bb3da8fe410285887f22679c6f08a1f40bcfac8f qt: Disable requests context menu actions when appropriate (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
The recent requests table will allow you to copy data points even if they do not exist. This PR implements checks to disable the `copy label`, `copy message`, and `copy amount` context menu actions if the respective fields are empty. This brings the recent requests table context menu behavior closer to the behavior seen in the transaction view.
On a payment request entry which does not have a value for label, message, or amount:
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|<img width="169" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 1 22 28 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108466086-167adc00-7251-11eb-8bd6-13984042bdb3.png">| <img width="169" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 1 21 49 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108466185-3e6a3f80-7251-11eb-9dd8-492ed07fd638.png">|
`copy URI` never needs to be disabled as an entry in the recent requests table must have a URI even if it doesn't have a label, message, or amount. #213 will add a `copy address` context menu action. This also does not need a check as an entry must be associated with an address.
Below are some more examples of how this PR will behave:
**Has Label, Message, and Amount**
<img width="780" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 12 05 38 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108466507-c18b9580-7251-11eb-8875-f3aeb9c4c8e9.png">
**Has Label and Amount, but no Message**
<img width="780" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-19 at 12 05 58 AM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108466421-9b65f580-7251-11eb-97eb-a3bfaa21fa7d.png">
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK bb3da8fe410285887f22679c6f08a1f40bcfac8f
Tree-SHA512: d98f1a6e05ebf6d9d056bc5754aca78ca7ecda93f497dba88187b947ca4a261eb7dc5e8c872956315acaa0008cc39320fb5806e17117e0c873090ad917ca4a3d
ca5bd1c8e5fee29a3c2f0a3fbc879ee74f892266 qt: Prevent the main window popup menu (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11168 is not fixed by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11169 completely, as users are allowed to right click on the menu bar:
This PR moves the context menu prohibition from `QToolBar` instance to its parent `BitcoinGUI` instance, which is derived from `QMainWindow`.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK ca5bd1c8e5fee29a3c2f0a3fbc879ee74f892266, tested on Ubuntu 20.04 Qt 5.12. Confirming that I can replicate the behavior described on `master` and this `PR` fixes it.
leonardojobim:
tACK ca5bd1c8e5
Tree-SHA512: a654ecf7ee35bb271df039be77077c1e1f9514e332587ba8622cea18da6a5b3ae8a7eb421e404ec5993c31a2f4d028e0e456fcc01facdbf61a2bc3b1e8423982
d98f4593cf00ab2973f8113e30506861b24383bc guix: Explicitly set umask in build container (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Opened as a separate PR to fix non-reproducibility found through testing here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21089#issuecomment-783549633
Many thanks to everyone who helped find this!
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK d98f4593cf00ab2973f8113e30506861b24383bc
fanquake:
ACK d98f4593cf00ab2973f8113e30506861b24383bc - I'm seeing matching hashes.
Tree-SHA512: ea339c3902f2f4dea32e8ef5cc675a1df0679530881260ae999aaaf7339d5b12c46e01e58677cbb079f33e573ad105e2b443a835f3e944ef8e943a25f83027f1
8b08d0f2a5161296d809a154ccde403a33a0f3ea build, doc: Fix configure script output indentation and typos (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is follow up of #16546, that breaks the `configure` script output indentation for gui/qt/qr lines:
```
Options used to compile and link:
external signer = no
multiprocess = no
with libs = yes
with wallet = yes
with sqlite = yes
with bdb = yes
with gui / qt = yes
with qr = yes
with zmq = yes
with test = yes
...
```
With this PR:
```
Options used to compile and link:
external signer = no
multiprocess = no
with libs = yes
with wallet = yes
with sqlite = yes
with bdb = yes
with gui / qt = yes
with qr = yes
with zmq = yes
with test = yes
...
```
Also typos are fixed.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 8b08d0f2a5161296d809a154ccde403a33a0f3ea
vasild:
ACK 8b08d0f2a5161296d809a154ccde403a33a0f3ea
Tree-SHA512: 46dfcfb754192dbcc080348781327d1714e2f9a696f3ed9252746b426e3afc628d84adb197ba3b8080eacaa6053ccac07e670998930ae92cef8ed713dd457c10
df8f2a11dcadd08840c5311631132a522650a83e test: Replace accidentally placed bit-OR with logical-OR (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow up of #19698.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK df8f2a11dc
Tree-SHA512: 36aba3e952850deafe78dd39775a568e89e867c8a352f511f152bce7062f614f5bb4f23266dbb33da5292c9ee6da5ccefce117e3168621c71d2140c8e7f58460
fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d [refactor] txmempool: split epoch logic into class (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Splits the epoch logic introduced in #17925 into a separate class.
Uses clang's thread safety annotations and encapsulates the data more strongly to reduce chances of bugs from API misuse.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d using clang thread safety annotations looks like a very good idea, and the encapsulation this change adds should improve robustness (and possible unit test-ability) of the code. Verified that changing some of the locking duly provoked build-time warnings with Clang 9 on Debian and that small changes in the new `Epoch` class were covered by failing functional test assertions in `mempool_updatefromblock.py`, `mempool_resurrect.py`, and `mempool_reorg.py`
hebasto:
re-ACK fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d, since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18017#pullrequestreview-569619362) review:
Tree-SHA512: 7004623faa02b56639aa05ab7a078320a6d8d54ec62d8022876221e33f350f47df51ddff056c0de5be798f8eb39b5c03c2d3f035698555d70abc218e950f2f8c
9bac71350d98580cc7441957fc7c3fa2f4158553 build: make HAVE_O_CLOEXEC available outside LevelDB (bugfix) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
584fd91d2d294883e6896dbd64a2176528e94581 init: only use pipe2 if availabile, check in configure (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The result of the O_CLOEXEC availability check is currently only set in the Makefile and passed to LevelDB (see `LEVELDB_CPPFLAGS_INT` in `src/Makefile.leveldb.include`), but not defined to be used in our codebase. This means that code within the preprocessor conditional `#if HAVE_O_CLOEXEC` was actually never compiled. On the master branch this is currently used for pipe creation in `src/shutdown.cpp`, PR #21007 moves this part to a new module (I found the issue while testing that PR).
The fix is similar to the one in #19803, which solved the same problem for HAVE_FDATASYNC.
In the course of working on the PR it turned out that pipe2 is not available an all platforms, hence a configure check and a corresponding define HAVE_PIPE2 is introduced and used.
The PR can be tested by anyone with a system that has pipe2 and O_CLOEXEC available by putting gibberish into the HAVE_O_CLOEXEC block: on master, everything should compile fine, on PR, the compiler should abort with an error. At least that's my naive way of testing preprocessor logic, happy to hear more sophisticated ways :-)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 9bac71350d98580cc7441957fc7c3fa2f4158553
Tree-SHA512: aec89faf6ba52b6f014c610ebef7b725d9e967207d58b42a4a71afc9f1268fcb673ecc85b33a2a3debba8105a304dd7edaba4208c5373fcef2ab83e48a170051
ba7e17e073f833eccd4c7c111ae9058c3f123371 rpc, test: document {previous,next}blockhash as optional (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the result help of the following RPCs w.r.t. the `previousblockhash` and `nextblockhash` fields:
- getblockheader
- getblock
Also adds trivial tests on genesis block (should not contain "previousblockhash") and best block (should not contain "nextblockhash").
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ef42c5c773fc436e1b4a67be14e2532e800e1e30e45e54a57431c6abb714d2c069c70d40ea4012d549293b823a1973b3f569484b3273679683b28ed40abf46bb
f75e0c1edde39a91cc353b0102638e232def9476 doc: add external-signer.md (Sjors Provoost)
d4b0107d68a91ed4d1a5c78c8ca76251329d3f3c rpc: send: support external signer (Sjors Provoost)
245b4457cf9265190a05529a0a97e1cb258cca8a rpc: signerdisplayaddress (Sjors Provoost)
7ebc7c0215979c53b92a436acc8b5b607b8d735a wallet: ExternalSigner: add GetDescriptors method (Sjors Provoost)
fc5da520f5c72287f59823b8a6d748dda49c574a wallet: add GetExternalSigner() (Sjors Provoost)
259f52cc33817a00b91ec9c7d078c07b88db7ab4 test: external_signer wallet flag is immutable (Sjors Provoost)
2655197e1c2dea9536c32afe1482ced4a1f481e9 rpc: add external_signer option to createwallet (Sjors Provoost)
2700f09c4130af6167ce71f46960e92ca800e205 rpc: signer: add enumeratesigners to list external signers (Sjors Provoost)
07b7c940a7da138d55a484ef83fee19ebf58a867 rpc: add external signer RPC files (Sjors Provoost)
8ce7767071779a0170364e6426bd393ed71bf281 wallet: add ExternalSignerScriptPubKeyMan (Sjors Provoost)
157ea7c614950d61bfe405310e2aaabcee31f7a3 wallet: add external_signer flag (Sjors Provoost)
f3e6ce78fba2b31173fe7b606aa9edb5b615bff3 test: add external signer test (Sjors Provoost)
8cf543f96dcd6fdfac1367b9e2b1d7d51be8bb76 wallet: add -signer argument for external signer command (Sjors Provoost)
f7eb7ecc6750ab267a979d9268ce5b5d151c26de test: framework: add skip_if_no_external_signer (Sjors Provoost)
87a97941f667483bbf2ab00929e03a2199cb8a62 configure: add --enable-external-signer (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Big picture overview in [this gist](https://gist.github.com/Sjors/29d06728c685e6182828c1ce9b74483d).
This PR lets `bitcoind` call an arbitrary command `-signer=<cmd>`, e.g. a hardware wallet driver, where it can fetch public keys, ask to display an address, and sign a transaction (using PSBT under the hood).
It's design to work with https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI, which supports multiple hardware wallets. Any command with the same arguments and return values will work. It simplifies the manual procedure described [here](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/HWI/blob/master/docs/bitcoin-core-usage.md).
Usage is documented in [doc/external-signer.md](
https://github.com/Sjors/bitcoin/blob/2019/08/hww-box2/doc/external-signer.md), which also describes what protocol a different signer binary should conform to.
Use `--enable-external-signer` to opt in, requires Boost::Process:
```
Options used to compile and link:
with wallet = yes
with gui / qt = no
external signer = yes
```
It adds the following RPC methods:
* `enumeratesigners`: asks <cmd> for a list of signers (e.g. devices) and their master key fingerprint
* `signerdisplayaddress <address>`: asks <cmd> to display an address
It enhances the following RPC methods:
* `createwallet`: takes an additional `external_signer` argument and fetches keys from device
* `send`: automatically sends transaction to device and waits
Usage TL&DR:
* clone HWI repo somewhere and launch `bitcoind -signer=../HWI/hwi.py`
* check if you can see your hardware device: `bitcoin-cli enumeratesigners`
* create wallet and auto import keys `bitcoin-cli createwallet "hww" true true "" true true true`
* display address on device: `bitcoin-cli signerdisplayaddress ...`
* to spend, use `send` RPC and approve transaction on device
Prerequisites:
- [x] #21127 load wallet flags before everything else
- [x] #21182 remove mostly pointless BOOST_PROCESS macro
Potentially useful followups:
- GUI support: bitcoin-core/gui#4
- bumpfee support
- (automatically) verify (a subset of) keys on the device after import, through message signing
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK f75e0c1edde39a91cc353b0102638e232def9476
Tree-SHA512: 7db8afd54762295c1424c3f01d8c587ec256a72f34bd5256e04b21832dabd5dc212be8ab975ae3b67de75259fd569a561491945750492f417111dc7b6641e77f
The recent requests table will allow you to copy data points even if they do not exist.
This PR implements checks to disable the 'copy label', 'copy message', and 'copy amount' context menu action if the respective fields are empty.
faf48f20f196e418b2eea390a0140db3604cfa15 log: Clarify log message when file does not exist (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Shorter and broader alternative to #21181
Rendered diff:
```diff
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Bitcoin Core version v21.99.0-db656db2ed5a (release build)
+Bitcoin Core version v21.99.0-faf48f20f196 (release build)
Qt 5.15.2 (dynamic), plugin=wayland (dynamic)
No static plugins.
Style: adwaita / Adwaita::Style
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ scheduler thread start
Using wallet directory /tmp/test_001/regtest/wallets
init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
init message: Loading banlist...
-ERROR: DeserializeFileDB: Failed to open file /tmp/test_001/regtest/banlist.dat
-Invalid or missing banlist.dat; recreating
+Missing or invalid file /tmp/test_001/regtest/banlist.dat
+Recreating banlist.dat
SetNetworkActive: true
Failed to read fee estimates from /tmp/test_001/regtest/fee_estimates.dat. Continue anyway.
Using /16 prefix for IP bucketing
@@ -63,9 +63,9 @@ Bound to [::]:18444
Bound to 0.0.0.0:18444
Bound to 127.0.0.1:18445
init message: Loading P2P addresses...
-ERROR: DeserializeFileDB: Failed to open file /tmp/test_001/regtest/peers.dat
-Invalid or missing peers.dat; recreating
-ERROR: DeserializeFileDB: Failed to open file /tmp/test_001/regtest/anchors.dat
+Missing or invalid file /tmp/test_001/regtest/peers.dat
+Recreating peers.dat
+Missing or invalid file /tmp/test_001/regtest/anchors.dat
0 block-relay-only anchors will be tried for connections.
init message: Starting network threads...
net thread start
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK faf48f20f196e418b2eea390a0140db3604cfa15
amitiuttarwar:
utACK faf48f20f1, 👍 for consistency. also checked where we create / load other `.dat` files, looks good to me.
practicalswift:
cr ACK faf48f20f196e418b2eea390a0140db3604cfa15
Tree-SHA512: 697a728ef2b9f203363ac00b03eaf23ddf80bee043ecd3719265a0d884e8cfe88cd39afe946c86ab849edd1c836f05ec51125f052bdc14fe184b84447567756f
5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4 assumptions: check C++17 assumption with MSVC (fanquake)
c7b46489f8c4d880382248fb47266d81948bbce0 assumptions: assume a C++17 compiler (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This has been the case since #20413.
This should also enable the check for MSVC. From my reading of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-cplusplus?view=msvc-160 and https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/ if we set the `/Zc:__cplusplus` switch in additional options, MSVC will report the correct value for `__cplusplus`. However I have not tested this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4
hebasto:
ACK 5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4, checked the MS docs, and AppVeyor build is green.
practicalswift:
ACK 5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4
Tree-SHA512: a4fb525cf5c33abc944c614edb0313a39c8a39a1637a03c09342c15ba0925f4eb037062e65e51b42ade667506b7e554c7159acf86e6b8c35d0a87dd79a6f239b
By default, a popup menu contains checkable entries for the toolbars
and dock widgets present in the main window. This allows users to
accidentally hide the toolbar.
5786a818e1a96bc1dd65b0e81b05998876357a74 Verify that all validation flags are backward compatible (gzhao408)
b10ce9aa48c8937cb91fca05e29c68098a364d93 [test] check verification flags are minimal/maximal (gzhao408)
a260c22cad0672dda11f42f649ebdc7cfa53b16a [test] Check for invalid flag combinations (gzhao408)
a7098a2a8d2d23ee3be1d71ab8c71475bf5a31ee [refactor] use CheckTxScripts, TrimFlags, FillFlags (gzhao408)
7a77727b2f66f3d723e03e917f0cabb459c49d62 Apply minimal validation flags to tx_invalid tests (gzhao408)
9532591bedaecf7c2debe779dec0a0debec2623b [test] add BADTX setting for invalid txns that fail CheckTransaction (gzhao408)
4c06ebf1281f0f387ab7493fe15176a05247525e [test] fix two witness tests in invalid tests with empty vout (gzhao408)
158a0b268ca2f73a5d504791359d1eff2cf27715 Apply maximal validation flags to tx_valid tests (gzhao408)
0a76a39b633760d4668d39859605c05629ee0025 [test] fix CSV test missing OP_ADD (gzhao408)
19db590d044efe7d474a16720e5b56e7b55db54c [test] remove unnecessary OP_1s from CSV and CLTV tests (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
This uses the first 4 commits of #15045, rebased and added some comments. The diff is quite large already and I want to make it easy to review, so I'm splitting it into 2 PRs (transaction and script). Script one is WIP, I'll link it when I open it.
Interpretation of scripts is dependent on the script verification flags passed in.
In tests, we should always apply **maximal** verification flags when checking that a transaction is **valid**; any additional flags should invalidate the transaction. A transaction should not be valid because we forgot to include a flag, and we should apply all flags by default.
We should apply **minimal** verification flags when asserting that a transaction is **invalid**; if verification flags are applied, removing any one of them should mean the transaction is valid.
New verify flags must be backwards compatible; tests should check backwards compatibility and apply the new flags by default. All `tx_invalid` tests should continue to be invalid with the exact same verify flags. All `tx_valid` tests that don't pass with new flags should _explicitly_ indicate that the flags need to be excluded, and fail otherwise.
1. Flip the meaning of `verifyFlags` in tx_valid.json to mean _excluded_ verification flags instead of included flags. Edit the test data accordingly.
2. Trim unneeded flags from tx_invalid.json.
3. Add check to verify that tx_valid tests have maximal flags and tx_invalid tests have minimal flags.
4. Add checks to verify that flags are soft forks (#10699) i.e. adding any flag should only decrease the number of acceptable scripts. Test by adding/removing random flags.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 5786a818e1a96bc1dd65b0e81b05998876357a74
laanwj:
ACK 5786a818e1a96bc1dd65b0e81b05998876357a74
Tree-SHA512: 19195d8cf3299e62f47dd3443ae4a95430c5c9d497993a18ab80de9e24b1869787af972774993bf05717784879bc4592fdabaae0fddebd437963d8f3c96d9a73
e348d7ea2c0b5d2eb8039dab33b0b9a48655885f qt: Add Copy Address Action to Payment Requests (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
Currently, the only way to copy the address of a payment request is to double-click on the payment request and then click on the copy address button. This PR adds a convenient context menu action to copy the address of a payment request.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ------------ |
|<img width="169" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-18 at 8 33 08 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108444489-b6703f80-7228-11eb-8684-945fbcd04772.png"> |<img width="169" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-18 at 8 33 50 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108444505-c12ad480-7228-11eb-9eee-473fee877ad7.png">|
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK e348d7ea2c0b5d2eb8039dab33b0b9a48655885f, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/pull/213#pullrequestreview-595520204) review.
Tree-SHA512: 2b75930ca326ef1d695afc1c6f25853ef55d06d20b66c3c3c372188a6cdfa4686c07f9c56824b766e46b660c731f8a9c2e5b935aa26b316fd46f9e396b29b802
Currently, the only way to copy the address of a payment request is to double-click on the payment request and then click on the copy address button. This commit adds a convenient context menu action to copy the address of a payment request.
fa1f3a26a7541ba82a28c2a5fd09401be825c888 doc: Clarify that squashing should happen before review (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Unlike other repos, in our repo code review happens before merge, ideally.
Thus, rebases, solving merge conflicts and squashing should happen before review, which again happens before merge.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK fa1f3a26a7541ba82a28c2a5fd09401be825c888
fanquake:
ACK fa1f3a26a7541ba82a28c2a5fd09401be825c888
Tree-SHA512: e9222191a6e9cf9867bd1f29982526dd7b746b70dd2cc94f485256ec98ff2d3941c9b40728935e151d13795239334e334b71ad41044909cb2849f57776811a94
a6a1b106dcc4350e420c461171c47e4934087175 guix: only download sources for hosts being built (fanquake)
Pull request description:
For example, if a user is only interested in building for Linux, this saves downloading the macOS compiler and additional dependencies, which is meaningful on a slow/poor connection. This will result in a few additional `make` invocations, for the Linux hosts, however this is low overhead, and time-wise irrelevant in terms of the overall build.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a6a1b106dcc4350e420c461171c47e4934087175
Tree-SHA512: 34c916ae6f69fed0d5845690b39111a8bee37208fd727176f375cf5eb4860f512abe12bde2680d697c859b4d50a3bc5688ddca7c2f28f9968fcf358753cf3f6d
95990b9f3278360b63e79d6975af4ab5009c66ba guix: Update conservative space requirements (Carl Dong)
5e6df1132656995ce5b9ce279d5a9808ea52ab32 guix: Add support for powerpc64{,le} (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
The new time-machine commit contains a few small changes that make the
powerpc cross-toolchain work.
```
See this compare to review my custom patches to Guix: 7d6bd44da5...6c9d16db96
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 95990b9f3278360b63e79d6975af4ab5009c66ba
Tree-SHA512: 464b0fb93d65962d8c27499293edb618d13d18f40d44e3eed96935e86d430666dfb1c5b8a30f99ffdfd17b44514ad88e358977390b689a2e3831d521f6f7b86a
ccb7b6a97652b45f60e0ac680a239bc6058b9773 contrib: run test-symbol check for RISCV (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Now that we are using Focal for gitian building (glibc 2.31), we can use a newer introduced symbol, and include RISC-V in this test.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK ccb7b6a97652b45f60e0ac680a239bc6058b9773
Tree-SHA512: 4ddaafc0b6cced49a504847ed8da02b0a514eca69014fdc2ad01068c6f8ddf9ad992525f47b2a182c3b4a5845f8dacfe5a7e4acf2f303a5dab6a70daa3b89509
25c57d640992255ed67964a44b17afbfd4bed0cf [doc] Add a note about where lock annotations should go. (Amiti Uttarwar)
ad5f01b96045f304b6cf9100879592b835c49c40 [validation] Move the lock annotation from function definition to declaration (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
Based on reviewing #21188
the first commit switches the lock annotations on `CheckInputScripts` to be on the function declaration instead of on the function definition. this ensures that all call sites are checked, not just ones that come after the definition.
the second commit adds a note to the developer-notes section to clarify where the annotations should be applied.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 25c57d640992255ed67964a44b17afbfd4bed0cf 🥘
promag:
Code review ACK 25c57d640992255ed67964a44b17afbfd4bed0cf.
Tree-SHA512: 61b6ef856bf6c6016d535fbdd19daf57b9e59fe54a1f30d47282a071b9b9d60b2466b044ee57929e0320cb1bdef52e7a1687cacaa27031bbc43d058ffffe22ba
fa55159b9ede4a915f8ef9e5b90e3e99eadedf91 net: Log to net debug in MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect except for noban and manual peers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The goal is to avoid local peers (e.g. untrusted peers on the local network or inbound onion peers via a local onion proxy) filling the debug log (and thus the disk).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa55159b9ede4a915f8ef9e5b90e3e99eadedf91
vasild:
ACK fa55159b9ede4a915f8ef9e5b90e3e99eadedf91
Tree-SHA512: de233bf57334580f9b91f369fafd131d71c5ae25db25b09cc8fa8cbf34c0648f083c52260a6a912238751467e3c3c5f5d2309c145710753058d44a0003f88f4f
8f9644890a167a093d95ecef1f12a20dce1bc581 qt: Remove Transactionview Edit Label Action (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `Edit Label` action from the `transactionview` context menu. Since the `Edit Label` action will no longer be utilized in the `transactionview`, the `Edit Label` function logic is also removed.
| Master | PR |
| ----------- | ----------- |
|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 34 34 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292189-9b86c800-7161-11eb-9e80-6238523bc27e.png">|<img width="248" alt="Screen Shot 2021-02-17 at 8 35 10 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108292204-a17ca900-7161-11eb-8582-7f33d3e2ba8f.png">|
Among the context menu actions for each transaction in the `transactionview` is the `Edit Label` action.
While all other actions apply directly to the selected transaction, the `Edit Label` action applies to the selected transaction's address. As documented in issue #209 and [#1168](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1168) , this is an "unfortunate" placement for such an action. The current placement creates a confusing UX scenario where the outcome of the action is ambiguous.
**Example of Ambiguous Behavior:**
The context menu gives the wrong impression that the `Edit Label` action will edit a `Label` for the specific transaction that has been right-clicked on. This impression can be because all other actions in this menu will relate to the specific transaction and the misconception between `Comment` and `Label`.
<img width="1062" alt="editlabel-start" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108296385-6da48200-7167-11eb-89f0-b21ccc58f6f4.png">
Let's say I wanted to give the transaction selected in the screenshot above a comment of "2-17[17:43]". Given all the context clues, it will be reasonable to assume that the `Edit Label` function will give a label to this transaction. Instead, it edits the `Label` for the address behind this transaction. Thus, changing the `Label` for all transactions associated with this address.
<img width="971" alt="editlabel-end" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23396902/108297179-e35d1d80-7168-11eb-86a9-0d2796c51829.png">
**Maintaining `Edit Label` Functionality:**
The action of Editing a Label should instead be reserved for the respective address tables of the `Send` and `Receive` tabs. As documented in this [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/209#issuecomment-780922101), `Edit Label` is currently implemented in the `Send` tab and is missing in the `Receive` tab. A follow-up PR can add the `Edit Label` functionality to the `Receive` tab.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8f9644890a167a093d95ecef1f12a20dce1bc581
Talkless:
tACK 8f9644890a167a093d95ecef1f12a20dce1bc581, tested on Debian Sid.
Tree-SHA512: 70bbcc8be3364b0d4f476a9760aa14ad1ad1f53b0b130ce0ffe75190d76c386e6e26c530c0a55d1742402fe2b45c68a2af6dbfaf58ee9909ad93b06f0b6559d4
142807af8b82e2372a03df893c50df4f4a96aca4 gui: display BIP152 high bandwidth relay in peer details (Jon Atack)
9476886353dffb730dcb75799f2bd5e143425795 gui: display fRelayTxes in peer details (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull adds two fields to the peer details, "Wants Tx Relay" (fRelayTxes) and "High Bandwidth" (bip152_highbandwidth to/from). See the added tooltips for more info.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 142807af8b82e2372a03df893c50df4f4a96aca4
jarolrod:
ACK 142807af8b82e2372a03df893c50df4f4a96aca4
Tree-SHA512: 956c7fa54c9c2ea76ee879d370711be0bed4af05484a17d35a1dd77713ed34ff441ed3957d0ef3a7ca7cf59a2f5d898be49b12af609a16b3e3cbfc4a1ba8f54e
3913d1e8c1f604bdd622d5e81e5077ef52b30466 qt: Drop buggy TableViewLastColumnResizingFixer class (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
In Qt 5 the last column resizing with dragging its left edge works out-of-the-box.
The current `TableViewLastColumnResizingFixer` implementation could put the last column content out of the view port and confuse a user:
Historical context:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2862
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3626
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3738
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3920#205 is a nice addition.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 3913d1e8c1f604bdd622d5e81e5077ef52b30466, tested on macOS 11.1 Qt 5.15.2
Talkless:
tACK 3913d1e8c1f604bdd622d5e81e5077ef52b30466, tested on Debian Sid. Can confirm that behavior in previous commit does not produce scroll bar, last column gets "hidden". This PR makes clear that there's more to see in the view.
promag:
Tested ACK 3913d1e8c1f604bdd622d5e81e5077ef52b30466 on macos.
Tree-SHA512: 12582dfce54bb1db3d9934ae092e305d32e9760cc99b0265322e161fa7f54b7d6fb6cefedf700783f767d5c3a56a8545c8d2f5ade66596c4e67b8a5287063e8a
