fanquake 9564f98fee
Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#27636: kernel: Remove util/system from kernel library, interface_ui from validation.
7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e refactor: Move system from util to common library (TheCharlatan)
7eee356c0a7fefd70c8de21689efa335f52a69ba refactor: Split util::AnyPtr into its own file (TheCharlatan)
44de325d95447498036479c3112ba741caf45bf6 refactor: Split util::insert into its own file (TheCharlatan)
9ec5da36b62276ae22e348f26f88aaf646357d6d refactor: Move ScheduleBatchPriority to its own file (TheCharlatan)
f871c69191dfe1331861ebcdbadb6bd47e45c8b1 kernel: Add warning method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
4452707edec91c7d7991f486dd41ef3edb4f7fbf kernel: Add progress method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
84d71457e7250ab25c0a11d1ad1c7657197ffd90 kernel: Add headerTip method to notifications (TheCharlatan)
447761c8228d58f948aae7e73ed079c028cacb97 kernel: Add notification interface (TheCharlatan)

Pull request description:

  This pull request is part of the `libbitcoinkernel` project https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/27587 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/18 and more specifically its "Step 2: Decouple most non-consensus code from libbitcoinkernel".

  ---

  It removes the kernel library's dependency on `util/system` and `interface_ui`. `util/system` contains networking and shell-related code that should not be part of the kernel library. The following pull requests prepared `util/system` for this final step: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27419 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27238.

  `interface_ui` defines functions for a more general node interface and has a dependency on `boost/signals2`. After applying the patches from this pull request, the kernel's reliance on boost is down to `boost::multiindex`.

  The approach implemented here introduces some indirection, which makes the code a bit harder to read. Any suggestions for improving or reworking this pull request to make it more concise, or even reworking it into a more proper interface, are appreciated.

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    re-ACK 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e (no change) 🎋
  stickies-v:
    Code Review ACK 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e
  hebasto:
    re-ACK 7d3b35004b039f2bd606bb46a540de7babdbc41e, only last two commits dropped since my [recent](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27636#pullrequestreview-1435394620) review.

Tree-SHA512: c8cfc698dc9d78e20191c444708f2d957501229abe95e5806106d1126fb9c5fbcee686fb55645658c0107ce71f10646f37a2fdf7fde16bbf22cbf1ac885dd08d
2023-05-30 14:57:22 +01:00
2023-02-27 14:01:14 +00:00
2023-02-13 17:11:15 -05:00
2022-12-24 11:40:16 +01:00
2022-08-23 16:57:46 -04:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree
Readme 2.2 GiB
Languages
C++ 63.7%
Python 18.8%
C 13.7%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.6%