87e7f37918 doc: clarify peer address in getpeerinfo and addnode RPC help (Vasil Dimov)
2a4450ccbb net: change FindNode() to not return a node and rename it (Vasil Dimov)
4268abae1a net: avoid recursive m_nodes_mutex lock in DisconnectNode() (Vasil Dimov)
3a4d1a25cf net: merge AlreadyConnectedToAddress() and FindNode(CNetAddr) (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`CConnman::FindNode()` would lock `m_nodes_mutex`, find the node in `m_nodes`, release the mutex and return the node. The current code is safe but it is a dangerous interface where a caller may end up using the node returned from `FindNode()` without owning `m_nodes_mutex` and without having that node's reference count incremented.
Change `FindNode()` to return a boolean since all but one of its callers used its return value to check whether a node exists and did not do anything else with the return value.
Remove a recursive lock on `m_nodes_mutex`.
Rename `FindNode()` to better describe what it does.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 87e7f37918
furszy:
Code review ACK 87e7f37918
hodlinator:
re-ACK 87e7f37918
Tree-SHA512: 44fb64cd1226eca124ed1f447b4a1ebc42cc5c9e8561fc91949bbeaeaa7fa16fcfd664e85ce142e5abe62cb64197c178ca4ca93b3b3217b913e3c498d0b7d1c9
0802398e74 fuzz: make it possible to mock (fuzz) CThreadInterrupt (Vasil Dimov)
6d9e5d130d fuzz: add CConnman::SocketHandler() to the tests (Vasil Dimov)
3265df63a4 fuzz: add CConnman::InitBinds() to the tests (Vasil Dimov)
91cbf4dbd8 fuzz: add CConnman::CreateNodeFromAcceptedSocket() to the tests (Vasil Dimov)
50da7432ec fuzz: add CConnman::OpenNetworkConnection() to the tests (Vasil Dimov)
e6a917c8f8 fuzz: add Fuzzed NetEventsInterface and use it in connman tests (Vasil Dimov)
e883b37768 fuzz: set the output argument of FuzzedSock::Accept() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Extend `CConnman` fuzz tests to also exercise the methods `OpenNetworkConnection()`, `CreateNodeFromAcceptedSocket()`, `InitBinds()` and `SocketHandler()`.
Previously fuzzing those methods would have resulted in real socket functions being called in the operating system which is undesirable during fuzzing. Now that https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21878 is complete all those are mocked to a fuzzed socket and a fuzzed DNS resolver (see how `CreateSock` and `g_dns_lookup` are replaced in the first commit).
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 0802398e74
jonatack:
Review re-ACK 0802398e74
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 0802398e74
Tree-SHA512: a717d4e79f42bacf2b029c821fdc265e10e4e5c41af77cd4cb452cc5720ec83c62789d5b3dfafd39a22cc8c0500b18169aa7864d497dded729a32ab863dd6c4d
`CConnman::AlreadyConnectedToAddress()` is the only caller of
`CConnman::FindNode(CNetAddr)`, so merge the two in one function.
The unit test that checked whether `AlreadyConnectedToAddress()` ignores
the port is now unnecessary because now the function takes a `CNetAddr`
argument. It has no access to the port.
Throwing an exception from the destructor of a class is a bad practice,
avoid that and instead print the message to the standard error output
and call `std::abort()`.
1d9f1cb4bd kernel: improve BlockChecked ownership semantics (stickies-v)
9ba1fff29e kernel: refactor: ConnectTip to pass block pointer by value (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Subscribers to the BlockChecked validation interface event may need access to the block outside of the callback scope. Currently, this is only possible by copying the block, which makes exposing this validation interface event publicly either cumbersome or with significant copy overhead.
By using shared_ptr, we make the shared ownership explicit and allow users to safely use the block outside of the callback scope. By using a const-ref shared_ptr, no atomic reference count cost is incurred if a subscriber does not require block ownership.
For example: in #30595, this would allow us to drop the `kernel_BlockPointer` handle entirely, and generalize everything into `kernel_Block`. This PoC is implemented in https://github.com/stickies-v/bitcoin/commits/kernel/remove-blockpointer/.
---
### Performance
I have added a benchmark in a [separate branch](https://github.com/stickies-v/bitcoin/commits/2025-07/validation-interface-ownership-benched/), to ensure this change does not lead to a problematic performance regression. Since most of the overhead comes from the subscribers, I have added scenarios for `One`, `Two`, and `Ten` subscribers. From these results, it appears there is no meaningful performance difference on my machine.
When `BlockChecked()` takes a `const CBlock&` reference _(master)_:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 170.09 | 5,879,308.26 | 0.3% | 0.01 | `BlockCheckedOne`
| 1,603.95 | 623,460.10 | 0.5% | 0.01 | `BlockCheckedTen`
| 336.00 | 2,976,173.37 | 1.1% | 0.01 | `BlockCheckedTwo`
When `BlockChecked()` takes a `const std::shared_ptr<const CBlock>&` _(this PR)_:
| ns/op | op/s | err% | total | benchmark
|--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------:|:----------
| 172.20 | 5,807,155.33 | 0.1% | 0.01 | `BlockCheckedOne`
| 1,596.79 | 626,254.52 | 0.0% | 0.01 | `BlockCheckedTen`
| 333.38 | 2,999,603.17 | 0.3% | 0.01 | `BlockCheckedTwo`
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1d9f1cb4bd
w0xlt:
reACK 1d9f1cb4bd
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 1d9f1cb4bd. These all seem like simple changes that make sense
TheCharlatan:
ACK 1d9f1cb4bd
yuvicc:
Code Review ACK 1d9f1cb4bd
Tree-SHA512: 7ed0cccb7883dbb1885917ef749ab7cae5d60ee803b7e3145b2954d885e81ba8c9d5ab1edb9694ce6b308235c621094c029024eaf99f1aab1b47311c40958095
ba84a25dee [doc] update mempool-replacements.md for incremental relay feerate change (glozow)
18720bc5d5 [doc] release note for min feerate changes (glozow)
6da5de58ca [policy] lower default minrelaytxfee and incrementalrelayfee to 100sat/kvB (glozow)
2e515d2897 [prep/test] make wallet_fundrawtransaction's minrelaytxfee assumption explicit (glozow)
457cfb61b5 [prep/util] help MockMempoolMinFee handle more precise feerates (glozow)
3eab8b7240 [prep/test] replace magic number 1000 with respective feerate vars (glozow)
5f2df0ef78 [miner] lower default -blockmintxfee to 1sat/kvB (glozow)
d6213d6aa1 [doc] assert that default min relay feerate and incremental are the same (glozow)
1fbee5d7b6 [test] explicitly check default -minrelaytxfee and -incrementalrelayfee (glozow)
72dc18467d [test] RBF rule 4 for various incrementalrelayfee settings (glozow)
85f498893f [test] check bypass of minrelay for various minrelaytxfee settings (glozow)
e5f896bb1f [test] check miner doesn't select 0fee transactions (glozow)
Pull request description:
ML post for discussion about the general concept, how this impacts the wider ecosystem, philosophy about minimum feerates, etc: https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/changing-the-minimum-relay-feerate/1886
This PR is inspired by #13922 and #32959 to lower the minimum relay feerate in response to bitcoin's exchange rate changes in the last ~10 years. It lowers the default `-minrelaytxfee` and `-incrementalrelayfee`, and knocks `-blockmintxfee` down to the minimum nonzero setting. Also adds some tests for the settings and pulls in #32750.
The minimum relay feerate is a DoS protection rule, representing a price on the network bandwidth used to relay transactions that have no PoW. While relay nodes don't all collect fees, the assumption is that if nodes on the network use their resources to relay this transaction, it will reach a miner and the attacker's money will be spent once it is mined. The incremental relay feerate is similar: it's used to price the relay of replacement transactions (the additional fees need to cover the new transactions at this feerate) and evicted transactions (following a trim, the new mempool minimum feerate is the package feerate of what was removed + incremental).
Also note that many nodes on the network have elected to relay/mine lower feerate transactions. Miners (some say up to 85%) are choosing to mine these low feerate transactions instead of leaving block space unfilled, but these blocks have extremely poor compact block reconstruction rates with nodes that rejected or didn't hear about those transactions earlier.
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33106#issuecomment-3155627414
- https://x.com/caesrcd/status/1947022514267230302
- https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000001305770e0aa279dcd8ba8be18c3d5cf736a26f77e06fd
- https://mempool.space/block/00000000000000000001b491649ec030aa8e003e1f4f9d3b24bb99ba16f91e97
- https://x.com/mononautical/status/1949452586391855121
While it wouldn't make sense to loosen DoS restrictions recklessly in response to these events, I think the current price is higher than necessary, and this motivates us changing the default soon. Since the minimum relay feerate defines an amount as too small based on what it costs the attacker, it makes sense to consider BTC's conversion rate to what resources you can buy in the "real world."
Going off of [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32959#issuecomment-3095260286) and [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33106#issuecomment-3142444090)
- Let's say an attacker wants to use/exhaust the network's bandwidth, and has the choice between renting resources from a commercial provider and getting the network to "spam" itself it by sending unconfirmed transactions. We'd like the latter to be more expensive than the former.
- The bandwidth for relaying a transaction across the network is roughly its serialized size (plus relay overhead) x number of nodes. A 1000vB transaction is 1000-4000B serialized. With 100k nodes, that's 0.1-0.4GB
- If the going rate for ec2 bandwidth is 10c/GB, that's like 1-4c per kvB of transaction data
- Then a 1000vB transaction should pay at least 4c
- $0.04 USD is 40 satoshis at 100k USD/BTC
- Baking in some margin for changes in USD/BTC conversion rate, number of nodes (and thus bandwidth), and commercial service costs, I think 50-100 satoshis is on the conservative end but in the right ballpark
- At least 97% of the recent sub-1sat/vB transactions would be accepted with a new threshold of 0.1sat/vB: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/33106#issuecomment-3156213089
List of feerates that are changed and why:
- min relay feerate: significant conversion rate changes, see above
- incremental relay feerate: should follow min relay feerate, see above
- block minimum feerate: shouldn’t be above min relay feerate, otherwise the node accepts transactions it will never mine. I've knocked it down to the bare minimum of 1sat/kvB. Now that we no longer have coin age priority (removed in v0.15), I think we can leave it to the `CheckFeeRate` policy rule to enforce a minimum entry price, and the block assembly code should just fill up the block with whatever it finds in mempool.
List of feerates that are not changed and why:
- dust feerate: this feerate cannot be changed as flexibly as the minrelay feerate. A much longer record of low feerate transactions being mined is needed to motivate a decrease there.
- maxfeerate (RPC, wallet): I think the conversion rate is relevant as well, but out of scope for this PR
- minimum feerate returned by fee estimator: should be done later. In the past, we've excluded new policy defaults from fee estimation until we feel confident they represent miner policy (e.g. #9519). Also, the fee estimator itself doesn't have support for sub-1sat/vB yet.
- all wallet feerates (mintxfee, fallbackfee, discardfee, consolidatefeerate, WALLET_INCREMENTAL_RELAY_FEE, etc.): should be done later. Our standard procedure is to do wallet changes at least 1 release after policy changes.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ba84a25dee
gmaxwell:
ACK ba84a25dee
jsarenik:
Tested ACK ba84a25dee
darosior:
ACK ba84a25dee
ajtowns:
ACK ba84a25dee
davidgumberg:
crACK ba84a25dee
w0xlt:
ACK ba84a25dee
caesrcd:
reACK ba84a25dee
ismaelsadeeq:
re-ACK ba84a25dee
Tree-SHA512: b4c35e8b506b1184db466551a7e2e48bb1e535972a8dbcaa145ce3a8bfdcc70a8807dc129460f129a9d31024174d34077154a387c32f1a3e6831f6fa5e9c399e
5c74a0b397 config: add DEBUG_ONLY -logratelimit (Eugene Siegel)
9f3b017bcc test: logging_filesize_rate_limit improvements (stickies-v)
350193e5e2 test: don't leak log category mask across tests (stickies-v)
05d7c22479 test: add ReadDebugLogLines helper function (stickies-v)
3d630c2544 log: make m_limiter a shared_ptr (stickies-v)
e8f9c37a3b log: clean up LogPrintStr_ and Reset, prefix all logs with "[*]" when there are suppressions (Eugene Siegel)
3c7cae49b6 log: change LogLimitStats to struct LogRateLimiter::Stats (Eugene Siegel)
8319a13468 log: clarify RATELIMIT_MAX_BYTES comment, use RATELIMIT_WINDOW (Eugene Siegel)
5f70bc80df log: remove const qualifier from arguments in LogPrintFormatInternal (Eugene Siegel)
b8e92fb3d4 log: avoid double hashing in SourceLocationHasher (Eugene Siegel)
616bc22f13 test: remove noexcept(false) comment in ~DebugLogHelper (Eugene Siegel)
Pull request description:
Followups to #32604.
There are two behavior changes:
- prefixing with `[*]` is done to all logs (regardless of `should_ratelimit`) per [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32604#discussion_r2195710943).
- a DEBUG_ONLY `-disableratelimitlogging` flag is added by default to functional tests so they don't encounter rate limiting.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 5c74a0b397
achow101:
ACK 5c74a0b397
l0rinc:
Code review ACK 5c74a0b397
Tree-SHA512: d32db5fcc28bb9b2a850f0048c8062200a3725b88f1cd9a0e137da065c0cf9a5d22e5d03cb16fe75ea7494801313ab34ffec7cf3e8577cd7527e636af53591c4
These remaining miscellaneous changes were identified by commenting out
the `operator const uint256&` conversion and the `Compare(const uint256&)`
method from `transaction_identifier.h`.
ad132761fc [allocators] Apply manual ASan poisoning to PoolResource (dergoegge)
Pull request description:
Currently ASan will not detect use-after-free issues for memory allocated by a `PoolResource`. This is because ASan is only aware of the memory chunks allocated by `PoolResource` but not the individual "sub-chunks" within.
E.g. this test will not produce an ASan error even though the referenced coin has been deallocated:
```c++
diff --git a/src/test/coins_tests.cpp b/src/test/coins_tests.cpp
index c46144b34b..aa6ca15ce1 100644
--- a/src/test/coins_tests.cpp
+++ b/src/test/coins_tests.cpp
@@ -508,6 +508,17 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(updatecoins_simulation_test, UpdateTest)
BOOST_CHECK(spent_a_duplicate_coinbase);
}
+BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(asan_uaf)
+{
+ CCoinsMapMemoryResource cache_coins_memory_resource{};
+ CCoinsMap map(0, SaltedOutpointHasher(/*deterministic=*/true), CCoinsMap::key_equal{}, &cache_coins_memory_resource);
+ COutPoint outpoint{};
+ map.emplace(outpoint, Coin{});
+ auto& coin = map.at(outpoint);
+ map.erase(outpoint);
+ coin.coin.nHeight = 1;
+}
+
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ccoins_serialization)
{
// Good example
```
Fix this by applying [manual ASan poisoning](https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerManualPoisoning) for memory allocated by `PoolResource`:
* Newly allocated chunks are poisoned as a whole
* "Sub-chunks" are unpoisoned/re-poisoned during allocation/deallocation
With the poisoning applied, ASan catches the issue in the test above:
```
$ ./build_unit/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test="coins_tests/asan_uaf"
Running 1 test case...
=================================================================
==366064==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: use-after-poison on address 0x7f99c3204870 at pc 0x55569dab6f8a bp 0x7ffe0210e4d0 sp 0x7ffe0210e4c8
READ of size 4 at 0x7f99c3204870 thread T0 (b-test)
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK ad132761fc
marcofleon:
code review ACK ad132761fc
Tree-SHA512: eb5e80bfa9509225e784151807bd8aa21fb0826ca1781dfe81b1d60bd3766019384ea3f9cb8e53398fde2f4e994a9c201b5a9962b4d279d7e52bb60e8961be11
Currently this code is not called in unit tests. Calling should make it
possible to write tests for things like IPC exceptions being thrown during
shutdown.
Subscribers to the BlockChecked validation interface event may need
access to the block outside of the callback scope. Currently, this
is only possible by copying the block, which makes exposing this
validation interface event publicly either cumbersome or with significant
copy overhead.
By using shared_ptr, we make the shared ownership explicit and allow
users to safely use the block outside of the callback scope.
62ed1f92ef txgraph: check that DoWork finds optimal if given high budget (tests) (Pieter Wuille)
f3c2fc867f txgraph: add work limit to DoWork(), try optimal (feature) (Pieter Wuille)
e96b00d99e txgraph: make number of acceptable iterations configurable (feature) (Pieter Wuille)
cfe9958852 txgraph: track amount of work done in linearization (preparation) (Pieter Wuille)
6ba316eaa0 txgraph: 1-or-2-tx split-off clusters are optimal (optimization) (Pieter Wuille)
fad0eb091e txgraph: reset quality when merging clusters (bugfix) (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Part of #30289. Builds on top of #31553.
So far, the `TxGraph::DoWork()` function took no parameters, and just made all clusters reach the "acceptable" internal quality level by performing a minimum number of improvement iterations on it, but:
* Did not attempt to go beyond that.
* Was broken, as the QualityLevel of optimal clusters that merge together was not being reset.
Fix this by adding an argument to `DoWork()` to control how much work it is allowed to do right now, which will first be used to get all clusters to the acceptable level, and if more budget remains, use it to try to get some or all clusters optimal. The function will now return `true` if all clusters are known to be optimal (and thus no further work remains). This is verified in the tests, by remembering whether the graph is optimal, and if it is at the end of the simulation run, verify that the overall linearization cannot be improved further.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 62ed1f92ef
ismaelsadeeq:
Code review ACK 62ed1f92ef
glozow:
ACK 62ed1f92ef
Tree-SHA512: 5f57d4052e369f3444e72e724f04c02004e0f66e365faa59c9f145323e606508380fc97bb038b68783a62ae9c10757f1b628b3b00b2ce9a46161fca2d4336d73
face8123fd log: [refactor] Use info level for init logs (MarcoFalke)
fa183761cb log: Remove function name from init logs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Many of the normal, and expected init logs, which are run once after startup use the deprecated alias of `LogInfo`.
Fix that by using `LogInfo` directly, which is a refactor, except for a few log lines that also have `__func__` removed.
(Also remove the unused trailing `\n` char while touching those logs)
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK face8123fd
fanquake:
ACK face8123fd
Tree-SHA512: 28c296129c9a31dff04f529c53db75057eae8a73fc7419e2f3068963dbb7b7fb9a457b2653f9120361fdb06ac97d1ee2be815c09ac659780dff01d7cd29f8480
This is required in the process_message(s) fuzz targets to avoid leaking
the next write time from one run to the next. Also, disable it
completely because it is not needed and due to leveldb-internal
non-determinism.
a60f863d3e scripted-diff: Replace GenTxidVariant with GenTxid (marcofleon)
c8ba199598 Remove old GenTxid class (marcofleon)
072a198ea4 Convert remaining instances of GenTxid to GenTxidVariant (marcofleon)
1b528391c7 Convert `txrequest` to GenTxidVariant (marcofleon)
bde4579b07 Convert `txdownloadman_impl` to GenTxidVariant (marcofleon)
c876a892ec Replace GenTxid with Txid/Wtxid overloads in `txmempool` (marcofleon)
de858ce2be move-only: make GetInfo a private CTxMemPool member (stickies-v)
eee473d9f3 Convert `CompareInvMempoolOrder` to GenTxidVariant (marcofleon)
243553d590 refactor: replace get_iter_from_wtxid with GetIter(const Wtxid&) (stickies-v)
fcf92fd640 refactor: make CTxMemPool::GetIter strongly typed (marcofleon)
11d28f21bb Implement GenTxid as a variant (marcofleon)
Pull request description:
Part of the [type safety refactor](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32189).
This PR changes the GenTxid class to a variant, which holds both Txids and Wtxids. This provides compile-time type safety and eliminates the manual type check (bool m_is_wtxid). Variables that can be either a Txid or a Wtxid are now using the new GenTxid variant, instead of uint256.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK a60f863d3e
dergoegge:
Code review ACK a60f863d3e
maflcko:
review ACK a60f863d3e🎽
theStack:
Code-review ACK a60f863d3e
Tree-SHA512: da9b73b7bdffee2eb9281a409205519ac330d3336094d17681896703fbca8099608782c9c85801e388e4d90af5af8abf1f34931f57bbbe6e9674d802d6066047
We mark ~DebugLogHelper as noexcept(false) to be able to catch the
exception it throws. This lets us use it in test in combination with
BOOST_CHECK_THROW and BOOST_CHECK_NO_THROW to check that certain log
messages are (not) logged.
Co-Authored-By: Niklas Gogge <n.goeggi@gmail.com>
c10e382d2a flatfile: check whether the file has been closed successfully (Vasil Dimov)
4bb5dd78ea util: check that a file has been closed before ~AutoFile() is called (Vasil Dimov)
8bb34f07df Explicitly close all AutoFiles that have been written (Vasil Dimov)
a69c4098b2 rpc: take ownership of the file by WriteUTXOSnapshot() (Hodlinator)
Pull request description:
`fclose(3)` may fail to flush the previously written data to disk, thus a failing `fclose(3)` is as serious as a failing `fwrite(3)`.
Previously the code ignored `fclose(3)` failures. This PR improves that by changing all users of `AutoFile` that use it to write data to explicitly close the file and handle a possible error.
---
Other alternatives are:
1. `fflush(3)` after each write to the file (and throw if it fails from the `AutoFile::write()` method) and hope that `fclose(3)` will then always succeed. Assert that it succeeds from the destructor 🙄. Will hurt performance.
2. Throw nevertheless from the destructor. Exception within the exception in C++ I think results in terminating the program without a useful message.
3. (this is implemented in the latest incarnation of this PR) Redesign `AutoFile` so that its destructor cannot fail. Adjust _all_ its users 😭. For example, if the file has been written to, then require the callers to explicitly call the `AutoFile::fclose()` method before the object goes out of scope. In the destructor, as a sanity check, assume/assert that this is indeed the case. Defeats the purpose of a RAII wrapper for `FILE*` which automatically closes the file when it goes out of scope and there are a lot of users of `AutoFile`.
4. Pass a new callback function to the `AutoFile` constructor which will be called from the destructor to handle `fclose()` errors, as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/29307#issuecomment-2243842400. My thinking is that if that callback is going to only log a message, then we can log the message directly from the destructor without needing a callback. If the callback is going to do more complicated error handling then it is easier to do that at the call site by directly calling `AutoFile::fclose()` instead of getting the `AutoFile` object out of scope (so that its destructor is called) and inspecting for side effects done by the callback (e.g. set a variable to indicate a failed `fclose()`).
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
ACK c10e382d2a
achow101:
ACK c10e382d2a
hodlinator:
re-ACK c10e382d2a
Tree-SHA512: 3994ca57e5b2b649fc84f24dad144173b7500fc0e914e06291d5c32fbbf8d2b1f8eae0040abd7a5f16095ddf4e11fe1636c6092f49058cda34f3eb2ee536d7ba
Switch to the index-aware `ReadBlock()` overload in `ComputeFilter` so that filter creation will abort if the stored block header hash doesn't match the expected one.
In the `readwriteblock` benchmark, pass the expected hash to `ReadBlock()` to match the new signature without affecting benchmark performance.
029ba1a21d index: remove CBlockIndex access from CustomAppend() (furszy)
91b7ab6c69 refactor: index, simplify CopyHeightIndexToHashIndex to process single block (furszy)
6f1392cc42 indexes, refactor: Remove remaining CBlockIndex* uses in index Rewind methods (Ryan Ofsky)
0a248708dc indexes, refactor: Stop requiring CBlockIndex type to call IsBIP30Unspendable (Ryan Ofsky)
331a25cb16 test: indexes, avoid creating threads when sync runs synchronously (furszy)
Pull request description:
Combining common refactors from #24230 and #26966, aiming to move both efforts forward while reducing their size and review burden.
Broadly, #24230 focuses on enabling indexes to run in a separate process, and #26966 aims to parallelize the indexes initial synchronization process. A shared prerequisite for both is ensuring that only the base index class interacts with the node’s chain internals - child index classes should instead operate solely through chain events.
This PR moves disk read lookups from child index classes to the base index class. It also includes a few documentation improvements and a test-only code cleanup.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 029ba1a21d👡
achow101:
ACK 029ba1a21d
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 029ba1a21d
davidgumberg:
ACK 029ba1a21d
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 029ba1a21d
Tree-SHA512: f073af407fc86f228cb47a32c7bcf2241551cc89ff32059317eb81d5b86fd5fda35f228d2567e0aedbc9fd6826291f5fee05619db35ba44108421ae04d11e6fb
The indexes test call StartBackgroundSync(), which spawns a thread to run Sync(),
only for the test thread to wait for it to complete by calling IndexWaitSynced().
So, since the sync is performed synchronously, we can skip the extra thread creation
entirely and call Sync() directly.
Historically, the headers have been bumped some time after a file has
been touched. Do it now to avoid having to touch them again in the
future for that reason.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i --regexp-extended 's;( 20[0-2][0-9])(-20[0-2][0-9])? The Bitcoin Core developers;\1-present The Bitcoin Core developers;g' $( git show --pretty="" --name-only HEAD~0 )
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This can be reproduced according to the developer notes with something
like
( cd ./src/ && ../contrib/devtools/run-clang-tidy.py -p ../bld-cmake -fix -j $(nproc) )
Also, the header related changes were done manually.
The Consensus Cleanup soft fork proposal includes enforcing that coinbase transactions set their
locktime field to the block height, minus 1 (as well as their nSequence such as to not disable the
timelock). If such a fork were to be activated by Bitcoin users, miners need to be ready to produce
compliant blocks at the risk of losing substantial amounts mining would-be invalid blocks. As miners
are unfamously slow to upgrade, it's good to make this change as early as possible.
Although Bitcoin Core's GBT implementation does not provide the "coinbasetxn" field, and mining
pool software crafts the coinbase on its own, updating the Bitcoin Core mining code is a first step
toward convincing pools to update their (often closed source) code. A possible followup is also to
introduce new fields to GBT. In addition, this first step also makes it possible to test future
Consensus Cleanup changes.
The changes to the seemingly-unrelated RBF tests is because these tests assert an error message
which may vary depending on the txid of the transactions used in the test. This commit changes the
coinbase transaction structure and therefore impact the txid of transactions in all tests.
The change to the "Bad snapshot" error message in the assumeutxo functional test is because this
specific test case reads into the txid of the next transaction in the snapshot and asserts the error
message based it gets on deserializing this txid as a coin for the previous transaction. As this
commit changes this txid it impacts the deserialization error raised.
3669ecd4cc doc: Document fuzz build options (Anthony Towns)
c1d01f59ac fuzz: enable running fuzz test cases in Debug mode (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
When building with
BUILD_FOR_FUZZING=OFF
BUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
allow the fuzz binary to execute given test cases (without actual fuzzing) to make it easier to reproduce fuzz test failures in a more normal debug build.
In Debug builds, deterministic fuzz behaviour is controlled via a runtime variable, which is normally false, but set to true automatically in the fuzz binary, unless the FUZZ_NONDETERMINISM environment variable is set.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK 3669ecd4cc🏉
marcofleon:
re ACK 3669ecd4cc
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3669ecd4cc with just variable renamed and documentation added since last review
Tree-SHA512: 5da5736462f98437d0aa1bd01aeacb9d46a9cc446a748080291067f7a27854c89f560f3a6481b760b9a0ea15a8d3ad90cd329ee2a008e5e347a101ed2516449e
When building with
BUILD_FOR_FUZZING=OFF
BUILD_FUZZ_BINARY=ON
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
allow the fuzz binary to execute given test cases (without actual
fuzzing) to make it easier to reproduce fuzz test failures in a more
normal debug build.
In Debug builds, deterministic fuzz behaviour is controlled via a runtime
variable, which is normally false, but set to true automatically in the
fuzz binary, unless the FUZZ_NONDETERMINISM environment variable is set.
This refactor clarifies that the MockableSteadyClock::mock_time_point
has millisecond precision by defining a type an using it.
Moreover, a ElapseSteady helper is added which can be re-used easily.
Threads may execute their function any time after they are spawned, so
coverage could be non-deterministic.
Fix this,
* for the script check worker threads by disabling them while fuzzing.
* for the scheduler thread by waiting for it to fully start and run the
service queue.
Since cluster_linearize.h does not actually have a Cluster type anymore, it is more
appropriate to rename the index type to DepGraphIndex.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i 's/Data type to represent transaction indices in clusters./Data type to represent transaction indices in DepGraphs and the clusters they represent./' $(git grep -l 'using ClusterIndex')
sed -i 's|\<ClusterIndex\>|DepGraphIndex|g' $(git grep -l 'ClusterIndex')
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
63b534f97e fuzz: sanity check hardcoded snapshot in utxo_snapshot target (Antoine Poinsot)
3b85eba83a test util: split up ConnectBlock from MineBlock (Antoine Poinsot)
d1527f6b88 qa: correct off-by-one in utxo snapshot fuzz target (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
The assumeutxo data for the fuzz target could change and invalidate the hash silently, preventing the fuzz target from reaching some code paths. Fix this by introducing a unit test which would break if the snapshot data the fuzz target relies on were to change.
In implementing this i noticed the height used for coins in the fuzz target is actually off-by-one (as if the first block in the created chain was the genesis but it's block `1`), so fix that too.
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK 63b534f97e
fjahr:
tACK 63b534f97e
Tree-SHA512: 2399b6e74db9b78aab8efba67c57a405d2d7d880ae3b7d8518a1c96cc6266f61f5e77722cd999adeac5d3e03e73d84cf9ae7bdbcc0afae198cc87049dde4012f
fa4fb6a8f1 fuzz: Use serial task runner to increase fuzz stability (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Leaking a scheduler with a non-empty queue from the fuzz initialization phase into the fuzz target execution phase is problematic, because it messes with coverage data. This in turn is problematic, because it leads to:
* Decrease in fuzz target execution stability (non-determinism when running the fuzz target).
* Decrease in fuzz input merge stability (non-determinism when selecting a minimum set of fuzz input to reach maximum coverage), which leads to qa-assets bloat.
Fix one such issue. Tracking issue: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/29018
Can be tested via: `RUST_BACKTRACE=1 cargo run --manifest-path ./contrib/devtools/deterministic-fuzz-coverage/Cargo.toml -- $PWD/bld-cmake $PWD/../b-c-qa-assets/fuzz_corpora/ partially_downloaded_block`.
The failure is non-deterministic (obviously) and will show coverage in validation signals such as `UpdatedBlockTip` before this change and will have this one fixed after this change.
ACKs for top commit:
marcofleon:
ACK fa4fb6a8f1
dergoegge:
Code review ACK fa4fb6a8f1
Tree-SHA512: fd1f66562c1d3c21553c7dd324399cdc16faa2fedfdb8e7544ea6a68b8b356e7c81d81815ecf70e0d334307dab6b275c1889b3b889b6f15eec514beee22c95f4
ffff4a293a bench: Update span-serialize comment (MarcoFalke)
fa4d6ec97b refactor: Avoid false-positive gcc warning (MarcoFalke)
fa942332b4 scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers after std::span changes (MarcoFalke)
fa0c6b7179 refactor: Remove unused Span alias (MarcoFalke)
fade0b5e5e scripted-diff: Use std::span over Span (MarcoFalke)
fadccc26c0 refactor: Make Span an alias of std::span (MarcoFalke)
fa27e36717 test: Fix broken span_tests (MarcoFalke)
fadf02ef8b refactor: Return std::span from MakeUCharSpan (MarcoFalke)
fa720b94be refactor: Return std::span from MakeByteSpan (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`Span` has some issues:
* It does not support fixed-size spans, which are available through `std::span`.
* It is confusing to have it available and in use at the same time with `std::span`.
* It does not obey the standard library iterator build hardening flags. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31272 for a discussion. For example, this allows to catch issues like the one fixed in commit fabeca3458.
Both types are type-safe and can even implicitly convert into each other in most contexts.
However, exclusively using `std::span` seems less confusing, so do it here with a scripted-diff.
ACKs for top commit:
l0rinc:
reACK ffff4a293a
theuni:
ACK ffff4a293a.
Tree-SHA512: 9cc2f1f43551e2c07cc09f38b1f27d11e57e9e9bc0c6138c8fddd0cef54b91acd8b14711205ff949be874294a121910d0aceffe0e8914c4cff07f1e0e87ad5b8
Non-Linux linkers require a fallback implementation for when coverage is not enabled.
The fallbacks are marked weak to have lower precedence than built-in implementations when available, removing ambiguity from the linker.
