Andrew Chow 395b932807
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#26720: wallet: coin selection, don't return results that exceed the max allowed weight
25ab14712b9d80276016f9fc9bff7fb9c1d09635 refactor: coinselector_tests, unify wallet creation code (furszy)
ba9431c505e1590db6103b9632134985cd4704dc test: coverage for bnb max weight (furszy)
5a2bc45ee0b123e461c5191322ed0b43524c3d82 wallet: clean post coin selection max weight filter (furszy)
2d112584e384de10021c64e4700455d71326824e coin selection: BnB, don't return selection if exceeds max allowed tx weight (furszy)
d3a1c098e4b5df2ebbae20c6e390c3d783950e93 test: coin selection, add coverage for SRD (furszy)
9d9689e5a657956db8a30829c994600ec7d3098b coin selection: heap-ify SRD, don't return selection if exceeds max tx weight (furszy)
6107ec2229c5f5b4e944a6b10d38010c850094ac coin selection: knapsack, select closest UTXO above target if result exceeds max tx size (furszy)
1284223691127e76135a46d251c52416104f0ff1 wallet: refactor coin selection algos to return util::Result (furszy)

Pull request description:

  Coming from the following comment https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25729#discussion_r1029324367.

  The reason why we are adding hundreds of UTXO from different sources when the target
  amount is covered only by one of them is because only SRD returns a usable result.

  Context:
  In the test, we create 1515 UTXOs with 0.033 BTC each, and 1 UTXO with 50 BTC. Then
  perform Coin Selection to fund 49.5 BTC.

  As the selection of the 1515 small UTXOs exceeds the max allowed tx size, the
  expectation here is to receive a selection result that only contain the big UTXO.
  Which is not happening for the following reason:

  Knapsack returns a result that exceeds the max allowed transaction size, when
  it should return the closest utxo above the target, so we fallback to SRD who
  selects coins randomly up until the target is met. So we end up with a selection
  result with lot more coins than what is needed.

ACKs for top commit:
  S3RK:
    ACK 25ab14712b9d80276016f9fc9bff7fb9c1d09635
  achow101:
    ACK 25ab14712b9d80276016f9fc9bff7fb9c1d09635
  Xekyo:
    reACK 25ab14712b9d80276016f9fc9bff7fb9c1d09635
  theStack:
    Code-review ACK 25ab14712b9d80276016f9fc9bff7fb9c1d09635

Tree-SHA512: 2425de4cc479b4db999b3b2e02eb522a2130a06379cca0418672a51c4076971a1d427191173820db76a0f85a8edfff100114e1c38fb3b5dc51598d07cabe1a60
2023-04-20 16:33:39 -04:00
2023-02-27 14:01:14 +00:00
2023-02-13 17:11:15 -05:00
2021-09-07 06:12:53 +03:00
2023-04-20 13:58:00 -04:00
2022-12-24 11:40:16 +01:00
2021-09-09 19:53:12 +05:30
2022-08-23 16:57:46 -04:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.2 GiB
Languages
C++ 63.6%
Python 18.9%
C 13.6%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.7%