589db872e1validation: don't erase coins cache on prune flushes (Andrew Toth)0e8918755fAdd linked-list test to CCoinsViewCache::SanityCheck (Pieter Wuille)05cf4e1875coins: move Sync logic to CoinsViewCacheCursor (Andrew Toth)7825b8b9aecoins: pass linked list of flagged entries to BatchWrite (Andrew Toth)a14edada8atest: add cache entry linked list tests (Andrew Toth)24ce37cb86coins: track flagged cache entries in linked list (Andrew Toth)58b7ed156dcoins: call ClearFlags in CCoinsCacheEntry destructor (Andrew Toth)8bd3959fearefactor: require self and sentinel parameters for AddFlags (Andrew Toth)75f36d241drefactor: add CoinsCachePair alias (Andrew Toth)f08faeade2refactor: move flags to private uint8_t and rename to m_flags (Andrew Toth)4e4fb4cbabrefactor: disallow setting flags in CCoinsCacheEntry constructors (Andrew Toth)8737c0cefarefactor: encapsulate flags setting with AddFlags and ClearFlags (Andrew Toth)9715d3bf1erefactor: encapsulate flags get access for all other checks (Andrew Toth)df34a94e57refactor: encapsulate flags access for dirty and fresh checks (Andrew Toth) Pull request description: Since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17487 we no longer need to clear the coins cache when syncing to disk. A warm coins cache significantly speeds up block connection, and only needs to be fully flushed when nearing the `dbcache` limit. For frequent pruning flushes there's no need to empty the cache and kill connect block speed. However, simply using `Sync` in place of `Flush` actually slows down a pruned full IBD with a high `dbcache` value. This is because as the cache grows, sync takes longer since every coin in the cache is scanned to check if it's dirty. For frequent prune flushes and a large cache this constant scanning starts to really slow IBD down, and just emptying the cache on every prune becomes faster. To fix this, we can add two pointers to each cache entry and construct a doubly linked list of dirty entries. We can then only iterate through all dirty entries on each `Sync`, and simply clear the pointers after. With this approach a full IBD with `dbcache=16384` and `prune=550` was 32% faster than master. For default `dbcache=450` speedup was ~9%. All benchmarks were run with `stopatheight=800000`. | | prune | dbcache | time | max RSS | speedup | |-----------:|----------:|------------:|--------:|-------------:|--------------:| | master | 550 | 16384 | 8:52:57 | 2,417,464k | - | | branch | 550 | 16384 | 6:01:00 | 16,216,736k | 32% | | branch | 550 | 450 | 8:05:08 | 2,818,072k | 8.8% | | master | 10000 | 5000 | 8:19:59 | 2,962,752k | - | | branch | 10000 | 5000| 5:56:39 | 6,179,764k | 28.8% | | master | 0 | 16384 | 4:51:53 | 14,726,408k | - | | branch | 0 | 16384 | 4:43:11 | 16,526,348k | 2.7% | | master | 0 | 450 | 7:08:07 | 3,005,892k | - | | branch | 0 | 450 | 6:57:24 | 3,013,556k |2.6%| While the 2 pointers add memory to each cache entry, it did not slow down IBD. For non-pruned IBD results were similar for this branch and master. When I performed the initial IBD, the full UTXO set could be held in memory when using the max `dbcache` value. For non-pruned IBD with max `dbcache` to tip ended up using 12% more memory, but it was also 2.7% faster somehow. For smaller `dbcache` values the `dbcache` limit is respected so does not consume more memory, and the potentially more frequent flushes were not significant enough to cause any slowdown. For reviewers, the commits in order do the following: First 4 commits encapsulate all accesses to `flags` on cache entries, and then the 5th makes `flags` private. Commits `refactor: add CoinsCachePair alias` to `coins: call ClearFlags in CCoinsCacheEntry destructor` create the linked list head nodes and cache entry self references and pass them into `AddFlags`. Commit `coins: track flagged cache entries in linked list` actually adds the entries into a linked list when they are flagged DIRTY or FRESH and removes them from the linked list when they are destroyed or the flags are cleared manually. However, the linked list is not yet used anywhere. Commit `test: add cache entry linked list tests` adds unit tests for the linked list. Commit `coins: pass linked list of flagged entries to BatchWrite` uses the linked list to iterate through DIRTY entries instead of using the entire coins cache. Commit `validation: don't erase coins cache on prune flushes` uses `Sync` instead of `Flush` for pruning flushes, so the cache is no longer cleared. Inspired by [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15265#issuecomment-457720636). Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11315. ACKs for top commit: paplorinc: ACK589db872e1sipa: reACK589db872e1achow101: ACK589db872e1mzumsande: re-ACK589db872e1Tree-SHA512: 23b2bc01c83edacb5b39aa60bb0b766de9a74ce17f0c59bf13b97b4328a7b758ad9aff6581c3ca88e2973f7658380651530d497444f48d6e22ea0bfc51cc921d
Unit tests
The sources in this directory are unit test cases. Boost includes a unit testing framework, and since Bitcoin Core already uses Boost, it makes sense to simply use this framework rather than require developers to configure some other framework (we want as few impediments to creating unit tests as possible).
The build system is set up to compile an executable called test_bitcoin
that runs all of the unit tests. The main source file for the test library is found in
util/setup_common.cpp.
Compiling/running unit tests
Unit tests will be automatically compiled if dependencies were met in ./configure
and tests weren't explicitly disabled.
After configuring, they can be run with make check, which includes unit tests from
subtrees, or make && make -C src check-unit for just the unit tests.
To run the unit tests manually, launch src/test/test_bitcoin. To recompile
after a test file was modified, run make and then run the test again. If you
modify a non-test file, use make -C src/test to recompile only what's needed
to run the unit tests.
To add more unit tests, add BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE functions to the existing
.cpp files in the test/ directory or add new .cpp files that
implement new BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE sections.
To run the GUI unit tests manually, launch src/qt/test/test_bitcoin-qt
To add more GUI unit tests, add them to the src/qt/test/ directory and
the src/qt/test/test_main.cpp file.
Running individual tests
test_bitcoin accepts the command line arguments from the boost framework.
For example, to run just the getarg_tests suite of tests:
test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests
log_level controls the verbosity of the test framework, which logs when a
test case is entered, for example.
test_bitcoin also accepts some of the command line arguments accepted by
bitcoind. Use -- to separate these sets of arguments:
test_bitcoin --log_level=all --run_test=getarg_tests -- -printtoconsole=1
The -printtoconsole=1 after the two dashes sends debug logging, which
normally goes only to debug.log within the data directory, also to the
standard terminal output.
... or to run just the doubledash test:
test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash
test_bitcoin creates a temporary working (data) directory with a randomly
generated pathname within test_common_Bitcoin Core/, which in turn is within
the system's temporary directory (see
temp_directory_path).
This data directory looks like a simplified form of the standard bitcoind data
directory. Its content will vary depending on the test, but it will always
have a debug.log file, for example.
The location of the temporary data directory can be specified with the
-testdatadir option. This can make debugging easier. The directory
path used is the argument path appended with
/test_common_Bitcoin Core/<test-name>/datadir.
The directory path is created if necessary.
Specifying this argument also causes the data directory
not to be removed after the last test. This is useful for looking at
what the test wrote to debug.log after it completes, for example.
(The directory is removed at the start of the next test run,
so no leftover state is used.)
$ test_bitcoin --run_test=getarg_tests/doubledash -- -testdatadir=/somewhere/mydatadir
Test directory (will not be deleted): "/somewhere/mydatadir/test_common_Bitcoin Core/getarg_tests/doubledash/datadir
Running 1 test case...
*** No errors detected
$ ls -l '/somewhere/mydatadir/test_common_Bitcoin Core/getarg_tests/doubledash/datadir'
total 8
drwxrwxr-x 2 admin admin 4096 Nov 27 22:45 blocks
-rw-rw-r-- 1 admin admin 1003 Nov 27 22:45 debug.log
If you run an entire test suite, such as --run_test=getarg_tests, or all the test suites
(by not specifying --run_test), a separate directory
will be created for each individual test.
Run test_bitcoin --help for the full list of tests.
Adding test cases
To add a new unit test file to our test suite you need
to add the file to src/Makefile.test.include. The pattern is to create
one test file for each class or source file for which you want to create
unit tests. The file naming convention is <source_filename>_tests.cpp
and such files should wrap their tests in a test suite
called <source_filename>_tests. For an example of this pattern,
see uint256_tests.cpp.
Logging and debugging in unit tests
make check will write to a log file foo_tests.cpp.log and display this file
on failure. For running individual tests verbosely, refer to the section
above.
To write to logs from unit tests you need to use specific message methods
provided by Boost. The simplest is BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE.
For debugging you can launch the test_bitcoin executable with gdb or lldb and
start debugging, just like you would with any other program:
gdb src/test/test_bitcoin
Segmentation faults
If you hit a segmentation fault during a test run, you can diagnose where the fault
is happening by running gdb ./src/test/test_bitcoin and then using the bt command
within gdb.
Another tool that can be used to resolve segmentation faults is valgrind.
If for whatever reason you want to produce a core dump file for this fault, you can do
that as well. By default, the boost test runner will intercept system errors and not
produce a core file. To bypass this, add --catch_system_errors=no to the
test_bitcoin arguments and ensure that your ulimits are set properly (e.g. ulimit -c unlimited).
Running the tests and hitting a segmentation fault should now produce a file called core
(on Linux platforms, the file name will likely depend on the contents of
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern).
You can then explore the core dump using
gdb src/test/test_bitcoin core
(gbd) bt # produce a backtrace for where a segfault occurred