highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-05-25 11:20:49 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

unit test: have CompareFeerateDiagram tested with diagrams both ways

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Greg Sanders 2024-03-25 09:55:41 -04:00
parent b62e2c0fa5
commit c0c37f07eb
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
src/test/rbf_tests.cpp
View File

@ -503,18 +503,21 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_diagram_utilities)
std::vector<FeeFrac> new_diagram{{FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1000, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}}};
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
// Incomparable diagrams
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1000, 300}, FeeFrac{1000, 400}};
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
// Strictly better but smaller size.
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1100, 300}};
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
// New diagram is strictly better due to the first chunk, even though
// second chunk contributes no fees
@ -522,24 +525,28 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_diagram_utilities)
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{1100, 100}, FeeFrac{1100, 200}};
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
// Feerate of first new chunk is better with, but second chunk is worse
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{750, 100}, FeeFrac{999, 350}, FeeFrac{1150, 1000}};
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
// If we make the second chunk slightly better, the new diagram now wins.
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{750, 100}, FeeFrac{1000, 350}, FeeFrac{1150, 500}};
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
// Identical diagrams, cannot be strictly better
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}};
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_eq(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_eq(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
// Same aggregate fee, but different total size (trigger single tail fee check step)
old_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 399}};
@ -547,8 +554,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_diagram_utilities)
// No change in evaluation when tail check needed.
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_gt(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram)));
// Padding works on either argument
BOOST_CHECK(std::is_lt(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram)));
// Trigger multiple tail fee check steps
@ -561,6 +566,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(feerate_diagram_utilities)
// Multiple tail fee check steps, unordered result
new_diagram = {FeeFrac{0, 0}, FeeFrac{950, 300}, FeeFrac{1050, 400}, FeeFrac{1050, 401}, FeeFrac{1050, 402}, FeeFrac{1051, 403}};
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(old_diagram, new_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
BOOST_CHECK(CompareFeerateDiagram(new_diagram, old_diagram) == std::partial_ordering::unordered);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()