threading: use correct mutex name in reverse_lock fatal error messages

Now that REVERSE_LOCK requires the name of the actual mutex, it can be used for
better error messages.
This commit is contained in:
Cory Fields
2025-06-17 17:49:21 +00:00
committed by kevkevinpal
parent a201a99f8c
commit de4eef52d1
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ public:
// it is not possible to use the lock's copy of the mutex for that purpose.
// Instead, the original mutex needs to be passed back to the reverse_lock for
// the sake of thread-safety analysis, but it is not actually used otherwise.
#define REVERSE_LOCK(g, cs) typename std::decay<decltype(g)>::type::reverse_lock UNIQUE_NAME(revlock)(g, cs, #g, __FILE__, __LINE__)
#define REVERSE_LOCK(g, cs) typename std::decay<decltype(g)>::type::reverse_lock UNIQUE_NAME(revlock)(g, cs, #cs, __FILE__, __LINE__)
// When locking a Mutex, require negative capability to ensure the lock
// is not already held

View File

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(reverselock_errors)
g_debug_lockorder_abort = false;
// Make sure trying to reverse lock a previous lock fails
BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION(REVERSE_LOCK(lock2, mutex2), std::logic_error, HasReason("lock2 was not most recent critical section locked"));
BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION(REVERSE_LOCK(lock2, mutex2), std::logic_error, HasReason("mutex2 was not most recent critical section locked"));
BOOST_CHECK(lock2.owns_lock());
g_debug_lockorder_abort = prev;