40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037 [miner] always assume we can create witness blocks (glozow)
Pull request description:
Given the low possibility of a reorg reverting the segwit soft fork, there is no longer a need to check whether segwit is active to see if it's okay to add to the block template (see also #23512, #21009, etc). `TestBlockValidity()` is also run on the block template at the end of `CreateNewBlock()`, so any invalid block would be caught there.
ACKs for top commit:
gruve-p:
ACK 40e871d9b4
jnewbery:
utACK 40e871d9b4, although I disagree about changing the test for segwit transaction in mempool before activagtion, instead of just removing it: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24421#discussion_r822933721.
achow101:
ACK 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037
theStack:
Code-review ACK 40e871d9b4e55f5b5f7ce2a89157cd3d9f152037
Tree-SHA512: bf4860bf2bed8339622d05228d11d60286edb0c32a9a3c434b8d154913c07ea56e50649f4af7009c2a1c6a58a81d2299ab43b41a6f16dee7d08cc89cc1603019
src/node/
The src/node/
directory contains code that needs to access node state
(state in CChain
, CBlockIndex
, CCoinsView
, CTxMemPool
, and similar
classes).
Code in src/node/
is meant to be segregated from code in
src/wallet/
and src/qt/
, to ensure wallet and GUI
code changes don't interfere with node operation, to allow wallet and GUI code
to run in separate processes, and to perhaps eventually allow wallet and GUI
code to be maintained in separate source repositories.
As a rule of thumb, code in one of the src/node/
,
src/wallet/
, or src/qt/
directories should avoid
calling code in the other directories directly, and only invoke it indirectly
through the more limited src/interfaces/
classes.
This directory is at the moment
sparsely populated. Eventually more substantial files like
src/validation.cpp
and
src/txmempool.cpp
might be moved there.