highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2026-01-18 22:35:39 +01:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge #18451: test: shift coverage from getunconfirmedbalance to getbalances

Browse Source 
0306d78cb4 Use getbalances in wallet_address_types tests (Jon Atack)
7eacdc5167 Shift coverage from getunconfirmedbalance to getbalances in wallet_abandonconflict tests (Jon Atack)
3e6f7377f6 Improve getbalances coverage in wallet_balance tests (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  <strike>This PR updates several tests and then removes the `getunconfirmedbalance` RPC which was deprecated in facfb4111d a year ago.

  Next steps: remove the deprecated `getwalletinfo` fields and the `getbalance` RPC in follow-ups, if there seems to be consensus on those removals.</strike>

  Update:

  `getunconfirmedbalance` RPC was deprecated in facfb4111d a year ago, but following the review comments below, this PR now only updates the test coverage to use `getbalances` while still leaving basic coverage for `getunconfirmedbalance` in wallet_balance.py.

  That said, I've seen 3 regular contributors confused in the past 10 days by "DEPRECATED" warnings in the code that are not following the deprecation policy in [JSON-RPC-interface.md#versioning](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/JSON-RPC-interface.md#versioning).

  ISTM these warnings should either be removed, or the calls deprecated (`-deprecatedrpc`), or the policy updated to describe these warnings as a pre-deprecation practice.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    utACK 0306d78cb

Tree-SHA512: 692e43e9bed5afa97d905740666e365f0b64e559e1c75a6a398236d9e943894e3477947fc11324f420a6feaffa0c0c1532aa983c50090ca39d06551399e6ddd1
This commit is contained in:
MarcoFalke
2020-04-13 17:57:11 -04:00
parent 6ef45bc968 0306d78cb4
commit 6110ae8326
3 changed files with 30 additions and 19 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
View File

@@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
# up in unconfirmed balance
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(unconfbalance, newbalance)
balances = self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']
assert_equal(balances['untrusted_pending'] + balances['trusted'], newbalance)
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
assert not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)]
balance = newbalance

11
test/functional/wallet_address_types.py
View File

@@ -97,12 +97,9 @@ class AddressTypeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
connect_nodes(self.nodes[i], j)
self.sync_all()
def get_balances(self, confirmed=True):
"""Return a list of confirmed or unconfirmed balances."""
if confirmed:
return [self.nodes[i].getbalance() for i in range(4)]
else:
return [self.nodes[i].getunconfirmedbalance() for i in range(4)]
def get_balances(self, key='trusted'):
"""Return a list of balances."""
return [self.nodes[i].getbalances()['mine'][key] for i in range(4)]
# Quick test of python bech32 implementation
def test_python_bech32(self, addr):
@@ -307,7 +304,7 @@ class AddressTypeTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.nodes[from_node].sendmany("", sends)
self.sync_mempools()
unconf_balances = self.get_balances(False)
unconf_balances = self.get_balances('untrusted_pending')
self.log.debug("Check unconfirmed balances: {}".format(unconf_balances))
assert_equal(unconf_balances[from_node], 0)
for n, to_node in enumerate(range(from_node + 1, from_node + 4)):

34
test/functional/wallet_balance.py
View File

@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# First argument of getbalance must be set to "*"
assert_raises_rpc_error(-32, "dummy first argument must be excluded or set to \"*\"", self.nodes[1].getbalance, "")
self.log.info("Test getbalance and getunconfirmedbalance with unconfirmed inputs")
self.log.info("Test balances with unconfirmed inputs")
# Before `test_balance()`, we have had two nodes with a balance of 50
# each and then we:
@@ -148,6 +148,18 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def test_balances(*, fee_node_1=0):
# getbalances
expected_balances_0 = {'mine': {'immature': Decimal('0E-8'),
'trusted': Decimal('9.99'), # change from node 0's send
'untrusted_pending': Decimal('60.0')},
'watchonly': {'immature': Decimal('5000'),
'trusted': Decimal('50.0'),
'untrusted_pending': Decimal('0E-8')}}
expected_balances_1 = {'mine': {'immature': Decimal('0E-8'),
'trusted': Decimal('0E-8'), # node 1's send had an unsafe input
'untrusted_pending': Decimal('30.0') - fee_node_1}} # Doesn't include output of node 0's send since it was spent
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalances(), expected_balances_0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalances(), expected_balances_1)
# getbalance without any arguments includes unconfirmed transactions, but not untrusted transactions
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('9.99')) # change from node 0's send
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), Decimal('0')) # node 1's send had an unsafe input
@@ -160,11 +172,9 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(minconf=1), Decimal('0'))
# getunconfirmedbalance
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance(), Decimal('60')) # output of node 1's spend
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']['untrusted_pending'], Decimal('60'))
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()["unconfirmed_balance"], Decimal('60'))
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getunconfirmedbalance(), Decimal('30') - fee_node_1) # Doesn't include output of node 0's send since it was spent
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['untrusted_pending'], Decimal('30') - fee_node_1)
# getwalletinfo.unconfirmed_balance
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getwalletinfo()["unconfirmed_balance"], Decimal('60'))
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getwalletinfo()["unconfirmed_balance"], Decimal('30') - fee_node_1)
test_balances(fee_node_1=Decimal('0.01'))
@@ -174,15 +184,19 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(txs[1]['hex']) # sending on both nodes is faster than waiting for propagation
self.sync_all()
self.log.info("Test getbalance and getunconfirmedbalance with conflicted unconfirmed inputs")
self.log.info("Test getbalance and getbalances.mine.untrusted_pending with conflicted unconfirmed inputs")
test_balances(fee_node_1=Decimal('0.02'))
self.nodes[1].generatetoaddress(1, ADDRESS_WATCHONLY)
self.sync_all()
# balances are correct after the transactions are confirmed
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), Decimal('69.99')) # node 1's send plus change from node 0's send
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), Decimal('29.98')) # change from node 0's send
balance_node0 = Decimal('69.99') # node 1's send plus change from node 0's send
balance_node1 = Decimal('29.98') # change from node 0's send
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']['trusted'], balance_node0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['trusted'], balance_node1)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance_node0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), balance_node1)
# Send total balance away from node 1
txs = create_transactions(self.nodes[1], self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal('29.97'), [Decimal('0.01')])
@@ -200,13 +214,13 @@ class WalletTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
# check mempool transactions count for wallet unconfirmed balance after
# dynamically loading the wallet.
before = self.nodes[1].getunconfirmedbalance()
before = self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['untrusted_pending']
dst = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
self.nodes[1].unloadwallet('')
self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(dst, 0.1)
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].loadwallet('')
after = self.nodes[1].getunconfirmedbalance()
after = self.nodes[1].getbalances()['mine']['untrusted_pending']
assert_equal(before + Decimal('0.1'), after)
# Create 3 more wallet txs, where the last is not accepted to the