mirror of
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git
synced 2026-01-20 15:19:07 +01:00
Merge #19680: 0.20: Add txids with non-standard inputs to reject filter
107cf1515etest addition of unknown segwit spends to txid reject filter (Gregory Sanders)06f9c5c3beAdd txids with non-standard inputs to reject filter (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: Backport of #19620 to 0.20. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK107cf1515efjahr: utACK107cf1515ejnewbery: utACK107cf1515eTree-SHA512: d89c75fefdb6b50f40adfcf3cfdb2a791122e4d6a5903cb553c664042963577beb97a73319f9d1cb8320d32846778233c95255812c37fb4c7b1b25da161a6595
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ enum class TxValidationResult {
|
||||
* is uninteresting.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
TX_RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE,
|
||||
TX_NOT_STANDARD, //!< didn't meet our local policy rules
|
||||
TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD, //!< inputs (covered by txid) failed policy rules
|
||||
TX_NOT_STANDARD, //!< otherwise didn't meet our local policy rules
|
||||
TX_MISSING_INPUTS, //!< transaction was missing some of its inputs
|
||||
TX_PREMATURE_SPEND, //!< transaction spends a coinbase too early, or violates locktime/sequence locks
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ static bool MaybePunishNodeForTx(NodeId nodeid, const TxValidationState& state,
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Conflicting (but not necessarily invalid) data or different policy:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_MISSING_INPUTS:
|
||||
case TxValidationResult::TX_PREMATURE_SPEND:
|
||||
@@ -1901,10 +1902,15 @@ void static ProcessOrphanTx(CConnman* connman, CTxMemPool& mempool, std::set<uin
|
||||
// Has inputs but not accepted to mempool
|
||||
// Probably non-standard or insufficient fee
|
||||
LogPrint(BCLog::MEMPOOL, " removed orphan tx %s\n", orphanHash.ToString());
|
||||
if (!orphanTx.HasWitness() && orphan_state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED) {
|
||||
if ((!orphanTx.HasWitness() && orphan_state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED) ||
|
||||
orphan_state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD) {
|
||||
// Do not use rejection cache for witness transactions or
|
||||
// witness-stripped transactions, as they can have been malleated.
|
||||
// See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8279 for details.
|
||||
// However, if the transaction failed for TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD,
|
||||
// then we know that the witness was irrelevant to the policy
|
||||
// failure, since this check depends only on the txid
|
||||
// (the scriptPubKey being spent is covered by the txid).
|
||||
assert(recentRejects);
|
||||
recentRejects->insert(orphanHash);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -2596,10 +2602,15 @@ bool ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, const std::string& msg_type, CDataStream& vRec
|
||||
recentRejects->insert(tx.GetHash());
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!tx.HasWitness() && state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED) {
|
||||
if ((!tx.HasWitness() && state.GetResult() != TxValidationResult::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED) ||
|
||||
state.GetResult() == TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD) {
|
||||
// Do not use rejection cache for witness transactions or
|
||||
// witness-stripped transactions, as they can have been malleated.
|
||||
// See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8279 for details.
|
||||
// However, if the transaction failed for TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD,
|
||||
// then we know that the witness was irrelevant to the policy
|
||||
// failure, since this check depends only on the txid
|
||||
// (the scriptPubKey being spent is covered by the txid).
|
||||
assert(recentRejects);
|
||||
recentRejects->insert(tx.GetHash());
|
||||
if (RecursiveDynamicUsage(*ptx) < 100000) {
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ bool IsStandardTx(const CTransaction& tx, bool permit_bare_multisig, const CFeeR
|
||||
* script can be anything; an attacker could use a very
|
||||
* expensive-to-check-upon-redemption script like:
|
||||
* DUP CHECKSIG DROP ... repeated 100 times... OP_1
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note that only the non-witness portion of the transaction is checked here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool AreInputsStandard(const CTransaction& tx, const CCoinsViewCache& mapInputs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -164,7 +166,11 @@ bool AreInputsStandard(const CTransaction& tx, const CCoinsViewCache& mapInputs)
|
||||
|
||||
std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> > vSolutions;
|
||||
txnouttype whichType = Solver(prev.scriptPubKey, vSolutions);
|
||||
if (whichType == TX_NONSTANDARD) {
|
||||
if (whichType == TX_NONSTANDARD || whichType == TX_WITNESS_UNKNOWN) {
|
||||
// WITNESS_UNKNOWN failures are typically also caught with a policy
|
||||
// flag in the script interpreter, but it can be helpful to catch
|
||||
// this type of NONSTANDARD transaction earlier in transaction
|
||||
// validation.
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
} else if (whichType == TX_SCRIPTHASH) {
|
||||
std::vector<std::vector<unsigned char> > stack;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -665,8 +665,9 @@ bool MemPoolAccept::PreChecks(ATMPArgs& args, Workspace& ws)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for non-standard pay-to-script-hash in inputs
|
||||
if (fRequireStandard && !AreInputsStandard(tx, m_view))
|
||||
return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_NOT_STANDARD, "bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs");
|
||||
if (fRequireStandard && !AreInputsStandard(tx, m_view)) {
|
||||
return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_INPUTS_NOT_STANDARD, "bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for non-standard witness in P2WSH
|
||||
if (tx.HasWitness() && fRequireStandard && !IsWitnessStandard(tx, m_view))
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1393,7 +1393,7 @@ class SegWitTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
temp_utxo.pop() # last entry in temp_utxo was the output we just spent
|
||||
temp_utxo.append(UTXO(tx2.sha256, 0, tx2.vout[0].nValue))
|
||||
|
||||
# Spend everything in temp_utxo back to an OP_TRUE output.
|
||||
# Spend everything in temp_utxo into an segwit v1 output.
|
||||
tx3 = CTransaction()
|
||||
total_value = 0
|
||||
for i in temp_utxo:
|
||||
@@ -1401,8 +1401,16 @@ class SegWitTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
tx3.wit.vtxinwit.append(CTxInWitness())
|
||||
total_value += i.nValue
|
||||
tx3.wit.vtxinwit[-1].scriptWitness.stack = [witness_program]
|
||||
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(total_value - 1000, CScript([OP_TRUE])))
|
||||
tx3.vout.append(CTxOut(total_value - 1000, script_pubkey))
|
||||
tx3.rehash()
|
||||
|
||||
# First we test this transaction against fRequireStandard=true node
|
||||
# making sure the txid is added to the reject filter
|
||||
self.std_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx3)
|
||||
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[1], self.std_node, tx3, with_witness=True, accepted=False, reason="bad-txns-nonstandard-inputs")
|
||||
# Now the node will no longer ask for getdata of this transaction when advertised by same txid
|
||||
self.std_node.announce_tx_and_wait_for_getdata(tx3, timeout=5, success=False)
|
||||
|
||||
# Spending a higher version witness output is not allowed by policy,
|
||||
# even with fRequireStandard=false.
|
||||
test_transaction_acceptance(self.nodes[0], self.test_node, tx3, with_witness=True, accepted=False, reason="reserved for soft-fork upgrades")
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user