86e3a0a8cb refactor: standardize obfuscation memory alignment (Lőrinc)
13f00345c0 refactor: write `Obfuscation` object when new key is generated in dbwrapper (Lőrinc)
e5b1b7c557 refactor: rename `OBFUSCATION_KEY_KEY` (Lőrinc)
298bf95105 refactor: simplify `Obfuscation::HexKey` (Lőrinc)
2dea045425 test: make `obfuscation_serialize` more thorough (Lőrinc)
a17d8202c3 test: merge xor_roundtrip_random_chunks and xor_bytes_reference (Lőrinc)
Pull request description:
Follow up for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31144
Applied the remaining comments in separate commits - except for the last one where I could group them.
Please see the commit messages for more context.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 86e3a0a8cb
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 86e3a0a8cb, just tweaking key write assert as suggested
hodlinator:
ACK 86e3a0a8cb
Tree-SHA512: 967510a141fbb57bf9d088d92b554cf2fffc2f6aa0eab756cbae3230f53e9b04ceebcc6fea5f3383c01ad41985ecde5b5686c64a771ca9deae3497b9b88c1c8b
18d1071dd1 init: replace deprecated PermissionsStartOnly systemd directive (Florian Schmaus)
1caaf65043 init: remove Group= as it will default to the user's default group (Florian Schmaus)
Pull request description:
> This removes the redundant 'Group=' directive and replaces the deprecated 'PermissionsStartOnly' directive.
Picks up #16994 / #19513. The concern in both of these PRs was changing this too early, while systemd v240 was still prelevant on supported systems. That was ~5 years ago, and from what I can see, no modern/supported OS is still using an older systemd.
Separately , I am wondering if we should move these files out to https://github.com/bitcoin-core/packaging/.
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
reACK 18d1071dd1
Tree-SHA512: a994e38099e68e8377ac820d3cd2047cbfca065ba617eff0d621e3c3b99b05bbd2329631aa8c885a83cf5d0066d97ff5be75bf5834e9f759d8f0d2c6c9b64851
fdbade6f8d kernel: create monolithic kernel static library (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Currently, consuming `libbitcoinkernel.a` requires all its dependency static libraries to be available. A switch to a monolithic variant, which contains object files from its dependencies, was discussed in the Kernel WG. The necessary preparations in the libsecp256k1 build scripts were completed in https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1678, which are now available in this repository since https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33036.
The changes in this PR were picked from https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/commits/static_kernel/, with an additional adjustment in `libbitcoinkernel.pc.in`.
This PR can be tested as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30814#issue-2505698234.
ACKs for top commit:
TheCharlatan:
ACK fdbade6f8d
stickies-v:
tACK fdbade6f8d
Tree-SHA512: bd9e9dbb0b765bdcb162fb3f4ad3c4e01fe5fa0b7061f97d0bad64442b21db036cbe0e4341fd45d43a8862df76d62c9532ca8945f76423aca753c6b528f70873
b093a19ae2 cmake: Proactively avoid use of `SECP256K1_DISABLE_SHARED` (Hennadii Stepanov)
eb59a192d9 cmake, refactor: Encapsulate adding secp256k1 subtree in function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The `SECP256K1_DISABLE_SHARED` CMake variable has been [removed](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1688) upstream.
This PR removes its usage ahead of the next `secp256k1` subtree update to prevent breakage and simplify integration.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK b093a19ae2
Tree-SHA512: a87cee71cf356f458f68d3163253ca5c4f86e56d268006b6b8e1d4b2c009ba436148a07a6b67b89ddbb2d0e3c1113ab4b4906c5fc5624cb3082b20e916e0e82b
3543bfdfec test: Fix 'getdescriptoractivity' RPCHelpMan, add test to verify 'spend_vin' is the correct field (Chris Stewart)
Pull request description:
Fixes bug in `getdescriptoractivity` RPC help manual.
Here is the line that pushes `spend_vin` field, there is no `spend_vout` json field.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/rpc/blockchain.cpp#L2757
ACKs for top commit:
nervana21:
tACK 3543bfd
luke-jr:
utACK 3543bfdfec
jonatack:
ACK 3543bfdfec
Tree-SHA512: 2cd543569a87261d8d804d9afe36f8e8ead55839c01da9c4831aea3ced7d1251e6885621e628898105700aae4d76cbb8a682f518f33c1c52163e66f75ec87a61
a26fbee38f qt: Translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
ca04eebd72 cmake: Switch to generated `ts_files.cmake` file (Hennadii Stepanov)
95341de6ca cmake, refactor: Move handling of Qt TS files into `locale` directory (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR:
1. Moves handling of Qt TS files into the `locale` directory.
2. Switches from inferior globbing to the explicit file list generated by the [`bitcoin-maintainer-tools/update-translations.py`](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools/blob/main/update-translations.py) script.
Closes#32653.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a26fbee38f
Tree-SHA512: 10596768c120d9da21a2340b693c5f39e9e1e02976805e14284cf9785780756f953d73d3d2b4a7246ada37acafe3e5d0e8927a8f51bf9fce3bc93a3544231489
fa1d2f6380 ci: Pass CI_FAILFAST_TEST_LEAVE_DANGLING into container (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
After commit fd813bf863, the env var `CI_FAILFAST_TEST_LEAVE_DANGLING` is no longer passed into the container.
This is harmless, because it isn't needed for the Linux containers and macos doesn't use containers at all.
However, it would be nice to document it as an allowed setting and consistently pass it on, when set. So do that here.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa1d2f6380
Tree-SHA512: b61780a27f4c2e11359827b1360a34a132e15bff94f358cbf4d453805afcafb873e2c395908b17610fae026ead93226c19a8f6be40fbb87b623ee992f3e2b43e
3333d3f75f ci: Only pass documented env vars (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The CI currently inherits almost all env vars from the host. This was problematic in the past and causing non-determinism, e.g. the fix in commit fa12558d21. It is still problematic today, see e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31349#issuecomment-2586828644, or https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32935
This fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32935 by only passing env vars documented in `./ci/test/00_setup_env.sh`.
Implementation-wise, instead of cramming the python code into the `python -c ""` statement, just start a fresh py file, which is easier to handle.
ACKs for top commit:
willcl-ark:
ACK 3333d3f75f
Tree-SHA512: f922e481a844128d7fbf773563278a3992c178ead60a3050eceb9ded2aad979afc815a5cbdb9f68494493c5d8d942cdd1111c21e32a5746d19505b87745cb84a
ad132761fc [allocators] Apply manual ASan poisoning to PoolResource (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
Currently ASan will not detect use-after-free issues for memory allocated by a `PoolResource`. This is because ASan is only aware of the memory chunks allocated by `PoolResource` but not the individual "sub-chunks" within.
E.g. this test will not produce an ASan error even though the referenced coin has been deallocated:
```c++
diff --git a/src/test/coins_tests.cpp b/src/test/coins_tests.cpp
index c46144b34b..aa6ca15ce1 100644
--- a/src/test/coins_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/coins_tests.cpp
@@ -508,6 +508,17 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(updatecoins_simulation_test, UpdateTest)
BOOST_CHECK(spent_a_duplicate_coinbase);
}
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(asan_uaf)
+{
+ CCoinsMapMemoryResource cache_coins_memory_resource{};
+ CCoinsMap map(0, SaltedOutpointHasher(/*deterministic=*/true), CCoinsMap::key_equal{}, &cache_coins_memory_resource);
+ COutPoint outpoint{};
+ map.emplace(outpoint, Coin{});
+ auto& coin = map.at(outpoint);
+ map.erase(outpoint);
+ coin.coin.nHeight = 1;
+}
+
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ccoins_serialization)
{
// Good example
```
Fix this by applying [manual ASan poisoning](https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerManualPoisoning) for memory allocated by `PoolResource`:
* Newly allocated chunks are poisoned as a whole
* "Sub-chunks" are unpoisoned/re-poisoned during allocation/deallocation
With the poisoning applied, ASan catches the issue in the test above:
```
$ ./build_unit/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test="coins_tests/asan_uaf"
Running 1 test case...
=================================================================
==366064==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7f99c3204870 at pc 0x55569dab6f8a bp 0x7ffe0210e4d0 sp 0x7ffe0210e4c8
READ of size 4 at 0x7f99c3204870 thread T0 (b-test)
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ad132761fc
marcofleon:
code review ACK ad132761fc
Tree-SHA512: eb5e80bfa9509225e784151807bd8aa21fb0826ca1781dfe81b1d60bd3766019384ea3f9cb8e53398fde2f4e994a9c201b5a9962b4d279d7e52bb60e8961be11
1252eeb997 rpc: fix getpeerinfo ping duration unit docs (0xb10c)
Pull request description:
The docs have been incorrect since a3789c700b (released in v25; master since Sept. 2022). Noticed while setting up monitoring using getpeerinfo.
0cb1ed2b7c/src/rpc/net.cpp (L249-L257)
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
utACK 1252eeb997
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 1252eeb997
jonatack:
ACK 1252eeb997
theStack:
ACK 1252eeb997
janb84:
ACK 1252eeb997
Tree-SHA512: 33f576336b2a4d9533f51f4641d564ee59ef692c5fa9a3cad239fc31465883d5da534bfd0e069be1e1d688e5f0dea3fe6850be19bf35335041b8f414d08f7f09
The getpeerinfo docs incorrectly specified the ping durations as
milliseconds. This was incorrectly changed in a3789c700b
(released in v25; master since Sept. 2022). The correct duration unit
is seconds.
Also, remove the documentation of the getpeerinfo RPC response from the
ping RPC since it's incomplete. Better to just reference the getpeerinfo
RPC and it's documenation for this.
e017ef3c7e init: make `-blockmaxweight` startup option debug-only (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This PR updates `-blockmaxweight` startup option to be debug-only so that it will be hidden from help text.
The option is currently unlikely to be used on mainnet, after the addition of the new `blockreservedweight` option. however it can be useful for test and signet network see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32654#issuecomment-2925674473
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK e017ef3c7e
fjahr:
ACK e017ef3c7e
polespinasa:
tACK e017ef3c7e
Tree-SHA512: 6c18781826b2f96b13b70b7f1624481f5971746a613079d0d9528366f274ba657a02611f134d7a64f35ecb7e5faf2e3cd025458b04574ac68f804372f6eb715f
a3cf623364 test: Test max_selection_weight edge cases (Murch)
57fe8acc8a test: Check max_weight_exceeded error (Murch)
Pull request description:
I tested all of the reported surviving mutants that @brunoerg reported in https://gist.github.com/brunoerg/834063398d5002f738506d741513e310.
I found that all Mutants except for 12, 14, 17, 37, and 39 were now being caught by one of the existing tests. This fixes Mutants 14, 37, and 39.
Mutant 17 is not fixed, because I consider it acceptable that running BnB for 100,001 instead of 100,000 comparisons doesn’t cause an issue, and Mutant 12 is not yet fixed, because at `fee` = `long_term_fee`, the waste of inputs is 0 and only excess matters, and I haven’t evaluated yet, whether it needs to be fixed.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a3cf623364
jlest01:
ACK a3cf623364
brunoerg:
code review ACK a3cf623364
Tree-SHA512: db67c52127ed98f809f64a903c6b3a012e56cf665a0cd851457af7c85c37ec3af8bb72035d7ad370dd883f99cf3014464e3576559899e37c1d6ee01230511754
cc33e45789 test: improve assertion for SRD max weight test (yancy)
Pull request description:
Replace generic assertion with a result specific assertion showing the correctness of the solution found. If the max weight parameter is exceeded, the least valuable `UTXOs` are removed from the result. Therefore, only the most valued _encountered_ `UTXO's` are selected. While the smallest set would include all the most valued `UTXO's`, in the case of the test there is one high value `UTXO` that is never found before the target value is reached.
Correct the test comment to be more specific about why the assertion is a good result.
ACKs for top commit:
murchandamus:
ACK cc33e45789
furszy:
ACK cc33e45789
Tree-SHA512: bad224063ba830c27fba1b7b80e411ac7cd6c3edcb60bade4e6e3010f3b5d360a921de742c7c20efea8fa839d7939f338270658f66bbcebedebe5c5c8a3e8f9b
c0642e558a [fuzz] fix latency score check in txorphan_protected (glozow)
3d4d4f0d92 scripted-diff: rename "ann" variables to "latency_score" (monlovesmango)
3b92448923 [doc] comment fixups for orphanage changes (glozow)
1384dbaf6d [config] emit warning for -maxorphantx, but allow it to be set (glozow)
b10c55b298 fix up TxOrphanage lower_bound sanity checks (glozow)
cfd71c6704 scripted-diff: rename TxOrphanage outpoints index (glozow)
edb97bb3f1 [logging] add logs for inner loop of LimitOrphans (glozow)
8a58d0e87d scripted-diff: rename OrphanTxBase to OrphanInfo (glozow)
cc50f2f0df [cleanup] replace TxOrphanage::Size() with CountUniqueOrphans (glozow)
ed24e01696 [optimization] Maintain at most 1 reconsiderable announcement per wtxid (Pieter Wuille)
af7402ccfa [refactor] make TxOrphanage keep itself trimmed (glozow)
d1fac25ff3 [doc] 31829 release note (glozow)
Pull request description:
Followup to #31829:
- Release notes
- Have the orphanage auto-trim itself whenever necessary (and test changes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31829#discussion_r2169508690
- Reduce duplicate reconsiderations by keeping track of which txns are already reconsiderable so we only mark it for reconsideration for 1 peer at a time https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31829#issuecomment-3001627814
- Rename `OrphanTxBase` to `OrphanInfo`
- Get rid of `Size()` method by replacing all calls with `CountUniqueOrphans`
- Rename outpoints index since they point to wtxids, not iterators https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31829#discussion_r2205557613
- Add more logging in the `LimitOrphans` inner loop to make it easy to see which peers are being trimmed https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31829#issuecomment-3074385460
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK c0642e558a
marcofleon:
Nice, ACK c0642e558a
Tree-SHA512: f298eae92cf906ed5e4f15a24eeffa7b9e620bcff457772cd77522dd9f0b3b183ffc976871b1b0e6fe93009e64877d518e53d4b9e186e0df58fc16d17f6de90a
444dcb2f99 fuzz: txgraph: fix `real_is_optimal` flag propagation in `CommitStaging` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
In the `txgraph` fuzz test, the `CommitStaging` step updates the `SimTxGraph` levels simply by erasing the front (=main) one in the `sims` vector, i.e. the staging level instance takes the place of the main level instance:
83a2216f52/src/test/fuzz/txgraph.cpp (L668-L672)
This also includes the `real_is_optimal` flag (reflecting whether the corresponding real graph is known to be optimally linearized), without taking into account that this flag should only be set if _both_ levels before the commiting are optimal.
E.g. in case of #33097, at this point the main level is not optimally linearized, while the staging level is, and due to the incorrect propagation of the latter the simulation incorrectly assumes that the main level is optimal after, leading to the assertion fail in the additional checks that are ran in this case[1]. Fix this by setting the flag in the resulting main level explicitly. This is done in a generic way, in case there will ever be more than two levels (not sure what is planned in this direction), a simpler alternative would be e.g. `main_optimal = sim[0].real_is_optimal && sim[1].real_is_optimal`.
Fixes#33097.
[1] see 0aedf09ccc for the printf-debug-session-clutter, if that is useful/interesting for anyone (most of the output turned out to be irrelevant to the actual cause of #33097, but it was an entertaining way to discover the interface and get a first glimpse of `TxGraph` internals as a cluster-mempool newbie).
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 444dcb2f99
glozow:
ACK 444dcb2f99
Tree-SHA512: c20580e14628fcdc34dabb646a097e02e95b26c5740fcd5ce50f3472e4ee08f20b9a146c9ff16c85e19e57b05af1560e41a9220289c60c15083ad897dc62a0f0
The translations for the following languages, which appear to be the
result of a mistake or an act of vandalism, have been discarded:
- Greek (el)
- Vietnamese (vi)
In the `txgraph` fuzz test, the `CommitStaging` step updates the
`SimTxGraph` levels simply by erasing the front (=main) one in the
`sims` vector, i.e. the staging level instance takes the place of the
main level instance. This also includes the `real_is_optimal` flag
(reflecting whether the corresponding real graph is known to be
optimally linearized), without taking into account that this flag
should only be set if _both_ levels before the commiting are optimal.
E.g. in case of #33097, the main level is not optimally linearized,
while the staging level is, and due to the incorrect propagation of the
latter to the simulation incorrectly assumes that the main level is
optimal, leading to the assertion fail. Fix this by setting the flag
in the resulting main level explicitly.
Resolves the fuzzing assertion fail in issue #33097.
e07e2532b4 test: fix anti-fee-sniping off-by-one error (ishaanam)
Pull request description:
This fixes the off-by-one error in the anti-fee-sniping tests for `send` and `sendall`. `assert_greater_than` fails if the two values are equal.
Closes#33114
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e07e2532b4
glozow:
utACK e07e2532b4
Tree-SHA512: 6c9c3d1256faf563361946703d9a51279777d73bc1a849873e03e5b5db52c3c2b9dea4bfe27b1f01b9c830ca246200a895b6a28484da6d822b93b0c7cba237c1
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/max_global_ann/max_global_latency_score/g' src/node/txorphanage.cpp
sed -i 's/max_global_ann/max_global_latency_score/g' src/node/txorphanage.h
sed -i 's/max_global_ann/max_global_latency_score/g' src/test/orphanage_tests.cpp
sed -i 's/max_global_ann/max_global_latency_score/g' src/test/fuzz/txorphan.cpp
sed -i 's/max_global_ann/max_global_latency_score/g' src/bench/txorphanage.cpp
sed -i 's/max_ann/max_lat/g' src/node/txorphanage.cpp
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This introduces an invariant that TxOrphanageImpl never holds more than one
announcement with m_reconsider=true for a given wtxid. This avoids duplicate
work, both in the caller might otherwise reconsider the same transaction multiple
times before it is ready, and internally in AddChildrenToWorkSet, which might
otherwise iterate over all announcements multiple times.
eb65f57f31 [test] setmocktime instead of waiting in 1p1c tests (glozow)
70772dd469 [test] cut the number of transactions involved in 1p1c DoS tests (glozow)
Pull request description:
It was brought to my attention that the runtime of this test is Too Damn High. The test is slow due to the many `wait_for_getdata`s with delays (inbound peer + txid request) and the large volume of messages sent in the dos-related tests. This PR cuts the runtime by about 60% by reducing the number of messages/transactions and using `setmocktime` instead of waiting.
On my machine, master:
```
84.51s user 1.55s system 57% cpu 2:28.53 total
```
After first commit (about 1min faster):
```
28.29s user 0.88s system 35% cpu 1:22.84 total
```
After second commit (about 30sec faster):
```
28.17s user 0.87s system 59% cpu 49.082 total
```
Reviewers should verify that the transactions in the DoS tests are still enough to cause evictions, and that the `bumpmocktime` amounts are not more than necessary.
Alternatives:
- If we don't like mocking the times, we can use outbound connections for all the peers. However, that approach won't improve the runtime as much because we impose a 2-second delay on all txid requests regardless of peer type.
- Note that `noban_tx_relay` is not relevant for this test because all delays are related to downloading, not announcing.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK eb65f57f31
w0xlt:
ACK eb65f57f31
Tree-SHA512: 6ffe1f9e5144653e2ded744cec9ddb62ad728c587705542565400a0e8f1fba4843aced4e0d929843874ca7f56f670f5871b7e009ff6be58b791ab24d2e6fcc0e
This change offers a few advantages, such as:
- a more readable and cleaner `ts_files.cmake` (see the next commit);
- a scoped `ts_files` variable;
- improved code locality;
- no need to adjust the location of the resulting `*.qm` files.
ea17a9423f [doc] release note for relaxing requirement of all unconfirmed parents present (glozow)
12f48d5ed3 test: add chained 1p1c propagation test (Greg Sanders)
525be56741 [unit test] package submission 2p1c with 1 parent missing (glozow)
f24771af05 relax child-with-unconfirmed-parents rule (glozow)
Pull request description:
Broadens the package validation interface, see #27463 for wider context.
On master, package rules include that (1) the package topology must be child-wth-parents (2) all of the child's unconfirmed parents must be present. This PR relaxes the second rule, leaving the first rule untouched (there are plans to change that as well, but not here).
Original motivation for this rule was based on the idea that we would have a child-with-unconfirmed-parents package relay protocol, and this would verify that the peer provided the "correct" package. For various reasons, we're not planning on doing this. We could potentially do this for ancestor packages (with a similar definition that all UTXOs to make the tx valid are available in this package), but it's also questionable whether it's useful to enforce this.
This rule gets in the way of certain usage of 1p1c package relay currently. If a transaction has multiple parents, of which only 1 requires a package CPFP, this rule blocks the package from relaying. Even if all the non-low-feerate parents are already in mempool, when the p2p logic submits the 1p1c package, it gets rejected for not meeting this rule.
ACKs for top commit:
ishaanam:
re-utACK ea17a9423f
instagibbs:
ACK ea17a9423f
Tree-SHA512: c2231761ae7b2acea10a96735e7a36c646f517964d0acb59bacbae1c5a1950e0223458b84c6d5ce008f0c1d53c1605df0fb3cd0064ee535ead006eb7c0fa625b
PermissionsStartOnly is deprecated [1]. This removes the directives
and instead we prefixes the value of the ExecStartPre directive with
'!', which means the executable, 'chgrp' in this case, is run with
full privileges and able to change the group of /etc/bitcoin.
1: 60b45a80c1/NEWS (L2434)
Setting Group=bitcoin is redundant. It is typically the default group
of the user and if not explicitly specified, systemd will run the
service with the default group of the user.
The `SECP256K1_DISABLE_SHARED` CMake variable has been removed upstream.
This change removes its usage ahead of the next `secp256k1` subtree
update to prevent breakage and simplify integration.
c157438116 qa: test that we do disconnect upon a second invalid compact block being announced (Antoine Poinsot)
fb2dcbb160 qa: test cached failure for compact block (Antoine Poinsot)
f12d8b104e qa: test a compact block with an invalid transaction (Antoine Poinsot)
d6c37b28a7 qa: remove unnecessary tx removal from compact block (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
In thinking about https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33050 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33012#issuecomment-3111631541, i went through the code paths for peer disconnection upon submitting an invalid block. It turns out that the fact we exempt a peer from disconnection upon submitting an invalid compact block was not properly tested, as can be checked with these diffs:
```diff
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 0c4a89c44c..d243fb88d4 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -1805,10 +1805,10 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidati
// The node is providing invalid data:
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CONSENSUS:
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_MUTATED:
- if (!via_compact_block) {
+ //if (!via_compact_block) {
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, message);
return;
- }
+ //}
break;
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_CACHED_INVALID:
{
```
```diff
diff --git a/src/net_processing.cpp b/src/net_processing.cpp
index 0c4a89c44cb..e8e0c805367 100644
--- a/src/net_processing.cpp
+++ b/src/net_processing.cpp
@@ -1814,10 +1814,10 @@ void PeerManagerImpl::MaybePunishNodeForBlock(NodeId nodeid, const BlockValidati
{
// Discourage outbound (but not inbound) peers if on an invalid chain.
// Exempt HB compact block peers. Manual connections are always protected from discouragement.
- if (peer && !via_compact_block && !peer->m_is_inbound) {
+ //if (peer && !via_compact_block && !peer->m_is_inbound) {
if (peer) Misbehaving(*peer, message);
return;
- }
+ //}
break;
}
case BlockValidationResult::BLOCK_INVALID_HEADER:
```
We do have a test for this, but it actually uses a coinbase witness commitment error, which is checked much earlier in `FillBlock`. This PR adds coverage for the two exemptions in `MaybePunishNodeForBlock`.
ACKs for top commit:
kevkevinpal:
ACK [c157438](c157438116)
nervana21:
tACK [c157438](c157438116)
instagibbs:
crACK c157438116
stratospher:
ACK c157438116.
Tree-SHA512: a77d5a9768c0d73f122b06db2e416e80d0b3c3fd261dae8e340ecec2ae92d947d31988894bc732cb6dad2e338b3c82f33e75eb3280f8b0933b285657cf3b212c
4b80147feb test: Perform backup filename checks in migrate_and_get_rpc (Ava Chow)
Pull request description:
Some test cases were unnecessarily checking the backup filename, which involved setting the mocktime before `migrate_and_get_rpc`. However, this could cause a failure if the test was slow since `migrate_and_get_rpc` also sets the mocktime. Since it also already checks that the backup file is named correctly, there's no need for those tests to also do their own mocktime and filename check.
The CI failure can be reproduced locally by adding a sleep to `migrate_and_get_rpc`:
```diff
diff --git a/test/functional/wallet_migration.py b/test/functional/wallet_migration.py
index 704204425c7..e87a6100623 100755
--- a/test/functional/wallet_migration.py
+++ b/test/functional/wallet_migration.py
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ class WalletMigrationTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
assert_equal(w["warnings"], ["This wallet is a legacy wallet and will need to be migrated with migratewallet before it can be loaded"])
# Mock time so that we can check the backup filename.
+ time.sleep(1)
mocked_time = int(time.time())
self.master_node.setmocktime(mocked_time)
# Migrate, checking that rescan does not occur
```
Fixes#33096
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
reACK 4b80147feb
Sammie05:
tACK 4b80147
pablomartin4btc:
utACK 4b80147feb
rkrux:
ACK 4b80147feb
Tree-SHA512: 045d4acf2ad0b56a7083ff2ee5ef09f0d74ad097c01a290660daca096c71fc07109848024256d84f74abbc87dd52691d160f9968b3654726626d3dbd21a84ab6
