6b059d9dbd
29b124416edoc: add release notes for 32800 (Musa Haruna)5d25a0c28drpc: add `vsize_adjusted` field to getrawtransaction output for mempool transactions (Musa Haruna)eaef8d3111rpc: add `vsize_adjusted` and `vsize_bip141` field to mempool-related RPCs (Musa Haruna) Pull request description: ### Motivation and Problem `CTxMemPoolEntry::GetTxSize()` returns the larger of two values: the BIP 141 virtual size (vsize) and the "sigop-adjusted size." This sigop-adjusted size is used by mempool validation and mining algorithms as a safeguard to prevent overfilling blocks with transactions that approach both the weight and signature operation (sigop) limits in a way that could harm block space efficiency. In the current implementation, the sigop-adjusted size is reported as the "vsize" in RPCs that provide mempool transaction data, such as `getmempoolentry`, `getrawmempool`, `testmempoolaccept`, and `submitpackage`. However, the documentation for these RPCs typically describes this value simply as the "virtual transaction size as defined in BIP 141," without acknowledging the sigop adjustment. Since the reported size may differ from the pure BIP 141 definition, this confuses people as in this [tweet](https://x.com/mononautical/status/1646166180145577990?s=20), discrepancy can be misleading, as the reported size may differ from the pure BIP 141 definition. ### Proposed Solution To resolve this, all mempool-related RPCs now return two separate fields: **vsize_adjusted:** the sigop-adjusted size, i.e. max(BIP 141 vsize, sigop-adjusted size), which reflects the value previously returned under the vsize label and continues to drive mempool acceptance and block template scoring. **vsize_bip141:** the pure BIP 141 virtual size, strictly `ceil(weight/4)`, matching the consensus definition is now reported here in `vsize_bip141` field. `vsize` field in now marked as DEPRECATED and users are advised to use the new `vsize_bip141` field for pure virtual size instead. This means that clients that depends on mempool policy size reported vsize will use `vsize_adjusted`, while `vsize` is now purely BIP 141. Additionally, this PR updates the relevant RPC help text to clearly document the distinction between these two sizes, and adds supporting documentation `doc/policy/feerates-and-vsize.md` to better explain fee rates, virtual size calculations, sigop adjustments, and the mempool policy heuristics. A new field, vsize_adjusted, has also been added to the getrawtransaction RPC result when input information (transaction is in the mempool) is available. Exposing this value provides users with more precise insight into how the transaction’s sigops impact its effective size for policy and fee estimation. Note: This picks up work from the closed [#27591](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27591) Fixes [#32775](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32775) ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK29b124416ehodlinator: re-ACK29b124416eismaelsadeeq: Code review ACK29b124416esedited: ACK29b124416eTree-SHA512: 9322ab1a2f7561b4221fb2bbe9f822c402f845c52a93de14008c1e5bc33e5c6f19ebc647ab6615b7c6be137c76cff6a33c6920818a78813de5632eb88c96a876
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.
What is Bitcoin Core?
Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.
Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.
License
Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be
completely stable. Tags are created
regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.
The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py
(assuming build is your build directory).
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.