mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-05-29 17:19:30 +02:00
679bb2aac2
32dcec269bf33f7be28245d88a1d8f2889cc39ae rpc: update RPC help of `createpsbt` (rkrux)
931117a46f5854d487e13b2b1446b621409c8371 rpc: update the doc for `data` field in `outputs` argument (rkrux)
8134a6b5d40568dcf32fdb21163cb1792efddc27 rpc: add cli example for `walletcreatefundedpsbt` RPC (rkrux)
Pull request description:
### add cli example for `walletcreatefundedpsbt` and `createpsbt` RPCs
The only example present earlier was one that creates an OP_RETURN output. This
lack of examples has discouraged me earlier to use this RPC. Adding an example
that creates PSBT sending bitcoin to address, a scenario that is much more common.
### rpc: update the doc for `data` field in `outputs` argument
It was not evident to me that this field creates an `OP_RETURN` output until
I read the code and tried it out. Thus, making the doc explicitly mention it.
This affects docs of the following RPCs:
`bumpfee`, `psbtbumpfee`, `send`, `walletcreatefundedpsbt`, `createpsbt`,
and `createrawtransaction`
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 32dcec269bf33f7be28245d88a1d8f2889cc39ae
1440000bytes:
utACK 32dcec269b
achow101:
ACK 32dcec269bf33f7be28245d88a1d8f2889cc39ae
ryanofsky:
Concept ACK 32dcec269bf33f7be28245d88a1d8f2889cc39ae. These seem like helpful clarifications, but I did not look into the details
Tree-SHA512: f994488ba7d52d00960fc52064bb419cf548e29822fe23d6ee0452fdf514dd93f089145eddb32b8086a7918cf8cf33a4c3f16bfcb7948f3c9d5afd95e8d3a1cb