d511adb664 [miner] omit dummy extraNonce via IPC (Sjors Provoost)
bf3b5d6d06 test: clarify getCoinbaseRawTx() comparison (Sjors Provoost)
78df9003d6 [doc] Update comments on dummy extraNonces in tests (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the Mining IPC interface to stop including a dummy `extraNonce` in the coinbase `scriptSig` by default, exposing only the consensus-required BIP34 height. This simplifies downstream mining software (including Stratum v2), avoids forcing clients to strip or ignore data we generate, and reduces the risk of incompatibilities if future soft forks add required commitments to the `scriptSig`.
Existing behavior is preserved for RPCs, tests, regtest, and internal mining by explicitly opting in to the dummy `extraNonce` where needed (e.g. to satisfy `bad-cb-length` at low heights), so consensus rules and test coverage are unchanged. The remainder of the PR consists of small comment fixes, naming clarifications, and test cleanups to make the intent and behavior clearer.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d511adb664
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d511adb664. Just rebased since last review and make suggested tweaks. I'd really like to see this PR merged for the cleanups and sanity it brings to this code. Needs another reviewer though.
sedited:
ACK d511adb664
Tree-SHA512: d41fa813eb6b5626f4f475d8abc506b29090f4a2d218f2d6824db58b5ebe2ed7c584a903b44de18ccec142bb79c257b0aba6d6da073f56175aec88df96aaaaba
3bd98b4508 refactor: use transparent comparator for setBlockIndexCandidates lookups (joaonevess)
Pull request description:
### Rationale
This PR improves code safety by removing a `const_cast` in `src/validation.cpp`.
Currently, `setBlockIndexCandidates` stores mutable `CBlockIndex*`. However, validation logic (like `CVerifyDB`) often holds `const CBlockIndex*`. Previously, checking for existence in the set required casting away constness. While currently benign, this bypasses compiler safety checks and could mask accidental modifications in future refactors.
### Description
1. **Enable Heterogeneous Lookup:** Added `using is_transparent = void;` to `CBlockIndexWorkComparator` in `src/node/blockstorage.h`. This allows the `std::set` to natively accept `const CBlockIndex*` for lookup (utilizing C++14 heterogeneous lookup).
2. **Remove Cast:** Removed the now unnecessary `const_cast<CBlockIndex*>` in `src/validation.cpp`, allowing the compiler to strictly enforce const-correctness.
### Notes
- **Refactoring only:** No behavioral change.
- **Verification:** `validation_tests` and `blockmanager_tests` pass.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 3bd98b4508🚪
frankomosh:
ACK 3bd98b4508. Good use of transparent comparator to eliminate `const_cast` in this specific code path.
sedited:
ACK 3bd98b4508
Tree-SHA512: 0f76bdce2a54b759dfec99633afce1e95586e62f4057ecf1e82eed1a073eb8ecb2d659ccbf28a7a139f0aa09a30f058ac6966cafdfbf1f2ee878fa2d86b2c487
fad7bd9ba3 noui: Remove always empty caption while formatting (MarcoFalke)
fa8ebeb332 refactor: [gui] Document that the title is always empty for node message (MarcoFalke)
fafe71b743 refactor: Remove empty caption from ThreadSafeMessageBox (MarcoFalke)
fa8d0088e7 refactor: Remove empty caption from ThreadSafeQuestion (MarcoFalke)
fa0195499c refactor: [gui] Use lambdas over std::bind (MarcoFalke)
eeee1e341f refactor: Remove trailing semicolon after ADD_SIGNALS_DECL_WRAPPER (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently, the user interface (noui, gui) has a caption for each message. However, the caption has many issues:
* It is always hard-coded to the empty string.
* This is confusing and tedious when reading or maintaining the code.
* It is redundant, because `noui` will ignore the caption and set the logging prefix (error, warning, info) based on the `style`.
* The gui does prefer to set the title based on the caption, but since it the caption is always empty, the fallback will always be used.
Fix all issues by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fad7bd9ba3, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK. Tested on Ubuntu 25.10.
sedited:
ACK fad7bd9ba3
Tree-SHA512: 58ef538b9b3e1cfdcf2955f6de9b8cee335edbf6339723cb693cb4d584817904c962dac5199ee44d7e2860a5332dec1a6abf47e621eb5cf919aa1cdae271b55f
e71c4df168 refactor: replace manual promise with SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (ANtutov)
Pull request description:
`BroadcastTransaction()` now waits for validation callbacks using the built-in `validation_signals>SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue()` instead of creating a local `std::promise` and scheduling a lambda. This removes an unnecessary allocation and uses the canonical API.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK e71c4df168🌃
rkrux:
lgtm ACK e71c4df168
sedited:
ACK e71c4df168
Tree-SHA512: 602994ba3c2ac91996068aee6eac7e788c3832d7ab949519a9420d2b59e2a67d2d4e67c3c9191ba60e9caa75f1524a95b0851fcd40b6732f6a9956a011b4a120
Previously the coinbase transaction generated by our miner code was
not used downstream, because the getblocktemplate RPC excludes it.
Since the Mining IPC interface was introduced in #30200 we do expose
this dummy coinbase transaction. In Stratum v2 several parts of it
are communicated downstream, including the scriptSig.
This commit removes the dummy extraNonce from the coinbase scriptSig
in block templates requested via IPC. This limits the scriptSig
to what is essential for consensus (BIP34) and removes the need for
external mining software to remove the dummy, or even ignore
the scriptSig we provide and generate it some other way. This
could cause problems if a future soft fork requires additional
data to be committed here.
A test is added to verify the new IPC behavior.
It achieves this by introducing an include_dummy_extranonce
option which defaults to false with all test code updated to
set it to true. Because this option is not exposed via IPC,
callers will no longer see it.
The caller needs to ensure that for blocks 1 through 16
they pad the scriptSig in order to avoid bad-cb-length.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
This allows checking for existence in setBlockIndexCandidates using a const CBlockIndex* without casting away constness, replacing a legacy const_cast check in validation.cpp.
The caption was empty for all call-sites, so this refactor does not
change any behavior.
Note that noui_ThreadSafeMessageBoxRedirect is test-only, so no end-user
behavior is changed here.
There is only one call-site, which provided an empty caption.
Note that noui_ThreadSafeQuestionRedirect is test-only and currently
entrirely unused, so the logging format string change is not a behavior
change.
This refactor does not change any behavior.
48f57bb35b mining: add new getCoinbaseTx() returning a struct (Sjors Provoost)
d59b4cdb57 mining: rename getCoinbaseTx() to ..RawTx() (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
The first commit renames `getCoinbaseTx()` to `getCoinbaseRawTx()` to reflect that it returns a serialised transaction. This does not impact IPC clients, because they do not use the function name.
The second commit then introduces a replacement `getCoinbase()` that provides a struct with everything clients need to construct a coinbase. This avoids clients having to parse and manipulate our dummy transaction.
Deprecate but don't remove `getCoinbaseRawTx()`, `getCoinbaseCommitment()` and `getWitnessCommitmentIndex()`.
After this change we can drop these deprecated methods, which in turn would allow us to clear the dummy transaction from the `getBlock()` result. But that is left for a followup to keep this PR focussed. See https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/pull/106 for an approach.
Expand the `interface_ipc.py` functional test to document its usage.
Can be tested using:
- https://github.com/stratum-mining/sv2-tp/pull/59
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 48f57bb35b. Just rebased and addressed comments and dropped coinbase tx "template" suffix, which is a nice change
ismaelsadeeq:
code review ACK 48f57bb35b
vasild:
ACK 48f57bb35b
Tree-SHA512: c4f1d752777fb3086a1a0b7b8b06e4205dbe2f3adb41f218855ad1dee952adccc263cf82acd3bf9300cc83c2c64cebd2b27f66a69beee32d325b9a85e3643b0d
8937221304 doc: add release notes for 29415 (Vasil Dimov)
582016fa5f test: add unit test for the private broadcast storage (Vasil Dimov)
e74d54e048 test: add functional test for private broadcast (Vasil Dimov)
818b780a05 rpc: use private broadcast from sendrawtransaction RPC if -privatebroadcast is ON (Vasil Dimov)
eab595f9cf net_processing: retry private broadcast (Vasil Dimov)
37b79f9c39 net_processing: stop private broadcast of a transaction after round-trip (Vasil Dimov)
2de53eee74 net_processing: handle ConnectionType::PRIVATE_BROADCAST connections (Vasil Dimov)
30a9853ad3 net_processing: move a debug check in VERACK processing earlier (Vasil Dimov)
d1092e5d48 net_processing: modernize PushNodeVersion() (Vasil Dimov)
9937a12a2f net_processing: move the debug log about receiving VERSION earlier (Vasil Dimov)
a098f37b9e net_processing: reorder the code that handles the VERSION message (Vasil Dimov)
679ce3a0b8 net_processing: store transactions for private broadcast in PeerManager (Vasil Dimov)
a3faa6f944 node: extend node::TxBroadcast with a 3rd option (Vasil Dimov)
95c051e210 net_processing: rename RelayTransaction() to better describe what it does (Vasil Dimov)
bb49d26032 net: implement opening PRIVATE_BROADCAST connections (Vasil Dimov)
01dad4efe2 net: introduce a new connection type for private broadcast (Vasil Dimov)
94aaa5d31b init: introduce a new option to enable/disable private broadcast (Vasil Dimov)
d6ee490e0a log: introduce a new category for private broadcast (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_Parts of this PR are isolated in independent smaller PRs to ease review:_
* [x] _https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29420_
* [x] _https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33454_
* [x] _https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33567_
* [x] _https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33793_
---
To improve privacy, broadcast locally submitted transactions (from the `sendrawtransaction` RPC) to the P2P network only via Tor or I2P short-lived connections, or to IPv4/IPv6 peers but through the Tor network.
* Introduce a new connection type for private broadcast of transactions with the following properties:
* started whenever there are local transactions to be sent
* opened to Tor or I2P peers or IPv4/IPv6 via the Tor proxy
* opened regardless of max connections limits
* after handshake is completed one local transaction is pushed to the peer, `PING` is sent and after receiving `PONG` the connection is closed
* ignore all incoming messages after handshake is completed (except `PONG`)
* Broadcast transactions submitted via `sendrawtransaction` using this new mechanism, to a few peers. Keep doing this until we receive back this transaction from one of our ordinary peers (this takes about 1 second on mainnet).
* The transaction is stored in peerman and does not enter the mempool.
* Once we get an `INV` from one of our ordinary peers, then the normal flow executes: we request the transaction with `GETDATA`, receive it with a `TX` message, put it in our mempool and broadcast it to all our existent connections (as if we see it for the first time).
* After we receive the full transaction as a `TX` message, in reply to our `GETDATA` request, only then consider the transaction has propagated through the network and remove it from the storage in peerman, ending the private broadcast attempts.
The messages exchange should look like this:
```
tx-sender >--- connect -------> tx-recipient
tx-sender >--- VERSION -------> tx-recipient (dummy VERSION with no revealing data)
tx-sender <--- VERSION -------< tx-recipient
tx-sender <--- WTXIDRELAY ----< tx-recipient (maybe)
tx-sender <--- SENDADDRV2 ----< tx-recipient (maybe)
tx-sender <--- SENDTXRCNCL ---< tx-recipient (maybe)
tx-sender <--- VERACK --------< tx-recipient
tx-sender >--- VERACK --------> tx-recipient
tx-sender >--- INV/TX --------> tx-recipient
tx-sender <--- GETDATA/TX ----< tx-recipient
tx-sender >--- TX ------------> tx-recipient
tx-sender >--- PING ----------> tx-recipient
tx-sender <--- PONG ----------< tx-recipient
tx-sender disconnects
```
Whenever a new transaction is received from `sendrawtransaction` RPC, the node will send it to a few (`NUM_PRIVATE_BROADCAST_PER_TX`) recipients right away. If after some time we still have not heard anything about the transaction from the network, then it will be sent to 1 more peer (see `PeerManagerImpl::ReattemptPrivateBroadcast()`).
A few considerations:
* The short-lived private broadcast connections are very cheap and fast wrt network traffic. It is expected that some of those peers could blackhole the transaction. Just one honest/proper peer is enough for successful propagation.
* The peers that receive the transaction could deduce that this is initial transaction broadcast from the transaction originator. This is ok, they can't identify the sender.
---
<details>
<summary>How to test this?</summary>
Thank you, @stratospher and @andrewtoth!
Start `bitcoind` with `-privatebroadcast=1 -debug=privatebroadcast`.
Create a wallet and get a new address, go to the Signet faucet and request some coins to that address:
```bash
build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" createwallet test
build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" getnewaddress
```
Get a new address for the test transaction recipient:
```bash
build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" loadwallet test
new_address=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" getnewaddress)
```
Create the transaction:
```bash
# Option 1: `createrawtransaction` and `signrawtransactionwithwallet`:
txid=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" listunspent | jq -r '.[0] | .txid')
vout=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" listunspent | jq -r '.[0] | .vout')
echo "txid: $txid"
echo "vout: $vout"
tx=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" createrawtransaction "[{\"txid\": \"$txid\", \"vout\": $vout}]" "[{\"$new_address\": 0.00001000}]" 0 false)
echo "tx: $tx"
signed_tx=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" signrawtransactionwithwallet "$tx" | jq -r '.hex')
echo "signed_tx: $signed_tx"
# OR Option 2: `walletcreatefundedpsbt` and `walletprocesspsbt`:
# This makes it not have to worry about inputs and also automatically sends back change to the wallet.
# Start `bitcoind` with `-fallbackfee=0.00003000` for instance for 3 sat/vbyte fee.
psbt=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" walletcreatefundedpsbt "[]" "[{\"$new_address\": 0.00001000}]" | jq -r '.psbt')
echo "psbt: $psbt"
signed_tx=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" walletprocesspsbt "$psbt" | jq -r '.hex')
echo "signed_tx: $signed_tx"
```
Finally, send the transaction:
```bash
raw_tx=$(build/bin/bitcoin-cli -chain="signet" sendrawtransaction "$signed_tx")
echo "raw_tx: $raw_tx"
```
</details>
---
<details>
<summary>High-level explanation of the commits</summary>
* New logging category and config option to enable private broadcast
* `log: introduce a new category for private broadcast`
* `init: introduce a new option to enable/disable private broadcast`
* Implement the private broadcast connection handling on the `CConnman` side:
* `net: introduce a new connection type for private broadcast`
* `net: implement opening PRIVATE_BROADCAST connections`
* Prepare `BroadcastTransaction()` for private broadcast requests:
* `net_processing: rename RelayTransaction to better describe what it does`
* `node: extend node::TxBroadcast with a 3rd option`
* `net_processing: store transactions for private broadcast in PeerManager`
* Implement the private broadcast connection handling on the `PeerManager` side:
* `net_processing: reorder the code that handles the VERSION message`
* `net_processing: move the debug log about receiving VERSION earlier`
* `net_processing: modernize PushNodeVersion()`
* `net_processing: move a debug check in VERACK processing earlier`
* `net_processing: handle ConnectionType::PRIVATE_BROADCAST connections`
* `net_processing: stop private broadcast of a transaction after round-trip`
* `net_processing: retry private broadcast`
* Engage the new functionality from `sendrawtransaction`:
* `rpc: use private broadcast from sendrawtransaction RPC if -privatebroadcast is ON`
* New tests:
* `test: add functional test for private broadcast`
* `test: add unit test for the private broadcast storage`
</details>
---
**This PR would resolve the following issues:**
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/3828 Clients leak IPs if they are recipients of a transaction
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14692 Can't configure bitocoind to only send tx via Tor but receive clearnet transactions
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19042 Tor-only transaction broadcast onlynet=onion alternative
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24557 Option for receive events with all networks, but send transactions and/or blocks only with anonymous network[s]?
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25450 Ability to broadcast wallet transactions only via dedicated oneshot Tor connections
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32235 Tor: TX circuit isolation
**Issues that are related, but (maybe?) not to be resolved by this PR:**
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21876 Broadcast a transaction to specific nodes
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28636 new RPC: sendrawtransactiontopeer
---
Further extensions:
* Have the wallet do the private broadcast as well, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11887 would have to be resolved.
* Have the `submitpackage` RPC do the private broadcast as well, [draft diff in the comment below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415#pullrequestreview-2972293733), thanks ismaelsadeeq!
* Add some stats via RPC, so that the user can better monitor what is going on during and after the broadcast. Currently this can be done via the debug log, but that is not convenient.
* Make the private broadcast storage, currently in peerman, persistent over node restarts.
* Add (optional) random delay before starting to broadcast the transaction in order to avoid correlating unrelated transactions based on the time when they were broadcast. Suggested independently of this PR [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30471).
* Consider periodically sending transactions that did not originate from the node as decoy, discussed [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415#discussion_r2035414972).
* Consider waiting for peer's FEEFILTER message and if the transaction that was sent to the peer is below that threshold, then assume the peer is going to drop it. Then use this knowledge to retry more aggressively with another peer, instead of the current 10 min. See [comment below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415#issuecomment-3258611648).
* It may make sense to be able to override the default policy -- eg so submitrawtransaction can go straight to the mempool and relay, even if txs are normally privately relayed. See [comment below](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415#issuecomment-3427086681).
* As a side effect we have a new metric available - the time it takes for a transaction to reach a random node in the network (from the point of view of the private broadcast recipient the tx originator is a random node somewhere in the network). This can be useful for monitoring, unrelated to privacy characteristics of this feature.
---
_A previous incarnation of this can be found at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27509. It puts the transaction in the mempool and (tries to) hide it from the outside observers. This turned out to be too error prone or maybe even impossible._
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
code review diff ACK 8937221304
andrewtoth:
ACK 8937221304
pinheadmz:
ACK 8937221304
w0xlt:
ACK 8937221304 with nit https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29415#discussion_r2654849875
mzumsande:
re-ACK 8937221304
Tree-SHA512: d51dadc865c2eb080c903cbe2f669e69a967e5f9fc64e9a20a68f39a67bf0db6ac2ad682af7fa24ef9f0942a41c89959341a16ba7b616475e1c5ab8e563b9b96
Introduce a new method intended to replace getCoinbaseRawTx(), which
provides a struct with everything clients need to construct a coinbase.
This is safer than providing a raw dummy coinbase that clients then have
to manipulate.
The CoinbaseTx data is populated during the dummy transaction generation
and stored in struct CBlockTemplate.
Expand the interface_ipc.py functional test to document its usage
and ensure equivalence.
d7de5b109f logs: show reindex progress in `ImportBlocks` (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
### Summary
When triggering a reindex, users have no indication of progress.
### Fix
This patch precomputes the total number of block files so progress can be shown.
Instead of only displaying which block file is being processed, it now shows the percent complete.
### Reproducer + expected results
```bash
cmake -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release && make -C build -j && ./build/bin/bitcoind -datadir=demo -reindex
```
Before, the block files were shown one-by-one, there's no way to see how much work is left:
```
Reindexing block file blk00000.dat...
Loaded 119920 blocks from external file in 1228ms
Reindexing block file blk00001.dat...
Loaded 10671 blocks from external file in 284ms
Reindexing block file blk00002.dat...
Loaded 5459 blocks from external file in 263ms
Reindexing block file blk00003.dat...
Loaded 5595 blocks from external file in 267ms
```
After the change we add a percentage:
```
Reindexing block file blk00000.dat (0% complete)...
Loaded 119920 blocks from external file in 1255ms
Reindexing block file blk00001.dat (1% complete)...
Loaded 10671 blocks from external file in 303ms
Reindexing block file blk00002.dat (2% complete)...
Loaded 5459 blocks from external file in 278ms
Reindexing block file blk00003.dat (3% complete)...
Loaded 5595 blocks from external file in 285ms
```
ACKs for top commit:
enirox001:
Concept ACK d7de5b1
rkrux:
lgtm ACK d7de5b109f
danielabrozzoni:
tACK d7de5b109f - code reviewed and tested on my archival node.
maflcko:
review ACK d7de5b109f💇
Tree-SHA512: 359a539b781ad8b73e2a616c951567062a76be27cf90e5b88bb5309295af9cd7994e327f185bacc1482b43b892b38329593b4043a5e71d8800e3e4b7a3954310
Specifically gets rid of batchpriority, chainparams, script/sign.h and
system includes.
Also take the opportunity of cleaning up the headers for the effected
files and adding them to the iwyu-enforced set.
fa4cb13b52 test: [doc] Manually unify stale headers (MarcoFalke)
fa5f297748 scripted-diff: [doc] Unify stale copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Historically, the upper year range in file headers was bumped manually
or with a script.
This has many issues:
* The script is causing churn. See for example commit 306ccd4, or
drive-by first-time contributions bumping them one-by-one. (A few from
this year: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32008,
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31642,
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32963, ...)
* Some, or likely most, upper year values were wrong. Reasons for
incorrect dates could be code moves, cherry-picks, or simply bugs in
the script.
* The upper range is not needed for anything.
* Anyone who wants to find the initial file creation date, or file
history, can use `git log` or `git blame` to get more accurate
results.
* Many places are already using the `-present` suffix, with the meaning
that the upper range is omitted.
To fix all issues, this bumps the upper range of the copyright headers
to `-present`.
Further notes:
* Obviously, the yearly 4-line bump commit for the build system (c.f.
b537a2c02a) is fine and will remain.
* For new code, the date range can be fully omitted, as it is done
already by some developers. Obviously, developers are free to pick
whatever style they want. One can list the commits for each style.
* For example, to list all commits that use `-present`:
`git log --format='%an (%ae) [%h: %s]' -S 'present The Bitcoin'`.
* Alternatively, to list all commits that use no range at all:
`git log --format='%an (%ae) [%h: %s]' -S '(c) The Bitcoin'`.
<!--
* The lower range can be wrong as well, so it could be omitted as well,
but this is left for a follow-up. A previous attempt was in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26817.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK fa4cb13b52
rkrux:
re-ACK fa4cb13b52
janb84:
ACK fa4cb13b52
Tree-SHA512: e5132781bdc4417d1e2922809b27ef4cf0abb37ffb68c65aab8a5391d3c917b61a18928ec2ec2c75ef5184cb79a5b8c8290d63e949220dbeab3bd2c0dfbdc4c5
This frees up the name getCoinbaseTx() for the next commit.
Changing a function name does not impact IPC clients, as they only
consider the function signature and sequence number.
db2d39f642 fuzz: add subtest for re-downloading a previously pruned block (Eugene Siegel)
45f5b2dac3 fuzz: Add fuzzer for block index (Martin Zumsande)
c011e3aa54 test: Wrap validation functions with TestChainstateManager (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This adds a fuzz target for the block index and various events in validation that interact with it.
It can create arbitrary tree-like structure of block indexes, simulating (so far) the following events:
- Adding a header
- Receiving the full block (may be valid or not)
- `ActivateBestChain()` - Reorging the chain to a new chain tip (possibly encountering invalid blocks on the way)
- Pruning a block in the best chain
- Receiving a previously pruned block again (`getblockfrompeer`)
It might be interesting / possible to extend this to more events, such as dealing with more than one chainstate (assumeutxo).
The test skips all actual validation of header/ block / transaction data by just simulating the outcome, and also doesn't interact with the data directory.
The main goal is to ensure the integrity of the block index tree in all fuzzed constellations, by calling `CheckBlockIndex()` at the end of each iteration.
Compared to #29158 this approach has a more limited scope (by skipping all actual validation), but it is fast - it doesn't do a full init sequence on each iteration, but "cleans up" after itself by resetting the global validation state after each iteration.
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
reACK db2d39f642
maflcko:
review ACK db2d39f642🍶
sedited:
Re-ACK db2d39f642
Tree-SHA512: 76cd5f8f4d7d7258620b46d7438bad4508c3bdc98825b48b60f694b5a9838e2b2cf4967c0ead181f86f66f4939ddfe552471851b9d18f84f584c03dd7e09fc43
d9319b06cf refactor: unify container presence checks - non-trivial counts (Lőrinc)
039307554e refactor: unify container presence checks - trivial counts (Lőrinc)
8bb9219b63 refactor: unify container presence checks - find (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
### Summary
Instead of counting occurrences in sets and maps, the C++20 `::contains` method expresses the intent unambiguously and can return early on first encounter.
### Context
Applied clang‑tidy's [readability‑container‑contains](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability/container-contains.html) check, though many cases required manual changes since tidy couldn't fix them automatically.
### Changes
The changes made here were:
| From | To |
|------------------------|------------------|
| `m.find(k) == m.end()` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.find(k) != m.end()` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k)` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `!m.count(k)` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 0` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 1` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) == 1` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) < 1` | `!m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) > 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
| `m.count(k) != 0` | `m.contains(k)` |
> Note that `== 1`/`!= 1`/`< 1` only apply to simple [maps](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/map/contains)/[sets](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/set/contains) and had to be changed manually.
There are many other cases that could have been changed, but we've reverted most of those to reduce conflict with other open PRs.
-----
<details>
<summary>clang-tidy command on Mac</summary>
```bash
rm -rfd build && \
cmake -B build \
-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/clang++" \
-DCMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT="$(xcrun --show-sdk-path)" \
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-target arm64-apple-macos11" \
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-target arm64-apple-macos11" \
-DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=ON -DBUILD_BENCH=ON -DBUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON -DBUILD_FOR_FUZZING=ON
"$(brew --prefix llvm)/bin/run-clang-tidy" -quiet -p build -j$(nproc) -checks='-*,readability-container-contains' | grep -v 'clang-tidy'
```
</details>
Note: this is a take 2 of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33094 with fewer contentious changes.
ACKs for top commit:
optout21:
reACK d9319b06cf
sedited:
ACK d9319b06cf
janb84:
re ACK d9319b06cf
pablomartin4btc:
re-ACK d9319b06cf
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d9319b06cf. I manually reviewed the full change, and it seems there are a lot of positive comments about this and no more very significant conflicts, so I will merge it shortly.
Tree-SHA512: e4415221676cfb88413ccc446e5f4369df7a55b6642347277667b973f515c3c8ee5bfa9ee0022479c8de945c89fbc9ff61bd8ba086e70f30298cbc1762610fe1
59b93f11e8 rest: print also HTTP response reason in case of an error (Roman Zeyde)
7fe94a0493 rest: add a test for unsuported `/blockpart/` request type (Roman Zeyde)
55d0d19b5c rest: deduplicate `interface_rest.py` negative tests (Roman Zeyde)
89eb531024 rest: update release notes for `/blockpart/` endpoint (Roman Zeyde)
41118e17f8 blockstorage: simplify partial block read validation (Roman Zeyde)
599effdeab rest: reformat `uri_prefixes` initializer list (Roman Zeyde)
Pull request description:
The commits below should resolve a few leftovers from #33657.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK 59b93f11e8
hodlinator:
re-ACK 59b93f11e8
Tree-SHA512: ae45e08edd315018e11283b354fb32f9658f5829c956554dc662a81c2e16397def7c3700e6354e0a91ff03c850def35638a69ec2668b7c015d25d6fed42b92bb
Extend `PeerManager` with a transaction storage and a new method
`InitiateTxBroadcastPrivate()` which:
* adds a transaction to that storage and
* calls `CConnman::PrivateBroadcast::NumToOpenAdd()` to open dedicated
privacy connections that will pick an entry from the transaction
storage and broadcast it.
Extend `node::TxBroadcast` with a 3rd option to not add the
transaction to the mempool and broadcast privately.
This is a non-functional change - `BroadcastTransaction()` will not
do anything if the 3rd options is passed and is not used by any of
its callers.
Rename `PeerManager::RelayTransaction()` to
`PeerManager::InitiateTxBroadcastToAll()`. The transaction is not
relayed when the method returns. It is only enqueued for a possible
broadcasting at a later time. Also, there will be another method which
only does so to Tor or I2P peers.
82be652e40 doc: Improve ChainstateManager documentation, use consistent terms (Ryan Ofsky)
af455dcb39 refactor: Simplify pruning functions (TheCharlatan)
ae85c495f1 refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::GetAll() method (Ryan Ofsky)
6a572dbda9 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::ActivateBestChains() method (Ryan Ofsky)
491d827d52 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::m_chainstates member (Ryan Ofsky)
e514fe6116 refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::SnapshotBlockhash() method (Ryan Ofsky)
ee35250683 refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::IsSnapshotValidated() method (Ryan Ofsky)
d9e82299fc refactor: Delete ChainstateManager::IsSnapshotActive() method (Ryan Ofsky)
4dfe383912 refactor: Convert ChainstateRole enum to struct (Ryan Ofsky)
352ad27fc1 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::ValidatedChainstate() method (Ryan Ofsky)
a229cb9477 refactor: Add ChainstateManager::CurrentChainstate() method (Ryan Ofsky)
a9b7f5614c refactor: Add Chainstate::StoragePath() method (Ryan Ofsky)
840bd2ef23 refactor: Pass chainstate parameters to MaybeCompleteSnapshotValidation (Ryan Ofsky)
1598a15aed refactor: Deduplicate Chainstate activation code (Ryan Ofsky)
9fe927b6d6 refactor: Add Chainstate m_assumeutxo and m_target_utxohash members (Ryan Ofsky)
6082c84713 refactor: Add Chainstate::m_target_blockhash member (Ryan Ofsky)
de00e87548 test: Fix broken chainstatemanager_snapshot_init check (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR contains the first part of #28608, which tries to make assumeutxo code more maintainable, and improve it by not locking `cs_main` for a long time when the snapshot block is connected, and by deleting the snapshot validation chainstate when it is no longer used, instead of waiting until the next restart.
The changes in this PR are just refactoring. They make `Chainstate` objects self-contained, so for example, it is possible to determine what blocks to connect to a chainstate without querying `ChainstateManager`, and to determine whether a Chainstate is validated without basing it on inferences like `&cs != &ActiveChainstate()` or `GetAll().size() == 1`.
The PR also tries to make assumeutxo terminology less confusing, using "current chainstate" to refer to the chainstate targeting the current network tip, and "historical chainstate" to refer to the chainstate downloading old blocks and validating the assumeutxo snapshot. It removes uses of the terms "active chainstate," "usable chainstate," "disabled chainstate," "ibd chainstate," and "snapshot chainstate" which are confusing for various reasons.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-review ACK 82be652e40🕍
fjahr:
re-ACK 82be652e40
sedited:
Re-ACK 82be652e40
Tree-SHA512: 81c67abba9fc5bb170e32b7bf8a1e4f7b5592315b4ef720be916d5f1f5a7088c0c59cfb697744dd385552f58aa31ee36176bae6a6e465723e65861089a1252e5
Deduplicate code looping over chainstate objects and calling
ActivateBestChain() and avoid need for code outside ChainstateManager to use
the GetAll() method.
Use to replace m_active_chainstate, m_ibd_chainstate, and m_snapshot_chainstate
members. This has several benefits:
- Ensures ChainstateManager treats chainstates instances equally, making
distinctions based on their attributes, not having special cases and making
assumptions based on their identities.
- Normalizes ChainstateManager representation so states that should be
impossible to reach and validation code has no handling for (like
m_snapshot_chainstate being set and m_ibd_chainstate being unset, or both
being set but m_active_chainstate pointing to the m_ibd_chainstate) can no
longer be represented.
- Makes ChainstateManager more extensible so new chainstates can be added for
different purposes, like indexing or generating and validating assumeutxo
snapshots without interrupting regular node operations. With the
m_chainstates member, new chainstates can be added and handled without needing
to make changes all over validation code or to copy/paste/modify the existing
code that's been already been written to handle m_ibd_chainstate and
m_snapshot_chainstate.
- Avoids terms that are confusing and misleading:
- The term "active chainstate" term is confusing because multiple chainstates
will be active and in use at the same time. Before a snapshot is validated,
wallet code will use the snapshot chainstate, while indexes will use the IBD
chainstate, and netorking code will use both chainstates, downloading
snapshot blocks at higher priority, but also IBD blocks simultaneously.
- The term "snapshot chainstate" is ambiguous because it could refer either
to the chainstate originally loaded from a snapshot, or to the chainstate
being used to validate a snapshot that was loaded, or to a chainstate being
used to produce a snapshot, but it is arbitrary used to refer the first
thing. The terms "most-work chainstate" or "assumed-valid chainstate" should
be less ambiguous ways to refer to chainstates loaded from snapshots.
- The term "IBD chainstate" is not just ambiguous but actively confusing
because technically IBD ends and the node is considered synced when the
snapshot chainstate finishes syncing, so in practice the IBD chainstate
will mostly by synced after IBD is complete. The term "fully-validated" is
a better way of describing the characteristics and purpose of this
chainstate.
IsSnapshotValidated() is only called one place outside of tests, and is use
redundantly in some tests, asserting that a snapshot is not validated when a
snapshot chainstate does not even exist. Simplify by dropping the method and
checking Chainstate m_assumeutxo field directly.
IsSnapshotActive() method is only called one place outside of tests and
asserts, and is confusing because it returns true even after the snapshot is
fully validated.
The documentation which said this "implies that a background validation
chainstate is also in use" is also incorrect, because after the snapshot is
validated, the background chainstate gets disabled and IsUsable() would return
false.
Change ChainstateRole parameter passed to wallets and indexes. Wallets and
indexes need to know whether chainstate is historical and whether it is fully
validated. They should not be aware of the assumeutxo snapshot validation
process.
Use to simplify code determining the chainstate leveldb paths. New method is
the now the only code that needs to figure out the storage path, so the path
doesn't need to be constructed multiple places and backed out of leveldb.
Remove hardcoded references to m_ibd_chainstate and m_snapshot_chainstate so
MaybeCompleteSnapshotValidation function can be simpler and focus on validating
the snapshot without dealing with internal ChainstateManager states.
This is a step towards being able to validate the snapshot outside of
ActivateBestChain loop so cs_main is not locked for minutes when the snapshot
block is connected.
Make Chainstate objects aware of what block they are targeting. This makes
Chainstate objects more self contained, so it's possible for validation code to
look at one Chainstate object and know what blocks to connect to it without
needing to consider global validation state or look at other Chainstate
objects.
The motivation for this change is to make validation and networking code more
readable, so understanding it just requires knowing about chains and blocks,
not reasoning about assumeutxo download states. This change also enables
simplifications to the ChainstateManager interface in subsequent commits, and
could make it easier to implement new features like creating new Chainstate
objects to generate UTXO snapshots or index UTXO data.
Note that behavior of the MaybeCompleteSnapshotValidation function is not
changing here but some checks that were previously impossible to trigger like
the BASE_BLOCKHASH_MISMATCH case have been turned into asserts.
It will enable different error handling flows for different error types.
Also, `ReadRawBlockBench` performance has decreased due to no longer reusing a vector
with an unchanging capacity - mirroring our production code behavior.
Co-authored-by: Hodlinator <172445034+hodlinator@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lőrinc <pap.lorinc@gmail.com>
This is a minimal behavior change and changes log output from:
[net:error] Something bad happened
[net:warning] Something problematic happened
to either
[error] Something bad happened
[warning] Something problematic happened
or, when -loglevelalways=1 is enabled:
[all:error] Something bad happened
[all:warning] Something problematic happened
Such a behavior change is desired, because all warning and error logs
are written in the same style in the source code and they are logged in
the same format for log consumers.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed --regexp-extended --in-place \
's/LogPrintLevel\((BCLog::[^,]*), BCLog::Level::(Error|Warning), */Log\2(/g' \
$( git grep -l LogPrintLevel ':(exclude)src/test/logging_tests.cpp' )
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
