240ea294d5e899a906f213f039b21e94c24d6018 doc: update doxygen documention of ComputeTimeSmart() and AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe() regarding rescanning_old_block parameter (BitcoinTsunami)
d6eb39af21810bf1c3bdce0ef2212c1ad6597bcd test: add functional test to check transaction time determination during block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
07b44f16e71b9df10dfac7f32f92997938f7e7aa wallet: fix ComputeTimeSmart algorithm to use blocktime during old block rescanning (BitcoinTsunami)
Pull request description:
The function ComputeTimeSmart in wallet.cpp assume that transaction are discovered in the right order.
Moreover the 'smarttime' determination algorithm is coded with realtime scenario in mind and not rescanning of old block.
The functional test demonstrate that if the user import a wallet, then rescan only recent history, and then rescan the entire history, the older transaction discovered would have an incorrect time determination.
In the context of rescanning old block, the only time value that as a meaning is the blocktime.
That's why I've fixed the problem with a simple separation between rescanning of old block and realtime time determination. The fix is written to have no impact on every realtime scenario and only impact the behaviour during a rescanning process.
This PR Fixes#20181.
To be fair, I don't think that this bug could be triggered with the wallet GUI, because it always proceed with a proper rescan.
But RPC API provide the possibility to trigger it. I've discovered it, because Specter desktop v0.10.0 was impacted. (https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop/issues/680).
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 240ea294d5e899a906f213f039b21e94c24d6018 per `git diff b92d552 240ea29`, re-verified rebase to latest master + debug build clean + new test passes on the branch and fails on master, only change since my review a few hours ago is incorporation of latest review suggestions
meshcollider:
re-utACK 240ea294d5e899a906f213f039b21e94c24d6018
Tree-SHA512: 514b02e41d011ddfa325f5e8080b93800e1ea4ed5853fa420670a6ac700e8b463000dbea65f8ced8565cfb950c7f51b69154034dcb111e67aca3b964a0061494
ea31caf6b4c182c6f10f136548f84e603800511c update estimatesmartfee rpc to return max of estimateSmartFee, mempoolMinFee and minRelayTxFee. (pranabp-bit)
Pull request description:
This PR is in response to the issue [#19699](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19699).
Based on the discussion in the comments of PR [#22673](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22673) changes have been made in the `estimatesmartfee` itself such that it takes into account `mempoolMinFee` and `relayMinFee` . Hence it provides a fee estimate that is most likely to be paid by the user in an actual transaction, preventing issues such as [#16072](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16072).
The test file test/functional/feature_fee_estimation.py has also been updated to check this functionality.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK ea31caf6b4c182c6f10f136548f84e603800511c
Tree-SHA512: 8f36153a07cbd552c5c13d11d9c6e987a7a555ea4cc83f2573c0c92dd97c706d90c30a7248671437c2f3a836d3272f8fad53d15a5fa6efaa0409ae8009b0a18d
43cd6b8af9d613ca033800c5cd8524c3f77e13ec doc: add release notes for removal of the -deprecatedrpc=addresses flag (Michael Dietz)
2b1fdc2c6ce1d0b0e51a3f107e23443c142d57af refactor: minor styling, prefer snake case and same line if (Michael Dietz)
d64deac7b823a0eba97ab3a3686054eefe330d3c refactor: share logic between ScriptPubKeyToUniv and ScriptToUniv (Michael Dietz)
8721638daa8502c7f8de5ae24a9393d7290a2ce5 rpc: remove deprecated addresses and reqSigs from rpc outputs (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
Resolves#21797 now that we've branched-off to v23 ("addresses" and "reqSigs" deprecated) "ExtractDestinations" should be removed.
`-deprecatedrpc=addresses` was initially added in this PR #20286 (which resolved the original issue #20102).
Some chunks of code and logic are no longer used/necessary with the removal of this, and therefore some minor refactoring is done in this PR as well (separated commits)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 43cd6b8af9d613ca033800c5cd8524c3f77e13ec 🐉
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 43cd6b8af9d613ca033800c5cd8524c3f77e13ec
jonatack:
ACK 43cd6b8af9d613ca033800c5cd8524c3f77e13ec per `git range-diff a9d0cec 92dc5e9 43cd6b8`, also rebased to latest master, debug built + quick re-review of each commit to bring back context, and ran tests locally at the final commit
Tree-SHA512: fba83495e396d3c06f0dcf49292f14f4aa6b68fa758f0503941fade1a6e7271cda8378e2734af1faea550d1b43c85a36c52ebcc9dec0732936f9233b4b97901c
b8909b074603a05a1a255461ca78d8a013dd3044 Run functional tests with all possible flags (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Functional tests which use flags like `--descriptors` or `--legacy-wallet` won't run if only the base script is given to `test_runner.py` because it doesn't match any script in the list exactly. It would be easier if it would just run both options.
For example, instead of:
```
test_runner.py 'wallet_basic.py --legacy-wallet' 'wallet_basic.py --descriptors'
```
We can now just run:
```
test_runner.py wallet_basic
```
Also useful for `--usecli`, the IPv4/IPv6/nonloopback `rpc_bind.py` variations, etc.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b8909b074603a05a1a255461ca78d8a013dd3044
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b8909b074603a05a1a255461ca78d8a013dd3044
Tree-SHA512: d367037cb170e705551726d47fe4569ebc3ceadece280dd3edbb3ecb41e19f3263d6d272b407316ed6011164e850df4321fb340b1b183b34497c9f7cc439f4d8
This will provide better estimates which would be closer to fee paid in actual
transactions.
The test has also been changed such that when the node is restarted with a
high mempoolMinFee, the estimatesmartfee still returns a feeRate greater
than or equal to the mempoolMinFee, minRelayTxFee.(just like the feeRate of actual transactions)
7e3ee4cdd0f60a2f549ba030fe96b90d61c036c5 GUI: Ask user to unlock wallet before signing psbt (Samuel Dobson)
0f3acecf3372f9da143590bb17d8444564e083f4 Add test that walletprocesspsbt requires unlocked wallet when signing (Samuel Dobson)
0e895212bb571ae0de5580adfd8ee9b3c2137e24 Ensure wallet is unlocked before signing in walletprocesspsbt (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
If signing a PSBT, we need to ensure the wallet is unlocked.
Fixes#22874, fixesbitcoin-core/gui#312
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0f60a2f549ba030fe96b90d61c036c5
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK 7e3ee4cdd0
benthecarman:
ACK 7e3ee4cdd0f60a2f549ba030fe96b90d61c036c5
Tree-SHA512: 6726a873582747900ab454ea21153a92be86808a4c1517dc2856b389876a2da9e8df1ffa9b567b6bd017038342c3544ecf5ca3c97744e7debe0a5ee65563687d
With this new method, outputs to an arbitrary scriptPubKey/amount can
be created. Note that the implementation was already present in the
test feature_rbf.py and is just moved to the MiniWallet interface, in
order to enable other tests to also use it.
faa9c19a4b27e7fabf7c5deae1b4c4ca612ed01a doc: Add 23061 release notes (MarcoFalke)
faff17bbde6dcb1482a6210bc48b3192603a446f Fix (inverse) meaning of -persistmempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Passing `-persistmempool` is currently treated as `-nopersistmempool`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK faa9c19a4b27e7fabf7c5deae1b4c4ca612ed01a
hebasto:
ACK faa9c19a4b27e7fabf7c5deae1b4c4ca612ed01a, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: f34a89a07745dabe340eb845b2a348b79c093e9056f7a21c17e1ba2e278177c9b4cf30e8095791fd645a7f90eb34850b2eee0c869b4f6ec02bf749c73b0e52ee
fad02274ba28189f28f5af536b8ea0ecddf9df55 test: Remove Windows workaround in authproxy (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Might no longer be needed after https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23089
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fad02274ba28189f28f5af536b8ea0ecddf9df55, passed 3 consequential runs on my [personal CI](https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4897456077930496):
Tree-SHA512: 3c408e068ad7590dc0e5922c0b4cd3bf927e22fe624b13b8ab38db848342d310c9c934f358638fd5234c7b5f10f95d3bddc676deb925dcbba54945e2e8229275
5825b34783545f9470d5ab94b87c918980715675 test: avoid non-determinism in asmap-addrman test (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the same approach as for the addpeeraddress test in `test/functional/rpc_net.py` in commit 869f1368.
The probability of collision when adding an addrman entry is expected to be 1/2^16 = 1/65536 for an address from a different /16. This change hopes to avoid these collisions by adding 1 tried entry before adding 1 new table one, instead of 2 tried entries followed by 2 new entries, which appears to have caused a collision in the CI.
To verify the regression test still fails when expected:
- `git checkout 181a120 && git cherry-pick ef242f5`
- recompile bitcoind
- git checkout this branch and run `test/functional/feature_asmap.py`. Expected output:
```
AssertionError: Unexpected stderr bitcoind: ./addrman.h:739: void CAddrMan::Check() const: Assertion `false' failed. !=
```
Closes#23078.
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Re-ACK 5825b34783545f9470d5ab94b87c918980715675
Tree-SHA512: eb6624a196fa5617c84aad860c8f91e8a8f60fc9fe2d7168facc298ee38db5e93b7e988e11c2ac1b399dc2c6b8fad360fb10bdbf10e598a1878300388475a200
d96b000e94d72d041689c5c47e374df2ebc0e011 Make GUI UTXO lock/unlock persistent (Samuel Dobson)
077154fe698f5556ad6e26ef49c9024c2f07ff68 Add release note for lockunspent change (Samuel Dobson)
719ae927dcdb60c0f9902fa79796256035228c4e Update lockunspent tests for lock persistence (Samuel Dobson)
f13fc16295c19a156f2974d2d73fba56d52fc161 Allow lockunspent to store the lock in the wallet DB (Samuel Dobson)
c52789365e5dbcb25aa5f1775de4d318da79e5a7 Allow locked UTXOs to be store in the wallet database (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
Addresses and closes#22368
As per that issue (and its predecessor #14907), there seems to be some interest in allowing unspent outputs to be locked persistently. This PR does so by adding a flag to lockunspent to store the change in the wallet database. Defaults to false, so there is no change in default behaviour.
Edit: GUI commit changes default behaviour. UTXOs locked/unlocked via the GUI are now persistent.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d96b000e94d72d041689c5c47e374df2ebc0e011
kristapsk:
ACK d96b000e94d72d041689c5c47e374df2ebc0e011
lsilva01:
Tested ACK d96b000e94 on Ubuntu 20.04
prayank23:
ACK d96b000e94
Tree-SHA512: 957a5bbfe7f763036796906ccb1598feb6c14c5975838be1ba24a198840bf59e83233165cb112cebae909b6b25bf27275a4d7fa425923ef6c788ff671d7a89a8
fa04f26aa77d2cf746db4a8a43068b7c5c9cd02b test: Avoid race after connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Wait until the connection is fully established on both sides (verack). Fixes#22714
ACKs for top commit:
kiminuo:
utACK fa04f26aa77d2cf746db4a8a43068b7c5c9cd02b
Tree-SHA512: bc2c44b44b688086ff84046924cf5251dd625584e93ce8fa17de27023855b32f3bb55109b846abbcec775e2836c7f3c5a81d6b4aff7c4ac065b9aefa044c1883
This is the same approach as for the addpeeraddress test in
`test/functional/rpc_net.py` in commit 869f1368.
The probability of collision when adding an addrman entry is
expected to be 1/2^16 = 1/65536 for an address from a different /16.
This change hopes to avoid these collisions by adding 1 tried entry
before adding 1 new table one, instead of 2 tried entries followed
by 2 new entries, which appears to have caused a collision in the CI.
To verify the regression test stills fails when expected:
- git checkout 181a120 && git cherry-pick ef242f5
- recompile bitcoind
- git checkout this branch and run test/functional/feature_asmap.py. Expected output:
```
AssertionError: Unexpected stderr bitcoind: ./addrman.h:739: void CAddrMan::Check() const: Assertion `false' failed. !=
```
Co-authored-by: Martin Zumsande <mzumsande@gmail.com>
This commit adds specific expected reject reasons for segwit blocks
sent to the node, that are only showing up if one script threads
is used. For this reason, the node is started with the parameter
`-par=1`.
This commit adds specific expected reject reasons for segwit blocks
sent to the node, that are independent of whether multiple script threads
are activated or not.
fa4db8671bb604e11b43a837f91de8866226f166 test: Activate all regtest softforks at height 1, unless overridden (MarcoFalke)
faad1e5ffda255aecf1b0ea2152cd4f6805e678f Introduce -testactivationheight=name@height setting (MarcoFalke)
fadb2ef2fa8561882db463f35df9b8a0e9609658 test: Add extra_args argument to TestChain100Setup constructor (MarcoFalke)
faa46986aaec69e4cf016101ae517ce8778e2ac5 test: Remove version argument from build_next_block in p2p_segwit test (MarcoFalke)
fa086ef5398b5ffded86e4f0d6633c523cb774e9 test: Remove unused ~TestChain100Setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
All softforks that are active at the tip of mainnet, should also be active from genesis in regtest. Otherwise their rules might not be enforced in user testing, thus making their testing less useful.
To still allow tests to check pre-softfork rules, a runtime argument can change the activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa4db8671bb604e11b43a837f91de8866226f166
theStack:
re-ACK fa4db8671bb604e11b43a837f91de8866226f166
Tree-SHA512: 6397d46ff56ebc48c007a4cda633904d6ac085bc76b4ecf83097c546c7eec93ac0c44b88083b2611b9091c8d1fb8ee1e314065de078ef15e922c015de7ade8bf
b69a106bcd8ddefdb810df6ebb3625c430197e04 test: use test_framework.p2p P2P_SERVICES in functional tests (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
`P2P_SERVICES` is defined in `test/functional/test_framework/p2p.py`, so we can use it as a single definition for our functional tests. It may also be a tiny bit more efficient to use the constant rather than calculating `NODE_NETWORK | NODE_WITNESS` every time we need it in the tests.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK b69a106bcd8ddefdb810df6ebb3625c430197e04
klementtan:
crACK b69a106bcd8ddefdb810df6ebb3625c430197e04
fanquake:
ACK b69a106bcd8ddefdb810df6ebb3625c430197e04 - didn't look at the formatting changes.
Tree-SHA512: f83e593663a69182986325d9ba2b4b787b87896d6648973f4f802f191a2573201b9e7d7e10e69662ef1965fa63268845726ed1aa5742a2e38dcccf4aebc6a961
f6e4db27ceb67157dc13d13f34351cb87fec2be5 test: add aarch64-apple-darwin platform entry to get_previous_releases (Zero-1729)
Pull request description:
Over the course of reviewing a PR, I had to edit `test/get_previous_releases.py` (after I ran `git clean -xdff`) to run the backwards compatibility tests (e.g. `wallet_upgradewallet`, `feature_backwards_compatibility`, etc.), as currently on master, running the script as indicated in [`test/README.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/README.md), for example, on an M1 machine results in the following error, as the `aarch64-apple-darwin*` platform entry is presently not recognised:
> Output from an M1 machine running macOS v11.5.2
```sh
$ test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.20.1 v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2
Releases directory: releases
Not sure which binary to download for aarch64-apple-darwin20.6.0
```
As a quick fix, this PR adds the missing `aarch64-apple-darwin*` platform entry. Running the script now results in fetching the old binaries, as expected:
```sh
$ test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.20.1 v0.19.1 v0.18.1 v0.17.2 v0.16.3 v0.15.2
Releases directory: releases
Fetching: https://bitcoincore.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.20.1/bitcoin-0.20.1-osx64.tar.gz
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 20.9M 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:02 --:--:-- 0
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 20.9M 100 20.9M 0 0 136k 0 0:02:37 0:02:37 --:--:-- 95607
Checksum matched
…
Checksum matched
```
After this patch, the backwards compatibility tests also run successfully, as expected.
**Note**: I am open to other possible solutions.
---
Steps to reproduce:
> Ensure you take out the binaries in `releases` if they already exist.
Try running `test/get_previous_releases.py -b v0.15.2` or similar to fetch the old release binaries.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a238d909b70a61be622234bc49b05d2e91a8acfc5ea348d29f2c8a927fb793cb97365e558571e3f46d6a5650c4f3c6e28fa126c6e56b38e1eb98f7c3e3594d0f
fa3669f72f69662049b55ad1a482b4a0f9f7ae40 fuzz: Move all addrman fuzz targets to one file (MarcoFalke)
fa7a883f5a219d5f3c2f992b090db4e6c279db12 addrman: Replace assert with throw on corrupt data (MarcoFalke)
fa298971e6890715e2b0b93f2a7f445d32d6622f Refactor: Turn the internal addrman check helper into a forced check (MarcoFalke)
fae5c633dc05a045aaac370b383e4799cb0e0590 move-only: Move CAddrMan::Check to cpp file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Assert should only be used for program internal logic errors, not to sanitize external user input.
The assert was introduced via the debug-only runtime option `-checkaddrman` in commit 803ef70fd9f65ef800567ff9456fac525bc3e3c2, thus won't need a backport.
Also, it doesn't really make sense to continue when the deserialized addrman doesn't pass the sanity check.
For example, if `nLastSuccess` is negative, it would later result in integer overflows. Thus, this patch fixes#22931.
Also,
Fixes#22503Fixes#22504Fixes#22519Closes#22498
Steps to test:
```
mkdir -p /tmp/test_235/regtest/
echo 'H4sIAAAAAAAAA/u1f+stZmUGYgELgwPRakfBKBgFo2AUjIJRMApGwSgYBaNgFIyCUTBswdyGpFnLjUKjP9e0bvjYusl6b+L2e7Vs2dd6N//Pua0/xQUALJAn93IQAAA=' | base64 --decode | zcat > /tmp/test_235/regtest/peers.dat
./src/qt/bitcoin-qt -regtest -datadir=/tmp/test_235/ -checkaddrman=1 -printtoconsole | grep -A2 'Loading P2P addresses'
```
Output before:
```
2021-09-10T11:28:37Z init message: Loading P2P addresses…
2021-09-10T11:28:37Z ADDRMAN CONSISTENCY CHECK FAILED!!! err=-16
bitcoin-qt: addrman.cpp:765: void CAddrMan::Check() const: Assertion `false' failed.
(program crashes)
```
Output after:
```
2021-09-10T11:26:00Z init message: Loading P2P addresses…
2021-09-10T11:26:00Z Error: Invalid or corrupt peers.dat (Corrupt data. Consistency check failed with code -16: iostream error). If you believe this is a bug, please report it to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues. As a workaround, you can move the file ("/tmp/test_235/regtest/peers.dat") out of the way (rename, move, or delete) to have a new one created on the next start.
(program exits)
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK fa3669f72f69662049b55ad1a482b4a0f9f7ae40
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa3669f72f69662049b55ad1a482b4a0f9f7ae40
vasild:
ACK fa3669f72f69662049b55ad1a482b4a0f9f7ae40
Tree-SHA512: 687e4a4765bbc66495152fa7a49d28ee84b405dc5370ba87b4016b5593e45f54c4ce5cae579e4d433e0e082d20fc263969fa602679c911accef0adb2d6213bd6
f680d27155374de658d40db0ba40460919aa1ba2 test: use MiniWallet for make_utxo helper in feature_rbf.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0f275246027266fa256d0a09251bb2c88d9bd72f test: scale amounts in test_doublespend_tree down by factor 10 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
d1e2481274edf2ac14747be633d86ecd46814ef4 test: scale amounts in test_doublespend_chain down by factor 10 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR aims to further increase MiniWallet usage in the functional test feature_rbf.py by using it in the `make_utxo(...)` helper, which is the only part that needs a wallet for most sub-tests. In order to do that, the amounts for the utxos have to be scaled down in two sub-tests first (`test_doublespend_chain` and `test_doublespend_tree`, see first two commits), since we need amounts passed to `make_utxo` than can be funded by only one input. For creating UTXOs with a value of 50 BTC, we'd need to implement a method for consolidating multiple utxos into one first, which seems to be overkill.
Note that after this PR's change, there is only one sub-test left (`test_rpc`) that needs the wallet compiled into bitcoind.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK f680d27155374de658d40db0ba40460919aa1ba2 🦐
Tree-SHA512: 46c8c245086a9e79855c4ede2f8f412333cf2658136805196b203b3567c89398d77fcb80715c0bb72fdc84331cc67544b2fdc259193a3adcb2fc36e147c26fce
cdaab90662a54e331de0e49a89596bbb94a8ac45 Add test for addrman consistency check on restart with asmap (Jon Atack)
869f136816c6900ce84bc4b5a9c93c0deab85193 Add test for rpc addpeeraddress with "tried" argument (Jon Atack)
ef242f52137f2a79a739447251d7759bd4705be0 Allow passing "tried" to rpc addpeeraddress to call CAddrMan::Good() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull adds a `tried` argument to RPC addpeeraddress and a regression test for the recent addrman/asmap changes and issue.
PR #22697 introduced a reproducible bug in commit 181a1207 that fails addrman consistency checks and causes it to significantly lose peer entries when the `-asmap` configuration option is used.
The issue occurs upon bitcoind restart due to an initialization order change in `src/init.cpp` in that commit, whereby CAddrman asmap is set after deserializing `peers.dat`, rather than before.
Issue reported on the `#bitcoin-core-dev` IRC channel starting at https://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2021-08-23.html#l-263.
```
addrman lost 22813 new and 2 tried addresses due to collisions or invalid addresses
ADDRMAN CONSISTENCY CHECK FAILED!!! err=-17 bitcoind: ./addrman.h:707: void CAddrMan::Check() const: Assertion `false' failed. Aborted
```
How to reproduce:
- `git checkout 181a1207`, build, and launch bitcoind with the `-asmap` and `-checkaddrman=1` configuration options enabled
- restart bitcoind
- bitcoind aborts on the second call to the addrman consistency checks in `CAddrMan::Check()`
How to test this pull:
- `git checkout 181a1207`, cherry pick the first commit of this branch, build, git checkout this branch, run `test/functional/rpc_net.py`, which should pass, and then run `test/functional/feature_asmap.py`, which should fail with the following output:
```
AssertionError: Unexpected stderr bitcoind: ./addrman.h:739: void CAddrMan::Check() const: Assertion `false' failed.
```
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK cdaab90662a54e331de0e49a89596bbb94a8ac45
mzumsande:
re-ACK cdaab90662a54e331de0e49a89596bbb94a8ac45 (based on code review of diff to d586817)
vasild:
ACK cdaab90662a54e331de0e49a89596bbb94a8ac45
Tree-SHA512: 0251a18fea629b62486fc907d7ab0e96c6df6fadb9e4d62cff018bc681afb6ac31e0e7258809c0a88f91e4a36c4fb0b16ed294ce47ef30585217de89c3342399
faa81f948663a7155335986b028fb2ce19049a79 test: Add addrman deserialization error tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Add missing test coverage
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Light code review ACK faa81f948663a7155335986b028fb2ce19049a79 and ran the test
Tree-SHA512: 8b254ba912c83473125faaf7df02a33a99840b40460bdce1486991a01de9ba6371c053354318f09b69fdc18c823bca3f2f7d341db0f8950e22d8435acbaa9cf5
