mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-01-19 23:03:45 +01:00
guix: Don't include directory name in SHA256SUMS
The SHA256SUMS file can be used in a sha256sum -c command to verify
downloaded binaries. However users are likely to download just a single
file and not place this file in the correct directory relative to the
SHA256SUMS file for the simple verification command to work. By not
including the directory name in the SHA256SUMS file, it will be easier
for users to verify downloaded binaries.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22654
Rebased-From: fb17c99e35
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Hennadii Stepanov
parent
88fb7e37ad
commit
27d43e5bd4
@@ -162,6 +162,18 @@ EOF
|
||||
echo "Attesting to build outputs for version: '${VERSION}'"
|
||||
echo ""
|
||||
|
||||
# Given a SHA256SUMS file as stdin that has lines like:
|
||||
# 0ba536819b221a91d3d42e978be016aac918f40984754d74058aa0c921cd3ea6 a/b/d/c/d/s/bitcoin-22.0rc2-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Replace each line's file name with its basename:
|
||||
# 0ba536819b221a91d3d42e978be016aac918f40984754d74058aa0c921cd3ea6 bitcoin-22.0rc2-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
|
||||
# ...
|
||||
#
|
||||
basenameify_SHA256SUMS() {
|
||||
sed -E 's@(^[[:xdigit:]]{64}[[:space:]]+).+/([^/]+$)@\1\2@'
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
outsigdir="$GUIX_SIGS_REPO/$VERSION/$signer_name"
|
||||
mkdir -p "$outsigdir"
|
||||
(
|
||||
@@ -174,6 +186,7 @@ mkdir -p "$outsigdir"
|
||||
cat "${noncodesigned_fragments[@]}" \
|
||||
| sort -u \
|
||||
| sort -k2 \
|
||||
| basenameify_SHA256SUMS \
|
||||
> "$temp_noncodesigned"
|
||||
if [ -e noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS ]; then
|
||||
# The SHA256SUMS already exists, make sure it's exactly what we
|
||||
@@ -201,6 +214,7 @@ mkdir -p "$outsigdir"
|
||||
cat "${sha256sum_fragments[@]}" \
|
||||
| sort -u \
|
||||
| sort -k2 \
|
||||
| basenameify_SHA256SUMS \
|
||||
> "$temp_all"
|
||||
if [ -e all.SHA256SUMS ]; then
|
||||
# The SHA256SUMS already exists, make sure it's exactly what we
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user