e518a8bf8a[functional test] opportunistic 1p1c package submission (glozow)87c5c524d6[p2p] opportunistically accept 1-parent-1-child packages (glozow)6c51e1d7d0[p2p] add separate rejections cache for reconsiderable txns (glozow)410ebd6efa[fuzz] break out parent functions and add GetChildrenFrom* coverage (glozow)d095316c1c[unit test] TxOrphanage::GetChildrenFrom* (glozow)2f51cd680f[txorphanage] add method to get all orphans spending a tx (glozow)092c978a42[txpackages] add canonical way to get hash of package (glozow)c3c1e15831[doc] restore comment about why we check if ptx HasWitness before caching rejected txid (glozow)6f4da19cc3guard against MempoolAcceptResult::m_replaced_transactions (glozow) Pull request description: This enables 1p1c packages to propagate in the "happy case" (i.e. not reliable if there are adversaries) and contains a lot of package relay-related code. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27463 for overall package relay tracking. Rationale: This is "non-robust 1-parent-1-child package relay" which is immediately useful. - Relaying 1-parent-1-child CPFP when mempool min feerate is high would be a subset of all package relay use cases, but a pretty significant improvement over what we have today, where such transactions don't propagate at all. [1] - Today, a miner can run this with a normal/small maxmempool to get revenue from 1p1c CPFP'd transactions without losing out on the ones with parents below mempool minimum feerate. - The majority of this code is useful for building more featureful/robust package relay e.g. see the code in #27742. The first 2 commits are followups from #29619: - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29619#discussion_r1523094034 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29619#discussion_r1519819257 Q: What makes this short of a more full package relay feature? (1) it only supports packages in which 1 of the parents needs to be CPFP'd by the child. That includes 1-parent-1-child packages and situations in which the other parents already pay for themselves (and are thus in mempool already when the package is submitted). More general package relay is a future improvement that requires more engineering in mempool and validation - see #27463. (2) We rely on having kept the child in orphanage, and don't make any attempt to protect it while we wait to receive the parent. If we are experiencing a lot of orphanage churn (e.g. an adversary is purposefully sending us a lot of transactions with missing inputs), we will fail to submit packages. This limitation has been around for 12+ years, see #27742 which adds a token bucket scheme for protecting package-related orphans at a limited rate per peer. (3) Our orphan-handling logic is somewhat opportunistic; we don't make much effort to resolve an orphan beyond asking the child's sender for the parents. This means we may miss packages if the first sender fails to give us the parent (intentionally or unintentionally). To make this more robust, we need receiver-side logic to retry orphan resolution with multiple peers. This is also an existing problem which has a proposed solution in #28031. [1]: see this writeup and its links02ec218c78/bip-0331.mediawiki (propagate-high-feerate-transactions)ACKs for top commit: sr-gi: tACKe518a8bf8ainstagibbs: reACKe518a8bf8atheStack: Code-review ACKe518a8bf8a📦 dergoegge: light Code review ACKe518a8bf8aachow101: ACKe518a8bf8aTree-SHA512: 632579fbe7160cb763bbec6d82ca0dab484d5dbbc7aea90c187c0b9833b8d7c1e5d13b8587379edd3a3b4a02a5a1809020369e9cd09a4ebaf729921f65c15943
Functional tests
Writing Functional Tests
Example test
The file test/functional/example_test.py is a heavily commented example of a test case that uses both the RPC and P2P interfaces. If you are writing your first test, copy that file and modify to fit your needs.
Coverage
Running test/functional/test_runner.py with the --coverage argument tracks which RPCs are
called by the tests and prints a report of uncovered RPCs in the summary. This
can be used (along with the --extended argument) to find out which RPCs we
don't have test cases for.
Style guidelines
- Where possible, try to adhere to PEP-8 guidelines
- Use a python linter like flake8 before submitting PRs to catch common style nits (eg trailing whitespace, unused imports, etc)
- The oldest supported Python version is specified in doc/dependencies.md. Consider using pyenv, which checks .python-version, to prevent accidentally introducing modern syntax from an unsupported Python version. The CI linter job also checks this, but possibly not in all cases.
- See the python lint script that checks for violations that could lead to bugs and issues in the test code.
- Use type hints in your code to improve code readability and to detect possible bugs earlier.
- Avoid wildcard imports.
- If more than one name from a module is needed, use lexicographically sorted multi-line imports in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts.
- Use a module-level docstring to describe what the test is testing, and how it is testing it.
- When subclassing the BitcoinTestFramework, place overrides for the
set_test_params(),add_options()andsetup_xxxx()methods at the top of the subclass, then locally-defined helper methods, then therun_test()method. - Use
f'{x}'for string formatting in preference to'{}'.format(x)or'%s' % x. - Use
platform.system()for detecting the running operating system andos.nameto check whether it's a POSIX system (see also theskip_if_platform_not_{linux,posix}methods in theBitcoinTestFrameworkclass, which can be used to skip a whole test depending on the platform).
Naming guidelines
- Name the test
<area>_test.py, where area can be one of the following:featurefor tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool, egfeature_rbf.pyinterfacefor tests for other interfaces (REST, ZMQ, etc), eginterface_rest.pymempoolfor tests for mempool behaviour, egmempool_reorg.pyminingfor tests for mining features, egmining_prioritisetransaction.pyp2pfor tests that explicitly test the p2p interface, egp2p_disconnect_ban.pyrpcfor tests for individual RPC methods or features, egrpc_listtransactions.pytoolfor tests for tools, egtool_wallet.pywalletfor tests for wallet features, egwallet_keypool.py
- Use an underscore to separate words
- exception: for tests for specific RPCs or command line options which don't include underscores, name the test after the exact RPC or argument name, eg
rpc_decodescript.py, notrpc_decode_script.py
- exception: for tests for specific RPCs or command line options which don't include underscores, name the test after the exact RPC or argument name, eg
- Don't use the redundant word
testin the name, eginterface_zmq.py, notinterface_zmq_test.py
General test-writing advice
- Instead of inline comments or no test documentation at all, log the comments to the test log, e.g.
self.log.info('Create enough transactions to fill a block'). Logs make the test code easier to read and the test logic easier to debug. - Set
self.num_nodesto the minimum number of nodes necessary for the test. Having additional unrequired nodes adds to the execution time of the test as well as memory/CPU/disk requirements (which is important when running tests in parallel). - Avoid stop-starting the nodes multiple times during the test if possible. A stop-start takes several seconds, so doing it several times blows up the runtime of the test.
- Set the
self.setup_clean_chainvariable inset_test_params()toTrueto initialize an empty blockchain and start from the Genesis block, rather than load a premined blockchain from cache with the default value ofFalse. The cached data directories contain a 200-block pre-mined blockchain with the spendable mining rewards being split between four nodes. Each node has 25 mature block subsidies (25x50=1250 BTC) in its wallet. Using them is much more efficient than mining blocks in your test. - When calling RPCs with lots of arguments, consider using named keyword arguments instead of positional arguments to make the intent of the call clear to readers.
- Many of the core test framework classes such as
CBlockandCTransactiondon't allow new attributes to be added to their objects at runtime like typical Python objects allow. This helps prevent unpredictable side effects from typographical errors or usage of the objects outside of their intended purpose.
RPC and P2P definitions
Test writers may find it helpful to refer to the definitions for the RPC and P2P messages. These can be found in the following source files:
/src/rpc/*for RPCs/src/wallet/rpc*for wallet RPCsProcessMessage()in/src/net_processing.cppfor parsing P2P messages
Using the P2P interface
-
P2Ps can be used to test specific P2P protocol behavior. p2p.py contains test framework p2p objects and messages.py contains all the definitions for objects passed over the network (CBlock,CTransaction, etc, along with the network-level wrappers for them,msg_block,msg_tx, etc). -
P2P tests have two threads. One thread handles all network communication with the bitcoind(s) being tested in a callback-based event loop; the other implements the test logic.
-
P2PConnectionis the class used to connect to a bitcoind.P2PInterfacecontains the higher level logic for processing P2P payloads and connecting to the Bitcoin Core node application logic. For custom behaviour, subclass the P2PInterface object and override the callback methods.
P2PConnections can be used as such:
p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
p2p_conn.send_and_ping(msg)
They can also be referenced by indexing into a TestNode's p2ps list, which
contains the list of test framework p2p objects connected to itself
(it does not include any TestNodes):
node.p2ps[0].sync_with_ping()
More examples can be found in p2p_unrequested_blocks.py, p2p_compactblocks.py.
Prototyping tests
The TestShell class exposes the BitcoinTestFramework
functionality to interactive Python3 environments and can be used to prototype
tests. This may be especially useful in a REPL environment with session logging
utilities, such as
IPython.
The logs of such interactive sessions can later be adapted into permanent test
cases.
Test framework modules
The following are useful modules for test developers. They are located in test/functional/test_framework/.
authproxy.py
Taken from the python-bitcoinrpc repository.
test_framework.py
Base class for functional tests.
util.py
Generally useful functions.
p2p.py
Test objects for interacting with a bitcoind node over the p2p interface.
script.py
Utilities for manipulating transaction scripts (originally from python-bitcoinlib)
key.py
Test-only secp256k1 elliptic curve implementation
blocktools.py
Helper functions for creating blocks and transactions.
Benchmarking with perf
An easy way to profile node performance during functional tests is provided
for Linux platforms using perf.
Perf will sample the running node and will generate profile data in the node's
datadir. The profile data can then be presented using perf report or a graphical
tool like hotspot.
There are two ways of invoking perf: one is to use the --perf flag when
running tests, which will profile each node during the entire test run: perf
begins to profile when the node starts and ends when it shuts down. The other
way is the use the profile_with_perf context manager, e.g.
with node.profile_with_perf("send-big-msgs"):
# Perform activity on the node you're interested in profiling, e.g.:
for _ in range(10000):
node.p2ps[0].send_message(some_large_message)
To see useful textual output, run
perf report -i /path/to/datadir/send-big-msgs.perf.data.xxxx --stdio | c++filt | less
See also:
- Installing perf
- Perf examples
- Hotspot: a GUI for perf output analysis