568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa scripted-diff: Adjust documentation per top-level target output location (Hennadii Stepanov)
026bb226e96919603af829d0b677779a234a0f6e cmake: Set top-level target output locations (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR sets the target output locations to the `bin` and `lib` subdirectories within the build tree, creating a directory structure that mirrors that of the installed targets.
This approach is widely adopted by the large projects, such as [LLVM](e146c1867e/lldb/cmake/modules/LLDBStandalone.cmake (L128-L130)):
```cmake
set(CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin)
set(CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
set(CMAKE_ARCHIVE_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib${LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX})
```
The `libsecp256k1` project has also recently [adopted](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/1553) this approach.
With this PR, all binaries are conveniently located. For example, run:
```
$ ./build/bin/fuzz
```
instead of:
```
$ ./build/src/test/fuzz/fuzz
```
On Windows, all required DLLs are now located in the same directory as the executables, allowing to run `bitcoin-chainstate.exe` (which loads `bitcoinkernel.dll`) without the need to copy DLLs or modify the `PATH` variable.
The idea was briefly discussed among the build team during the recent CoreDev meeting.
---
**Warning**: This PR changes build locations of newly built executables like `bitcoind` and `test_bitcoin` from `src/` to `bin/` without deleting previously built executables. A clean build is recommended to avoid accidentally running old binaries.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Light re-ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa. Only change since last review was rebasing. I'm ok with this PR in its current form if other developers are happy with it. I just personally think it is inappropriate to \*silently\* break an everyday developer workflow like `git pull; make bitcoind`. I wouldn't have a problem with this PR if it triggered an explicit error, or if the problem was limited to less common workflows like changing cmake options in an existing build.
TheCharlatan:
Re-ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa
theuni:
ACK 568fcdddaec2cc8decba5a098257f31729cc1caa
Tree-SHA512: 1aa5ecd3cd49bd82f1dcc96c8e171d2d19c58aec8dade4bc329df89311f9e50cbf6cf021d004c58a0e1016c375b0fa348ccd52761bcdd179c2d1e61c105e3b9f
fac1dd9dffba1033245c283bc0468e801c14e910 test: Fix authproxy named args debug logging (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
In Python the meaning of `args or argsn` is that `argsn` is fully ignored when `args` is a list with at least one element. However, the RPC server accepts mixed positional and named args in the same RPC.
Fix the debug log by always printing both. Also, add a new `_json_dumps` helper to avoid bloated code.
Can be tested via `--tracerpc` on a call that uses named args mixed with positional args.
ACKs for top commit:
i-am-yuvi:
Tested ACK fac1dd9dffba1033245c283bc0468e801c14e910
rkrux:
tACK fac1dd9dffba1033245c283bc0468e801c14e910
musaHaruna:
Tested ACK [fac1dd9](fac1dd9dff)
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fac1dd9dffba1033245c283bc0468e801c14e910. Thanks for logging fix. This change should have been included in #19762
Tree-SHA512: ff63fbc2564b2c7589e9294baacf4c7a79f10d593776813392510702ca726e3893a29db3ba261f3aee1789a59bb215d7cb10fc85ca1a02632631d3722ddcdfc5
This change:
1. Collects build artifacts in dedicated locations.
2. Allows running bitcoin-chainstate.exe with bitcoinkernel.dll directly
from the build tree on Windows.
b2e9fdc00f5c40c241a37739f7b73b74c2181e39 test: expect that files may disappear from /proc/PID/fd/ (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`get_socket_inodes()` calls `os.listdir()` and then iterates on the results using `os.readlink()`. However a file may disappear from the directory after `os.listdir()` and before `os.readlink()` resulting in a `FileNotFoundError` exception.
It is expected that this may happen for `bitcoind` which is running and could open or close files or sockets at any time. Thus ignore the `FileNotFoundError` exception.
ACKs for top commit:
arejula27:
ACK [`b2e9fdc`](b2e9fdc00f)
sipa:
utACK b2e9fdc00f5c40c241a37739f7b73b74c2181e39
achow101:
ACK b2e9fdc00f5c40c241a37739f7b73b74c2181e39
theuni:
utACK b2e9fdc00f5c40c241a37739f7b73b74c2181e39
hodlinator:
ACK b2e9fdc00f5c40c241a37739f7b73b74c2181e39
Tree-SHA512: 8eb05393e4de4307a70af446c3fc7e8f7dc3f08bf9d68d74d02b0e4e900cfd4865249f297be31f1fd7b05ffea45eb855c5cfcd75704167950c1deb4f17109f33
386eecff5f14d508688e6e7374b67cb54aaa7249 doc: add release notes (ismaelsadeeq)
3eaa0a3b663782bb1bd874ea881b21649f1db767 miner: init: add `-blockreservedweight` startup option (ismaelsadeeq)
777434a2cd14841e35ce39d7a6f51131e6a41de2 doc: rpc: improve `getmininginfo` help text (ismaelsadeeq)
c8acd4032d5a7617764857b51777c076fd7ef13d init: fail to start when `-blockmaxweight` exceeds `MAX_BLOCK_WEIGHT` (ismaelsadeeq)
5bb31633cc9155ed58ad97fc04b47b3d317a3ec2 test: add `-blockmaxweight` startup option functional test (ismaelsadeeq)
2c7d90a6d67a159332d109aab278632d64078f0b miner: bugfix: fix duplicate weight reservation in block assembler (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
* This PR attempts to fix the duplicate coinbase weight reservation issue we currently have.
* Fixes#21950
We reserve 4000 weight units for coinbase transaction in `DEFAULT_BLOCK_MAX_WEIGHT`
7590e93bc7/src/policy/policy.h (L23)
And also reserve additional `4000` weight units in the default `BlockCreationOptions` struct.
7590e93bc7/src/node/types.h (L36-L40)
**Motivation**
- This issue was first noticed during a review here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11100#discussion_r136157411)
- It was later reported in issue #21950.
- I also came across the bug while writing a test for building the block template. I could not create a block template above `3,992,000` in the block assembler, and this was not documented anywhere. It took me a while to realize that we were reserving space for the coinbase transaction weight twice.
---
This PR fixes this by consolidating the reservation to be in a single location in the codebase.
This PR then adds a new startup option `-blockreservedweight` whose default is `8000` that can be used to lower or increase the block reserved weight for block header, txs count, coinbase tx.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
ACK 386eecff5f14d508688e6e7374b67cb54aaa7249
fjahr:
Code review ACK 386eecff5f14d508688e6e7374b67cb54aaa7249
glozow:
utACK 386eecff5f14d508688e6e7374b67cb54aaa7249, nonblocking nits. I do think the release notes should be clarified more
pinheadmz:
ACK 386eecff5f14d508688e6e7374b67cb54aaa7249
Tree-SHA512: f27efa1da57947b7f4d42b9322b83d13afe73dd749dd9cac49360002824dd41c99a876a610554ac2d67bad7485020b9dcc423a8e6748fc79d6a10de6d4357d4c
723440c5b8eb3a815c80bfb37ad195b5448b25ed test framework, wallet: rename get_scriptPubKey method to get_output_script (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
fa0232a3e07ad6d11b4d4aaec93e9531ac3274f3 test: add validation for gettxout RPC response (Alfonso Roman Zubeldia)
Pull request description:
Added a new test in `test/functional/rpc_blockchain.py` to validate the gettxout RPC response. This new test ensures all response elements are verified, including `bestblock`, `confirmations`, `value`, `coinbase`, and `scriptPubKey` details.
Also renamed the method `get_scriptPubKey` from `test/functional/test_framework/wallet.py` to the modern name `get_output_script` as suggested by maflcko (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30226#discussion_r1925491846)
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
reACK 723440c5b8eb3a815c80bfb37ad195b5448b25ed
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 723440c5b8eb3a815c80bfb37ad195b5448b25ed
brunoerg:
code review ACK 723440c5b8eb3a815c80bfb37ad195b5448b25ed
Tree-SHA512: 3384578909d2e7548cef302c5b8a9fed5b82dfc942892503ad4a05e73f5cceafad1eab3af9a27e54aef3db7631f8935298d6b882c70d2f02a9a75b8e3c209b6c
- This commit renamed coinbase_max_additional_weight to block_reserved_weight.
- Also clarify that the reservation is for block header, transaction count
and coinbase transaction.
d45eb3964f693eddcf96f1e4083cf19d327be989 test: compare BDB dumps of test framework parser and wallet tool (Sebastian Falbesoner)
01ddd9f646a5329a92341bb216f3757fa97c0709 test: complete BDB parser (handle internal/overflow pages, support all page sizes) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds missing features to our test framework's BDB parser with the goal of hopefully being able to read all legacy wallets that are created with current and past versions of Bitcoin Core. This could be useful both for making review of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26606 easier and to also possibly improve our functional tests for the wallet BDB-ro parser by additionally validating it with an alternative implementation. The second commits introduces a test that create a legacy wallet with huge label strings (in order to create overflow pages, i.e. pages needed for key/value data than is larger than the page size) and compares the dump outputs of wallet tool and the extended test framework BDB parser.
It can be exercised via `$ ./test/functional/tool_wallet.py --legacy`. BDB support has to be compiled in (obviously).
For some manual tests regarding different page sizes, the following patch can be used:
```diff
diff --git a/src/wallet/bdb.cpp b/src/wallet/bdb.cpp
index 38cca32f80..1bf39323d3 100644
--- a/src/wallet/bdb.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/bdb.cpp
@@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ void BerkeleyDatabase::Open()
DB_BTREE, // Database type
nFlags, // Flags
0);
+ pdb_temp->set_pagesize(1<<9); /* valid BDB pagesizes are from 1<<9 (=512) to <<16 (=65536) */
if (ret != 0) {
throw std::runtime_error(strprintf("BerkeleyDatabase: Error %d, can't open database %s", ret, strFile));
```
I verified that the newly introduced test passes with all valid page sizes between 512 and 65536.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK d45eb3964f693eddcf96f1e4083cf19d327be989
furszy:
utACK d45eb3964f693eddcf96f1e4083cf19d327be989
brunoerg:
code review ACK d45eb3964f693eddcf96f1e4083cf19d327be989
Tree-SHA512: 9f8ac80452545f4fcd24a17ea6f9cf91b487cfb1fcb99a0ba9153fa4e3b239daa126454e26109fdcb72eb1c76a4ee3b46fd6af21dc318ab67bd12b3ebd26cfdd
faf2f2c654d9aa18b2f49a157956f9ab0fce302a test: Avoid redundant stop and error spam on shutdown (MarcoFalke)
fae3bf6b870eb0f9cddd1adac82ba72890806ae3 test: Avoid redundant stop and error spam on startup failure (MarcoFalke)
fa0dc09b9002f0bcae63af6af8d37fb3e0040ef4 test: Remove --noshutdown flag (MarcoFalke)
fad441fba07877ea78ed6020fde11828307273a6 test: Treat leftover process as error (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `--noshutdown` flag is brittle, confusing, and redundant:
* Someone wanting to inspect the state after a test failure will likely also want to debug the state on the python side, so the option is redundant with `--pdbonfailure`. If there was a use case to replicate `--pdbonfailure` without starting pdb, a dedicated flag could be added for that use case.
* It is brittle to use the flag for a passing test, because it will disable checks in the test. For example, on shutdown LSan will perform a leak check, and the test framework will check that the node did not crash, and it will check that the node did not print errors to stderr.
Fix all issues by removing it.
Also, tidy up startup error messages to be less confusing as a result.
ACKs for top commit:
hodlinator:
re-ACK faf2f2c654d9aa18b2f49a157956f9ab0fce302a
pablomartin4btc:
re tACK faf2f2c654d9aa18b2f49a157956f9ab0fce302a
Tree-SHA512: 46d7ae59c7be88b93f1f9e0b6be21af0fc101e646512e2c5e725682cb18bfec8aa010e0ebe89ce9ffe239e5caac0da5f81cc97b79e738d26ca5fa31930e8e4e3
1b51616f2e3b58a1c63a19e6dba8e7e9c2aefdeb test: improve rogue calls in mining functions (i-am-yuvi)
Pull request description:
#31403 follow-up, see [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31403#pullrequestreview-2498806354)
- Rename `invalid_call` parameter to `called_by_framework` in `generateblock`, `generatetoaddress` and `generatetodescriptor` mining methods to better express its intended usage.
- Add explicit assertion message clarifying that these functions should only be called by TestFramework itself to maintain proper node synchronization.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
lgtm ACK 1b51616f2e3b58a1c63a19e6dba8e7e9c2aefdeb
achow101:
ACK 1b51616f2e3b58a1c63a19e6dba8e7e9c2aefdeb
hodlinator:
re-ACK 1b51616f2e3b58a1c63a19e6dba8e7e9c2aefdeb
Prabhat1308:
ACK [1b51616](1b51616f2e)
Tree-SHA512: 56832626fe54dcaa07dacb4f9c960c0a83fad3fb12272155114ac697856c59b7f44805e1152eddeec7a5e8f7daf487382dc01b5b9ae2e74b62b2df6bd1f81f77
92787dd52cd4ddc378cf1bcb7e92a649916a0f42 test: raise an error when target_vsize is below tx virtual size (ismaelsadeeq)
a8780c937f730f4fa2ef2045458e3908bb2176e4 test: raise an error if output value is <= 0 in `create_self_transfer` (ismaelsadeeq)
f6e88931f071f06cb8aefeac61cf3bce662eea74 test: test that `create_self_transfer_multi` respects `target_vsize` (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
This is a simple test PR that does two things:
1. Raise an exception in `_bulk_tx_` when `target_vsize` is too low, i.e., below the tx vsize.
2. Addresses some review comments from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30162, which are:
- Raise an error if the output value is less than or equal to zero in `create_self_transfer`.
This prevents creating transactions with a value of 0 or less.
- Add a test to verify that `create_self_transfer_multi` also respects the passed `target_vsize`.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 92787dd52cd4ddc378cf1bcb7e92a649916a0f42
theStack:
ACK 92787dd52cd4ddc378cf1bcb7e92a649916a0f42
rkrux:
reACK 92787dd52cd4ddc378cf1bcb7e92a649916a0f42
glozow:
ACK 92787dd52cd4ddc378cf1bcb7e92a649916a0f42
Tree-SHA512: 1f2767f2cf715ed65074c5fff347eec160b142685777d833d5e872cfef364d3dc1916b52ee442e99c7b9a8d514ff62bc67a9899d8854f65a4b93ac3ae300d18e
Trying to shut down a node after a test failure may fail and lead to an
RPC error.
Also, it is confusing to sidestep the existing fallback to kill any
leftover nodes on a test failure.
So just rely on the fallback.
Idea by Hodlinator.
Co-Authored-By: Hodlinator <172445034+hodlinator@users.noreply.github.com>
For blocks 1 through 15 the script_BIP34_coinbase_height appends OP_1
to comply with BIP34 and avoid bad-cb-length.
This is inconsistent with BlockAssembler::CreateNewBlock() which adds
OP_0 instead.
The utxo_total_supply fuzzer and MinerTestingSetup::Block also use OP_0.
Changing it is required to import the test vectors in the next commit.
It also ensures the test vectors can be regenerated using the CPU miner
at https://github.com/pooler/cpuminer without patches (it uses OP_0).
The same helper is used by the signet miner, so this will impact newly
bootstrapped signets.
`p2p_seednode.py` would try to connect to `0.0.0.1` and `0.0.0.2` as
seed nodes. This sends outbound TCP packets on a non-loopback interface
to the default router.
Configure an unavailable proxy for all executions of `bitcoind` during
this test. Also change `0.0.0.1` and `0.0.0.2` because connecting to
them would skip the `-proxy=` setting because for such an address:
* `CNetAddr::IsLocal()` is true, thus
* `CNetAddr::IsRoutable()` is false, thus
* `CNetAddr::GetNetwork()` is `NET_UNROUTABLE`, even though
`CNetAddr::m_net` is `NET_IPV4`.
This speeds up the execution time of `p2p_seednode.py`
from 12.5s to 2.5s.
Trying to immediately shut down a node after a startup failure without
waiting for the RPC to be fully up will in most cases just fail and lead
to an RPC error.
Also, it is confusing to sidestep the existing fallback to kill any
leftover nodes on a test failure.
So just rely on the fallback.
Printing to stderr instead of stdout makes the test_runner.py fail on
leftover processes. This is desired and fine, because a leftover process
should only happen on a test failure anyway.
`get_socket_inodes()` calls `os.listdir()` and then iterates on the
results using `os.readlink()`. However a file may disappear from the
directory after `os.listdir()` and before `os.readlink()` resulting in a
`FileNotFoundError` exception.
It is expected that this may happen for `bitcoind` which is running and
could open or close files or sockets at any time. Thus ignore the
`FileNotFoundError` exception.
If the `releases` directory exists, but still only a subset of the
necessary previous release binaries are available, the test fails by
throwing an exception (sometimes leading to follow-up exceptions like
"AssertionError: [node 0] Error: no RPC connection") and printing out
a stack trace, which can be confusing and at a first glance suggests
that the node crashed or some alike.
Improve this by checking and printing out *all* of the missing release
binaries and failing with an explicit error in this case. Also add an
info on how to download previous releases binaries.
Noticed while testing #30328.
Can be tested by e.g.
$ ./test/get_previous_releases.py -b
$ rm -rf ./releases/v28.0/
$ ./build/test/functional/wallet_migration.py
d9d5bc2e7466033d989432f53a112325fa3d6d4a qa: Limit `-maxconnections` in tests (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On systems such as NetBSD, the `bitcoind` typically prints the following warning:
```
Warning: Reducing -maxconnections from 125 to 96, because of system limitations.
```
This breaks the functional test framework (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23968).
This PR limits the `-maxconnections` to mitigate the issue and enable functional tests on NetBSD.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/23968.
Here is CI log from the [`bitcoin-core-nightly`](https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly) repository: https://github.com/hebasto/bitcoin-core-nightly/actions/runs/12415868523/job/34663207030
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK d9d5bc2e7466033d989432f53a112325fa3d6d4a
achow101:
ACK d9d5bc2e7466033d989432f53a112325fa3d6d4a
mzumsande:
Code Review ACK d9d5bc2e7466033d989432f53a112325fa3d6d4a
tdb3:
tested ACK d9d5bc2e7466033d989432f53a112325fa3d6d4a
Tree-SHA512: ad02adce98ce609176c9688289a0ca347932da5b6f259c6ab4e686914352f3d61f819adc150be80220f969200ee6a0c1c8737426525816fa0df58d688c51410c
a2c45ae5480a2ee643665d6ecaee9714a287a70e test: report failure during utf8 response decoding (furszy)
Pull request description:
Useful for debugging issues such https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31241#issuecomment-2462816933.
Prints the entire response content instead of printing only the position of the byte it can't be decoded.
The diff between the error messages can be seen by running the `wallet_migration.py` functional test with the following patch applied:
```
diff --git a/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp b/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp
--- a/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp(revision d65918c5da52c7d5035b4151dee9ffb2e94d4761)
+++ b/src/wallet/rpc/wallet.cpp(date 1731005254673)
@@ -801,7 +801,7 @@
}
UniValue r{UniValue::VOBJ};
- r.pushKV("wallet_name", res->wallet_name);
+ r.pushKV("wallet_name", "\xc3\x28");
if (res->watchonly_wallet) {
r.pushKV("watchonly_name", res->watchonly_wallet->GetName());
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a2c45ae5480a2ee643665d6ecaee9714a287a70e
theStack:
re-ACK a2c45ae5480a2ee643665d6ecaee9714a287a70e
rkrux:
tACK a2c45ae5480a2ee643665d6ecaee9714a287a70e
ismaelsadeeq:
utACK a2c45ae5480a2ee643665d6ecaee9714a287a70e
Tree-SHA512: 6abb524b5a215c51ec881eea91ebe8174140a88ff3874c8c88676157edae7818801356586a904dbb21b45053183315a6d71dbf917d753611d8e413776b57c484
1dd3af8fbc350c6f1efa8ae6449e67e1b42ccff4 Add release note for #31223 (Martin Zumsande)
997757dd2b4d7b20b17299fbd21970b2efb8bbc8 test: add functional test for -port behavior (Martin Zumsande)
0e2b12b92a28a2949e75bf50f31563f52e647d6e net, init: derive default onion port if a user specified a -port (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
This resolves#31133 (setups with multiple local nodes each using a different `-port` no longer working with v28.0, see the issue description for more details) by deriving the default onion listening port to be the value specified by `-port` incremented by 1 (idea by vasild / laanwj).
Note that with this fix, the chosen `-port` values of two local nodes cannot be adjacent, otherwise there will be port collisions again.
From the discussion in the linked issue, this was the most popular option, followed by doing nothing and telling affected users to change their setups to use `-bind` instead of `-port`. But more opinions are certainly welcome!
I think that if we decide to do something about the problem described in the issue, we should do so soon (in 28.1.), so I opened this PR.
Fixes#31133
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 1dd3af8fbc350c6f1efa8ae6449e67e1b42ccff4
laanwj:
Tested ACK 1dd3af8fbc350c6f1efa8ae6449e67e1b42ccff4
tdb3:
Code review ACK 1dd3af8fbc350c6f1efa8ae6449e67e1b42ccff4
Tree-SHA512: 37fda2b23bbedcab5df3a401cf5afce66ae5318fb78f9660f83e3fd075b528e8156d7a0903f9a12ffe97ab5d83860587116b74af28670a1f4c2f0d1be4999f40
fae76393bdbf867176e65447799d6ee3d3567b18 test: Avoid F541 (f-string without any placeholders) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
An extra `f` string-prefix is mostly harmless, but could be confusing or hint to a mistake where a format argument was forgotten.
Try to avoid the confusion and mistakes by applying the `F541` linter rule.
ACKs for top commit:
lucasbalieiro:
**Tested ACK** [fae7639](fae76393bd)
danielabrozzoni:
ACK fae76393bdbf867176e65447799d6ee3d3567b18
tdb3:
Code review ACK fae76393bdbf867176e65447799d6ee3d3567b18
Tree-SHA512: 4992a74fcf0c19b32e4d95f7333e087b4269b5c5259c556789fb86721617db81c7a4fe210ae136c92824976f07f71ad0f374655e7008b1967c02c73324862d9a
409d0d629378c3e23388ed31516376ad1ae536b5 test: enable running individual independent functional test methods (ismaelsadeeq)
Pull request description:
- Some test methods in the functional test framework are independent and do not require any prior context or setup in `run_test`.
- This commit adds a new option for running these specific methods within a test file, allowing them to be executed individually without running the entire test suite.
- Using this option reduces the time you need to wait before the test you are interested in starts executing.
- The functionality added by this PR can be achieved manually by commenting out code, but having a pragmatic option to do this is more convenient.
Note: Running test methods that require arguments or context will fail.
**Example Usage**:
```zsh
build/test/functional/feature_reindex.py --test_methods continue_reindex_after_shutdown
```
```zsh
build/test/functional/feature_config_args.py --test_methods test_log_buffer test_args_log test_connect_with_seednode
```
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
review ACK 409d0d629378c3e23388ed31516376ad1ae536b5
rkrux:
reACK 409d0d629378c3e23388ed31516376ad1ae536b5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 409d0d629378c3e23388ed31516376ad1ae536b5. This seems like a good step towards making it easy to run independent tests quickly. I think ideally there would be some naming convention or @ annotation added to test methods that can run independently, so the test framework could provide more functionality like being able to list test methods, being able to show command lines to quickly reproduce problems when tests fails, and calling test methods automatically instead of requiring individual tests to call them. But these ideas are all compatible with the new `--test_methods` option
Tree-SHA512: b0daac7c3b322e6fd9b946962335d8279e8cb004ff76f502c8d597b9c4b0073840945be198a79d44c5aaa64bda421429829d5c84ceeb8c6139eb6ed079a35878
111465d72dd35e42361fc2a089036f652417ed37 test: Remove unused attempts parameter from wait_until (Fabian Jahr)
5468a23eb9a3fd2b0c08dbca69fe3df58af42530 test: Add check_interval parameter to wait_until (Fabian Jahr)
16c87d91fd4d7709fa9d8824d5b641ef71821931 test: Introduce ensure_for helper (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A repeating pattern in the functional tests is that the test sleeps for a while to ensure that a certain condition is still true after some amount of time has elapsed. Most recently a new case of this was added in #30807. This PR here introduces an `ensure` helper to streamline this functionality.
Some approach considerations:
- It is possible to construct this by reusing `wait_until` and wrapping it in `try` internally. However, the logger output of the failing wait would still be printed which seems irritating. So I opted for simplified but similar internals to `wait_until`.
- This implementation starts for a failure in the condition right away which has the nice side-effect that it might give feedback on a failure earlier than is currently the case. However, in some cases, it may be expected that the condition may still be false at the beginning and then turns true until time has run out, something that would work when the test sleeps without checking in a loop. I decided against this design (and even against adding it as an option) because such a test design seems like it would be racy either way.
- I have also been going back and forth on naming. To me `ensure` works well but I am also not a native speaker, happy consider a different name if others don't think it's clear enough.
ACKs for top commit:
maflcko:
re-ACK 111465d72dd35e42361fc2a089036f652417ed37 🍋
achow101:
ACK 111465d72dd35e42361fc2a089036f652417ed37
tdb3:
code review re ACK 111465d72dd35e42361fc2a089036f652417ed37
furszy:
utACK 111465d72dd35e42361fc2a089036f652417ed37
Tree-SHA512: ce01a4f3531995375a6fbf01b27d51daa9d4c3d7cd10381be6e86ec5925d2965861000f7cb4796b8d40aabe3b64c4c27e2811270e4e3c9916689575b8ba4a2aa
After port collisions are no longer tolerated but lead to
a startup failure in v28.0, local setups of multiple nodes,
each with a different -port value would not be possible anymore
due to collision of the onion default port - even if the nodes
were using tor or not interested in receiving onion inbound connections.
Fix this by deriving the onion listening port to be -port + 1.
(idea by vasild / laanwj)
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
