highperfocused/bitcoin
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.git synced 2025-10-10 19:43:13 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
1742f8e12d163852df09575e03edcd3db73198ee
bitcoin/src/node
History
MarcoFalke 80a699fda9 Merge #21525: [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4 
693414d271 node/ifaces: ChainImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong)
98c4e252f0 node/ifaces: NodeImpl: Use an accessor for ChainMan (Carl Dong)
7e8b5ee814 validation: Make BlockManager::LookupBlockIndex const (Carl Dong)
88aead263c node: Avoid potential UB by asserting assumptions (Carl Dong)
1dd8ed7a84 net_processing: Move comments to declarations (Carl Dong)
07156eb387 node/coinstats: Replace #include with fwd-declaration (Carl Dong)
7b8e976cd5 miner: Add chainstate member to BlockAssembler (Carl Dong)
e62067e7bc Revert "miner: Pass in chainstate to BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock" (Carl Dong)
eede0647b0 Revert "scripted-diff: Invoke CreateNewBlock with chainstate" (Carl Dong)
0c1b2bc549 Revert "miner: Remove old CreateNewBlock w/o chainstate param" (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Chronological history of this changeset:
  1. Bundle 4 (#21270) got merged
  2. Posthumous reviews were posted
  3. These changes were prepended in bundle 5
  4. More reviews were added in bundle 5
  5. Someone suggested that we split the prepended changes up to another PR
  6. This is that PR

  In the future, I will just do posthumous review changes in another PR instead. I apologize for the confusion.

  Addresses posthumous reviews on bundle 4:
    - From jnewbery:
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#issuecomment-796738048
        - I didn't fix this one, but I added a `TODO` comment so that we don't lost track of it
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592291225
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592296942
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592299738
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r592301704
    - From MarcoFalke:
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593096212
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097032
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593097867
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21270#discussion_r593100570

  Addresses reviews on bundle 5:
  - Checking chainman existence before locking cs_main
    - MarcoFalke
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601776
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601876
  - Appropriate locking, usage of chainman, and control flow in `src/node/interfaces.cpp`
    - MarcoFalke
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r596601383
    - jnewbery
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029360
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597029921
    - ryanofsky
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597163828
  - Style/comment formatting changes
    - jnewbery
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597026552
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597027186
  - Making LookupBlockIndex const
    - jnewbery
      - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21391#discussion_r597035062

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    review ACK 693414d271 🛐
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 693414d271. I reviewed this previously as part of #21391. I am a fan of the increasingly complicated bundle numbering, and kind of hope there in the next round there is some way we can get bundles 5.333333 and 5.666667!
  jamesob:
    ACK 693414d271 ([`jamesob/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/21525.1.dongcarl.bundle_4_5_n_followup_f))

Tree-SHA512: 9bdc199f70400d01764e1bd03c25bdb6cff26dcef60e4ca3b649baf8d017a2dfc1f058099067962b4b6ccd32d078002b1389d733039f4c337558cb70324c0ee3
2021-04-01 10:58:53 +02:00
..
coin.cpp
node: Avoid potential UB by asserting assumptions
2021-03-30 13:52:22 -04:00
coin.h
…
coinstats.cpp
rpc: Improve gettxoutsetinfo help
2021-03-23 20:32:47 +01:00
coinstats.h
node/coinstats: Replace #include with fwd-declaration
2021-03-24 15:40:56 -04:00
context.cpp
[net] Construct addrman outside connman
2021-03-20 10:24:36 +00:00
context.h
[net] Construct addrman outside connman
2021-03-20 10:24:36 +00:00
interfaces.cpp
Merge #21525: [Bundle 4.5/n] Followup fixups to bundle 4
2021-04-01 10:58:53 +02:00
psbt.cpp
…
psbt.h
refactor: post Optional<> removal cleanups
2021-03-17 14:56:20 +08:00
README.md
…
transaction.cpp
node: Avoid potential UB by asserting assumptions
2021-03-30 13:52:22 -04:00
transaction.h
…
ui_interface.cpp
…
ui_interface.h
…
utxo_snapshot.h
…

README.md

src/node/

The src/node/ directory contains code that needs to access node state (state in CChain, CBlockIndex, CCoinsView, CTxMemPool, and similar classes).

Code in src/node/ is meant to be segregated from code in src/wallet/ and src/qt/, to ensure wallet and GUI code changes don't interfere with node operation, to allow wallet and GUI code to run in separate processes, and to perhaps eventually allow wallet and GUI code to be maintained in separate source repositories.

As a rule of thumb, code in one of the src/node/, src/wallet/, or src/qt/ directories should avoid calling code in the other directories directly, and only invoke it indirectly through the more limited src/interfaces/ classes.

The src/node/ directory is a new directory introduced in #14978 and at the moment is sparsely populated. Eventually more substantial files like src/validation.cpp and src/txmempool.cpp might be moved there.