61c569ab6069d04079a0831468eb713983919636 refactor: decouple early return commands from AppInit (furszy)
4927167f855f8ed3bbf6d2766f61229f742e632a gui: return EXIT_FAILURE on post-init fatal errors (furszy)
3b2c61e8198bcefb1c2343caff1d705951026cc4 Return EXIT_FAILURE on post-init fatal errors (furszy)
3c06926cf21dcca3074ef51506f556b2286c299b refactor: index: use `AbortNode` in fatal error helper (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9ddf7e03a35592617a016418fd320cc93c8d1abd move ThreadImport ABC error to use AbortNode (furszy)
Pull request description:
It seems odd to return `EXIT_SUCCESS` when the node aborted execution due a fatal internal error
or any post-init problem that triggers an unrequested shutdown.
e.g. blocks or coins db I/O errors, disconnect block failure, failure during thread import (external
blocks loading process error), among others.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 61c569ab6069d04079a0831468eb713983919636
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 61c569ab6069d04079a0831468eb713983919636
pinheadmz:
ACK 61c569ab6069d04079a0831468eb713983919636
theStack:
Code-review ACK 61c569ab6069d04079a0831468eb713983919636
Tree-SHA512: 18a59c3acc1c6d12cbc74a20a401e89659740c6477fccb59070c9f97922dfe588468e9e5eef56c5f395762187c34179a5e3954aa5b844787fa13da2e666c63d3
It seems odd to return `EXIT_SUCCESS` when the node aborted
execution due a fatal internal error or any post-init problem
that triggers an unrequested shutdown.
e.g. blocks or coins db I/O errors, disconnect block failure,
failure during thread import (external blocks loading process
error), among others.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Ofsky <ryan@ofsky.org>
67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c [mempool] clear mapDeltas entry if prioritisetransaction sets delta to 0 (glozow)
c1061acb9d502cdf8c6996c818d9a8a281cbe40c [functional test] prioritisation is not removed during replacement and expiry (glozow)
0e5874f0b06114d9b077e0ff582915e4f83059e6 [functional test] getprioritisedtransactions RPC (glozow)
99f8046829f699ff2eace266aa8cea1d9f7cb65a [rpc] add getprioritisedtransactions (glozow)
9e9ca36c80013749faaf2aa777d52bd07d9d24ec [mempool] add GetPrioritisedTransactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
Add an RPC to get prioritised transactions (also tells you whether the tx is in mempool or not), helping users clean up `mapDeltas` manually. When `CTxMemPool::PrioritiseTransaction` sets a delta to 0, remove the entry from `mapDeltas`.
Motivation / Background
- `mapDeltas` entries are never removed from mapDeltas except when the tx is mined in a block or conflicted.
- Mostly it is a feature to allow `prioritisetransaction` for a tx that isn't in the mempool {yet, anymore}. A user can may resbumit a tx and it retains its priority, or mark a tx as "definitely accept" before it is seen.
- Since #8448, `mapDeltas` is persisted to mempool.dat and loaded on restart. This is also good, otherwise we lose prioritisation on restart.
- Note the removal due to block/conflict is only done when `removeForBlock` is called, i.e. when the block is received. If you load a mempool.dat containing `mapDeltas` with transactions that were mined already (e.g. the file was saved prior to the last few blocks), you don't delete them.
- Related: #4818 and #6464.
- There is no way to query the node for not-in-mempool `mapDeltas`. If you add a priority and forget what the value was, the only way to get that information is to inspect mempool.dat.
- Calling `prioritisetransaction` with an inverse value does not remove it from `mapDeltas`, it just sets the value to 0. It disappears on a restart (`LoadMempool` checks if delta is 0), but that might not happen for a while.
Added together, if a user calls `prioritisetransaction` very regularly and not all those transactions get mined/conflicted, `mapDeltas` might keep lots of entries of delta=0 around. A user should clean up the not-in-mempool prioritisations, but that's currently difficult without keeping track of what those txids/amounts are.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c
theStack:
Code-review ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c
instagibbs:
code review ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c
ajtowns:
ACK 67b7fecacd0489809690982c89ba2d0acdca938c code review only, some nits
Tree-SHA512: 9df48b622ef27f33db1a2748f682bb3f16abe8172fcb7ac3c1a3e1654121ffb9b31aeaad5570c4162261f7e2ff5b5912ddc61a1b8beac0e9f346a86f5952260a
The functional test feature_taproot.py fails in some rare cases on the
execution of the `"branched_codesep"` spending script. The problem
occurs if the first data-push (having random content with a random
length in the range [0, 510]) has a length of 1 and the single byte has
value of [1...16] or [-1]; in this case, the data-push is not minimally
encoded by test framework's CScript class (i.e. doesn't use the special
op-codes OP_1...OP_16 or OP_1NEGATE) and the script interpreter throws
an SCRIPT_ERR_MINIMALDATA error:
```
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Data push larger than necessary) (-26)
```
Background:
The functional test framework's CScript class translates passed
bytes/bytearrays always to data pushes using OP_PUSHx/OP_PUSHDATA{1,2,4}
op-codes. E.g. the expression `CScript(bytes([1]))` yields
`bytes([OP_PUSH1, 1])` instead of the minimal-encoded `bytes([OP_1])`.
Fix this by adapting the random-size range to [2,...], i.e. never pass
byte-arrays below length two to be pushed.
Closes#27595.
a7b46a1feae60e38fe4bdcacf5034f44cae49222 test: added coverage to mining_basic.py (kevkevin)
Pull request description:
Included a test that checks if we call submitblock with block.vtx.empty() then it throws an rpc deserialization error, currently we only test if !block.vtx->IsCoinBase() throws an rpc deserialization error
I've tested to make sure this actually doing what I intended by breaking up this if block into two if blocks with different error messages and running the functional test
322ec63b01/src/rpc/mining.cpp (L963)
This change should increase the test coverage for the `submitblock()` rpc in `./src/rpc/mining.cpp`
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK a7b46a1feae60e38fe4bdcacf5034f44cae49222
Tree-SHA512: 4078cb1fa879cc9e34438319f73085b521b90a5a95348b23e494cf8e5ac792ec426bc0e1a63e949645e16afebe54c5f35a194f02e20b7273871163d89a5c44e6
2cd28e9fef5dd743bcd70025196ee311fcfdcae4 rpc: Add check for unintended option/parameter name clashes (Ryan Ofsky)
95d7de0964620a3f7386a4adc5707559868abf84 test: Update python tests to use named parameters instead of options objects (Ryan Ofsky)
96233146dd31c1d99fd1619be4449944623ef750 RPC: Allow RPC methods accepting options to take named parameters (Ryan Ofsky)
702b56d2a8ce48bc3b66a2867d09fa11dcf12fc5 RPC: Add add OBJ_NAMED_PARAMS type (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Allow RPC methods which take an `options` parameter (`importmulti`, `listunspent`, `fundrawtransaction`, `bumpfee`, `send`, `sendall`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `simulaterawtransaction`), to accept the options as named parameters, without the need for nested JSON objects.
This makes it possible to make calls like:
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid fee_rate=10
```
instead of
```sh
src/bitcoin-cli -named bumpfee txid options='{"fee_rate": 10}'
```
RPC help is also updated to show options as top level named arguments instead of as nested objects.
<details><summary>diff</summary>
<p>
```diff
@@ -15,16 +15,17 @@
Arguments:
1. txid (string, required) The txid to be bumped
-2. options (json object, optional)
+2. options (json object, optional) Options object that can be used to pass named arguments, listed below.
+
+Named Arguments:
- {
- "conf_target": n, (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
+conf_target (numeric, optional, default=wallet -txconfirmtarget) Confirmation target in blocks
- "fee_rate": amount, (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
+fee_rate (numeric or string, optional, default=not set, fall back to wallet fee estimation)
Specify a fee rate in sat/vB instead of relying on the built-in fee estimator.
Must be at least 1.000 sat/vB higher than the current transaction fee rate.
WARNING: before version 0.21, fee_rate was in BTC/kvB. As of 0.21, fee_rate is in sat/vB.
- "replaceable": bool, (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
+replaceable (boolean, optional, default=true) Whether the new transaction should still be
marked bip-125 replaceable. If true, the sequence numbers in the transaction will
be left unchanged from the original. If false, any input sequence numbers in the
original transaction that were less than 0xfffffffe will be increased to 0xfffffffe
@@ -32,11 +33,10 @@
still be replaceable in practice, for example if it has unconfirmed ancestors which
are replaceable).
- "estimate_mode": "str", (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
+estimate_mode (string, optional, default="unset") The fee estimate mode, must be one of (case insensitive):
"unset"
"economical"
"conservative"
- }
Result:
{ (json object)
```
</p>
</details>
**Review suggestion:** To understand this PR, it is probably easiest to review the commits in reverse order because the last commit shows the external API changes, the middle commit shows the internal API changes, and the first commit contains the low-level implementation.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 2cd28e9fef5dd743bcd70025196ee311fcfdcae4
Tree-SHA512: 50f6e78fa622826dab3f810400d8c1a03a98a090b1f2fea79729c58ad8cff955554bd44c2a5975f62a526b900dda68981862fd7d7d05c17f94f5b5d847317436
This fixes an intermittent error, caused by blocks arriving
out of order due to how compact block relay may revert to headers
processing when the tip hasn't caught up, and resulting in slightly
different pruning behavior.
Making sure that all blocks from the previous tests are synced before
generating more blocks makes this impossible.
See Issue #27749 for more details.
015cc5e588fa25f65f6ea2ed03701def8dfd5444 lint: stop ignoring LIEF imports (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Type stubs are now available as of 0.13.0.
See https://github.com/lief-project/LIEF/issues/650.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK 015cc5e588fa25f65f6ea2ed03701def8dfd5444
Tree-SHA512: ebb754f293c2a61a0ef64c3552f7c700ceb3054b50fd3f1573e4a9e87773ddeba47bd9875f6ab055043012dbc20aeb71e4d76cd3da535c76651dfb1fbfc66e89
fa6b11a55663e70369bfbbba5fccc55b33f2b310 test: Throw error when -signetchallenge is non-hex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of silently parsing non-hex to an empty challenge, throw an error.
Also, add missing includes while touching the file.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [fa6b11a](fa6b11a556)
kallewoof:
ACK fa6b11a
TheCharlatan:
Nice, ACK fa6b11a55663e70369bfbbba5fccc55b33f2b310
Tree-SHA512: 018ebbbf819ba7cdf0c6dd294fdfaa5ddb81b87058a8b9c57b96066d5b07e1656fd78f18e3cef375aebefa191fa515c2c70bc764880fa05f98f526334431a616
89df7987c2f1eea42454c2b0efc31a924fbfd3a8 Add wallets_conflicts (Antoine Riard)
dced203162d45e542f187f8d0d07dab85c52cf28 wallet, tests: mark unconflicted txs as inactive (ishaanam)
096487c4dcfadebe5ca959927f5426cae1c304d5 wallet: introduce generic recursive tx state updating function (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This implements a fix for #7315. Previously when a block was disconnected any transactions that were conflicting with transactions mined in that block were not updated to be marked as inactive. The fix implemented here is described on the [Bitcoin DevWiki](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki/Wallet-Transaction-Conflict-Tracking#idea-refresh-conflicted). A test which tested the previous behavior has also been updated.
Second attempt at #17543
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 89df7987c2f1eea42454c2b0efc31a924fbfd3a8
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 89df7987c2f1eea42454c2b0efc31a924fbfd3a8.
glozow:
ACK 89df7987c2f1eea42454c2b0efc31a924fbfd3a8
furszy:
Tested ACK 89df7987
Tree-SHA512: 3133b151477e8818302fac29e96de30cd64c09a8fe3a7612074a34ba1a332e69148162e6cb3f1074d9d9c9bab5ef9996967d325d8c4c99ba42b5fe3b66a60546
ffffe622e9cbf926326135bb23958380dcf09df1 test: Move test_chain_listunspent wallet check from mempool_packages to wallet_basic (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes a bug.
On master:
```
$ ./test/functional/mempool_packages.py --legacy-wallet
File "./test/functional/mempool_packages.py", line 52, in run_test
self.nodes[0].importaddress(self.wallet.get_address())
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: Bech32m addresses cannot be imported into legacy wallets (-5)
```
On this pull, all tests pass.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK ffffe622e9cbf926326135bb23958380dcf09df1, thanks for changing! Nice to remove wallet from another non-wallet test.
Tree-SHA512: 842c3b7c2e90285a155b8ed9924ef0c99f7773892be4f1847e5d7ece79c914ea5acee0d71de2ce46c354ee95fb74a03c20c0afb5e49c0b8e1c0ce406df963650
eefe56967b4eb4b5144325cde4f40fc1cbde3e65 bugfix: Fix incorrect debug.log config file path (Ryan Ofsky)
3746f00be1b732a04976fc70cbb0661f97bbbd99 init: Error if ignored bitcoin.conf file is found (Ryan Ofsky)
398c3719b02197ad92fded20f6ff83b364747297 lint: Fix lint-format-strings false positives when format specifiers have argument positions (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Show an error on startup if a bitcoin datadir that is being used contains a `bitcoin.conf` file that is ignored. There are two cases where this could happen:
- One case reported in [#27246 (comment)](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27246#issuecomment-1470006043) happens when a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default datadir (e.g. `$HOME/.bitcoin/bitcoin.conf`) has a `datadir=/path` line that sets different datadir containing a second `bitcoin.conf` file. Currently the second `bitcoin.conf` file is ignored with no warning.
- Another way this could happen is if a `-conf=` command line argument points to a configuration file with a `datadir=/path` line and that path contains a `bitcoin.conf` file, which is currently ignored.
This change only adds an error message and doesn't change anything about way settings are applied. It also doesn't trigger errors if there are redundant `-datadir` or `-conf` settings pointing at the same configuration file, only if they are pointing at different files and one file is being ignored.
ACKs for top commit:
pinheadmz:
re-ACK eefe56967b4eb4b5144325cde4f40fc1cbde3e65
willcl-ark:
re-ACK eefe56967b
TheCharlatan:
ACK eefe56967b4eb4b5144325cde4f40fc1cbde3e65
Tree-SHA512: 939a98a4b271b5263d64a2df3054c56fcde94784edf6f010d78693a371c38aa03138ae9cebb026b6164bbd898d8fd0845a61a454fd996e328fd7bcf51c580c2b
eeee55f9288740747b6e8d806ce8177fd92635cf rpc: Fix invalid bech32 handling (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the handling of invalid bech32(m) addresses over RPC has many issues:
* No error for invalid addresses is reported, leading to internal bugs via `CHECK_NONFATAL`, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27723
* The error messages use "data size" (the meaning of which is unclear to the user, because the witness program data and bech32 section data are related but different) when they mean "program size"
Fix all issues. Also, use the BIP 173 and BIP 350 test vectors.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK eeee55f9288740747b6e8d806ce8177fd92635cf
brunoerg:
crACK eeee55f9288740747b6e8d806ce8177fd92635cf
Tree-SHA512: c8639ee49e2a54b740b72d66bc4a40352dd553a6e3220dea9f94e48e33124f21f597a2817cb405d0a4c88d21df1013c0a4877a01370a2d326aa2cff1f9c381a8
d7f359b35e8b1e9acc4d397de262cd9ba9bbcb83 Add tests for parallel compact block downloads (Greg Sanders)
03423f8bd12b95a06a4a9d8377e781625dd38aae Support up to 3 parallel compact block txn fetchings (Greg Sanders)
13f9b20b4cb2f3f26e81184a77e9cf1f626d4f57 Only request full blocks from the peer we thought had the block in-flight (Greg Sanders)
cce96182ba2457335868c65dc16b081c3dee32ee Convert mapBlocksInFlight to a multimap (Greg Sanders)
a90595478dcf4e443cd15bbb822d485dc42bdb18 Remove nBlocksInFlight (Greg Sanders)
86cff8bf18f2c6344a25ad8b81cf366201a73c36 alias BlockDownloadMap for mapBlocksInFlight (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
This is an attempt at mitigating https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25258 , which is a revival of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10984, which is a revival of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9447.
This PR attempts to mitigate a single case, where high bandwidth peers can bail us out of a flakey
peer not completing blocks for us. We allow up to 2 additional getblocktxns requests per unique block.
This would hopefully allow the chance for an honest high bandwidth peer to hand us the transactions
even if the first in flight peer stalls out.
In contrast to previous effort:
1) it will not help if subsequent peers send block headers only, so only high-bandwidth peers this time. See: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10984/files#diff-6875de769e90cec84d2e8a9c1b962cdbcda44d870d42e4215827e599e11e90e3R1411
2) `MAX_GETBLOCKTXN_TXN_AFTER_FIRST_IN_FLIGHT` is removed, in favor of aiding recovery during turbulent mempools
3) We require one of the 3 block fetching slots to be an outbound peer. This can be the original offering peer, or subsequent compact blocks given by high bandwidth peers.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK d7f359b35e8b1e9acc4d397de262cd9ba9bbcb83
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK d7f359b35e8b1e9acc4d397de262cd9ba9bbcb83
Tree-SHA512: 54980eac179e30f12a0bd49df147b2c3d63cd8f9401abb23c7baf02f76eeb59f2cfaaa155227990d0d39384de9fa38663f88774e891600a3837ae927f04f0db3
272eb5561667482f8226bcf98eea00689dccefb8 test: fix `include_immature_coinbase` logic in `get_utxos` (brunoerg)
a951c34f179dad0c7059b04a7f1e6b0804462168 test: fix `interface_usdt_mempool` by mining a block after each test (brunoerg)
1557bf1196bc2bdf00fd32f3b5d525796b4d194c test: fix mature utxos addition to wallet in `mempool_package_limits` (brunoerg)
60ced9007d518d542ce489b91076f9bbaf3312e3 test: fix intermittent issue in `feature_bip68_sequence` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
Fixes#27129
To avoid `bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase` error,
when getting a utxo (using `get_utxo`) to create a new
transaction `get_utxo` shouldn't return (if possible)
by default immature coinbase.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 272eb5561667482f8226bcf98eea00689dccefb8
pinheadmz:
re-ACK 272eb5561667482f8226bcf98eea00689dccefb8
Tree-SHA512: eae821c7833bf084d8b907c94876ed010a7925d2177c3013a0c61b69d9571df006da83397a19487d93b0d1fa415951152f0b8ad0de2a55d86c39f6917934f050
4f2f615d1362afe92cabe9eab50087f8bfe454fd test: Make `util/test_runner.py` honor `BITCOINUTIL` and `BITCOINTX` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is a continuation of changes to our testing frameworks (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27554, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27561) that allow them to work correctly in a multi-config build environment that is possible for [upcoming](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25797) CMake-based build system. That means that built for different configurations binaries (e.g., "Debug" and "Release") can coexist in separated directories.
The commit has been pulled from https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/15 and it seems [useful](https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin/pull/15#discussion_r1200251404) by itself as:
> I believe the rationale for allowing to drop in the executables via env var is to allow to test the guix-produced, or other third-party-produced executables...
The current implementation of the `test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py` script uses the same approach: 09351f51d2/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py (L231-L246)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK 4f2f615d1362afe92cabe9eab50087f8bfe454fd
TheCharlatan:
ACK 4f2f615d1362afe92cabe9eab50087f8bfe454fd
stickies-v:
ACK 4f2f615d1362afe92cabe9eab50087f8bfe454fd
Tree-SHA512: 99ee9a727b266700649d8f2ec528dfaeb04a1e48f0cb1d4eeaece65917165be647c10c4548429a9e8b30d094597f67e860c1db03ac689ebb409b223ce1b63aa9
1bce12acd3e271a7c88d9400b4e3a5645bc8a911 test: add test for `descriptorprocesspsbt` RPC (ishaanam)
fb2a3a70e860aa87fb7a21f6554ed9f3ce901e2d rpc: add descriptorprocesspsbt rpc (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This PR implements an RPC called `descriptorprocesspsbt`. This RPC is based off of `walletprocesspsbt`, but instead of interacting with the wallet to update, sign and finalize a psbt, it instead accepts an array of output descriptors and uses that information along with information from the mempool, txindex, and the utxo set to do so. `utxoupdatepsbt` also updates a psbt in this manner, but doesn't sign or finalize it. Because of this overlap, a helper function that is added in this PR is called by both `utxoupdatepsbt` and `descriptorprocesspsbt`. Whether or not the helper function signs a psbt is dictated by if the HidingSigningProvider passed to it contains any private information. There is also a test added in this PR for this new RPC that uses p2wsh, p2wpkh, and legacy outputs.
Edit: see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25796#issuecomment-1228830963
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK 1bce12acd3e271a7c88d9400b4e3a5645bc8a911
instagibbs:
reACK 1bce12acd3
Tree-SHA512: e1d0334739943e71f2ee68b4db7637ebe725da62e7aa4be071f71c7196d2a5970a31ece96d91e372d34454cde8509e95ab0eebd2c8edb94f7d5a781a84f8fc5d
To avoid `bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase` error,
when getting a utxo (using `get_utxo`) to create a new
transaction `get_utxo` shouldn't return by default
immature coinbase.
fa4c16b186a34f4172deda617166813c8cb92c59 test: Add test to check tx in the last block can be downloaded (MarcoFalke)
fadc8490ab4fdd91aaf446e08108657b304a3ded test: Split up test_notfound_on_unannounced_tx test case (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
If a peer received an `inv` about a transaction, which was included in a block before receiving the corresponding `getdata`, it can be beneficial to send this transaction to the peer to aid compact block relay.
Add a test for this to avoid breaking it in the future.
ACKs for top commit:
sdaftuar:
ACK fa4c16b186a34f4172deda617166813c8cb92c59
instagibbs:
ACK fa4c16b186a34f4172deda617166813c8cb92c59
Tree-SHA512: 1ec16dcc216dd29c849928e753158d45c409612e9ac528db16e5af465bb5b69cd42241ac6f67e5a4583b8e558eeba49fa0a0889a4247b3fb0053b2758eec9490
faf4315c88d8c81c2ff84870bc81aef3cf719816 test: Return dict in MiniWallet::send_to (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Returning a tuple has many issues:
* If only one value is needed, it can not be indexed by name
* If another value is added to the return value, all call sites need to be updated
Bite the bullet now and update all call sites to fix the above issues.
ACKs for top commit:
brunoerg:
crACK faf4315c88d8c81c2ff84870bc81aef3cf719816
theStack:
Code-review ACK faf4315c88d8c81c2ff84870bc81aef3cf719816
stickies-v:
Code review ACK faf4315c88d8c81c2ff84870bc81aef3cf719816
Tree-SHA512: 8ce1aca237df21f04b3990d0e5fcb49cc408fe6404399d3769a64eae1b5218941157d9785fce1bd9e45140cf70e06c3aa42646ee8f7b57855beb784fc3ef0261
This is achieved by letting the index sync thread wait until
reindex-chainstate is finished.
This also disables the pruning check when reindexing the chainstate (which is
incompatible with prune mode) because there would be no chain at this point
in init.
The index sync code has logic to go back the chain to the forking point, while
also updating index-specific state, which is necessary to prevent
possible corruption of the coinstatsindex.
Also add a test for this (a reorg happens while the index is deactivated)
that would not pass before this change.
Test the case of a tx being conflicted by multiple
txs with different depths. The conflicted tx is also spent by
a child tx for which confirmation status is tied to the parent's.
After a reorg of conflicting txs, the conflicted status should be
undone properly.
Co-authored-by: furszy <mfurszy@protonmail.com>
In `blockDisconnected`, for each transaction in the block, look
for any wallet transactions spending the same inputs. If any of
these transactions were marked conflicted, they are now marked as
inactive.
Co-authored-by: ariard <antoine.riard@gmail.com>
