Files
bitcoin/src/test/fuzz
merge-script 7e08445449 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#33399: key: use static context for libsecp256k1 calls where applicable
1ff9e92948 key: use static context for libsecp256k1 calls where applicable (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  The dynamically created [signing context](2d6a0c4649/src/key.cpp (L19)) for libsecp256k1 calls is only needed for functions that involve generator point multiplication with a secret key, i.e. different variants of public key creation and signing. The API docs hint to those by stating "[(not secp256k1_context_static)](b475654302/include/secp256k1.h (L645))" for the context parameter. In our case that applies to the following calls:
  - `secp256k1_ec_pubkey_create`
  - `secp256k1_keypair_create`
  - `secp256k1_ellswift_create`
  - `secp256k1_ecdsa_sign`
  - `secp256k1_ecdsa_sign_recoverable`
  - `secp256k1_schnorrsig_sign32`
  - `ec_seckey_export_der` (not a direct secp256k1 function, but calls `secp256k1_ec_pubkey_create` inside)

  For all the other secp256k1 calls we can simply use the static context. This is done for consistency to other calls that already use `secp256k1_context_static`, and also to reduce dependencies on the global signing context variable. Looked closer at this in the course of reviewing #29675, where some functions used the signing context that didn't need to, avoiding a move to another module (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29675#discussion_r2333831377).

ACKs for top commit:
  Eunovo:
    ACK 1ff9e92948
  furszy:
    ACK 1ff9e92948
  rkrux:
    crACK 1ff9e92948

Tree-SHA512: f091efa56c358057828f3455d4ca9ce40ec0d35f3e38ab147fe3928bb5dbf7ffbc27dbf97b71937828ab95ea4e9be5f96d89a2d29e2aa18df4542aae1b33e258
2025-09-26 11:44:29 -04:00
..
2025-07-30 09:24:11 -03:00
2023-12-06 15:44:38 +01:00
2025-07-09 14:28:23 +02:00
2024-06-12 15:21:31 +02:00
2025-05-30 10:12:38 -04:00
2025-06-03 08:09:28 +01:00
2025-09-08 11:18:51 +02:00
2023-11-30 11:28:19 +01:00
2023-11-30 11:28:19 +01:00
2025-08-07 09:01:56 +01:00