327 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carl Dong
5921b863e3 init: Reset mempool and chainman via reconstruction
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22964

Previously, we used UnloadBlockIndex() in order to reset node.mempool
and node.chainman. However, that has proven to be fragile (see
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22964), and requires
UnloadBlockIndex and its callees to be updated manually for each member
that's introduced to the mempool and chainman classes.

In this commit, we stop using the UnloadBlockIndex function and we
simply reconstruct node.mempool and node.chainman.

Since PeerManager needs a valid reference to both node.mempool and
node.chainman, we also move PeerManager's construction via `::make` to
after the chainstate activation sequence is complete.

There are no more callers to UnloadBlockIndex after this commit, so it
and its sole callees can be pruned.
2022-04-27 11:09:00 -04:00
fanquake
bd616bc16a
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24917: Make BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex private
fa1970f075292d7312654730a994a68c2ca8bc06 Make BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex private (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  * After commit fa27f03b4943540aa2eab283d4cf50ad4a1a01f8 `BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex` is only called by `BlockManager::LoadBlockIndexDB`. Thus, it can be made `private`.

  * After commit c600ee38168a460d3026eae0e289c976194aad14 `m_best_invalid` is no longer accessed by `BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex`. Thus, the unused `friend` can be removed.

ACKs for top commit:
  mruddy:
    ACK fa1970f075292d7312654730a994a68c2ca8bc06 I verified by double checking references, then applying the patch, and running `make check`. LGTM.

Tree-SHA512: 9b36b4c59bf7ad01171764ce61b1be9750fc92d105c4fe939b1a6a70027ab6300d5d2a2fc3e82f981e22c3987f2ca84e092d2e1f8463fa320af9f05048580c0a
2022-04-26 20:20:07 +01:00
Fabian Jahr
2561823531
blockstorage: Add prune locks to BlockManager
This change also introduces an aditional buffer of 10 blocks (PRUNE_LOCK_BUFFER) that will not be pruned before the best block.

Co-authored-by: Luke Dashjr <luke-jr+git@utopios.org>
2022-04-25 23:21:58 +02:00
Fabian Jahr
231fc7b035
refactor: Introduce GetFirstStoredBlock helper function 2022-04-25 23:18:01 +02:00
fanquake
505ba39665
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22910: net: Encapsulate asmap in NetGroupManager
36f814c0e84d009c0e0aa26981a20ac4cf338a85 [netgroupman] Remove NetGroupManager::GetAsmap() (John Newbery)
4709fc2019e27e74be02dc5fc123b9f6f46d7990 [netgroupman] Move asmap checksum calculation to NetGroupManager (John Newbery)
1b978a7e8c71dcc1501705022e66f6779c8c4528 [netgroupman] Move GetMappedAS() and GetGroup() logic to NetGroupManager (John Newbery)
ddb4101e6377a998b7c598bf52217b47698ddec9 [net] Only use public CNetAddr functions and data in GetMappedAS() and GetGroup() (John Newbery)
6b2268162e96bc4fe1a3ebad454996b1d3d4615c [netgroupman] Add GetMappedAS() and GetGroup() (John Newbery)
19431560e3e1124979c60f39eca9429c4a0df29f [net] Move asmap into NetGroupManager (John Newbery)
17c24d458042229e00dd4e0b75a32e593be29564 [init] Add netgroupman to node.context (John Newbery)
9b3836710b8160d212aacd56154938e5bb4b26b7 [build] Add netgroup.cpp|h (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  The asmap data is currently owned by addrman, but is used by both addrman and connman. #22791 made the data const and private (so that it can't be updated by other components), but it is still passed out of addrman as a reference to const, and used by `CNetAddress` to calculate the group and AS of the net address.

  This RFC PR proposes to move all asmap data and logic into a new `NetGroupManager` component. This is initialized at startup, and the client components addrman and connman simply call `NetGroupManager::GetGroup(const CAddress&)` and `NetGroupManager::GetMappedAS(const CAddress&)` to get the net group and AS of an address.

ACKs for top commit:
  mzumsande:
    Code Review ACK 36f814c0e84d009c0e0aa26981a20ac4cf338a85
  jnewbery:
    CI failure seems spurious. I rebased onto latest master to trigger a new CI run, but whilst I was doing that, mzumsande ACKed 36f814c0e8, so I've reverted to that.
  dergoegge:
    Code review ACK 36f814c0e84d009c0e0aa26981a20ac4cf338a85

Tree-SHA512: 244a89cdfd720d8cce679eae5b7951e1b46b37835fccb6bdfa362856761bb110e79e263a6eeee8246140890f3bee2850e9baa7bc14a388a588e0e29b9d275175
2022-04-22 14:43:14 +01:00
Carl Dong
f0a2fb3c5d scripted-diff: Rename pindexBestHeader, fHavePruned
...to m_best_header and m_have_pruned

-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
find_regex="\bpindexBestHeader\b" \
    && git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src \
        | xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@m_best_header@g"
find_regex="\bfHavePruned\b" \
    && git grep -l -E "$find_regex" -- src \
        | xargs sed -i -E "s@$find_regex@m_have_pruned@g"
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
2022-04-19 14:36:18 -04:00
Carl Dong
a401402125 Clear fHavePruned in BlockManager::Unload()
-----

Code Reviewer Notes

Call graph of relevant functions:

UnloadBlockIndex() <-- Moved from
    calls ChainstateManager::Unload()
        which calls BlockManager::Unload() <-- Moved to

So calling UnloadBlockIndex() would still run this moved code. The code
will also now run when ~BlockManager gets called, which makes sense.
2022-04-19 14:34:56 -04:00
Carl Dong
3308ecd3fc move-mostly: Make fHavePruned a BlockMan member
[META] In the next commit, we move the clearing of fHavePruned to
       BlockManager::Unload()
2022-04-19 14:34:56 -04:00
Carl Dong
0d567daf23 move-mostly: Make pindexBestHeader a ChainMan member
[META] In the next commit, we move the clearing of pindexBestHeader to
       ChainstateManager::Unload()
2022-04-19 14:34:55 -04:00
MarcoFalke
fa1970f075
Make BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex private 2022-04-19 11:32:49 +02:00
John Newbery
17c24d4580 [init] Add netgroupman to node.context
This is constructed before addrman and connman, and destructed afterwards.

netgroupman does not currently do anything, but will have functionality added in future commits.
2022-04-19 10:25:40 +01:00
Carl Dong
5d670173a3 validation: Load pindexBestHeader in ChainMan
Now BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex() will ACTUALLY only load BlockMan
members.

[META] In a later commit, pindexBestHeader will be moved to ChainMan as
       a member

-----

Code Reviewer Notes

Call graph of relevant functions:

ChainstateManager::LoadBlockIndex() <-- Moved to
    calls BlockManager::LoadBlockIndexDB()
        which calls BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex() <-- Moved from

There is only one call to each of inner functions, meaning that no
behavior is changing.
2022-04-12 14:37:27 -04:00
MarcoFalke
ffffb7a25a
doc: Convert remaining comments to clang-tidy format 2022-04-06 15:37:07 +02:00
laanwj
c5c4fb3182
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24758: Disable the syscall sandbox for bitcoin-qt and remove gui-related syscalls
fabdf9f870a4c07cb3548c3b385438f02179ea88 Remove gui-only syscalls (MarcoFalke)
fa0c2aa826282fe40d2ce7becb4eb6d4814447a3 init: Disable syscall sandbox in the bitcoin-qt process (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  It is basically impossible (and a bit out of scope) for us to maintain a sandbox for the qt library. I am not sure if it is possible to only sandbox a few threads in a process, but I doubt this will add no practical benefit anyway, so I am disabling the sandbox for the whole bitcoin-qt process.

  See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24690#issuecomment-1084372400

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fabdf9f870a4c07cb3548c3b385438f02179ea88

Tree-SHA512: 944ded03ee25f7dfd0bfeea9c3f97f575f2d470aa03b387b07f3e3bec5cb886e4aaa17e4a9fb359d3e670e6da69adc9111673d13e6561ec55b3161bb67dfe760
2022-04-06 11:57:08 +02:00
MarcoFalke
79bf1a0fa2
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24732: Remove buggy and confusing IncrementExtraNonce
cccc4e879a8cb9d858a88ea46b28ea27ab79ca55 Remove nHeightEnd and nHeight in generateBlocks helper (MarcoFalke)
fa38b1c8bd29e2c792737f6481ab928e46396b7e Remove buggy and confusing IncrementExtraNonce (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  IncrementExtraNonce has many issues:

  * It is test-only code, but part of bitcoind
  * It is using the block height of the tip, as opposed to the block's previous block as reference for the new height. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/24730#issuecomment-1085586193
  * It has no use case in regtest testing. With a low difficulty the extra nonce won't be incremented. With a high difficulty the test-only functions are clumsy to handle anyway. For example, the generate* RPCs will return an empty array once they reached `maxtries`, as opposed to an error. Also the calls can't be aborted early unless the node shuts down completely. So I think it is fine to just remove the extra nonce functionality and leave it to the outside to implement, if needed. For example, a wrapper script can call the `generate*` RPCs once every second, to use the timestamp as extra nonce.

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    ACK cccc4e879a8cb9d858a88ea46b28ea27ab79ca55

Tree-SHA512: d8a3989ad280ebd4b1b574159b3a396b8a42134347e6be3c88445162d86624d221c416456f45ae75aea62ed8c8a1a9bb3a2532924abca2ef7a879cb8e6b15654
2022-04-06 11:12:10 +02:00
laanwj
f421de5be6
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24236: Remove utxo db upgrade code
fa9112aac07dc371bfda437d40eb1b841f36f392 Remove utxo db upgrade code (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  It is not possible to upgrade Bitcoin Core pre-segwit (pre-0.13.1) to a recent version without a full IBD from scratch after  commit 19a56d1519fb493c3e1bd5cad55360b6b80fa52b (released in version 22.0).

  Any Bitcoin Core version with the new database format after commit 1088b02f0ccd7358d2b7076bb9e122d59d502d02 (released in version 0.15), can upgrade to any version that is supported as of today.

  This leaves the versions 0.13.1-0.14.x. Even though those versions are unsupported, some users with an existing datadir may want to upgrade to a recent version. However, it seems reasonable to simply ask them to `-reindex` to run a full IBD from scratch. This allows us to remove the utxo db upgrade code.

ACKs for top commit:
  Sjors:
    re-ACK fa9112aac07dc371bfda437d40eb1b841f36f392
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK fa9112aac07dc371bfda437d40eb1b841f36f392

Tree-SHA512: 4243bb35df9ac4892f9fad30fe486d338745952bcff4160bcb0937c772d57b13b800647da14695e21e3655e85ee0d95fa3dc7789ee309d59ad84f422297fecb8
2022-04-05 15:38:14 +02:00
MarcoFalke
fa0c2aa826
init: Disable syscall sandbox in the bitcoin-qt process 2022-04-05 13:29:42 +02:00
fanquake
37a16ffd70
refactor: fix clang-tidy named args usage 2022-04-04 09:01:19 +01:00
MarcoFalke
fa38b1c8bd
Remove buggy and confusing IncrementExtraNonce 2022-04-01 11:00:42 +02:00
MarcoFalke
fa84a49526
Use CAmount for fee delta and modified fee 2022-03-21 13:38:08 +01:00
MarcoFalke
601bfc417d
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24515: Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions
f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices (Carl Dong)
28ba0313eac37e4a900b7e97af7169ce999c4024 Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator (Carl Dong)
12eb05df63f930969115af6dc66e2e5d02f2a517 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage (Carl Dong)
c600ee38168a460d3026eae0e289c976194aad14 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Carl Dong)
42e56d9b188f97c077ed2269e24acc0be35ece17 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight (Carl Dong)
3bbb6fea051f4e19bd2448e401a6c4e9b4cc7a41 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups (Carl Dong)
5be9ee3c54dcb396ff52fc8c8b7e4e6e39ec4a3b refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  The only important commit is "Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions", everything else is all just small style changes.

  Here's the commit message, reproduced:
  ```
  This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
  "derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.

  This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
  relevant to the BlockManager.
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    ACK f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 ; code review only
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK f865cf8ded2b2fbc82a6fbc41226d991909a6880 🗂

Tree-SHA512: 7b204d782834e06fd7329d022e2ae860181b4e8105c33bfb928539a4ec24161dc7438a9c4d4ee279dcad77de310c160b997bb8aa18923243d0fd55ccf4ad7c3a
2022-03-17 07:23:43 +01:00
Carl Dong
f865cf8ded Add and use BlockManager::GetAllBlockIndices 2022-03-15 19:42:43 -04:00
Carl Dong
28ba0313ea Add and use CBlockIndexHeightOnlyComparator
...also use std::sort for clarity
2022-03-15 19:42:43 -04:00
Carl Dong
12eb05df63 move-only: Move CBlockIndexWorkComparator to blockstorage
...it's declared in blockstorage.h
2022-03-15 19:42:43 -04:00
Carl Dong
c600ee3816 Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions
This commit effectively splits the "load block index itself" logic from
"derive Chainstate variables from loaded block index" logic.

This means that BlockManager::LoadBlockIndex{,DB} will only load what's
relevant to the BlockManager.

I strongly recommend reviewing with the following git-diff flags:
  --color-moved=dimmed_zebra --color-moved-ws=allow-indentation-change
2022-03-15 19:42:41 -04:00
Carl Dong
42e56d9b18 style-only: No need for std::pair for vSortedByHeight
...since the height information in already in CBlockIndex* and we can
use an easy custom sorter.
2022-03-15 19:40:51 -04:00
fanquake
23e8c702bc
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24421: miner: always assume we can build witness blocks
40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037 [miner] always assume we can create witness blocks (glozow)

Pull request description:

  Given the low possibility of a reorg reverting the segwit soft fork, there is no longer a need to check whether segwit is active to see if it's okay to add to the block template (see also #23512, #21009, etc). `TestBlockValidity()` is also run on the block template at the end of `CreateNewBlock()`, so any invalid block would be caught there.

ACKs for top commit:
  gruve-p:
    ACK 40e871d9b4
  jnewbery:
    utACK 40e871d9b4, although I disagree about changing the test for segwit transaction in mempool before activagtion, instead of just removing it: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24421#discussion_r822933721.
  achow101:
    ACK 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037

Tree-SHA512: bf4860bf2bed8339622d05228d11d60286edb0c32a9a3c434b8d154913c07ea56e50649f4af7009c2a1c6a58a81d2299ab43b41a6f16dee7d08cc89cc1603019
2022-03-11 15:00:38 +00:00
MarcoFalke
fa9112aac0
Remove utxo db upgrade code 2022-03-10 13:05:29 +01:00
Carl Dong
3bbb6fea05 style-only: Various blockstorage.cpp cleanups 2022-03-09 14:32:49 -05:00
Anthony Towns
5be9ee3c54 refactor: more const annotations for uses of CBlockIndex* 2022-03-09 14:32:47 -05:00
MarcoFalke
5e49b2a252
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24050: validation: Give m_block_index ownership of CBlockIndexs
6c23c415613d8b847e6f6a2f872be893da9f4384 refactor: Rewrite AddToBlockIndex with try_emplace (Carl Dong)
c05cf7aa1e1c15089753897a10c14762027d4b99 style: Modernize range-based loops over m_block_index (Carl Dong)
c2a1655799c5d5dab9b14bd2a6b2d2296efd6964 style-only: Use using instead of typedef for BlockMap (Carl Dong)
dd79dad17545424d145e846026518d70da594380 refactor: Rewrite InsertBlockIndex with try_emplace (Carl Dong)
531dce034718523967808a89c18ba69a1e3e5a1f tests: Remove now-unnecessary manual Unload's (Carl Dong)
bec86ae32683ac56b4e6ba9c9b7d21cfbdf4ac03 blockstorage: Make m_block_index own CBlockIndex's (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Part of: #24303
  Split off from: #22564

  ```
  Instead of having CBlockIndex's live on the heap, which requires manual
  memory management, have them be owned by m_block_index. This means that
  they will live and die with BlockManager.
  ```

  The second commit demonstrates how this makes calls to `Unload()` to satisfy the address sanitizer unnecessary.

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    ACK 6c23c415613d8b847e6f6a2f872be893da9f4384
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK 6c23c415613d8b847e6f6a2f872be893da9f4384 🎨

Tree-SHA512: 81b2b5119be27cc0f8a9457b11da60cc60930315d2a5be36be89fe253d32073ffe622348ff153114b9b3212197bddbc791810913a43811b33cc58e7162bd105b
2022-03-07 13:15:27 +01:00
laanwj
848b11615b
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22834: net: respect -onlynet= when making outbound connections
0eea83a85ec6b215d44facc2b16ee1b035275a6b scripted-diff: rename `proxyType` to `Proxy` (Vasil Dimov)
e53a8505dbb6f9deaae8ac82793a4fb760a1e0a6 net: respect -onlynet= when making outbound connections (Vasil Dimov)

Pull request description:

  Do not make outbound connections to hosts which belong to a network
  which is restricted by `-onlynet`.

  This applies to hosts that are automatically chosen to connect to and to
  anchors.

  This does not apply to hosts given to `-connect`, `-addnode`,
  `addnode` RPC, dns seeds, `-seednode`.

  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/13378
  Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22647
  Supersedes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22651

ACKs for top commit:
  naumenkogs:
    utACK 0eea83a85ec6b215d44facc2b16ee1b035275a6b
  prayank23:
    reACK 0eea83a85e
  jonatack:
    ACK 0eea83a85ec6b215d44facc2b16ee1b035275a6b code review, rebased to master, debug built, and did some manual testing with various config options on signet

Tree-SHA512: 37d68b449dd6d2715843fc84d85f48fa2508be40ea105a7f4a28443b318d0b6bd39e3b2ca2a6186f2913836adf08d91038a8b142928e1282130f39ac81aa741b
2022-03-01 18:32:01 +01:00
glozow
40e871d9b4 [miner] always assume we can create witness blocks
Given the low possibility of a reorg reverting the segwit soft fork,
there is no need to check whether segwit is active here. Also,
TestBlockValidity is run on the block template after it has been
created.
2022-02-23 10:55:05 +00:00
Carl Dong
6c23c41561 refactor: Rewrite AddToBlockIndex with try_emplace 2022-02-22 11:56:49 -05:00
Carl Dong
c05cf7aa1e style: Modernize range-based loops over m_block_index 2022-02-22 11:56:49 -05:00
Carl Dong
c2a1655799 style-only: Use using instead of typedef for BlockMap 2022-02-22 11:56:49 -05:00
Carl Dong
dd79dad175 refactor: Rewrite InsertBlockIndex with try_emplace
Credit to ajtowns for this suggestion, thanks!
2022-02-22 11:56:49 -05:00
Carl Dong
bec86ae326 blockstorage: Make m_block_index own CBlockIndex's
Instead of having CBlockIndex's live on the heap, which requires manual
memory management, have them be owned by m_block_index. This means that
they will live and die with BlockManager.

A change to BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex:
- Previously, it was a const member function returning a non-const CBlockIndex*
- Now, there's are const and non-const versions of
  BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex returning a CBlockIndex with the same
  const-ness as the member function:
    (e.g. const CBlockIndex* LookupBlockIndex(...) const)

See next commit for some weirdness that this eliminates.

The range based for-loops are modernize (using auto + destructuring) in
a future commit.
2022-02-22 11:52:19 -05:00
MarcoFalke
fa462ea787
Avoid implicit-integer-sign-change in VerifyLoadedChainstate 2022-02-21 10:29:37 +01:00
Taeik Lim
ba4906f951 doc: Fix typos 2022-02-17 03:42:08 +09:00
MarcoFalke
1111d33532
refactor: Make MessageBoxFlags enum underlying type unsigned 2022-01-31 09:27:12 +01:00
laanwj
196b459920
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23438: refactor: Use spans of std::byte in serialize
fa5d2e678c809c26bd40d7e7c171529d3ffb5903 Remove unused char serialize (MarcoFalke)
fa24493d6394b3a477535f480664c9596f18e3c5 Use spans of std::byte in serialize (MarcoFalke)
fa65bbf217b725ada35107b4ad646d250228355c span: Add BytePtr helper (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  This changes the serialize code (`.read()` and `.write()` functions) to take a `Span` instead of a pointer and size. This is a breaking change for the serialize interface, so at no additional cost we can also switch to `std::byte` (instead of using `char`).

  The benefits of using `Span`:
  * Less verbose and less fragile code when passing an already existing `Span`(-like) object to or from serialization

  The benefits of using `std::byte`:
  * `std::byte` can't accidentally be mistaken for an integer

  The goal here is to only change serialize to use spans of `std::byte`. If needed, `AsBytes`,  `MakeUCharSpan`, ... can be used (temporarily) to pass spans of the right type.

  Other changes that are included here:

  * [#22167](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22167) (refactor: Remove char serialize by MarcoFalke)
  * [#21906](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21906) (Preserve const in cast on CTransactionSignatureSerializer by promag)

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Concept and code review ACK fa5d2e678c809c26bd40d7e7c171529d3ffb5903
  sipa:
    re-utACK fa5d2e678c809c26bd40d7e7c171529d3ffb5903

Tree-SHA512: 08ee9eced5fb777cedae593b11e33660bed9a3e1711a7451a87b835089a96c99ce0632918bb4666a4e859c4d020f88fb50f2dd734216b0c3d1a9a704967ece6f
2022-01-27 19:19:12 +01:00
laanwj
cf5bb048e8
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22932: Add CBlockIndex lock annotations, guard nStatus/nFile/nDataPos/nUndoPos by cs_main
6ea56827842b9b2bd730edc38f3a7b1f46f6247b Guard CBlockIndex::nStatus/nFile/nDataPos/nUndoPos by cs_main (Jon Atack)
5d59ae0ba88849b1eb0d7350871bc19fcd5ef601 Remove/inline ReadRawBlockFromDisk(block_data, pindex, message_start) (Hennadii Stepanov)
eaeeb88768db529b5241ccd42f1e87579908b4df Require IsBlockPruned() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack)
ca47b005770f71aa229ecc1f7b8146a96ff02151 Require CBlockIndex::IsValid() to hold cs_main (Vasil Dimov)
e9f3aa5f6a7b39e8d5f2069617e5e382798d8d60 Require CBlockIndex::RaiseValidity() to hold cs_main (Vasil Dimov)
8ef457cb83fac796f8b6a56977b1016193fc1185 Require CBlockIndex::IsAssumedValid() to hold cs_main (Vasil Dimov)
572393448b4d32f91b92edc84b4200ab52d62422 Require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack)
2e557ced2830fc54476e598d52225f1679205e7d Require WriteUndoDataForBlock() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack)
6fd4341c10b319399c58d71c4ddeae4417e337d7 Require CBlockIndex::GetBlockPos() to hold mutex cs_main (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Issues:

  - `CBlockIndex` member functions `GetBlockPos()`, `GetUndoPos()`, `IsAssumedValid()`, `RaiseValidity()`, and `IsValid()` and block storage functions `WriteUndoDataForBlock()` and `IsBlockPruned()` are missing thread safety lock annotations to help ensure that they are called with mutex cs_main to avoid bugs like #22895. Doing this also enables the next step:

  - `CBlockIndex::nStatus` may be racy, i.e. potentially accessed by multiple threads, see #17161. A solution is to guard it by cs_main, along with fellow data members `nFile`, `nDataPos` and `nUndoPos`.

  This pull:

  - adds thread safety lock annotations for the functions listed above
  - guards `CBlockIndex::nStatus`, `nFile`, `nDataPos` and `nUndoPos` by cs_main

  How to review and test:
  - debug build with clang and verify there are no `-Wthread-safety-analysis` warnings
  - review the code to verify each annotation or lock is necessary and sensible, or if any are missing
  - look for whether taking a lock can be replaced by a lock annotation instead
  - for more information about Clang thread safety analysis, see
      - https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ThreadSafetyAnalysis.html
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#lockingmutex-usage-notes
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#threads-and-synchronization

  Mitigates/potentially closes #17161.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK 6ea56827842b9b2bd730edc38f3a7b1f46f6247b

Tree-SHA512: 3ebf429c8623c51f944a7245a2e48d2aa088dec4c4914b40aa6049e89856c1ee8586f6e2e3b65195190566637a33004468b51a781e61a082248748015167569b
2022-01-27 10:57:33 +01:00
Hennadii Stepanov
5d59ae0ba8
Remove/inline ReadRawBlockFromDisk(block_data, pindex, message_start) 2022-01-25 20:43:37 +01:00
Jon Atack
eaeeb88768
Require IsBlockPruned() to hold mutex cs_main
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
2022-01-25 20:43:34 +01:00
Jon Atack
572393448b
Require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold mutex cs_main 2022-01-25 20:43:22 +01:00
Jon Atack
2e557ced28
Require WriteUndoDataForBlock() to hold mutex cs_main
Mutex cs_main is already held by the caller of WriteUndoDataForBlock().
This change is needed to require CBlockIndex::GetUndoPos() to hold
cs_main and CBlockIndex::nStatus to be guarded by cs_main in the
following commits without adding 2 unnecessary cs_main locks to
WriteUndoDataForBlock().
2022-01-25 20:43:19 +01:00
MarcoFalke
fac8165443
Remove unused checkFinalTx 2022-01-25 10:16:06 +01:00
MarcoFalke
c561f2f06e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23497: Add src/node/ and src/wallet/ code to node:: and wallet:: namespaces
e5b6aef61221b621ad77b5f075a16897e08835bf Move CBlockFileInfo::ToString method where class is declared (Russell Yanofsky)
f7086fd8ff084ab0dd656d75b7485e59263bdfd8 Add src/wallet/* code to wallet:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
90fc8b089d591cabff60ee829a33f96c37fd27ba Add src/node/* code to node:: namespace (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  There are no code changes, this is just adding `namespace` and `using` declarations and `node::` or `wallet::` qualifiers in some places.

  Motivations for this change are:

  - To make it easier to see when node and wallet code is being accessed places where it shouldn't be. For example if GUI code is accessing node and wallet internals or if wallet and node code are referencing each other.
  - To make source code organization clearer ([#15732](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15732)), being able to know that `wallet::` code is in `src/wallet/`, `node::` code is in `src/node/`, `init::` code is in `src/init/`, `util::` code is in `src/util/`, etc.

  Reviewing with `git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=.` can be helpful to verify this is only updating declarations, not changing code.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK e5b6aef61221b621ad77b5f075a16897e08835bf
  MarcoFalke:
    Concept ACK e5b6aef61221b621ad77b5f075a16897e08835bf 🍨

Tree-SHA512: 3797745c90246794e2d55a2ee6e8b0ad5c811e4e03a242d3fdfeb68032f8787f0d48ed4097f6b7730f540220c0af99ef423cd9dbe7f76b2ec12e769a757a2c8d
2022-01-11 11:11:00 +01:00
Jon Atack
1823766fc6
refactor: add thread safety lock assertion to WriteBlockIndexDB()
The new helper function, BlockManager::WriteBlockIndexDB(),
has a thread safety lock annotation in its declaration but is
missing the corresponding run-time lock assertion in its definition.

Per doc/developer-notes.md: "Combine annotations in function
declarations with run-time asserts in function definitions."
2022-01-07 13:12:17 +01:00