When we have preselected inputs the coin selection search target is reduced
by the sum of (effective) values. This causes incorrect m_target value.
Create separate instance of SelectionResult for all the preselected inputs and
set the target equal to the sum of (effective) values. Target for preselected
SelectionResult is equal to the delta for the search target. To get the final
SelectionResult with accurate m_target we merge both SelectionResult instances.
SelectionResult::m_target should be equal to actual selection target.
Selection target is the sum of all recipient amounts plus non input fees.
So we need to remove change_fee from the m_target. It's safe because change
target is always greater than the change fee, so we can always cover fees
if change output is created.
292b1a3e9c98b9ba74b28d149df8554d4ad8e5c0 GetExternalSigner(): fail if multiple signers are found (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
If there are multiple external signers, `GetExternalSigner()` will
just pick the first one in the list. If the user has two or more
hardware wallets connected at the same time, he might not notice this.
This PR adds a check and fails with suitable message, forcing the user to disconnect all but one external signer, so that there is no ambiguity as to which external signer was used.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 292b1a3e9c98b9ba74b28d149df8554d4ad8e5c0
achow101:
ACK 292b1a3e9c98b9ba74b28d149df8554d4ad8e5c0
Tree-SHA512: e2a41d3eecc607d4f94e708614bed0f3545f7abba85f300c5a5f0d3d17d72c815259734accc5ca370953eacd290f27894ba2c18016f5e9584cd50fa1ec2fbb0b
If our headers chain is behind on startup, then if a block is found we'll try
to catch up from all peers announcing the block, in addition to our initial
headers-sync peer. This commit changes behavior so that in this situation,
we'll choose at most one peer announcing a block to additionally sync headers
from.
Plus, calculate the cached balance right when the wallet model, so the wallet widgets don't need to redo the same balance calculation multiple times when they are waiting for the model balance polling timer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
test wise: `WalletTests` now need to trigger the walletModel balance changed manually. So the model updates its internal state and can be used by the widgets.
This is because the test does not start the balance polling timer, in the same way as does not initialize several parts of the GUI workflow. All the objects (wallet, models, views, etc) that are used on this test are manually created instead of using the `WalletController` class flow.
Rationale is that this unit test is focused on verifying the GUI widgets/views behavior only: update the presented information, etc. when they receive different signals and/or function calls from outside (in other words, focus is on the signal slots/receiver side). It's not about whether the wallet balance polling timer is functioning as expected or not (which we definitely create a new test case for it in a follow-up work).
Inside setModel, we call 'wallet().getBalances()', to set the view balance,
right before calling 'updateDisplayUnit' which calls 'wallet().getBalances()'
internally and re-sets the view balance again.
478695982b88fd48a277a9eb197ce819688487f0 bench: Add a benchmark for descriptor expansion (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Taken from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16116 , as requested here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25748#issuecomment-1205441706
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 478695982b88fd48a277a9eb197ce819688487f0
Tree-SHA512: f2efdf8f84e1783c7c298abe65123191d25cab0a9da2d0ff5957a60acc2d10e356151d7ecec0d98d28c456f42ddef50efd70c7edc0c9012df2a977e080515b9d
daabd4121114fe6f780bccab311a522c0717c5b8 net: simplify GetLocalAddress() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
There is no need to use two variables `ret` and `addr` of the same type
`CService` and assign one to the other in a strange way like
`ret = CService{addr}`.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK daabd4121114fe6f780bccab311a522c0717c5b8
aureleoules:
ACK daabd4121114fe6f780bccab311a522c0717c5b8.
w0xlt:
ACK daabd41211
Tree-SHA512: 4bbd3746bc30fbc05bb32b58bb122c938acd849c0f72f1d3e8170557c1999ec26a888e06e874c3fc22562a2becddc7d817db7d174e0e1b383e8d74c39aa1e898
9376a6dae41022874df3b9302667796a9fb7b81d refactor: make active_chain_tip a reference (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes a TODO introduced in #21055.
Makes `active_chain_tip` argument in `CheckFinalTxAtTip` function a reference instead of a pointer.
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK 9376a6dae41022874df3b9302667796a9fb7b81d
Tree-SHA512: c36d1769e0b9598b7f79334704b26b73e958d54caa3bd7e4eff954f3964fcf3f5e3a44a5a760497afad51b76e1614c86314fe035e4083c855e3574a620de7f4d
acda7e8686a1f7a967d6331a2f6a3a01389c3048 [coin selection] consolidate m_change_target and m_min_change_target (glozow)
Pull request description:
These values are both intended for the same thing. Their divergence seems to be the result of an incomplete rename.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK acda7e8686a1f7a967d6331a2f6a3a01389c3048
Xekyo:
ACK acda7e8686a1f7a967d6331a2f6a3a01389c3048
furszy:
ACK acda7e86
aureleoules:
ACK acda7e8686a1f7a967d6331a2f6a3a01389c3048.
Tree-SHA512: 4b86171af5d893f7172373bb404bad12c49588ad1e22eb0544c242173f4bc4dede2ff1270c93c9f02f503ab8d9f66b841a8319d0ecb5e896d0fe8727cf03dbf4
2e79fb6585c802813f80080fc2cadc5b54ddebfb validation tests: Use existing {Chainstate,Block}Man (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This is split up because it is needed for two changes:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25781
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25623
ACKs for top commit:
adam2k:
ACK tested 2e79fb6585c802813f80080fc2cadc5b54ddebfb
aureleoules:
ACK 2e79fb6585c802813f80080fc2cadc5b54ddebfb.
Tree-SHA512: 2cd6a2fec19545f8ffc77e37ccb793aa6cb5815bb1b5e560c0345af6e0f890fd500ae3297b044d3f6f613b8dd7fd4553f5fc2824013342b9e25af1fe2b624967
b16f93caddcd3254eaf3dc43e09adf2142a9c40a script/sign: remove needless IsSolvable() utility (Antoine Poinsot)
c232ef20c0fd2e3b55355e52684091cad3af5247 outputtype: remove redundant check for uncompressed keys in AddAndGetDestinationForScript (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
Now that we have descriptors there is no need to try to sign for a scriptPubKey using dummy signatures, and using a mocked verification of this witness against the interpreter, just to make sure we know how to spend such a Script. Just try to infer a solvable descriptor: any scriptPubKey that we can sign for can be inferred as such.
This came up in #24149 but i think it's worth it on its own.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK b16f93cadd
achow101:
re-ACK b16f93caddcd3254eaf3dc43e09adf2142a9c40a
furszy:
ACK b16f93ca, only change is the `IsSolvable` helper function removal.
Tree-SHA512: 137068157ce90210b710b1bf9ac3c400e2ff5af1112f892094b69875ea473d6a899f52adb51e5030cb907dee517602059cd1661107808558efa5de842ba12b41
8b3d2bbd0d3c87f1a68586822ddc468e0c2f9b52 test: add tests for `datacarrier` and `datacarriersize` options (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
As suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25787, this PR adds tests for `datacarrier` and `datacarriersize` initialization options.
Close https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25787.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK 8b3d2bbd0d3c87f1a68586822ddc468e0c2f9b52
stickies-v:
re-ACK 8b3d2bbd0d
Tree-SHA512: 962638ac9659f9d641bc5d1eff0571a08085dc7d4981b534b7ede03e4c702abd7048d543c199a588e2f94567b6d2393280e686629b19d7f4b24d365662be5e40
Instead of providing our destination (private key) to the I2P proxy when
creating the session, ask it to generate one for us and do not save it
on disk.
49db42cdf56be1a76ab381d37870aa45e17ab666 [test] make tx6 child of tx5, not tx3, in rbf_tests (glozow)
Pull request description:
A small overlooked oopsie from #25674.
There is no effect on the test results because tx3 and tx5 pay the same fee, but this was the intended configuration, as the comment suggests.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 49db42cdf5
darosior:
Github diff ACK 49db42cdf56be1a76ab381d37870aa45e17ab666. Should have catched this. :/
Tree-SHA512: 2f54337ac3edc38707115cde5b466a85b8a6ac0a0a507effa0e9fecb12c9be196ecd1b16702bc23ba617cfb6a3b5db27d3b71616b3c2dadb186c699c4609831e
70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4 psbt: Avoid unsigned int overflow in PSBT_IN_TAP_BIP32_DERIVATION (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Fixes#25749
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4
darosior:
re-utACK 70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4
jonatack:
Review ACK 70a55c059b014c7a687de7a4813a90c65148aed4, this should avoid the issue reported in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25749
Tree-SHA512: 6bb58e1cda9a5baa50fcd24f818b5b27ed94f0d33da3f71f6e457618176611bf2a84e1864e9a48d9303c301252bc4c1dee8b19a67dd713e849fb9442851ca341
9f9339c69206d81d355345ce66c1e23dcfe64c31 msvc: Drop `_SILENCE_CXX17_OLD_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS_DEPRECATION_WARNING` (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It is no longer needed.
ACKs for top commit:
sipsorcery:
tACK 9f9339c69206d81d355345ce66c1e23dcfe64c31.
Tree-SHA512: 7bcb9df4629726ddb8b23e73b186635be54a5e5379928ce250ba2fba7a6d6f1dda98429b8329790e34fcb3861a8b00c6954746ea78e99693b86c51017c4713e0
fb9faffae3a26b8aed8b671864ba679747163019 extended keys: fail to derive too large depth instead of wrapping around (Antoine Poinsot)
8dc6670ce159c2b080e9f735c6603a601d40b6ac descriptor: don't assert success of extended key derivation (Antoine Poinsot)
50cfc9e7613d6cf6b534df6e551238b80678c70d (pubk)key: mark Derive() as nodiscard (Antoine Poinsot)
0ca258a5ace798c4e54308aa8a09b1ab3302cd7e descriptor: never ignore the return value when deriving an extended key (Antoine Poinsot)
d3599c22bd4c6b3cfaaadd675e95ebe3b3cb1749 spkman: don't ignore the return value when deriving an extended key (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
We would previously silently wrap the derived child's depth back to `0`. Instead, explicitly fail when trying to derive an impossible depth, and handle the error in callers.
An extended fuzzing corpus of `descriptor_parse` triggered this behaviour, which was reported by MarcoFalke.
Fixes#25751.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
re-ACK fb9faffae3a26b8aed8b671864ba679747163019
instagibbs:
utACK fb9faffae3
Tree-SHA512: 9f75c23572ce847239bd15e5497df2960b6bd63c61ea72347959d968b5c4c9a4bfeee284e76bdcd7bacbf9eeb70feee85ffd3e316f353ca6eca30e93aafad343
b4a5ab96b42957a0e2110525b9e2e450deda09c1 test: refactor: deduplicate `DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT` constants (Sebastian Falbesoner)
0fda1c7df6165a60f63ced139ed10169f5df55f8 scripted-diff: test: rename `MAX_{ANCESTORS,DESCENDANTS}` to `DEFAULT_{ANCESTOR,DESCENDANT}_LIMIT` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR renames the default in-mempool max ancestors/descendants constants `MAX_ANCESTORS`/`MAX_DESCENDANTS` in the functional tests to match the ones in the codebase:
c012875b9d/src/policy/policy.h (L58-L59)c012875b9d/src/policy/policy.h (L62-L63)
The custom limit constants `MAX_ANCESTORS_CUSTOM`/`MAX_DESCENDANTS_CUSTOM` are also renamed accordingly to better fit to this naming style. In the second commit, the default constants are deduplicated by moving them into the `messages.py` module. (Not sure if this module is really appropriate, as it doesn't have a connection to messages. If someone has a good suggestion, would be glad to hear it.)
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK b4a5ab96b4
glozow:
utACK b4a5ab96b42957a0e2110525b9e2e450deda09c1
fanquake:
ACK b4a5ab96b42957a0e2110525b9e2e450deda09c1
Tree-SHA512: a15c8256170afce3e383fceddcb562f588a02be97ce4202c84a2ebf22d73ab843f5e5a7d7c98e9ea044d8bcb7a4aeae0081d0e84c53e8fc0edffbcca00460139
4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c doc: test: suggest multi-line imports in functional test style guide (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As long as I remember contributing to functional tests (~2-3 years), it was always kind of an unwritten rule that multi-line imports are preferred over single-line imports in order to reduce the possibility of potential merge conflicts -- at least if more than one symbol from a module is imported. This PR adds this rule to the style guide and adapts the example test accordingly. (Inspired by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25792#discussion_r941180819).
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
ACK 4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c
1440000bytes:
ACK 4edc689382
w0xlt:
ACK 4edc689382
fanquake:
ACK 4edc6893825fd8c45c53c81c73a6a7801e1b458c
Tree-SHA512: c7b6ff62f601f4e57cc8334d291662987d6737ebca8d81c063280409f4412302172f1404ec16afc9a13007bcdba55bdab66b9b80363287e287888929cb386584
d8b26abed91c421e8517a2c9a60b57d988121b3a build: move raw rule into Makefile.am (fanquake)
Pull request description:
The same rule is used by the tests and benchmarks to generate headers,
and currently causes #25501. Just deduplicate the code into Makefile.am.
Fixes: #25501.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK d8b26abed91c421e8517a2c9a60b57d988121b3a, tested on Ubuntu 22.04, the moved code was verified using `git diff --color-moved=dimmed-zebra HEAD~1..HEAD`.
jarolrod:
tACK d8b26abed91c421e8517a2c9a60b57d988121b3a
Tree-SHA512: 249813318c92f992a89002fb9b96e70fca6ca97b2136ba0a7f5cc312e9abe24fbbe9a8faddb3bc1c0d775ae901bc91eab63ba564810bb2e3b9d56a2b1a107eb1
07df6cda1468ed45ac227ac6f0169b040e5c0bf3 wallet: Return `util::Result` from WalletLoader methods (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a method that implement common logic to WalletLoader methods and change them to return `BResult<std::unique_ptr<Wallet>>`.
Motivation: #25594 changed `restoreWallet` to return `BResult` but this method shares a common pattern with `createWallet` and `loadWallet`. This PR keeps the same pattern to all WalletLoader methods.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Review ACK 07df6cda1468ed45ac227ac6f0169b040e5c0bf3
theStack:
Code-review ACK 07df6cda1468ed45ac227ac6f0169b040e5c0bf3
Tree-SHA512: 2fe321134883f7cce60206888113800afef0fa168dab184e1a8692cd21a231970eb9c25c7220ea39e5d457134002d47f0974463925db76abbf8dfcd421629c63
Use {Chain,}TestingSetup's existing {Chainstate,Block}Manager and avoid
unnecessarily creating a local one.
This also helps reduce the code diff for a later commit where we change
{Chainstate,Block}Manager's constructor signature.
it was pointed out by a few reviewers that the code block at the end
of attempt selection was difficult to follow and lacked comments.
refactor to get rid of triple nested if statement and improve
readibility.
