Ava Chow 69fc991791 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32606: p2p: Drop unsolicited CMPCTBLOCK from non-HB peer and when blocksonly
55e3a57f22 qa: Avoid UTXO reuse between test functions (Hodlinator)
9c5dd2926a p2p: Ignore CMPCTBLOCK from peer that hasn't sent SENDCMPCT (David Gumberg)
bf9884f4e5 p2p: make blocksonly nodes ignore CMPCTBLOCK messages (David Gumberg)
92cea63c71 test: (Un)solicited invalid cb -> get disconnected. (David Gumberg)
e845e26344 test: p2p: Nodes ignore unsolicited CMPCTBLOCK's (David Gumberg)
8313591715 p2p: Drop unsolicited CMPCTBLOCK from non-HB peer (David Gumberg)
44f377a71f refactor: test: Static assert_highbandwidth_states (David Gumberg)
25457a3272 test: Tighten getblocktxn checks in parallel cb reconstruction test. (David Gumberg)
51dd90fb50 refactor: Merge announce_cmpct_block() defs into one (Hodlinator)

Pull request description:

  Processing unsolicited `CMPCTBLOCK`'s from a peer that has not been marked high bandwidth is not well-specified behavior in BIP-0152, in fact the BIP seems to imply that it is not permitted:

  > "[...] method is not useful for compact blocks because `cmpctblock` blocks can be sent unsolicitedly in high-bandwidth mode"

  See https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0152.mediawiki#separate-version-for-segregated-witness

  This PR disables processing of CMPCTBLOCK messages in three cases:
  $1$. When the block is unsolicited and from a non-HB peer.
  $2$. When this node is running in `-blocksonly` mode.
  $3$. When the peer has not advertised `CMPCTBLOCK` support with a `SENDCMPCT` message.

  Not processing unsolicited blocks slightly raises the cost of discovering a peer's mempool via `CMPCTBLOCK` as described in #28272. As pointed out there, getting an HB slot is relatively easy, so this does not prevent an attacker from doing this, it just slightly raises the bar.

  Probably more important is not processing `CMPCTBLOCK` messages as a `-blocksonly` node. A blocksonly node has a lot less surface area for leaking its mempool since it does no transaction relay, and leaking a blocksonly node's mempool is pretty dangerous since it is very likely to be the origin for all of the transactions in its mempool.

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 55e3a57f22
  w0xlt:
    reACK 55e3a57f22
  hodlinator:
    re-ACK 55e3a57f22
  polespinasa:
    lgtm ACK 55e3a57f22

Tree-SHA512: 118bea55adca01dbd6467ba5ae3adf420d960794a6a2c40dd30fcc7d79aa944e01af0f6dd6bd6ff6d33dc9155171f6f4f497cbd7e8eb6d3c4c89e12740b51c05
2026-07-06 15:52:10 -07:00
2026-07-02 11:37:19 +01:00
2026-02-06 13:40:59 +00:00
2026-07-02 11:38:54 +01:00
2026-07-02 16:33:16 +01:00
2026-05-29 08:59:43 +01:00
2026-04-29 21:50:13 +01:00
2025-12-29 17:50:43 +00:00
2025-06-19 11:22:14 +01:00
2026-06-23 09:25:49 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Languages
C++ 62.8%
Python 18.7%
C 14.9%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.2%