This commit simplfies the test since we only test the preimage
extraction logic in the htlc timeout resolver, there's no need to test
it for all different channel types as the resolver is made to be
oblivious about them.
Starting from this commit, we begin the process of flattening the
multi-hop itests to make them easier to be maintained. The tests are
refactored into their own test cases, with each test focusing on testing
one channel type. This is necessary to save effort for future
development.
These tests are also updated to reflect the new `blockbeat` behavior.
We need to check `dispatched` before sending conf details, otherwise the
channel `ntfn.Event.Confirmed` will be blocking, which is the leftover
from #9275.
This commit adds a new method to enable us resending the blockbeat in
`ChainArbitrator`, which is needed for the channel restore as the chain
watcher and channel arbitrator are added after the start of the chain
arbitrator.
This commit moves the creation of the spending notification from `Start`
to `newChainWatcher` so we subscribe the spending event before handling
the block, which is needed to properly handle the blockbeat.
We need to offer the outgoing htlc one block earlier to make sure when
the expiry height hits, the sweeper will not miss sweeping it in the
same block. This also means the outgoing contest resolver now only does
one thing - watch for preimage spend till height expiry-1, which can
easily be moved into the timeout resolver instead in the future.
In this commit, we break the old `launchResolvers` into two steps - step
one is to launch the resolvers synchronously, and step two is to
actually waiting for the resolvers to be resolved. This is critical as
in the following commit we will require the resolvers to be launched at
the same blockbeat when a force close event is sent by the chain watcher.
When calling `NotifyExitHopHtlc` it is allowed to pass a chan to
subscribe to the HTLC's resolution when it's settled. However, this
method will also return immediately if there's already a resolution,
which means it behaves like a notifier and a getter. If the caller
decides to only use the getter to do a non-blocking lookup, it can pass
a nil subscriber chan to bypass the notification.
This commit breaks the `Resolve` into two parts - the first part is
moved into a `Launch` method that handles sending sweep requests, and
the second part remains in `Resolve` which handles waiting for the
spend. Since we are using both utxo nursery and sweeper at the same
time, to make sure this change doesn't break the existing behavior, we
implement the `Launch` as following,
- zero-fee htlc - handled by the sweeper
- direct output from the remote commit - handled by the sweeper
- legacy htlc - handled by the utxo nursery
This commit breaks the `Resolve` into two parts - the first part is
moved into a `Launch` method that handles sending sweep requests, and
the second part remains in `Resolve` which handles waiting for the
spend. Since we are using both utxo nursery and sweeper at the same
time, to make sure this change doesn't break the existing behavior, we
implement the `Launch` as following,
- zero-fee htlc - handled by the sweeper
- direct output from the remote commit - handled by the sweeper
- legacy htlc - handled by the utxo nursery
We will use this and its following commits to break the original
`Resolve` methods into two parts - the first part is moved to a new
method `Launch`, which handles sending a sweep request to the sweeper.
The second part remains in `Resolve`, which is mainly waiting for a
spending tx.
Breach resolver currently doesn't do anything in its `Launch` since the
sweeping of justice outputs are not handled by the sweeper yet.
