Ava Chow 2c7a4231db
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#30569: node: reduce unsafe uint256S usage
18d65d27726bf9fc7629b8e794047a10c9cf6156 test: use uint256::FromUserHex for RANDOM_CTX_SEED (stickies-v)
6819e5a329c3bf38e47a07434e2a3c0031f808d0 node: use uint256::FromUserHex for -assumevalid parsing (stickies-v)
2e58fdb544b538dba9823bcd5754d074272bfc04 util: remove unused IsHexNumber (stickies-v)
8a44d7d3c1e5d5af6779c3e4befe514c9dafb8ff node: use uint256::FromUserHex for -minimumchainwork parsing (stickies-v)
70e2c87737e77ee85812cc328c4ddfaea7147533 refactor: add uint256::FromUserHex helper (stickies-v)
85b7cbfcbe3f94770bdf73dedd8bda0193a44627 test: unittest chainstatemanager_args (stickies-v)

Pull request description:

  Since fad2991ba073de0bd1f12e42bf0fbaca4a265508, `uint256S` has been [deprecated](fad2991ba0 (diff-800776e2dda39116e889839f69409571a5d397de048a141da7e4003bc099e3e2R138)) because it is less robust than the `base_blob::FromHex()` introduced in [the same PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/30482). Specifically, it tries to recover from length-mismatches, recover from untrimmed whitespace, 0x-prefix and garbage at the end, instead of simply requiring exactly 64 hex-only characters. _(see also #30532)_

  This PR carves out the few `uint256S` callsites that may potentially prove a bit more controversial to change because they deal with user input and backwards incompatible behaviour change.

  The main behaviour change introduced in this PR is:
  - `-minimumchainwork` will raise an error when input is longer than 64 hex digits
  - `-assumevalid` will raise an error when input contains invalid hex characters, or when it is longer than 64 hex digits
  - test: the optional RANDOM_CTX_SEED env var will now cause tests to abort when it contains invalid hex characters, or when it is longer than 64 hex digits

  After this PR, the remaining work to remove `uint256S` completely is almost entirely mechanical and/or test related. I will open that PR once #30560 is merged because it builds on that.

ACKs for top commit:
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK 18d65d27726bf9fc7629b8e794047a10c9cf6156
  l0rinc:
    ACK 18d65d27726bf9fc7629b8e794047a10c9cf6156
  achow101:
    ACK 18d65d27726bf9fc7629b8e794047a10c9cf6156
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 18d65d27726bf9fc7629b8e794047a10c9cf6156. Very nice change that cleans up the API, adds checking for invalid values, makes parsing of values more consistent, and adds test coverage.

Tree-SHA512: ec118ea3d56e1dfbc4c79acdbfc797f65c4d2107b0ca9577c848b4ab9b7cb8d05db9f3c7fe8441a09291aca41bf671572431f4eddc59be8fb53abbea76bbbf86
2024-08-27 16:47:54 -04:00
2024-07-30 16:14:19 +01:00
2024-08-27 07:00:27 +02:00
2024-08-27 11:20:54 -04:00
2024-08-26 15:12:58 -04:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.2 GiB
Languages
C++ 64.3%
Python 19.7%
C 12.1%
CMake 1.3%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.6%