The version replacement here is not working anyway, not just that but it
is actively harmful as it removes all `-` from the text. So remove that
line. See discussion in #22681.
Tree-SHA512: 909c6225a50bbda1253bae65c09700a658bd36b5c91c91cea28d1df0aad5dc4adb095e0695259eca377536da34d17741ce453a5c5c50041d1163d94bbbe5355d
aa254a01c1 qt: Pre-rc3 translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A regularly updated PR with new translations fetched from Transifex.com.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Sanity-check (did not review any specific translations) ACK aa254a01c1
Tree-SHA512: bb380b1afb8af7895ac2de5ccdf489b9a73b6d47334d5eb5608370034795c064b5978106814ada96aaa5abd45a04901e6fd749bddc23149fb4a11dd4e6efe846
The uploaded binaries need to match the same flat directory structure of
the SHA256SUMS file in order for torrent downloaders to be able to
verify the download without moving files. Mention this in the release
process doc.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22654
Rebased-From: 132cae44f2
The SHA256SUMS file can be used in a sha256sum -c command to verify
downloaded binaries. However users are likely to download just a single
file and not place this file in the correct directory relative to the
SHA256SUMS file for the simple verification command to work. By not
including the directory name in the SHA256SUMS file, it will be easier
for users to verify downloaded binaries.
Co-authored-by: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22654
Rebased-From: fb17c99e35
Previously, building from a release source tarball would result in a
version string like v22.0.0-<commithash>, but we expect just v22.0.0.
This commit solves this problem.
Also use PACKAGE_VERSION instead of reconstructing it.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22685
Rebased-From: 5100deee58
ApproximateBestSubset had an edge case (due to not using
GetSelectionAmount) where it was possible for it to return success but
fail to select enough to cover transaction fees. A test is added that
could trigger this failure prior to the fix being implemented.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22686
Rebased-From: 92885c4f69
When the fee is not subtracted from the outputs, the amount that has
been reserved for the fee (change_and_fee - change_amount) must be
enough to cover the fee that is needed. It would be a bug to not do so,
so use an assert to make this obvious if such a situation were to occur.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22686
Rebased-From: d9262324e8
For target value calculations, GetSelectionAmount should be used, not
m_effective_value or m_value.
Specifically, ApproximateBestSubset mistakenly uses m_value when
calculating whether the target value has been met. This has been changed
to use GetSelectionAmount.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22686
Rebased-From: 2de222c401
This allows us to remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks and release with a
SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22642
Rebased-From: 90b3e482e9
Previously, if verification fails, the correct message will be printed,
but the exit code would still be 0.
Github-Pull: bitcoin/bitcoin#22643
Rebased-From: d451b60d22
When no external signers are available, the option to enable external
signers should always be disabled. However the encrypt wallet checkbox
can erroneously re-enable the external signer checkbox. To avoid this,
CreateWalletDialog now stores whether signers were available during
setSigners so that future calls to external_signer_checkbox->setEnabled
can account for whether signers are available.
Github-Pull: bitcoin-core/gui#396
Rebased-From: a9b9ca82da
Adding a new item to the m_wallet_selector must follow the establishment
of signal-slot connections.
Github-Pull: bitcoin-core/gui#393
Rebased-From: d54d949598
739d19053b doc: add info to i2p.md about IBD time and multiple networks (Jon Atack)
cc8838ce98 contrib, p2p: update I2P hardcoded seeds (Jon Atack)
cd57bb1a66 guix: Ensure EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE does not include GPG information (Andrew Chow)
219900a123 guix: Remove extra \r from all.SHA256SUMS line ending (Andrew Chow)
38d18c01e2 guix, doc: Add a note that codesigners need to rebuild after tagging (Andrew Chow)
aa9b6aba03 guix: Allow changing the base manifest in guix-verify (Andrew Chow)
056e47d887 guix: Make all.SHA256SUMS rather than codesigned.SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow)
8f1e3b31b2 script, doc: guix touchups (jonatack)
3bbfc1b8e0 Updated Readme, Corrected the codesign typo (h)
34f9f88bc9 guix/build: Remove vestigial SKIPATTEST.TAG (Carl Dong)
9e52a30ebd guix/INSTALL: Misc fixups (Carl Dong)
45e0f3d608 guix: Silence getent(1) invocation (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Currently backports #22511. We can collect up further backports and merge prior to rc2.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 739d19053b
Tree-SHA512: 8fc795ee56b7757ff405636a2811bd606ea33ba1160f3f1ea42e0e1478ce8211bb60bf7b16a673b932db40a24b76d47c54e703bf2775d3b9385d9b080183b433
2d3fcf5760 qt: Pre-rc2 translations update (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Since 6312b8370c translations are still updating everyday.
I'm going to keep this PR updated until the moment just before tagging rc2, when it is expected to be merged.
Hope this will make life of both translators and release maintainers a bit easier :)
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: d2c44f3900ee313cfce24edaed30a08dbe340e5ecc627301bc3cc7162ddebe6c0403351ce0bf056395ab14e55908de1609f5e6e8183d3405bed86416888cb32d
If the user has set log.showSignature=true in their git config, then the
git log will always output GPG signature information. Since git log is
used to set EPOCH_SOURCE_DATE, this will mistakenly have GPG signature
information in it which causes issues for the build. To avoid this
issue, we override the config and force log.showSignature=false.
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 9b313dfef1
guix-attest mistakenly added an extra \r to the line endings in
all.SHA256SUMS, causing guix-verify to erroneously fail.
Co-Authored-By: Carl Dong <contact@carldong.me>
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 43225f0a2a
One of the issues observed during the 22.0rc1 release process was that a
codesigner's attestation mismatched non-codesigner attestations because
the guix-codesign step was performed prior to tagging the version in
bitcoin-detached-sigs.
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: d080c27066
When verifying guix attestations, it is useful to set a particular
signer's manifest as the base to compare against.
Github-Pull: #22531
Rebased-From: 4a466388a0
We forgot this for rc1. Thanks to Hebasto for fixing the import script.
Tree-SHA512: 127d0989dabf95867f4542e7f3134ef5d5045418b1411582772d60759e16a5090e30c83bffbbc44b2a496ba830a66bdb0d8ba0d2def43f3462a4f15edf64953a
9b85a5e2f7 tests: Test for dumpwallet lock order issue (Andrew Chow)
25d99e6511 Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go first (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When a wallet is loaded which has an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool, it will end up establishing the lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. If `dumpwallet` is used on this wallet, then a lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main will be used, which causes a lock order assertion. This PR fixes this by reordering `dumpwallet` and `GetKeyBirthTimes` (only used by `dumpwallet`). Specifically, in both functions, the function calls which lock cs_main are done prior to locking cs_KeyStore. This avoids the lock order issue.
Additionally, I have added a test case to `wallet_dump.py`. Of course testing this requires `--enable-debug`.
Fixes#22489
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9b85a5e2f7🎰
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b85a5e2f7. Nice to reduce lock scope, and good test!
prayank23:
tACK 9b85a5e2f7
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 9b85a5e2f7 under the same conditions reported in issue #22489 and the `dumpwallet` command completed successfully.
Tree-SHA512: d370a8f415ad64ee6a538ff419155837bcdbb167e3831b06572562289239028c6b46d80b23d227286afe875d9351f3377574ed831549ea426fb926af0e19c755
5a77abd4e6 [style] Clean up BroadcastTransaction() (John Newbery)
7282d4c036 [test] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (glozow)
cd48372b67 [mempool] Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions (John Newbery)
847b6ed48d [test] Test transactions are not re-added to unbroadcast set (Duncan Dean)
2837a9f1ea [mempool] Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
1. Only add a transaction to the unbroadcast set when it's added to the mempool
Currently, if BroadcastTransaction() is called to rebroadcast a
transaction (e.g. by ResendWalletTransactions()), then we add the
transaction to the unbroadcast set. That transaction has already been
broadcast in the past, so peers are unlikely to request it again,
meaning RemoveUnbroadcastTx() won't be called and it won't be removed
from m_unbroadcast_txids.
Net processing will therefore continue to attempt rebroadcast for the
transaction every 10-15 minutes. This will most likely continue until
the node connects to a new peer which hasn't yet seen the transaction
(or perhaps indefinitely).
Fix by only adding the transaction to the broadcast set when it's added to the mempool.
2. Allow rebroadcast for same-txid-different-wtxid transactions
There is some slightly unexpected behaviour when:
- there is already transaction in the mempool (the "mempool tx")
- BroadcastTransaction() is called for a transaction with the same txid
as the mempool transaction but a different witness (the "new tx")
Prior to this commit, if BroadcastTransaction() is called with
relay=true, then it'll call RelayTransaction() using the txid/wtxid of
the new tx, not the txid/wtxid of the mempool tx. For wtxid relay peers,
in SendMessages(), the wtxid of the new tx will be taken from
setInventoryTxToSend, but will then be filtered out from the vector of
wtxids to announce, since m_mempool.info() won't find the transaction
(the mempool contains the mempool tx, which has a different wtxid from
the new tx).
Fix this by calling RelayTransaction() with the wtxid of the mempool
transaction in this case.
The third commit is a comment/whitespace only change to tidy up the BroadcastTransaction() function.
ACKs for top commit:
duncandean:
reACK 5a77abd
naumenkogs:
ACK 5a77abd4e6
theStack:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
lsilva01:
re-ACK 5a77abd4e6
Tree-SHA512: d1a46d32a9f975220e5b432ff6633fac9be01ea41925b4958395b8d641680500dc44476b12d18852e5b674d2d87e4d0160b4483e45d3d149176bdff9f4dc8516
5730a43703 test: Add functional test for AddrFetch connections (Martin Zumsande)
c34ad3309f net, rpc: Enable AddrFetch connections for functional testing (Martin Zumsande)
533500d907 p2p: Add timeout for AddrFetch peers (Martin Zumsande)
b6c5d1e450 p2p: AddrFetch - don't disconnect on self-announcements (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
AddrFetch connections (old name: oneshots) are intended to be short-lived connections on which we ask a peer for addresses via `getaddr` and disconnect after receiving them.
This is done by disconnecting after receiving the first `addr`. However, it is no longer working as intended, because nowadays, the first `addr` a typical bitcoin core node sends is its self-announcement.
So we'll disconnect before the peer gets a chance to answer our `getaddr`.
I checked that this affects both `-seednode` peers specified manually, and DNS seeds when AddrFetch is used as a fallback if DNS doesn't work for us.
The current behavior of getting peers via AddrFetch when starting with an empty addrman would be to connect to the peer, receive its self-announcement and add it to addrman, disconnect, reconnect to the same peer again as a full outbound (no other addresses in addrman) and then receive more `addr`. This is silly and not in line with AddrFetch peer being intended to be short-lived peers.
Fix this by only disconnecting after receiving an `addr` message of size > 1.
[Edit] As per review discussion, this PR now also adds a timeout after which we disconnect if we haven't received any suitable `addr`, and a functional test.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 5730a43703
naumenkogs:
ACK 5730a43703
jnewbery:
ACK 5730a43703
Tree-SHA512: 8a81234f37e827705138eb254223f7f3b3bf44a06cb02126fc7990b0d231b9bd8f07d38d185cc30d55bf35548a6fdc286b69602498d875b937e7c58332158bf9
54c7754f31 build: use aarch64 Clang if cross-compiling for darwin on aarch64 (fanquake)
Pull request description:
If we're cross-compiling for darwin on aarch64 hardware, we need to
use a Clang that will run on that hardware.
Only tested in a Linux Docker container (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu),
running on an Apple M1 mac-mini (aarch64-apple-darwin20.5.0).
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 54c7754f31, I agree it can be merged (fix in #22448 is orthogonal to this one).
Tree-SHA512: 66c530097a5dc072a0a00dc22eb3d4a7d923dfa8ab8160f7c3e395cbe58da324f367548d673c0510606f5225d5d37bb5607a76b1703b8b03ac7d2cceeccbd542
e6a94d4446 guix: Bump to version-1.3.0 from upstream (Carl Dong)
90fd13b954 guix: Pin kernel header version (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
- Use 4.19 for riscv64 (earliest LTS release w/ riscv64 support)
- Use 4.9 for all others (second-oldest LTS release, released in
combination with glibc glibc 2.24 in Debian stretch)
```
```
The chosen commit is the HEAD of Guix's version-1.3.0 branch as of July
15th, 2021.
Also fix visual indenting.
```
-----
This + the documentation PR should make our Guix system ready for release!
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK e6a94d4446 to change to vanilla guix. Did not review the kernel change.
laanwj:
ACK e6a94d4446
fanquake:
ACK e6a94d4446
Tree-SHA512: a175e4ddb3ee786a39f5e800ce336932ad2f6797a3a28400a6f723875d0f19833fd36cedc41b3580e4604110517211bd9f557be36adf7265fd8e591c434ae032
0a5723beea macdeploy: cleanup .temp.dmg if present (fanquake)
ecffe8689d macdeploy: remove qt4 related code (fanquake)
639f064253 macdeploy: select the plugins we need, rather than excluding those we don't (fanquake)
3d26b6b9e9 macdeploy: fix framework printing when passing -verbose (fanquake)
dca6c90329 macdeploy: remove unused plistlib import (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This includes [one followup](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20422#discussion_r534207899) and [one bug fix](3d26b6b9e9) from #20422, as well as some simplifications to the `macdeployqtplus` code.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 0a5723beea, tested on macOS Big Sur 11.4 (20F71, x86_64) + Homebrew's Qt 5.15.2.
Tree-SHA512: cfad9505eacd32fe3a9d06eb13b2de0b6d2cad7b17778e90b503501cbf922e53d4e7f7f74952d1aed58410bdae9b0bb3248098583ef5b85689cb27d4dc06c029
fac4814106 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong)
5d24cc3d82 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong)
5da2ee49d5 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong)
318c60700b guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong)
fcab35b229 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong)
c2541fd0ca guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong)
46ce6ce378 tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong)
fc4f8449f3 guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong)
263220a85c guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #21462
Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier.
Current TODOs:
- [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up
- [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login
- [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section
- [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section
- [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made
- [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now
- [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source
- [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key
- [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work.
Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fac4814106 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release.
Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
facd56750c scripted-diff: Revert "fuzz: Add Temporary debug assert for oss-fuzz issue" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No longer needed, as it wouldn't help to debug this issue. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22472#issuecomment-882692900
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK facd56750c
Tree-SHA512: 13352b3529c43d6e65ab127134b32158d3072dc2fbbb326fea9adfeada5a8610d0477ea75748b8b68e7abb3b9869a989df3a3169e92bdd458053d64bae6ed379
