Jiayuan Zhang 7116691c07 fix(github): hide reference-only PR links from the issue PR list (#4611) ...

* fix(github): hide reference-only PR links from the issue PR list

A PR that merely mentions an issue key in passing in its description
(e.g. "Related to MUL-3739") was auto-linked and shown in that issue's
right-side PR list as if it were a working PR for the issue.

Add a reference_only flag to issue_pull_request. The webhook keeps
linking generously (so close_intent stays trackable across edits) but
flags a link as reference_only unless the key is a genuine target: a
title prefix, a branch reference, or a body closing keyword
(Closes/Fixes/Resolves). ListPullRequestsByIssue filters
reference_only rows, so passing body mentions are hidden from the CLI
and the UI PR list while real targets remain. reference_only follows
the same terminal preserve gate as close_intent; the auto-advance gate
is unchanged.

Closes MUL-3739

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>

* fix(github): exclude reference_only links from the close aggregate

A reference_only link is hidden from the issue PR list, but
GetIssuePullRequestCloseAggregate still counted it toward open_count.
An open body-only mention ("Related to MUL-X") could therefore block
the issue from auto-advancing to `done` after a real closing PR merged,
while being invisible in the right-side PR list.

Filter `AND NOT reference_only` in the aggregate too (reference_only
rows never carry close_intent, so merged_with_close_intent_count is
unchanged). Add TestWebhook_HiddenBodyMentionDoesNotBlockAutoAdvance.

Addresses code review on PR #4611.

Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>

---------

Co-authored-by: Lambda <lambda@multica.ai>
Co-authored-by: multica-agent <github@multica.ai>

2026-07-05 13:30:18 +08:00

56 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

View Raw