666016e56bci: use --usecli in one of the CI jobs (Martin Zumsande)7ea248a020test: Disable several (sub)tests with cli (Martin Zumsande)f420b6356btest: skip subtests that check for wrong types with cli (Martin Zumsande)6530d0015btest: add function to convert to json for height_or_hash params (Martin Zumsande)54d28722batest: Don't send empty named args with cli (Martin Zumsande)cca422060etest: convert tuple to json for cli (Martin Zumsande)af34e98086test: make rpc_psbt.py usable with --usecli (Martin Zumsande)8f8ce9e174test: rename .rpc to ._rpc and remove unnecessary uses (Martin Zumsande)5b08885986test: enable functional tests with large rpc args for cli (Martin Zumsande)7d5352ac73test: use -stdin for large rpc commands (Martin Zumsande)6c364e0c10test: Enable various tests for usage with cli (Martin Zumsande) Pull request description: Fixes #32264 I looked into all current failures listed in the issue, as well all tests that are already disabled for the cli with `self.supports_cli = False`. There are several reasons why existing tests fail with `--usecli` on many systems, the most important ones are: - Most common reason is that the test executes a RPC call with a large arg that exceeds `MAX_ARG_STRLEN` of the OS, which is usually 128kb on linux: This is fixed by using `-stdin` for these large calls (idea by 0xB10C) - they test specifically the rpc interface - nothing to do there except disabling. - Some functional test submit wrong types to params on purpose to test the error message (which is different when using the cli) - deactivated these specific subtests locally for the cli when there is just one or two of them, deactivated the entire tests when there are more spots - When python sets `None` for an arg, the cli converts this to 'null' in `arg_to_cli`. This is fine e.g. for boolean args, but doesn't work for strings where it's interpreted as the string 'null'. Bypass this for named args by not including args in case the value is `None` for the cli is used (it's effectively the same as leaving the optional arg out). - the `height_or_hash` param used in some RPC needs to be converted to a JSON (effectively adding full quotes). - Some tests were marked with `self.supports_cli = False` in the past but run fine on master today - enabled those. In total, this PR fixes all tests that fail on master and reduces the number of tests that are deactivated (`self.supports_cli = False`) from 40 to 21. It also adds `--usecli` to one CI job (multiprocess, i686, DEBUG) to detect regressions. ACKs for top commit: maflcko: re-ACK666016e56b🔀 pinheadmz: re-ACK666016e56bTree-SHA512: 7a1efd212649ca100b236a1239294d40ecd36e2720e3b173a230b14545bb40b135111db7fed8a0d1448120f5387da146a03f1912e2028c8d03a0b6a3ca8761b0
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.
What is Bitcoin Core?
Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.
Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py
(assuming build is your build directory).
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.