5736d1ddactracing: pass if replaced by tx/pkg to tracepoint (0xb10c)a4ec07f194doc: add comments for CTxMemPool::ChangeSet (Suhas Daftuar)83f814b1d1Remove m_all_conflicts from SubPackageState (Suhas Daftuar)d3c8e7dfb6Ensure that we don't add duplicate transactions in rbf fuzz tests (Suhas Daftuar)d7dc9fd2f7Move CalculateChunksForRBF() to the mempool changeset (Suhas Daftuar)284a1d33f1Move prioritisation into changeset (Suhas Daftuar)446b08b599Don't distinguish between direct conflicts and all conflicts when doing cluster-size-2-rbf checks (Suhas Daftuar)b53041021aDuplicate transactions are not permitted within a changeset (Suhas Daftuar)b447416fddPublic mempool removal methods Assume() no changeset is outstanding (Suhas Daftuar)2b30f4d36cMake RemoveStaged() private (Suhas Daftuar)18829194caEnforce that there is only one changeset at a time (Suhas Daftuar)7fb62f7db6Apply mempool changeset transactions directly into the mempool (Suhas Daftuar)34b6c5833dClean up FinalizeSubpackage to avoid workspace-specific information (Suhas Daftuar)57983b8addMove LimitMempoolSize to take place outside FinalizeSubpackage (Suhas Daftuar)01e145b975Move changeset from workspace to subpackage (Suhas Daftuar)802214c083Introduce mempool changesets (Suhas Daftuar)87d92fa340test: Add unit test coverage of package rbf + prioritisetransaction (Suhas Daftuar)15d982f91eAdd package hash to package-rbf log message (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: part of cluster mempool: #30289 It became clear while working on cluster mempool that it would be helpful for transaction validation if we could consider a full set of proposed changes to the mempool -- consisting of a set of transactions to add, and a set of transactions (ie conflicts) to simultaneously remove -- and perform calculations on what the mempool would look like if the proposed changes were to be applied. Two specific examples of where we'd like to do this: - Determining if ancestor/descendant/TRUC limits would be violated (in the future, cluster limits) if either a single transaction or a package of transactions were to be accepted - Determining if an RBF would make the mempool "better", however that idea is defined, both in the single transaction and package of transaction cases In preparation for cluster mempool, I have pulled this reworking of the mempool interface out of #28676 so it can be reviewed on its own. I have not re-implemented ancestor/descendant limits to be run through the changeset, since with cluster mempool those limits will be going away, so this seems like wasted effort. However, I have rebased #28676 on top of this branch so reviewers can see what the new mempool interface could look like in the cluster mempool setting. There are some minor behavior changes here, which I believe are inconsequential: - In the package validation setting, transactions would be added to the mempool before the `ConsensusScriptChecks()` are run. In theory, `ConsensusScriptChecks()` should always pass if the `PolicyScriptChecks()` have passed and it's just a belt-and-suspenders for us, but if somehow they were to diverge then there could be some small behavior change from adding transactions and then removing them, versus never adding them at all. - The error reporting on `CheckConflictTopology()` has slightly changed due to no longer distinguishing between direct conflicts and indirect conflicts. I believe this should be entirely inconsequential because there shouldn't be a logical difference between those two ideas from the perspective of this function, but I did have to update some error strings in some tests. - Because, in a package setting, RBFs now happen as part of the entire package being accepted, the logging has changed slightly because we do not know which transaction specifically evicted a given removed transaction. - Specifically, the "package hash" is now used to reference the set of transactions that are being accepted, rather than any single txid. The log message relating to package RBF that happen in the `TXPACKAGES` category has been updated as well to include the package hash, so that it's possible to see which specific set of transactions are being referenced by that package hash. - Relatedly, the tracepoint logging in the package rbf case has been updated as well to reference the package hash, rather than a transaction hash. ACKs for top commit: naumenkogs: ACK5736d1ddacinstagibbs: ACK5736d1ddacismaelsadeeq: reACK5736d1ddacglozow: ACK5736d1ddacTree-SHA512: 21810872e082920d337c89ac406085aa71c5f8e5151ab07aedf41e6601f60a909b22fbf462ef3b735d5d5881e9b76142c53957158e674dd5dfe6f6aabbdf630b
This directory contains integration tests that test bitcoind and its utilities in their entirety. It does not contain unit tests, which can be found in /src/test, /src/wallet/test, etc.
This directory contains the following sets of tests:
- fuzz A runner to execute all fuzz targets from /src/test/fuzz.
- functional which test the functionality of bitcoind and bitcoin-qt by interacting with them through the RPC and P2P interfaces.
- util which tests the utilities (bitcoin-util, bitcoin-tx, ...).
- lint which perform various static analysis checks.
The util tests are run as part of ctest invocation. The fuzz tests, functional
tests and lint scripts can be run as explained in the sections below.
Running tests locally
Before tests can be run locally, Bitcoin Core must be built. See the building instructions for help.
The following examples assume that the build directory is named build.
Fuzz tests
See /doc/fuzzing.md
Functional tests
Dependencies and prerequisites
The ZMQ functional test requires a python ZMQ library. To install it:
- on Unix, run
sudo apt-get install python3-zmq - on mac OS, run
pip3 install pyzmq
On Windows the PYTHONUTF8 environment variable must be set to 1:
set PYTHONUTF8=1
Running the tests
Individual tests can be run by directly calling the test script, e.g.:
build/test/functional/feature_rbf.py
or can be run through the test_runner harness, eg:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py feature_rbf.py
You can run any combination (incl. duplicates) of tests by calling:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py <testname1> <testname2> <testname3> ...
Wildcard test names can be passed, if the paths are coherent and the test runner
is called from a bash shell or similar that does the globbing. For example,
to run all the wallet tests:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py test/functional/wallet*
functional/test_runner.py functional/wallet* # (called from the build/test/ directory)
test_runner.py wallet* # (called from the build/test/functional/ directory)
but not
build/test/functional/test_runner.py wallet*
Combinations of wildcards can be passed:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py ./test/functional/tool* test/functional/mempool*
test_runner.py tool* mempool*
Run the regression test suite with:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py
Run all possible tests with
build/test/functional/test_runner.py --extended
In order to run backwards compatibility tests, first run:
test/get_previous_releases.py -b
to download the necessary previous release binaries.
By default, up to 4 tests will be run in parallel by test_runner. To specify
how many jobs to run, append --jobs=n
The individual tests and the test_runner harness have many command-line
options. Run build/test/functional/test_runner.py -h to see them all.
Speed up test runs with a RAM disk
If you have available RAM on your system you can create a RAM disk to use as the cache and tmp directories for the functional tests in order to speed them up.
Speed-up amount varies on each system (and according to your RAM speed and other variables), but a 2-3x speed-up is not uncommon.
Linux
To create a 4 GiB RAM disk at /mnt/tmp/:
sudo mkdir -p /mnt/tmp
sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=4g tmpfs /mnt/tmp/
Configure the size of the RAM disk using the size= option.
The size of the RAM disk needed is relative to the number of concurrent jobs the test suite runs.
For example running the test suite with --jobs=100 might need a 4 GiB RAM disk, but running with --jobs=32 will only need a 2.5 GiB RAM disk.
To use, run the test suite specifying the RAM disk as the cachedir and tmpdir:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py --cachedir=/mnt/tmp/cache --tmpdir=/mnt/tmp
Once finished with the tests and the disk, and to free the RAM, simply unmount the disk:
sudo umount /mnt/tmp
macOS
To create a 4 GiB RAM disk named "ramdisk" at /Volumes/ramdisk/:
diskutil erasevolume HFS+ ramdisk $(hdiutil attach -nomount ram://8388608)
Configure the RAM disk size, expressed as the number of blocks, at the end of the command
(4096 MiB * 2048 blocks/MiB = 8388608 blocks for 4 GiB). To run the tests using the RAM disk:
build/test/functional/test_runner.py --cachedir=/Volumes/ramdisk/cache --tmpdir=/Volumes/ramdisk/tmp
To unmount:
umount /Volumes/ramdisk
Troubleshooting and debugging test failures
Resource contention
The P2P and RPC ports used by the bitcoind nodes-under-test are chosen to make conflicts with other processes unlikely. However, if there is another bitcoind process running on the system (perhaps from a previous test which hasn't successfully killed all its bitcoind nodes), then there may be a port conflict which will cause the test to fail. It is recommended that you run the tests on a system where no other bitcoind processes are running.
On linux, the test framework will warn if there is another bitcoind process running when the tests are started.
If there are zombie bitcoind processes after test failure, you can kill them by running the following commands. Note that these commands will kill all bitcoind processes running on the system, so should not be used if any non-test bitcoind processes are being run.
killall bitcoind
or
pkill -9 bitcoind
Data directory cache
A pre-mined blockchain with 200 blocks is generated the first time a functional test is run and is stored in build/test/cache. This speeds up test startup times since new blockchains don't need to be generated for each test. However, the cache may get into a bad state, in which case tests will fail. If this happens, remove the cache directory (and make sure bitcoind processes are stopped as above):
rm -rf build/test/cache
killall bitcoind
Test logging
The tests contain logging at five different levels (DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR
and CRITICAL). From within your functional tests you can log to these different
levels using the logger included in the test_framework, e.g.
self.log.debug(object). By default:
- when run through the test_runner harness, all logs are written to
test_framework.logand no logs are output to the console. - when run directly, all logs are written to
test_framework.logand INFO level and above are output to the console. - when run by our CI (Continuous Integration), no logs are output to the console. However, if a test
fails, the
test_framework.logand bitcoinddebug.logs will all be dumped to the console to help troubleshooting.
These log files can be located under the test data directory (which is always printed in the first line of test output):
<test data directory>/test_framework.log<test data directory>/node<node number>/regtest/debug.log.
The node number identifies the relevant test node, starting from node0, which
corresponds to its position in the nodes list of the specific test,
e.g. self.nodes[0].
To change the level of logs output to the console, use the -l command line
argument.
test_framework.log and bitcoind debug.logs can be combined into a single
aggregate log by running the combine_logs.py script. The output can be plain
text, colorized text or html. For example:
build/test/functional/combine_logs.py -c <test data directory> | less -r
will pipe the colorized logs from the test into less.
Use --tracerpc to trace out all the RPC calls and responses to the console. For
some tests (eg any that use submitblock to submit a full block over RPC),
this can result in a lot of screen output.
By default, the test data directory will be deleted after a successful run.
Use --nocleanup to leave the test data directory intact. The test data
directory is never deleted after a failed test.
Attaching a debugger
A python debugger can be attached to tests at any point. Just add the line:
import pdb; pdb.set_trace()
anywhere in the test. You will then be able to inspect variables, as well as call methods that interact with the bitcoind nodes-under-test.
If further introspection of the bitcoind instances themselves becomes
necessary, this can be accomplished by first setting a pdb breakpoint
at an appropriate location, running the test to that point, then using
gdb (or lldb on macOS) to attach to the process and debug.
For instance, to attach to self.node[1] during a run you can get
the pid of the node within pdb.
(pdb) self.node[1].process.pid
Alternatively, you can find the pid by inspecting the temp folder for the specific test you are running. The path to that folder is printed at the beginning of every test run:
2017-06-27 14:13:56.686000 TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testo9vsdjo3
Use the path to find the pid file in the temp folder:
cat /tmp/user/1000/testo9vsdjo3/node1/regtest/bitcoind.pid
Then you can use the pid to start gdb:
gdb /home/example/bitcoind <pid>
Note: gdb attach step may require ptrace_scope to be modified, or sudo preceding the gdb.
See this link for considerations: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/security/Yama.txt
Often while debugging RPC calls in functional tests, the test might time out before the
process can return a response. Use --timeout-factor 0 to disable all RPC timeouts for that particular
functional test. Ex: build/test/functional/wallet_hd.py --timeout-factor 0.
Profiling
An easy way to profile node performance during functional tests is provided
for Linux platforms using perf.
Perf will sample the running node and will generate profile data in the node's
datadir. The profile data can then be presented using perf report or a graphical
tool like hotspot.
To generate a profile during test suite runs, use the --perf flag.
To see render the output to text, run
perf report -i /path/to/datadir/send-big-msgs.perf.data.xxxx --stdio | c++filt | less
For ways to generate more granular profiles, see the README in test/functional.
Util tests
Util tests can be run locally by running build/test/util/test_runner.py.
Use the -v option for verbose output.
Lint tests
See the README in test/lint.
Writing functional tests
You are encouraged to write functional tests for new or existing features. Further information about the functional test framework and individual tests is found in test/functional.