merge-script 994c17d6c0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#34697: descriptor: fix musig() duplicate key checks and doubled PSBT origin paths
b42f7fade0 descriptor: don't prepend key origins twice (Shuvam Pandey)
7b15e2cb44 descriptor: fix duplicate check for hardened keys (Shuvam Pandey)

Pull request description:

  Fixes #34273.

  Importing a descriptor that uses the same `musig()` participants twice in one
  tapleaf, with different musig subderivations, fails with
  `is not sane: contains duplicate public keys`. It only fails when one of the
  participants is a private key on a hardened path. The all-xpub version of the
  same descriptor imports fine. That's what gave it away.

  The duplicate check (`KeyCompare`) resolves each key expression to a pubkey and
  compares the results. It does this at index 0, and the old code used an empty
  signing provider. With that empty provider, a `musig()` expression can't resolve
  when one of its participants is on a hardened path, because deriving that
  participant needs its private key, so the whole aggregate key comes back empty.
  Two different musig expressions both came back empty, so the check treated them
  as duplicates. The fix derives against the signing provider populated during
  parsing, which holds the private keys, and only compares the expression strings
  when neither side resolves. 151henry151 had suggested looking at the empty
  signing provider on the issue.

  scgbckbone found a second, separate bug in the same descriptors. When another
  expression that reuses those participants is handled in the same expansion, its
  participant origin in the PSBT is added twice, so `m/86h/1h/0h` becomes
  `m/86h/1h/0h/86h/1h/0h` in both the input and output Taproot BIP32 derivation
  maps. `OriginPubkeyProvider::GetPubKey()` now derives into a temporary provider,
  merges it, and writes the corrected origin once, so a later expression can't
  prepend the same origin again.

  Tested:
  ```
  ./build/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test=descriptor_tests
  ./build/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test=miniscript_tests
  ./build/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test=bip328_tests
  ./build/bin/test_bitcoin --run_test=psbt_wallet_tests
  ./build/test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_musig.py --jobs=1
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK b42f7fade0
  scgbckbone:
    ACK b42f7fade0

Tree-SHA512: ab36caa6bc484fa1fc3289c79e9a3d713278d82f80de478e53e1bdbe645037e07776ac798eba085733abc139c11a9dbf0d3f49d3c0eee9632e4ddf33d2242f92
2026-08-24 10:52:18 +01:00
2026-08-21 09:05:27 +01:00

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

https://bitcoincore.org

For an immediately usable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/.

What is Bitcoin Core?

Bitcoin Core connects to the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network to download and fully validate blocks and transactions. It also includes a wallet and graphical user interface, which can be optionally built.

Further information about Bitcoin Core is available in the doc folder.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/license/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but it is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly from release branches to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui repository is used exclusively for the development of the GUI. Its master branch is identical in all monotree repositories. Release branches and tags do not exist, so please do not fork that repository unless it is for development reasons.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled during the generation of the build system) with: ctest. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: build/test/functional/test_runner.py (assuming build is your build directory).

The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is tested on Windows, Linux, and macOS. The CI must pass on all commits before merge to avoid unrelated CI failures on new pull requests.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Description
Languages
C++ 62.8%
Python 18.7%
C 14.9%
CMake 1.2%
Shell 0.9%
Other 1.2%