/](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/wallet) and just exposed in [src/interfaces/](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/interfaces) instead of being implemented there, so it can be more modular and accessible to unit tests.
However the some methods in the newly added `BlockTemplateImpl` and `MinerImpl` classes partially enforces this guideline, as the implementations of the `submitSolution`, `waitNext`, and `waitTipChanged` methods reside within the class itself.
#### What the PR Does
This PR introduces a simple refactor by moving certain method implementations from `BlockTemplateImpl` into the miner module. It introduces three new functions:
1. Remove rundundant coinbase fee check in `waitNext`
2. **`AddMerkleRootAndCoinbase`**: Computes the block's Merkle root, inserts the coinbase transaction, and sets the Merkle root in the block. This function is called by `submitSolution` before the block is submitted for processing.
3. **`WaitAndCreateNewBlock`**: Returns a new block template either when transaction fees reach a certain threshold or when a new tip is detected. If a timeout is reached, it returns `nullptr`. The `waitNext` method in `BlockTemplateImpl` now simply wraps this function.
4. Move `GetTip` implementation to miner.
5. **`WaitTipChanged`**: Returns the tip when the chain it changes, or `nullopt` if a timeout or interrupt occurs. The `waitTipChanged` method in `MinerImpl` now calls `GetTip` after invoking `ChainTipChanged`, and returns the tip.
#### Behavior Change
- We now only `Assert` for a valid chainman and notifications pointer once.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 62fc42d475
Sjors:
ACK 62fc42d475
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 62fc42d475. Lots of suggest suggest changes made since last review, altering function names and signatures and also adding new commit to drop negative fee handling. I like the idea of making the wait function return a BlockRef, that is clearer than what I suggested. Left some comments below but they are not important and this looks good as-is
Tree-SHA512: 502632f94ced81f576b2c43cf015f1527e2c259e6ca253f670f5a6889171e2246372b4e709575701afa3f01d488d6633557fef54f48fe83bbaf1836ac5326c4f
a04f17a188 doc: warn that CheckBlock() underestimates sigops (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Counting sigops in the witness requires context that `CheckBlock()` does not have, so it only counts sigops for non-segwit transactions.
It's useful to document, but it should not be a problem.
The commit message contains some historical context.
ACKs for top commit:
ismaelsadeeq:
ACK a04f17a188
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK a04f17a188
Tree-SHA512: 26528367a7f3cfa8540ef0b90f7aa912c8f0bc057428f20a1fd1d4e232dac77747bc20044f0fcb0ffab8a2e1fb3dbe3dab46be749553a917744ddc7a829025cb
- This commit creates a function `WaitTipChanged` that waits for the connected
tip to change until timeout elapsed.
- This function is now used by `waitTipChanged`
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
fa427ffcee fuzz: Properly setup wallet in wallet_fees target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`g_wallet_ptr` is destructed after the `testing_setup`. This is not supported and will lead to issues such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30221#issuecomment-2863875857 or https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32409#issuecomment-2855259932.
This could be fixed by fixing the initialization order.
However, the global wallet is also modified in the fuzz target, which is bad fuzzing practise.
So instead fix it by constructing a fresh wallet for each fuzz iteration.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
code review ACK fa427ffcee
hebasto:
ACK fa427ffcee, this change fixes the issue when building the "Debug" configuration with MSVC on Windows.
marcofleon:
Code review ACK fa427ffcee
Tree-SHA512: 161b93fc39a609cb16d9ffea7366c5e339bd01712577f0782aedff46c00f79edd2a907807ac83f9fcec687b4bbbe0fd6e6f75e32169639a310e4e7b771078b3b
rend() creates a pointer with offset -1. This is UB, according to the
C++ standard: https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.add#4:
When an expression J that has integral type is added to [...] an
expression P of pointer type, the result has the type of P.
... if P points to a (possibly-hypothetical) array element i of an
array object x with n elements [...] the expressions P + J and J + P
(where J has the value j) point to the (possibly-hypothetical) array
element i+j of x if 0≤i+j≤n [...]
Otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
Also, it is unclear why the functions exist at all, when stdlib utils
such as std::reverse_iterator{it} or std::views::reverse can be used out
of the box.
So remove them, along with the ubsan suppressions, that are no longer
used.
1e0de7a6ba fees: document non-monotonic estimation edge case (willcl-ark)
Pull request description:
Closes: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11800
In scenarios where data is available for higher targets but not for lower ones, this method *may* return lower fee rates for higher confirmation targets. This could occur if `estimateCombinedFee` returns no valid data (`-1`) for some estimates for a low target, but **does** return valid data for a higher target.
Users of this function should be aware of this potential, if unlikely, inconsistency in behaviour in data-sparse scenarios.
ACKs for top commit:
adamandrews1:
Code review ACK 1e0de7a
ismaelsadeeq:
Code review ACK 1e0de7a6ba
glozow:
ACK 1e0de7a6ba
Tree-SHA512: 161e5dafdd131570853a89491753ae39a7b725d1a86cab5a7294c2a5939da1a9a5f2c4aca0900e9ad810e828b6e0e636f256384e3d1fda6dd552da189bbbe747
0750249289 mining: document gbt_rule_value helper (Sjors Provoost)
5e87c3ec09 scripted-diff: rename gbt_force and gbt_force_name (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The term "force" is ambiguous and not used in [BIP9](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0009.mediawiki#getblocktemplate-changes) where there ! rule prefix is introduced.
E.g. this code is hard to read:
```cpp
if (!gbt_force) {
s.insert(s.begin(), '!');
```
Additionally, #29039 renamed `gbt_vb_name` to `gbt_force_name` which, at least for me, further increased the confusion.
This is a pure (variable rename) refactor (plus documentation) and does not change behavior.
Reminder of how to verify a scripted diff:
```sh
test/lint/commit-script-check.sh origin/master..HEAD
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0750249289
janb84:
ACK [0750249](0750249289)
musaHaruna:
ACK [0750249](0750249289)
glozow:
ACK 0750249289, seems sensible
Tree-SHA512: 8c88a273a3b36040f6c641843bd20579d0065b051aad4b39fc14f0d2af2808690dff6772bd8b1a4d9699b72279a700d2661012651bc315433a123dcc8996adaa
8673e8f019 txgraph: Special-case singletons in chunk index (optimization) (Pieter Wuille)
abdd9d35a3 txgraph: Skipping end of cluster has no impact (optimization) (Pieter Wuille)
604acc2c28 txgraph: Reuse discarded chunkindex entries (optimization) (Pieter Wuille)
c734081454 txgraph: Introduce TxGraph::GetWorstMainChunk (feature) (Pieter Wuille)
394dbe2142 txgraph: Introduce BlockBuilder interface (feature) (Pieter Wuille)
883df3648e txgraph: Generalize GetClusterRefs to support subsections (preparation) (Pieter Wuille)
c28a602e00 txgraph: Introduce TxGraphImpl observer tracking (preparation) (Pieter Wuille)
9095d8ac1c txgraph: Maintain chunk index (preparation) (Pieter Wuille)
87e74e1242 txgraph: abstract out transaction ordering (refactor) (Pieter Wuille)
2614fea17f txgraph: Add GetMainStagingDiagrams function (feature) (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Part of cluster mempool: #30289.
This adds more functionality to the txgraph module, specifically:
* `TxGraph::GetMainStagingDiagrams()`, a function to obtain feerate diagrams for both the main graph and the staged changes to it, including only the clusters that differ between the two.
* `TxGraph::GetBlockBuilder()`, a function to obtain an object which can efficiently iterate the chunks of the (main) graph from high to low chunk feerate, allowing each to be skipped or included.
* `TxGraph::GetWorstMainChunk()`, a function to obtain the last chunk that would be returned by `GetBlockBuilder()`'s returned object, intended for eviction.
ACKs for top commit:
monlovesmango:
reACK 8673e8f019
instagibbs:
reACK 8673e8f019
glozow:
reACK 8673e8f019
Tree-SHA512: 5c98c54919c44eb2f9545dfc130e54dfc25b5b54d43cf5ca9bcf46e019b9fd405a572fcd70e71e2a7c5b4b096cfd540a4d09ef1f52ba188504418682f1dfc4af
- Create a new function `AddMerkleRootAndCoinbase` that compute the
block's merkle root, insert the coinbase transaction and the merkle
root into the block.
This interface lets one iterate efficiently over the chunks of the main
graph in a TxGraph, in the same order as CompareMainOrder. Each chunk
can be marked as "included" or "skipped" (and in the latter case,
dependent chunks will be skipped).
This is preparation for a next commit which will introduce a class whose
objects hold references to internals in TxGraphImpl, which disallows
modifications to the graph while such objects exist.
