merge-script 502d47203e
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#31161: cmake: Set top-level target output locations
568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa scripted-diff: Adjust documentation per top-level target output location (Hennadii Stepanov)
026bb226e96919603af829d0b677779a234a0f6e cmake: Set top-level target output locations (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This PR sets the target output locations to the `bin` and `lib` subdirectories within the build tree, creating a directory structure that mirrors that of the installed targets.

  This approach is widely adopted by the large projects, such as [LLVM](e146c1867e/lldb/cmake/modules/LLDBStandalone.cmake (L128-L130)):
  ```cmake
  set(CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin)
  set(CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
  set(CMAKE_ARCHIVE_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
  ```

  The `libsecp256k1` project has also recently [adopted](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1553) this approach.

  With this PR, all binaries are conveniently located. For example, run:
  ```
  $ ./build/bin/fuzz
  ```
  instead of:
  ```
  $ ./build/src/test/fuzz/fuzz
  ```

  On Windows, all required DLLs are now located in the same directory as the executables, allowing to run `bitcoin-chainstate.exe` (which loads `bitcoinkernel.dll`) without the need to copy DLLs or modify the `PATH` variable.

  The idea was briefly discussed among the build team during the recent CoreDev meeting.

  ---

  **Warning**: This PR changes build locations of newly built executables like `bitcoind` and `test_bitcoin` from `src/` to `bin/` without deleting previously built executables. A clean build is recommended to avoid accidentally running old binaries.

ACKs for top commit:
  theStack:
    Light re-ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa. Only change since last review was rebasing. I'm ok with this PR in its current form if other developers are happy with it. I just personally think it is inappropriate to \*silently\* break an everyday developer workflow like `git pull; make bitcoind`. I wouldn't have a problem with this PR if it triggered an explicit error, or if the problem was limited to less common workflows like changing cmake options in an existing build.
  TheCharlatan:
    Re-ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa
  theuni:
    ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa

Tree-SHA512: 1aa5ecd3cd49bd82f1dcc96c8e171d2d19c58aec8dade4bc329df89311f9e50cbf6cf021d004c58a0e1016c375b0fa348ccd52761bcdd179c2d1e61c105e3b9f
2025-03-12 11:19:00 +08:00
2025-02-06 09:38:49 +00:00
2025-03-04 14:53:06 +00:00
2025-02-06 22:21:48 +01:00
2023-06-01 23:35:10 +05:30
2025-01-06 12:23:11 +00:00
2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.2 GiB
Languages
C++ 63.9%
Python 20.1%
C 12.3%
CMake 1.1%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.6%