mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-07-13 04:47:02 +02:00
4b1fb50def
f685a13befdoc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)abc57e1f08refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: ~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now). In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background. Relevant IRC log: ``` 17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it. 17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1 17:53 <stickies-v> agreed! 17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya 17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex 17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :) 17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex) 17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp) 17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things. 17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background 17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now ``` The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: Code review ACKf685a13befrajarshimaitra: tACKf685a13befmjdietzx: crACKf685a13befLarryRuane: Code review, test ACKf685a13befTree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
This folder contains lint scripts.
check-doc.py
Check for missing documentation of command line options.
commit-script-check.sh
Verification of scripted diffs. Scripted diffs are only assumed to run on the latest LTS release of Ubuntu. Running them on other operating systems might require installing GNU tools, such as GNU sed.
git-subtree-check.sh
Run this script from the root of the repository to verify that a subtree matches the contents of the commit it claims to have been updated to.
Usage: test/lint/git-subtree-check.sh [-r] DIR [COMMIT]
test/lint/git-subtree-check.sh -?
DIRis the prefix within the repository to check.COMMITis the commit to check, if it is not provided, HEAD will be used.-rchecks that subtree commit is present in repository.
To do a full check with -r, make sure that you have fetched the upstream repository branch in which the subtree is
maintained:
- for
src/secp256k1: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1.git (branch master) - for
src/leveldb: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/leveldb.git (branch bitcoin-fork) - for
src/univalue: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/univalue.git (branch master) - for
src/crypto/ctaes: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/ctaes.git (branch master) - for
src/crc32c: https://github.com/google/crc32c.git (branch master)
To do so, add the upstream repository as remote:
git remote add --fetch secp256k1 https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1.git
lint-all.sh
Calls other scripts with the lint- prefix.